« first day (2248 days earlier)      last day (2680 days later) » 

7:00 AM
@Secret Quantum wrongics?
 
Recently I have a very engineer mindset to problems: If a proof showed something does not work, then ask whether the universe will implode if we nuke the bits that make the proof work so the proof fails
->(binary) division by zero is one example
(for unary division by zero, see Wheels and Meadows)
 
Howdy @EmilioPisanty
 
user228700
7:26 AM
@JohnRennie :-D How was it?
 
Lovely! I feel happier now!
 
user228700
:-) Awesome! I've never tasted pie. How dyou make it?
 
Pie?
 
@JohnRennie You called?
 
user228700
Whoops. U ate cake. But u ate pie too, right?
 
7:30 AM
We had fish pie a few days ago, but that isn't really a pie.
 
user228700
1 hour ago, by John Rennie
I've also eaten large amounts of pumpkin pie and carrot cake - they're vegetables :-)
 
Ah. Despite the name pumpkin pie isn't really a pie. It's a tart.
Pumpkin pie is a sweet dessert pie with a spiced, pumpkin-based custard filling. The pumpkin is a symbol of harvest time, and pumpkin pie is often eaten during the fall and early winter. In the United States and Canada, it is usually prepared for Thanksgiving and Christmas, and is also featured at Halloween. The pie consists of a pumpkin-based custard, ranging in colour from orange to brown, baked in a single pie shell, rarely with a top crust. The pie is generally flavored with cinnamon, powdered ginger, nutmeg, and cloves. Allspice is also commonly used and can replace the clove and nutmeg, as...
 
user228700
Tart-another delicacy I haven't had yet.
 
So it has a pastry base, but no pastry top.
 
user228700
You're speaking in a foreign language, Sir :-P
 
7:32 AM
It's basically a custard tart with pumpkin in the custard
 
user228700
@SirCumference x'D
 
Custard tarts or flans pâtissier are a pastry consisting of an outer pastry crust filled with egg custard and baked. == History == The development of custard is so intimately connected with the custard tart or pie that the word itself comes from the old French croustade, meaning a kind of pie. Some other names for varieties of custard tarts in the Middle Ages were doucettes and darioles. In 1399, the coronation banquet prepared for Henry IV included "doucettys". Medieval recipes generally included a shortcrust and puff pastry case filled with a mixture of cream, milk, or broth with eggs, sweeteners...
 
user228700
@JohnRennie I reiterate: "You're speaking in a foreign language, Sir :-P"
 
user228700
@JohnRennie I see...
 
But then there are dozens, possibly hundreds of dishes from the Indian subcontinent that I've never eaten.
 
user228700
7:34 AM
Same here, actually :-P
 
user228700
Say, dyou celebrate New Years' eve?
 
I don't celebrate it myself.
New Years Eve is a party time and i'm not really a party animal.
 
user228700
Oh, I see...
 
@JohnRennie Eh, you can invite family over
 
I will probably go to bed at 9 p.m. as usual ... then be woken by the fireworks at midnight!!!
 
7:38 AM
Funny story about that once
 
user228700
:-) @Sir: Yeah..?
 
My friend once heard loud bangs in the middle of nowhere, so he hid under the table and started dialing 911.
Then he realized the date was July 4
 
user228700
Aw x'D
 
8:26 AM
Claim: I am specialised in investigating any unatural mathematical objects
 
8:47 AM
I only don't like those who don't get along with me
I actually like those who don't agree with me as long we respect each other
This is because the more they are dissimilar to me, the easier for them to spot something about me that I don;t know about (and vise versa)
Once again that has parallels with quantum stuff: Interference is most significant if the two states are antiphase or in phase
Perhaps my whole life is quantum mechanics itself living like a normal human being after all...
 
hello
 
user228700
I was taking a break and took one of those dumb buzzfeed quizzes to take my mind off of electrodynamics.
 
user228700
The quiz was "We'll guess how old you'll turn in 2017". Somebody guess how much I got.
 
user228700
@Ken: Yello again :-)
 
18?
 
user228700
9:01 AM
Nope. 52.
 
