@user21820 @amWhy @ZacharySelk @Did Now, I know this question is literally the second math.SE question, so yeah yeah historic value, but I really don't think we need this. Would appreciate it if it could be downvoted and deleted.
@SimplyBeautifulArt Gone. I don't care if it is an SE associate. Such lousy questions are worthless.
@Anneliset. Perhaps it was because it was not clear what was your question and what question your question was asking about. Also, you originally had "interpreter" instead of "interpret". That is incorrect.
@Did @amWhy @SimplyBeautifulArt @ZacharySelk @DavidReed @LeakyNun: Please take a look at the utter nonsense linked above. It may be better to ban Math SE from HNQ.
Sometimes, contrary to what a lot of people think, being unfair is actually the better way to go. For an unrelated example, consider that we ought to be unfair to unrepentant murderers and at least jail them so that other people can live in peace. But to address this specific issue here, the main reason for my claim is that the drive-by visitors from other SE sites often know nothing about mathematics and either give rubbish answers or upvote rubbish answers.
Of course, this is just my opinion, and I'm not in any position to attempt to change the SE system.
Also note that drive-by visitors can upvote but cannot downvote (100 association bonus is not enough for the 'privilege' of downvoting), though that doesn't make much difference since they (for above reason and because of rep loss) practically never downvote.
technically fair for murderers would be to violently execute them in the exact same manner they killed their victims so they truly feel the pain the caused
but regardless preventing bad questions from being popular would prevent the issue altogether
after all, the only reasonable purpose of posting homework on se is for the purpose of cheating
@Typhon According to some moral systems, life-for-life is just. I lean towards life imprisonment, because there is the possibility of error on the part of the judge. We can discuss this in more detail in SBA's realm, but for now I need to go. I'll move this there first.
This answer does not answer the question, and its content is too imprecise to be meaningful. No wonder people misunderstand undefinability, because too many do not define definability properly. That user is also a semi-crank who posts nonsense (here and here and here) that need to be deleted.
And for people who don't believe me about the crankiness of that user, see this nonsense and this rubbish. In case they get deleted, as least we have a record here that people can find.
@user21820 I have just looked at it. Was it the question or answers that bothered you? I personally don't take issue with the question. I think questions that involve finding errors in incorrect proofs are extremely valuable actually. Helps sharpen reasoning.
@user21820 Ah nvm. I see you have said you have issues with the answers