« first day (1986 days earlier)      last day (2338 days later) » 

Videonauth
Videonauth
2:09 AM
@Zanna So the link limit for new users is gone? Good wasn't making any sense anyways, spammers gonna spam no matter what, and since they use scripts to drop their spam the link limit didn't apply to them anyways.
 
Videonauth
Videonauth
2:57 AM
 
 
5 hours later…
Videonauth
Videonauth
8:23 AM
deeply sighs It is again close voted as being off-topic despite your edit @Zanna askubuntu.com/q/981487
would you provide a comment to close voters?
If i do it it might seem to be a bit biased.
 
Zanna
Zanna
Well... you voted to close it initially and in your post on Code Review you describe it as borderline on-topic. So, are you surprised that others differ slightly in their opinion? It seems to me that you know better than me what reviewers are thinking. I think this post should be on-topic, because general text-processing questions are on topic, but you think it is borderline. Why so?
The new close voter might have come from your code review question!
 
Videonauth
Videonauth
well it was as it was asking for python first now you removed the python dependency and it got even a new answer solving it in bash
well whatever i cant vote on this anymore and this new close vote is not from me and i as well reopened it again
 
Zanna
Zanna
I will try to write a comment
done
 
Videonauth
Videonauth
8:41 AM
thank you
 
Zanna
Zanna
maybe it will get a reply, even if it doesn't work, and it can be discussed on meta
 
Videonauth
Videonauth
yep
I revised my question on code-review.se
 
Zanna
Zanna
ah that's good, thanks :)
 
SmokeDetector
SmokeDetector
9:32 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at end of body: Python Scrapy Without Splash by amir arabnezhad on askubuntu.com
 
Videonauth
Videonauth
askubuntu.com/q/982694 not sure if this is spam
and smokey only detected it after i made my edits
 
Zanna
Zanna
Smokey just doesn't like link at end of body... I don't think it is spam... seems off-topic though
 
Videonauth
Videonauth
10:08 AM
did you know that linux was inteded to be called freax as it was in the making?
 
Zanna
Zanna
haha no
 
 
2 hours later…
Eliah Kagan
Eliah Kagan
12:00 PM
I would leave this open unless it is a duplicate of something. It was clear enough to answer. In hindsight, my comment should probably be an answer. But now it has one. The user who answered it also voted to close it as unclear... which is strange. Since it was migrated to meta, closing it for any reason except as a duplicate will cause the system to treat it as a rejected migration, which makes no sense in this case.
 
Videonauth
Videonauth
I voted to leave it open tho, its badly worded and without paragraphs a bit hard to read, but it is not unclear
maybe @Zanna could kick it out of review queue with an edit?
 
Zanna
Zanna
I can't, because I voted to close it. But I retracted my vote. The title is quite meaningless. But I don't like to edit angry meta posts
 
Eliah Kagan
Eliah Kagan
12:15 PM
Well, the title contains important information. They really do appear to have thought AU is a forum in the sense of a traditional Internet forum where creating threads is discouraged if you want to talk about a topic someone else is already talking about.
 
Zanna
Zanna
ah I see what you mean
 
Eliah Kagan
Eliah Kagan
 
Zanna
Zanna
absolutely not imho
@Panther MrRoth is not using sudo su to start a root shell, but to start a login shell for another user, ubuntu. For some reason, using sudo to su to this user changes the PATH. When they SSH to that user account on localhost they get a different PATH variable, the one they want. They don't want to change root's environment. But it might have something to do with sudo's secure_path. MrRoth, how did you get the output for the config files after the login commands? I don't understand that... — Zanna Nov 30 at 8:35
but maybe I just don't understand how this case is really the same. It seems to me not at all the same, but I could be totally wrong
 
Eliah Kagan
Eliah Kagan
I'm going to vote to reopen it.
 
Zanna
Zanna
12:32 PM
me too
 
 
1 hour later…
Videonauth
Videonauth
1:51 PM
can someone of you approve that edit so i can edit in the text insted of the picture? askubuntu.com/q/982741/522934
 
Zanna
Zanna
2:03 PM
have "improved" the edit
 
Videonauth
Videonauth
had run that image through ocr and while i was touching up the mishaps of the ocr software the edit happened
 
Zanna
Zanna
:)
 
Videonauth
Videonauth
2:45 PM
just had a small giggle moment as i have read this questions title: askubuntu.com/q/982755 (My initial thought was OMG sky is falling the internet has stopped!) :D
actually thinking of a better title for that question
 
Zanna
Zanna
O.O
 
Videonauth
Videonauth
its just hard to think of a better title when i always start giggling again when i just look at it lol
 
Videonauth
Videonauth
3:32 PM
I dont hink the close reason here applies really :askubuntu.com/q/982752/522934
 
Zanna
Zanna
Isn't it POB in any case, as written?
 
Videonauth
Videonauth
yes but it seems to get closed for being about 18.04 development etc.
but on the other side its aimed directly at canonical hence the tag
and i pinged popey about it in general chat
 
Zanna
Zanna
4:05 PM
 
SmokeDetector
SmokeDetector
4:58 PM
 
Videonauth
Videonauth
5:32 PM
@Videonauth can you edit it to make it clearer what OP means then? I don't understand it, and the answers all say something different and seem to be guessing what OP wants to know. None of them has been upvoted and I don't feel able to upvote any of them. — Zanna 1 min ago
@Zanna he simply wonder what the boot up check messages are and how they are produced.
 
Zanna
Zanna
> I want to know what is this and what are the commands for it.
 
Videonauth
Videonauth
well i edited it just now
now clearer ?
:)
 
Zanna
Zanna
I don't know if that is what they meant
but it makes a reasonable question anyway
 
Videonauth
Videonauth
5:48 PM
I spent enough time in my life working with non german native workers so i learned to read between the lines somethimes to understand their questions
:)
and my guess is that is here the same case
simple language barrier
and if not the OP can still edit his question again
 
Videonauth
Videonauth
6:15 PM
ok im lost, how can i prevent grep from running through /sys and /proc ?
Tried this: grep --exclude-dir \/proc --exclude-dir \/sys -r 'ssl-snakeoil.pem' / but it still wanders into sys and well you know the show, it greps forever
 
Zanna
Zanna
oh afaik the syntax is --exclude-dir=/sys
 
Videonauth
Videonauth
yes and using -R instead of -r 
grep -R --exclude-dir={"/proc","/sys"} "ssl-snakeoil\.pem" /
this seems to do the trick
 
Zanna
Zanna
:)
 
Videonauth
Videonauth
still seems to take a long long time to go through all files on the system
 
Zanna
Zanna
7:11 PM
any dupe target for this question?
is the answer to this question an answer?
what about this question? Is it a dupe of something?
o.O the answer to this question doesn't make much sense to me... I don't really understand the question though. Maybe it will make more sense on a second read
 

« first day (1986 days earlier)      last day (2338 days later) »