I sympathise about the electrodynamics. As far as I can see the subject exists only to allow examiners to make up unrealistically complicated problems to set students.
52?
 
user228700
@JohnRennie :-/
 
user228700
YES, FIFTY TWO! -__-
 
But then I've long believed that all women are born middle aged while all men naturally settle at a mental age of 13.
2
This just proves my theory :-)
 
user228700
:-P I really doubt that.
 
9:05 AM
OK, that's true ... men's mental age is actually only 12.
 
user228700
Haha, I doubt that too! :-) I have a friend who's about 30 but is really only 18.
 
@DanielSank Well, HK people are under some really crazy pressure, given suicides in the uni and the primary school and high school ocassionally. In addition, HK has the longest work hours on the planet, everyone is pretty much ****ed
and not to mention, the political instabilities and stuff and stuff
australia people are better and more or less similar to the western countries
 
@Kaumudi.H he's an alien doing a good impression of a human male except for the mental age. Ask him if he thinks farting and belching is funny. If he says no then he's definitely an alien.
 
user228700
I also know the answer to both of those questions and they are both no. He's my best friend and I haven't fully ruled out the possibility that he is an alien just yet. He's the one who wanted to thank you, dyou remember? :-)
 
That's OK. Aliens are nice guys too. But if he suddenly extrudes a mucus coated tentacle with a mouth on the end of it full of sharp teeth that might be a good time to make your excuses and leave.
 
9:13 AM
You obviously watched too much aliens and predators
 
user228700
Ugh. Your description has woken up memories from the time I watched Species (1 and 2 in a row! Seriously, wtf was I thinking?!) and you don't how hard it was to bury them deep down.
 
I haven't seen Species, but it sounds fun. I wonder if my niece wants to watch it ...
 
user228700
 
user228700
Dyou still wanna watch it?
 
Eeeeeeeeeek!
@Kaumudi.H yes, of course. Mental age 13 remember.
 
user228700
9:17 AM
@JohnRennie Ah. I regret having watched it. It's far too graphic for a 10 year-old to have watched on a lazy summer afternoon :-( I read the description and it sounded like fun but things went downhill from there pretty fast. It was gripping too, so I watched both movies! Stupid marathon on the stupid channel.
 
Cor it has semi-naked women in (also semi-reptilian but who's counting? :-)
 
user228700
What's "cor"?
 
user228700
Yeah. She basically has sex with a bunch of people and turns into a terrible alien mid-coitus. I don't remember what her objective was. But uuuugh, I was 10, somebody symptathise with me :'-(
 
user228700
9:21 AM
@JohnRennie Oh, wow, I've literally never heard that before.
 
I think I've just gone off watching the film :-)
 
user228700
:'-( Okay. Bye.
 
@Kaumudi.H No-one in the UK says cor seriously these days.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Ah, okay.
 
user228700
Good luck feeling happy again after watching the film!
 
user228700
9:28 AM
@JohnR: Awesome. You're gone. GOOD LUCK FEELING ANYTHING OTHER THAN DREAD AGAIN!!!. There, I've done my job.
 
I was just reading the story identification questions on the SF Stack exchange to see if there are any I can answer.
However it's not looking good ...
 
9:41 AM
@Kaumudi.H I cannot seemed to find any transcript of that nature other than Balerka walking you through surjective and injective functions
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Oh, so movie? :-P
 
user228700
@Secret The day before. DanielS and me.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie I once read a whole series about these kids having magical powers doing stuff but I can't remember the name for the death of me :'-(
 
I'm unlikely to watch either of the Species films, regardless of what Natasha Henstridge gets up to in her birthday suit, simply because I rarely watch films.
 
user228700
Haha, okay. Ooh, have u read the Gatekeeper series by Anthony Horowitz? It's excellent.
 
