« first day (2341 days earlier)      last day (2504 days later) » 
00:00 - 06:0006:00 - 12:0012:00 - 15:0015:00 - 17:0017:00 - 21:0021:00 - 00:00

Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
12:15 PM
I keep forgetting how difficult bf is to program eugh
 
Adám
Adám
@Mr.Xcoder CMC: integer to any string which could be Roman-interpreted back to the given integer. (Or maybe a good main challenge?)
 
Leaky Nun
Leaky Nun
@Adám it's a dupe ofc
 
Adám
Adám
@LeakyNun Really?
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
I think every number has one valid canonical roman form
 
Adám
Adám
@DestructibleLemon Only according to some systems. But that isn't what my CMC is about.
 
Leaky Nun
Leaky Nun
12:25 PM
@Adám so basically "I".__mul__?
 
Adám
Adám
@LeakyNun Hm. Didn't think about that.
How about this:
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
ok I guess
 
Adám
Adám
CMC: Convert integer to shortest possible, purely additive Roman numeral.
1203 → MCCIII
 
Leaky Nun
Leaky Nun
nice
 
Adám
Adám
2017 → MMXVII
 
Leaky Nun
Leaky Nun
12:27 PM
can we take input as string?
 
Adám
Adám
@LeakyNun I can't prevent that.
 
Jim
Jim
@Adám What do you mean by "purely additive"?
 
Adám
Adám
@Jim Output letters must occur in the order MDCLXVI
 
Okx
Okx
so IV would not be valid?
 
Adám
Adám
@Okx Correct, it should be IIII
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
12:31 PM
so a greedy algorithm with the roman numeral values?
 
Adám
Adám
@DestructibleLemon I guess so. What exactly do you mean by greedy? As many Ms as possible, then as many Ds as possible, etc.?
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
that is the technical term
greedy means doing the biggest value that is possible to place in
 
New Meta Posts
New Meta Posts
0
Q: What is a character encoding, exactly?

Socratic PhoenixPreface I've 'failed' twice at this whole golf language design thing, once with JAISBaL and again with Clack. Now that I've had a go twice, I am obviously an expert and am attempting to design the perfect golfing language. One of the things in particular that annoys me about Clack, JAISBaL, Jell...

discussion code-golf
 
Downgoat
Downgoat
@Adám :| this is so lennyable
 
Adám
Adám
@Downgoat Lennyable?
 
Mayube
Mayube
12:43 PM
@Adám so 796 would be DCCLXXXXVI?
 
Adám
Adám
@Mayube Yes.
 
New Sandboxed Posts
New Sandboxed Posts
0
A: Sandbox for Proposed Challenges

Comrade SparklePonypwaS eht tirsf dna tasl setterl fo hace dorw! Or, "Swap the first and last letters of each word!" Your challenge is to, given a string of alphabetical characters in one case and one other character to use as a delimiter, swap the first and last letters of each word. The examples/testcases use ...

0
A: Sandbox for Proposed Challenges

Comrade SparklePonyS-p-e-l-l o-u-t w-o-r-d-s! Given a string of alphabetic characters in one case and one extra character to use as a delimiter, spell out each of the words in the string using another delimiter. The example and test cases use the lowercase alphabet, the space as the string delimiter and - as the ...

 
Mayube
Mayube
@Adám Braingolf; Not golfy, over half of it is printing the characters after figuring out how many of each to print D:
 
Emigna
Emigna
 
Adám
Adám
@Mayube @Emigna This looks like a significant challenge. Maybe I should post to Main?
 
feersum
feersum
12:51 PM
Non-subtracting Roman numbering could be considered a duplicate of a change-making challenge.
 
Emigna
Emigna
@Adám I did a quick search and found this. Seems very similar
if you ignore the parenthesis cases
and that it isn't purely additive
 
Adám
Adám
@Emigna In other words, not a dup at all.
@feersum change-making challenge?
 
Emigna
Emigna
I wouldn't consider it a duplicate, but some might
 
feersum
feersum
You know, like quaters, nickels...
 
New Main Posts
New Main Posts
0
Q: Create ASCII Art with your code

EvorlorCreate ASCII Art with your code. Not your output, but the code itself. The code must compile and run. Infinite loops are acceptable. Comments are not allowed. Example in brainfuck: ----------- [ , , ] [ - - ] [ > ] [ ] [ ..... ] [ + ] ----------- ...

ascii-art popularity-contest
 
Leaky Nun
Leaky Nun
12:54 PM
@EriktheOutgolfer what bottom line?
 
