Typesetting my chemistry thesis using mhchem, I make semi-frequent use of the option to escape to text mode using {}, especially to typeset hyphens in the midst of chemistry like in the following way: \ce{6{-}Me}. The output should be:
6-Me
However, after the addition of a word in Hebrew, t...
yeah at least I don't have those problems. my co-supervisor is vice rector for research at our university, once I drop his name everything is possible.
I was wondering that like whenever I boil milk I just have to keep standing in front of it to make sure that I don't waste any milk but then I was wondering like Why does it even overflow ? In case of water it doesn't happen. What makes it to behave like this ?
How can we find among the following solutions which remains neutral after electrolysis .
$CuSO_4$
$AgNO_3$ $K_2$$SO_4$ $NaCl$
My try
With (A) copper sulphate the copper comes out as copper metal so that doesn't change the pH, while at the other electrode the sulphate forms sulphuric acid. So...
@AaronAbraham Should be possible; the question is rather why or why not do this. Do you have trouble with a user there, then there might be a deeper problem at hand.
@Martin-マーチン You might laugh if I said I felt I was being stalked (Unrelated: glares at @Kaumudi). Nah, it isn't anything serious...but I like that 'no-nonsense' response of yours ;) As typical of you Mods. ^_^
I actually wanted to change my name to paracresol and replace my display photo with a black seal...but I think that'd piss @ortho off XD... Pissing a Mod. off is no joke ._.
@hBy2Py However I don't get the 'snake' which was used instead of Pi 0_0
@koolman This is exactly what you keep doing to me ;P
The user name field already has a filter that removes the Unicode ♦ character (and some look-a-likes) used to identify moderators. Users are not allowed to spoof this as part of their username.
This seems like a reasonable guideline to me. Intending to deceive the community by making yourself ou...
@koolman "Wrong news"? Apart from the time in the 3th grade I told everyone the world was going to end by 2012 and got them to throw to pool in for a pizza party before we 'die' [in the midst of the commotion, I managed to get away with paying for my share 3:) ]...I haven't spread any "wrong news" as of yet ಠ_ಠ
@AaronAbraham There are lots of things that would be fun to do on SE as a joke, but that have too many nefarious implications and so they're either made impossible by SE design or slammed down upon by various levels of mods if anyone does them.
@hBy2Py I actually really want to create a new account, and suspend it for fun just to see how it looks like "from the other side". The issue is that this notifies all the other mods and I don't really want to spam their inboxes with rubbish like this, haha
Yeah. This place has had quite a number of years to evolve and I get the feeling that nearly all the possibly-harmful stuff that users can do have been stripped away.
For every restrictive feature in SE, there's someone that's used it for something nefarious.
Say, … I’m using the Ubuntu software-centre distributed TeXLive. Can I update a package by downloading the .sty file from CTAN and then simply replacing the existing one or is that bound to fail?
If worst comes to the worst, copy the system .sty into the current directory, replace the system spot with the downloaded one and what the hard drive explode …
In that solution, you won't find S8. H2CO3 and S8 aren't in the same level. One is a product of a reaction that's happening there, and the other is just not there
Theoretically, you could probably say that. However if you don't want to be laughed at, I'd recommend you subsequently specify that H2CO3 (aq) decomposes into H2O + CO2.
Aqueous carbonate solutions contain four different solute species:
$\ce{CO2(aq)}$
$\ce{H2CO3}$
$\ce{HCO3-}$
$\ce{CO3^2-}$
The equilibrium for the hydration reaction
$$\ce{H2O + CO2(aq) <=> H2CO3}\tag1$$
lies to the left. The corresponding equilibrium constant $K$ at $25\ \mathrm{^\circ C}$ ...
Well, you can solve a lot of those questions if you understand basic things like nucleophilicity/electrophilicity, stability of cations/anions/radicals/.... and so on
I don't think that there are such simple rules that it would be easier to use those. Organic Chemistry is a lot of just learning by heart, but if you actually understand the "logic" behind it it will get extremly easy to "remember" all those mechanisms, because you will be able to reproduce it even if you remember only parts of it.
For swern for example I know the starting materials, I know DMSO reacts first with oxalyl chloride (and I know how that one usually reacts) and then with the alcohole and somehow base is involved. This leads to two reasonable mechanisms
but well, years of teaching that stuff in labs helps too:-D
I mean if you know those rules you don't have to learn by heart the reactions
I would prefer to have a lesson with rules and example than all about alcohols, amines, ester, organometallic ...
Obviously only rules will be tricky we all need to do things on example
I just prefer to think by myself first and correct if it's wrong
Because you don't need to have a lesson in which the teacher gives you mechanism of Shapiro reaction to do it by yourself if you have some habits in organic chemistry
I second that. But the Shapiro reaction is actually a pretty nice example, because you can solve that with very basic knowledge. All you need to know is identify the two most acidic protons and know that tosyl is a good leaving group.
yes, ofc you can determine the quality of the leaving group by looking at resonance structures too. Those are just burned into my brain so I don't even think about this usually:D
my book says "Increasing [Y] (the incoming ligand concentration) will NOT lead to saturation kinetics with I (interchange mechanism) as predicted when D (dissociative mechanism) is operative". Does this mean no pseudo-first order rate constants for Id?
basically I was given rate constants for exchange of a chromium (III) complex with the solvent as a ligand, for three different solvents
they all had units s-1
so I figured it was the pseudo first order case of Dd mechanism... and I figured it wouldn't be Id since Id is bimolecular, but then my friend told me that small 3d ions generally follow the Id mechanism and she argued that the bimolecular Id mechanism could follow pseudo first order kinetics anyways.
does "saturation kinetics" mean pseudo-first order rate laws? If so, does that mean no first order rate constants for Id mechanisms?
Well, if it's usually second order then pseudo first order is possible, no matter what. The question is if your interchange is second order, sind something like ML <-> M -> ML' might not be second order.
saturation kinetics is a term I've only heard in enzyme kinetics, where it means more substrate doesn't increase rate
in pseudo first order there's no saturation kinetics, more of the excess substrate equals higher rate
the thing is that my book specifically talks about the Dd mechanism being able to exhibit pseudo-first order kinetics when [incoming ligand]>>>>[complex]
but the book doesn't mention pseudo-first order kinetics for Id mechanisms (which are bimolecular), however I figure it could happen.
ah ok I think this is Id just because it's a small d3 ion
but I still want to know what "The I and D mechanisms can be differentiated in principle since increasing [Y] will not lead to satura- tion kinetics with I as predicted when a D mechanism is operative." means