9:50 AM
No. My niece might have as she's a big fan of the Alex Rider books.
 
user228700
Ohh. I haven't read those.
 
The last few books I've read are:
Essel Pratt - Sharkantula
Ernest Cline - Ready Player One
Gabriel Squailia - Viscera
Bradley P Beaulieu - The Burning Light
Cory Doctorow - The Things that Make Me Weak - novella
Adam Christopher - Mad to Kill
Warren Ellis - Normal - novella
Daniel Polansky - A City Dreaming
Stephen Palmer - The Girl With Two Souls
 
user228700
The Gatekeeper series is really, really good tho.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Nope, haven't read any of them. Wait, oh, I bet you have a list. Don't you? Some sort of catalogue?
 
Yes, there really is a book called Sharkantula, and yes it really is about a mutant hybrid of a great white shark and a tarantula.
It isn't a very good book ...
 
user228700
9:53 AM
x'D I see. I was intrigued by the name so I was just googling it...
 
user228700
And coming up with nothing :-/
 
@Kaumudi.H I keep a list of all the books I read but I don't keep any catalogue of all my books, mainly because there are too many of them.
And people keep writing new books faster than I can read them :-)
 
user228700
I see...
 
> the protagonist, Matthew Freeman, is hunted by a Cult who want to conduct a blood sacrifice on him to blast open a portal using a combination of nuclear physics and black magic, to unlock another dimension which is holding a group of ancient evil demons captive.
 
user228700
O_o Weird...Nuclear physics and black magic?!
 
9:56 AM
Quantum field theory is black magic, so at least Horowitz got that right :-)
 
user228700
Omg, that's the description for the gatekeeper series, isn't it?! x'D
 
It is!
 
user228700
I don't remember any nuclear physics, wtf! :-o
 
user228700
Wait, this is the first book?
 
Though I found it under The Power of Five. Apparently it had different names in different parts of the world.
 
user228700
9:58 AM
Ah, yes, there was something about a nuclear reactor...
 
The Power of Five (also known as The Gatekeepers in the US) is a series of five fantasy and suspense novels, written by English author Anthony Horowitz and published between 2005 and 2012. It is an updated re-imagining of Horowitz's Pentagram series, which the author had left unfinished in the 1980s. The series is published in the United Kingdom by Walker Books Ltd and in the United States by Scholastic Press. The novels deal heavily in the occult and examples of things such as human sacrifice and blood rituals are major plot elements, such as in the first book, where the protagonist, Matthew Freeman...
 
user228700
Only the first book tho.
 
user228700
Yeah, that.
 
user228700
I read it 3 years ago but yeah, the first book has something to do with an abandoned nuclear reactor.
 
user228700
9:59 AM
@JohnRennie Wow :-P I see...
 
I recommend you never read that book. In fact if you see it run away screaming :-)
 
user228700
Back to the power of five for a second, I want to emphasise how amazing it is!
 
user228700
Okay, that description makes it sound really really weird but that's just the first book.
 
user228700
Plus, it's not that weird!
 
I'll mention it to my niece. I suspect the series may appeal to some age ranges more than others.
 
user228700
10:01 AM
Yeah :-/ Although, you did just read Sharkantula x'D
 
@Kaumudi.H it's a bit of a long story ...
 
user228700
How u ended up reading it?
 
I saw the book and posted on Facebook saying I couldn't believe anyone had written such a crap book
But then the author replied (very politely) saying he hoped I would enjoy it (oops)
 
user228700
Oh God :-o :'-(
 
So I felt honour bound to buy a copy and read it
 
user228700
10:03 AM
But indeed, it is a "crap book"?
 
And it was ruuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuubish!!! Though I didn't tell the author that.
 
user228700
Oh God, that really sucks. I mean, I'm sorry you had to read it but you've got to sympathise with the author too. How did he/she even find your post?!
 