Adám
Adám
@feersum They overlap, so you have to decide to add another quarter and thereby prevent a dime.
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
@LeakyNun I'm not sure if the correct output for aaabbbbbccqrrrssstttttttPPw is: 
              tt
              tt
    bb        tt
    bb        tt
  aabb    rrsstt
  aabbcc  rrssttPP
  aabbccqqrrssttPP
(many leading newlines...)
 
Business Cat
Business Cat
 
Leaky Nun
Leaky Nun
@EriktheOutgolfer read the challenge
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
@LeakyNun no, leading newlines don't appear in the message...
also where's the bottom line?
 
Leaky Nun
Leaky Nun
12:58 PM
@EriktheOutgolfer ctrl+f -> sky
 
Adám
Adám
OK, I'll post it to main.
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
what I meant is that the message is supposed to contain leading newlines...
 
Leaky Nun
Leaky Nun
what line
@Adám after 10 ppl did it in chat?
@EriktheOutgolfer what the **** is the bottom line?
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
@LeakyNun well, on the bottom line, a couple of ws is supposed to be there...since you have w in the input as well
 
Leaky Nun
Leaky Nun
you mean the right line?
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
1:00 PM
the last building basically
it doesn't appear at all
 
Adám
Adám
@LeakyNun Not exactly 10, but I didn't realise it was such a good challenge. It would be trivial for the chatters to post to main, no?
 
Leaky Nun
Leaky Nun
how on earth is that the "bottom" line
@Adám go ahead
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
@LeakyNun confusion
also this errors
 
Leaky Nun
Leaky Nun
he already fixed it
I see no point continuing this discussion
 
PhiNotPi
PhiNotPi
@mınxomaτ no, I didn't hear about that. Can I still or is it too late?
 
Comrade SparklePony
Comrade SparklePony
1:03 PM
CMC: Given a natural number and a list, generate a list from 1 to that number inclusive, but the outputted list should not have the numbers from the list in it. For example, an in put of 5, [3,4] should return/print [1,2,5].
 
Leaky Nun
Leaky Nun
@ComradeSparklePony Jelly, 2 bytes: Rḟ
And no, I won't do it in 10 languages.
 
Riley
Riley
@ComradeSparklePony 05AB1E, 3 bytes: LsK
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
@ComradeSparklePony what if input is 0? should we make range [1..0]?
(hint: 0 is natural number)
 
Comrade SparklePony
Comrade SparklePony
@EriktheOutgolfer 0 won't be in the input.
 
Business Cat
Business Cat
@ComradeSparklePony CJam, 7 bytes: {,:)\-}
Damn CJam is verbose
 
Leaky Nun
Leaky Nun
1:08 PM
@BusinessCat talk about verbose
@ComradeSparklePony can the list contain duplicates?
 
Comrade SparklePony
Comrade SparklePony
@LeakyNun No.
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
@ComradeSparklePony Pyth, 4 bytes: -SQE
probably golfable
damn internet is so slow
 
Okx
Okx
@ComradeSparklePony Neim, 4 bytes: 𝐈Σ₂𝕚
 
Adám
Adám
@ComradeSparklePony APL, 4 bytes: ~⍨∘⍳
 
Jim
Jim
@EriktheOutgolfer You ninja'd me
 
Leaky Nun
Leaky Nun
1:12 PM
yesterday, by Leaky Nun
2 days ago, by HyperNeutrino
2 hours ago, by Erik the Outgolfer
please, "ninja'd" should be restricted to when you actually post the message a split second later than somebody else posting the same message, and then you are the one who is ninja'd
 
Jim
Jim
@EriktheOutgolfer Golfed to 3 bytes: -SE with the list first and the number last
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
yeah...that's what I was thinking of
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
> Some definitions ... begin the natural numbers with 0, corresponding to the non-negative integers 0, 1, 2, 3, …, whereas others start with 1, corresponding to the positive integers 1, 2, 3, ….
So ideally a challenge should specify which definition is intended
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
3 mins ago, by Erik the Outgolfer
probably golfable
@trichoplax then let's make consensus for multiple definitions of a mathematical concept
 
Leaky Nun
Leaky Nun
@trichoplax obviously the one that includes 0 is the standard one
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
1:14 PM
I agree it's obvious, but not that it's that one :P
 
Adám
Adám
@LeakyNun Obviously not.
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
for God's sake, please don't start an unnecessary dispute
 
Leaky Nun
Leaky Nun
@Adám if you use the set-theoretic encoding for natural numbers, it would be natural to start at the empty set and then call that 0, instead of starting at {{}}.
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
@EriktheOutgolfer Since both definition are widely used, I don't think a meta consensus is useful. Some new users will be confused whichever way we decide, so specifying for each challenge seems the only way to avoid that.
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
@trichoplax but is it a consensus?
 