I Honestly I don't know how he found me. I have only a small Facebook presence so I'm very surprised he found it.
I think the book was meant as a parody, but to work well parodies need to be witty and funny.
And Skarkantula is neither.
 
user228700
Wow. That's crazy.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie :-( I see...
 
10:06 AM
Oh well :-)
 
user228700
@JohnR: This is a strange question, but if I like, die and stop coming online, would u like, want my parents to bring you up to speed about my death? Just in case :-P
 
I suspect your parents would have more on their minds ...
 
user228700
:-P Sure, yeah, but I'm not talking about "Oh, she died, let's update John". Eventually, I mean. Anyhoo, okay, that's settled, then :-P
 
I would probably just assume you'd decided to study biology instead - that's a sort of death :-)
 
user228700
Oh God x'D
 
user228700
10:14 AM
Anyway, I feel like I'd want to know if people I've known here suddenly pass...but I suspect there would be no way to know and that's really really sad :-/
 
You're unusually morbid today. You probably ought to stop learning about hypreconjugation if these are the side effects :-)
 
user228700
x'D What? No, I'm not! What else have I said that sounded even remotely...macabre?
 
Death or electrodynamics. That's ... actually a tough choice :-)
 
user228700
:-P Hey, electrodynamics isn't half bad. I actually really like EMI.
 
But then after I die I might go to Hell and discover that it's an eternity of exams on electrodynamics.
 
user228700
10:19 AM
That sounds terrible. Good luck! :-P
 
Ok I think I can understood the logic, though I can also see that if we don't have some conditions to restrict the possible $y$ like those parabola cases that you encountered, then we cannot really find the range that way without actually knowing the function values. $\sin(x)=y$ is a good example of that even though we can define the relation $\sin(y)=x$
However, I suppose for any function $f$ and its inverse relation $g$ (this is more general than an inverse function, something along the lines Danielsank is mentioning), if the domain of the function is the range of the inverse relation and vise versa, then the trick will work at finding the range
Graphically, at least for real functions of one variable, that will be exactly as how danielsank illustrated
The nice thing is that the condition mentioned above for inverse relations and functions always work for all polynomial functions, thus it explains why your book's method works
 
 
1 hour later…
11:29 AM
Can someone point some didatic material on where I can get the feeling of what is a particle distribution function?
even the definitions I find seems weird
to get the number of particles in a given point in the velocity and position space, do I have to take the indefinite integral?
since the integral has no boundaries, what is it supposed to mean?
 
@lvella if you have a density over a real space (meaning a d-dimensional vector space on the real numbers), then the number of particles at a given point is usually zero - because points have zero measure. You usually need to integrate over a small volume (with nonzero measure) to obtain the number of particles in that volume
 
Yes, I though so. But look at the fisrt paragraph in wikipedia article about particle distribution functions: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distribution_function
is that integration from -inf to +inf, in every variable?
 
you mean in the first two formulas? Yes, I'd believe so
in the end, it's just the normalisation requirements
 
yes, the first two formulas
what normalisation requirements? I am trying to understand the discretization used in lattice-boltzmann method
 
11:45 AM
ah well, in lattice boltzmann (which I am no expert in) we are dealing with a discrete lattice, therefore discrete point sets and then a point does probably need to have a nonzero measure
 
yes, but it can be dicretized from the continuous equations
 
in non-lattice theory, I just want the integral over the whole phase space (i.e., velocity and space) to yield all the particles there are
 
that step is what I am strugling with
 
that's the second requirement
the first one is that by integrating out the velocity degrees of freedom, we obtain a distribution function in space
a bit like saying "if we do not care about the velocities of the single particles, there is a number density in space"
 
I guess I am getting it.
I got confused by the lack of limits of integration
 
11:53 AM
that's an annoying notation, I agree
what book are you learning lattice boltzmann with?
 
None for now. I started with article "Theory of the lattice Boltzmann method: From the Boltzmann equation to the lattice Boltzmann equation", but I guess I'll have to get their reference 16 "An Introduction to the Theory of the Boltzmann Equation".
 
I read into a lattice boltzmann book for a PhD interview - Wolf-Gladrow; it was nice to read - so if you're searching for alternatives/introductions, you might want to check that out too :)
 
I don't really know where to go, because all background I have is classical CFD, based on Navier-Stokes and macroscopic properties
Thanks.
 
I remember they first introduced and motivated the lattice boltzmann method and then showed that it agrees with navier stokes afterwards
 
12:40 PM
 
user228700
@JohnR: Guess what?! Well, it's not that exciting, but I'm going to order a chocolate pizza today :-P
 
1:16 PM
chocolate pizza...hmm, sounds good
 
@Kaumudi.H I'm interested to hear what it's like
I have just eaten a pizza in fact. With smoked ham and Polish sausage (no veg)
 
1:35 PM
hmm, finally went through the transcript
quite interesting conversation
 
user228700
1:49 PM
@JohnRennie I see. I'm waiting for my order right now. It looks like it's going to be awhile :-(
 
user228700
Hi, @Heather :-) Yes, it sounds good. I will post a picture when I get it.
 
there should be a hat for editing a gazillion posts.
 
@heather There's badges for editing already
 
@ACuriousMind, yeah, I know =P just being early-morning grumpy at a few posts
 
2:19 PM
An interesting take on answering:
-1
A: Antimatter and annihilation of light and black light

ShuddaBeenCodinPerhaps I'm misunderstanding your statement, but in order to 'annihilate' two photons you must have a reaction between an equivalent quantity of antiphotons, which are essentially photons with different charges and leptons, which i link to spin, which I assume is phase. When they annihilate, they...

Ending it with "Boom"
 
2:31 PM
@DanielSank, it's developing to bad-question-and-answer-itis
 
@heather It?
 
Yes, I'm not sure that makes sense to me.
Also: this was a really good game because of the improbability of coming back to win it in the 2nd half.
Until about the 5 minute mark in the 3rd quarter, Arkansas had a >90% probability to win. Then they turned over the ball a few times that led to touchdowns
 
2:55 PM
@DanielSank you diagnosed me the other day =P
Dec 23 at 15:56, by DanielSank
Let's see how bad your bad-question-itis is.
 
Got it.
Hey @heather, funny story: we made that scheme t-shirt design. Then I left it on the website with a recovery code so I could actually order a few later. It's been a while, and I just got an email from threadless with a 30% off code.
Moral of the story: if you want something from threadless, design it and then wait a while.
Also, I just got a hat called "6" and I have no idea why.
 
3:11 PM
@DanielSank, well that's good (that it's cheaper now). I have to ask my mom again tonight about whether or not I can get it, she said she'd think about it and i think just forgot about it. =)
 
Whatcha doing today? I'm trying to decide what project to resume.
 
i'm going to keep reading about the bit-flip code, keep reading some books i've got to finish over break, and work more on the quantum computer simulation code, i think.
i'm also going to spend some quality time being annoyed at having to go back to school on tuesday =P
 
hahaha
Is school more annoying than useful?
(I definitely felt like it was some times)
 
at this point the only class i'd define as anywhere near useful is geometry, but it goes pretty slowly
 
hmmm, I see.
 
3:19 PM
and then next semester i've got an engineering elective
which should be good
but other than that.
 
Well, hopefully in high school you'll have more freedom. College is awesome because you get to do mostly whatever you want.
 
yeah, we were doing this four-year plan thing for highschool, just to see what classes were offered, and it's going to be awesome
 
Good!
When I was in high school, I wound up taking calculus when I was a junior. The only math course after that was AP statistics and at the time I was pretty sure I'd hate statistics and I didn't want to take it.
(I was probably right. The way they teach stats in high school has little to nothing to do with the part of statistics I like)
Anyway, there was this Romanian woman on the math staff who had a masters or PhD in math from her home country.
She knew her stuff, so I asked if she could teach us multivariable calc.
 