Adám
Adám
1:15 PM
@trichoplax Or let the answerer chose.
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
@EriktheOutgolfer Oh I see - you mean we should have a consensus on meta that the challenge author needs to specify?
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
yeah
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
Yes that might be useful. I suspect many people don't realise there is another definition (I certainly tend to assume "natural numbers" means "positive integers") so it could be handy to have somewhere to point to when a challenge author thinks it is too obvious to specify
@Adám Letting the answerer choose the meaning of the spec sounds like a leaky spec...
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
the "too obvious to specify" part is very common misconception...others may think too obvious too but different
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
Yes exactly - it happens with so many things
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
1:19 PM
also when I read "number" I often assume positive integer
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
I think natural number is slightly worse because when a spec says "number" at least one person will probably say "does that include negative and zero" whereas when a spec says "natural number" most people think their definition is the only one and don't ask for clarification, so the spec doesn't get edited until answers come in and arguments start
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
and the fact we've not already had a consensus is even more shocking...
 
Leaky Nun
Leaky Nun
@trichoplax resists to make a pun out of it
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
@LeakyNun I'm glad you didn't think that was a comment on your specs...
 
Adám
Adám
@trichoplax No, a lot of challenges allow choosing index origin. This isn't any worse, is it?
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
1:28 PM
@Adám not exactly what we're talking about...
natural numbers is just an example of a mathematical concept which can have many different accepted definitions...it could not always be just a matter of setting the index base
e.g. 0^0
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
@Adám Oh I see. No I don't see a problem with leaving an option open. It's just that other challenges might be significantly different with a different definition. So there's a difference between the challenge author saying "choose either" in a challenge where it doesn't matter, and a challenge author saying "natural numbers", genuinely believing that this is unambiguous in a challenge where the other definition breaks the challenge
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
also what trichoplax said, OP might not even be aware of the situation
 
betseg
betseg
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
In short: flexible specs are fine, ambiguous specs are not
 
Stephen S
Stephen S
I always heard in school that natural/counting numbers are 1,2,3,..., whole numbers are 0,1,2,3,..., and integers are ...,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,...
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
1:33 PM
natural numbers==whole numbers
except if we use the first definition
the last definitions for integers is correct
 
Stephen S
Stephen S
@EriktheOutgolfer Right, but I'm saying the first definition is what I learned in school
 
Jim
Jim
@StephenS That's not what I learnt => ambiguous
 
Leaky Nun
Leaky Nun
are we in some pre-18th century era where 0 isn't natural?
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
are we in some prehistorical era where 0 doesn't exist?
 
Stephen S
Stephen S
@Jim Exactly my point :)
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
1:36 PM
Personally I'd rather use "integers", which we all agree on, and qualify with "negative", "positive", "non-negative", or "non-positive"
 
Stephen S
Stephen S
 
Poke
Poke
Anything not explicitly stated in a challenge specification is left up to the answerer. Generally folks will comment with questions... but in code golf you gotta take those byte reductions while you can.
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
@trichoplax but this is not about what you'd use personally...also I dunno if "non-negative" or "non-positive" are unambiguous enough
 
feersum
feersum
You can have 0 of a physical object, so excluding 0 seems totally unnatural to me.
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
and that's why that's a definition of natural numbers
but there's the other definition where the object wouldn't exist at all...there arises the confusion
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
1:38 PM
I mean my answer to the meta question would be "don't use natural numbers, and ask challenge authors to edit to qualified integers"
 
feersum
feersum
@EriktheOutgolfer I don't see the logic in this.
 
Stephen S
Stephen S
couldn't we just use mathematical interval notation? integers in [1, infinity) or something like that
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
@StephenS then why not just say n ≥ 1?
 
Adám
Adám
I used "strictly positive".
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
I think any of these are clear apart from "natural"
 
SIGSEGV
SIGSEGV
1:40 PM
@EriktheOutgolfer Then why not just say n > 0 and eliminate a byte?
 
New Main Posts
New Main Posts
5
Q: Those Greedy Romans!