::@BernardoMeurer falls in love::
 
^ AHAHAHA
 
3:22 PM
i couldn't resist that one
 
She said yes, and the principle agreed to let her do it as long as I could get twelve people to sign a thingy saying they'd take the course.
So I got twelve people to sign.
 
cool!
 
Then the next year comes around and only six of us actually take the class ;)
 
did she still teach it?
 
Last week, I went back to my high school and found her.
Yeah, she taught it.
It was a moving experience. Her multivariable calculus course now has forty students.
 
3:23 PM
wow
that's....
 
They love it so much that each year the class takes a group photo with a theme!
 
that's pretty amazing
 
They had custom shirts for the course one year!
 
=D
 
Yeah, I was really happy that I went and talked with her.
 
3:24 PM
at the highschool i'll be going to, there's programming classes and engineering classes and physics classes and math classes and apparently senior year i can do this dual-enrollment thing and take college classes and its block scheduling so i can take two full year courses in one year without them overlapping
and so the teachers were like "try to get an idea of what you'll take each year" because its required by the state of Iowa or something
 
What's block scheduling?
Is that where you don't have each class every day?
 
sort of
i don't understand all the details
 
but the important part is that the periods (blocks) are longer so you can take a 1 year course in a semester, for instance
 
Lol, here's a review I just found on that math teacher:
"Great and caring if you really get to know her. If you're unsure about her, take MVC and you won't regret it. Unlike her other courses, MVC goes much slower and is actually so enjoyable that I'm not even sleepy in the mornings anymore. Worship the parallelepiped!!!"
@heather woah
 
3:26 PM
@DanielSank lol
@DanielSank yeah
or a 1 semester course in a quarter
for example, i can take AP Physics I and II in the same year
::chorus of angels sings "Hallelujah"::
or AP Calc I and II the same year
or what have you
 
@heather I'm not sure what that means. Sounds like the system has changed.
Not surprising...
 
what's different about it?
I think my mom said she had AP classes as a kid
 
Well, we had two AP physics courses, but you only took one of them.
 
oh
huh
 
They were called "AB" and "BC". Not sure what that's about.
 
3:29 PM
maybe BC was the advanced version of AB or something? But they're AP courses, they're advanced by default...
strange
 
Meh, yeah I think BC was "moar material" or something.
Whatevs.
So, I have another funny story from going back to my high school.
 
these you're supposed to take consecutively
 
Oh, interesting.
 
@DanielSank ooh, storytime!
 
Yeah, so I found one of my physics teachers.
We talked a bit and then he showed me a shred of paper on the bulletin board in the physics classroom.
It said:
Dear Mr. Patt and Mr. Thompson, $$\frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{q}} \right) = \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial q}$$ wut?
 
3:32 PM
wat
 
It was in my handwriting.
 
you wrote that note?
 
It's the Euler-Lagrange equation of motion. It's like $F = ma$ but for more abstract systems.
@heather Yep.
 
oh, okay
@DanielSank that's fabulous
 
I don't remember it, really, but it was definitely my writing.
Amazing they kept it all these years!
 
3:34 PM
yeah =)
why were you visiting your highschool, btw? I didn't realize you could visit like that...
 
@heather I dunno... I was going for a walk around the neighborhood park and I saw a kid with a backpack walking home. I figured classes must have just got out, so I could probably catch my old teachers.
 
oh, that's cool =)
 
Yup. Caught two of the three I was hoping to find.
The other was my old bio teacher. She was incredible. One day she brought the respiratory system of a goat to the classroom (I guess she got it from a butcher).
She stuck a vacuum cleaner into the trachea and turned it on and the thing went "BAAHH!" like a goat.
My goodness, I learned how mechanical living beings really are that day!
 
oh gosh, that's kind of creepy, actually
 
Yeah but I'll never forget it.
 
3:37 PM
i'm sure!
 
Thanks for listening. It's fun to share these stories :D
Yo anyone know what the 6 hat is for?
 
no idea, but i got it
 
hmmmm
 
i don't think it's got a description for it on the secret hats meta post either
let me check
 
The meta doesn't know.
 
3:41 PM
IIRC its about deleting comments
 
i also got the don't want to taco bout it hat
for some reason
meta doesn't have the answer for that either.
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform orly?
@heather Do you want to try to discuss how you got it, or do you not want to taco bout it?
::hides::
 
@DanielSank, ::sighs::
 
Whatever, you should hear the stuff I put up with at work.
 
taco is about editing posts and leaving the edit summary empty
 
3:45 PM
There are three certified punmakers in the office.
@AccidentalFourierTransform How U know?!
 
23 hours ago, by AccidentalFourierTransform
@DanielSank well, Im literally "Just Here for the Hat(s)"
hats is life
 
Doesn't answer my question.
 
oh, then no wonder i got it
 
I just edited a post with no explanation to test your theory.
 
i do that all the time, though i shouldn't
bet you'll get it @DanielSank
 
3:48 PM
@DanielSank you have to do it a couple of times
 
@DanielSank lol, nice
 
or three, I dont know
lets say, several. Do it till you get it
 
I just did three or four.
This is a duplicate, right?
0
Q: Can the physics of quantum mechanics apply to macroscopic objects?

Alex The Science CatI was wondering, can the laws of quantum mechanics apply to everyday objects like pencils or apples?

 
that seems like that should definitely be a duplicate of something
 
3
Q: What's the boundary of microscopic world and macroscopic world?

user931In other words, what's the maximum size of a Quantum denizen upto which it shows Quantum behaviors? How big do I need to create a molecule (or, collection of molecules) so that Feynman's multiple path and multiple history would no longer be applicable to it? In a sense, Feynman's multiple path an...

or
1
Q: Explain why quantum behavior is not observed in daily life

kwei ChangPeople always ask: How come we don't see any "Wave" attached to a classical object such as a car? You always see the object in the same place without any uncertainty. I am sure there are answers, but please use the simplest language understandable by general public.

or even
2
Q: Quantum mechanics in macroscopic systems

nnafdI don't understand the superposition principle in quantum mechanics or the collapse of wave-function (I think it's impossible for me to understand it) My question is: Is it possible to demonstrate the quantum mechanical behaviour (Superposition and wavefunction collapse, etc.) in some macroscop...

 
3:53 PM
yeah
wow
those all seem like they themselves could be duplicates of each other
 
and
4
Q: Can actual quantum effects occur on a macro scale?

user991710I apologize if this question is posted on the wrong portion of the website, but I knew no better place to ask. I've come to see that some effects, such as super-conduction may happen at either extremely low temperatures, or at extreme temperatures (the recent discovery of superconducting iron in...

yeah, people ask that question very often
and "do we really need complex numbers in QM?"
incidentally, you know the answer to that question: complex numbers can be emulated with real (rotation) matrices, and therefore there is no intrinsic need for complex numbers, its just convenient
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform huh, that's true
=D
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform Yeah. The structure is needed though.
$[x, p] \propto i$ is important.
 
well yeah, you need something. The point is that you can write everything without ever using the symbol $i$
 
Whether you want a matrix or whatever, you still need that basic relation.
Right, and we could write real numbers as limits of sequences too ;)
 
3:57 PM
what does that infinity sign with a chunk cut out mean?
 
I once formulated QM using only the axiom of choice and Peano axioms
 

« first day (2248 days earlier)      last day (2680 days later) »