AdámGiven a strictly positive integer, return the shortest possible Roman numeral using only the additive rule. Output must consist of zero or more of each of the characters MDCLXVI in that order. The number 14 must therefore give XIIII rather than XIV. The characters' numeric values are M=1000, D=5...

code-golf math arithmetic base-conversion roman-numerals
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
@NewMainPosts too late
@trichoplax I think it's time to get to the actual consensus making...all of this is clear evidence we do need it
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
Good point. Who wants to start the meta discussion?
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
me
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
Thanks
 
SIGSEGV
SIGSEGV
1:43 PM
@trichoplax But we cant just say 'non-negativeandalsosomewhatfeelsnatural numbers'
 
mınxomaτ
mınxomaτ
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
wtf I made a bf program and it doesn't work ;_; I'm gonna cry
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
@SIGSEGV I'm suggesting we don't need the word natural at all
 
Downgoat
Downgoat
@betseg ono D: 0/10 discrimination
 
SIGSEGV
SIGSEGV
btw do we want a golflang that's all about Google Assistant
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
1:46 PM
@SIGSEGV I'd say "non negative integers", but there's a meta post about to arrive if you want to discuss it...
 
SIGSEGV
SIGSEGV
@trichoplax sure
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
@SIGSEGV "need" is a strong word
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
wai u do dis bf
 
SIGSEGV
SIGSEGV
@DestructibleLemon if somebody didn't know that bf was a programming language, he/she would think you broke up with your bf
2
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
o
also it turns out my python implementation of bf doesn't work either
dangit
dangit
 
HyperNeutrino
HyperNeutrino
1:49 PM
rip. can I see it?
 
PhiNotPi
PhiNotPi
@mınxomaτ I'm applying now. need to figure out what to write
 
HyperNeutrino
HyperNeutrino
Ooh quantum stuff
looks interesting but I don't think I'd be able to use it rip
oh wait it's hosted over internet?
I might be able to play around with it then (•◡•)
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
it was a really stupid bug
 
HyperNeutrino
HyperNeutrino
oh ok
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
well goddamnit
now I am mad
 
HyperNeutrino
HyperNeutrino
1:53 PM
ono rip
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
well, rip that implementation
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
Doesn't all programming consist of writing stupid bugs, and then finding them?
 
totallyhuman
totallyhuman
That's why birds love programming
The next step tends to be eating the bugs
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
@totallyhuman do they know how to write bugs?
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
o I think I figured it out possibly
 
Business Cat
Business Cat
1:55 PM
I don't know how to write bugs, but I do it anyway
10
 
HyperNeutrino
HyperNeutrino
@DestructibleLemon can i see code
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
no
 
totallyhuman
totallyhuman
:c
 
HyperNeutrino
HyperNeutrino
:o :c
> Though superposition is stronger than a probabilism, it is weaker than actually having an army of 2^N real computers all working on the problem at once.
That sounds amazing (2^N computers for large N :D)
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
o my god I am not very smart sometimes
 
HyperNeutrino
HyperNeutrino
1:58 PM
o look i am very not smart always xD
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
o wait that wasn't the part where the bug is
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
A stream of consciousness becomes even more irritating when you refuse to share the code
 
HyperNeutrino
HyperNeutrino
^ +1
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
o wait is was. ok, will share code
but it will make very long link
 
totallyhuman
totallyhuman
c:
 
HyperNeutrino
HyperNeutrino
2:00 PM
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
I'm sorry
 
totallyhuman
totallyhuman
TFW you realize you didn't even add quote characters to your code page
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
Sorry for all the edits. It turns out spaces at the end of link text break the link
 
HyperNeutrino
HyperNeutrino
:'c SE Chat formatting is really weird
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
2:02 PM
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
@trichoplax almost finishing the post
 
HyperNeutrino
HyperNeutrino
o god what is this meant to do?
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
compile stuff
but it infinite loops or something
 
HyperNeutrino
HyperNeutrino
oh I see
 
totallyhuman
totallyhuman
™
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
2:04 PM
in fact I put in a bit of debug code at the end ([-]) to try ans see if that was issue but it was not
wait
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
@DestructibleLemon Surely it's easy to find the bug when it's all so neatly indented... ;)
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
I did another stupid
I left in a []
I FIXED IT!!
 
totallyhuman
totallyhuman
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
WAIT NEVERMIND
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
@DestructibleLemon This still seems to be listing thoughts and actions...
 
totallyhuman
totallyhuman
2:05 PM
But the awesome hello world answer didn't work on it ;-;
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
OK I will stop now
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
@trichoplax done :)
 
totallyhuman
totallyhuman
I don't know what are the specs of the implementation that that answer uses
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
@DestructibleLemon Thanks :)
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
also I should probably be asleep at the moment
 
Business Cat
Business Cat
2:06 PM
@totallyhuman Should be %= 256 not %= 255
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
I'm sad now
 
totallyhuman
totallyhuman
@BusinessCat oh
 
Business Cat
Business Cat
That's pretty cool though
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
@EriktheOutgolfer +1 & +1
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
I noticed
ooh another +1 on question and answer
 
totallyhuman
totallyhuman
2:08 PM
@BusinessCat shh you saw nothing
 
HyperNeutrino
HyperNeutrino
@EriktheOutgolfer me (•◡•) thanks for addressing that, that's a very good point
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
@DestructibleLemon You don't have to be silent. You can discuss what you're doing with someone, just not the play by play commentary
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
no I'm sad because this is screwed up
and I probably can't fix it soon
 
totallyhuman
totallyhuman
Imagine being silent in a chat room
Totally makes sense
 
HyperNeutrino
HyperNeutrino
Imagine TNB being put into timeout :o
 
totallyhuman
totallyhuman
2:10 PM
It makes as much sense as I am robotic
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
@totallyhuman well, since you're totallyrobot
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
@DestructibleLemon Oh I see. Perhaps it will fall into place after a break from it. I often find sleeping on a problem makes it easier when I return
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
ehh...
well, I guess I have to go to bed
 
trichoplax
trichoplax
@DestructibleLemon See it as an active part of the development process :P
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
@DestructibleLemon yeah you should
 
Destructible Lemon
Destructible Lemon
2:11 PM
ok
seeya
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
goodnight
 
totallyhuman
totallyhuman
ó.ò/
 
PhiNotPi
PhiNotPi
Thoughts on the Ruby programming language?
 
totallyhuman
totallyhuman
String manipulation, puts, inspired by Perl, and Ruby on rails
 
ToxicFrog
ToxicFrog
@PhiNotPi "perl is great, but it doesn't go nearly far enough, nor are its proponents nearly as smug as they could be"
"let's fix that"
 
Okx
Okx
2:22 PM
despite never using it my mum think it's her favourite language only because of the name
 
PhiNotPi
PhiNotPi
Context: looking for a new language to learn.
 
Mayube
Mayube
@PhiNotPi what languages do you know?
 
PhiNotPi
PhiNotPi
Native language was Perl, now mainly use Java, occasionally Python and C when required.
 
Stephen S
Stephen S
@PhiNotPi If you ever need to touch web learning some JS might not be a bad idea
 
Mayube
Mayube
^^
 
Wheat Wizard
Wheat Wizard
2:29 PM
I've been learning Haskell and Its really good.
 
totallyhuman
totallyhuman
Learn them a Haskell for great good!
 
New Meta Posts
New Meta Posts
3
Q: What to do about mathematical concepts with different definitions?

Erik the OutgolferYou must be wondering, why is this a so important subject? Well, take the example where a challenge asks you to take a "natural number" as input. What's a natural number? A non-negative integer, or a positive integer? The same would happen with Fibonacci numbers, do we include the 0 or not? Anot...

discussion policy asking-questions
 
totallyhuman
totallyhuman
That is late
 
PhiNotPi
PhiNotPi
@StephenS I haven't done too much JS (just enough to hack together the OEIS challenge stack snippet from way back). So although I should probably learn more of it, I'm just not interested in web development right now.
 
totallyhuman
totallyhuman
Quick which bracket stands for for exclusive and which stands for inclusive
 
PhiNotPi
PhiNotPi
2:35 PM
Exclusive () inclusive []
 
Dennis
Dennis
@NewMetaPosts Me in set theory: of course 0 is a natural number. Me in analysis: of course 0 isn't a natural number.
12
 
totallyhuman
totallyhuman
B-but 0 is a while number
cowers to stupid inconsistent standards
 
Erik the Outgolfer
Erik the Outgolfer
@totallyhuman no while 0:... will be skipped...but it's a whole number...not sure if natural number though, will you math guys finally decide?!
 
New Main Posts
New Main Posts
2
Q: Keyboard vs Code-Golf?

DaniFoldiIf you've come here, you probably know what code-golf is, and that's what I'm going to assume. Story (I guess) Keyboards are input devices we use all the time. They existed before mice and touch screen, etc. Their fundamentals have not changed: when you press a key down, a signal is sent to ...

code-golf keyboard
 
HyperNeutrino
HyperNeutrino
2:59 PM
How does this look? (It's my about-me website; the stuff about my achievements etc. is just for the purposes of an application; I plan on removing it after I get results back) (cc @Downgoat)
s/achievements/things that make me not as much of a failure lol/
 
00:00 - 06:0006:00 - 12:0012:00 - 15:0015:00 - 17:0017:00 - 21:0021:00 - 00:00

« first day (2341 days earlier)      last day (2504 days later) »