I just realized now that this room is called 'The Sphinx's Lair' and not 'The Sphinx's Liar'... Always thought it was some kind of joke I didn't get. This is embarrassing, so I'm posting it here :P
3
user61230
12:47 AM
@Randal'Thor The first time I saw one of these was in person, and I was blown away, legitimately counting the spikes.
I thought that what defined fractals was having "fractional" -- really, non-integer -- dimension. So if you built something in stages like the Koch snowflake, but managed enough variety in the ways each stage was derived from the last, so that it isn't self-similar, it'd still be fractal.
@ABcDexter Lol for that link you posted on my answer... I finished The Alchemist just a week ago. That quote was the primary reason I posted that answer.
@RosieF Sure, but how can you define a fractional-dimension object if it's not self-similar? Using self-similarity is the easiest way to define dimension. You need 4 squares to make one 2 times as large, so the dimension of a sphere is log_2(4)=2. You need 3 Sierpinski triangles to make one 2 times as large, so the dimension of a Sierpinski triangle is log_2(3).
> A fractal is a natural phenomenon or a mathematical set that exhibits a repeating pattern that displays at every scale. If the replication is exactly the same at every scale, it is called a self-similar pattern. An example of this is the Menger Sponge. Fractals can also be nearly the same at different levels. This latter pattern is illustrated in the small magnifications of the Mandelbrot set. Fractals also include the idea of a detailed pattern that repeats itself.
So maybe it has to have structure on every scale (for some rigorous definition of the term) but not necessarily exactly the same structure?
Supposing there were two ways to replace a straight line segment by a longer polyline: the one in the Koch snowflake and some other (perhaps 5 segments of length 1/4, say). Symbolise them by 0 and 1, and let the binary rep of sqrt(2) indicate the order they're applied...
... assuming that the prevalences of 0 and 1 -> 1/2 each in the limit, do we now have a fractal of well defined dimension? sqrt(log_3(4)*log_4(5)), is it?
Or, to be really devious and avoid such nice things as limits and convergence, 010011000011110000000011111111 (run lengths double)
Or that transcendental number which is all 0's except a 1 in the (n!)th place for each n. The fractal you get that way would probably have the same dimension as if it was all 0's, but still wouldn't be exactly self-similar.
'A hint when composing riddles: A good riddle usually has some kind of play on words or alternate meaning, so that you have to interpret part of the riddle in a non-obvious way in order to solve it. It is also unambiguous; when you have the solution, it should be obvious that the solution is correct. – GentlePurpleRain♦'
@BeastlyGerbil Most of the lines seem like they do involve wordplay or alternate meanings - I mean, whatever the solution is, it can't be winter and summer and spring. And the solution may very well be obvious once it's found. I really can't see why that riddle has a score of -14 (!!!) and 3 votes to close. Looks like a nice riddle to me.
About fractals - there was a program, called Fract - in the old windows games - I liked playing with it as a kid - trying out different combinations and seeing which would produce the best figures. :)
This is a sequel to A princess fell in love
During her journey, the princess encountered a very strange crossroad.
Can you help you her choose a safe way to go to the prince? What would she encounter on each of the roads?
Here is a map of the road:
Note: You can click on each road to...
I have an idea for a puzzle in the "Such-and-such Word (TM)" sequence. Should I bother checking if this idea has been used before, or just go ahead and make my puzzle and hope it isn't a duplicate?
@LukasRotter The lateral thinking might be that she loses hope and commits suicide or goes back home and makes up some story or whatever. That could be an alternative answer since all others point towards danger..
@Areeb I thought there were an awful lot, but I'm having trouble finding a search term that will give me a complete list ... apparently SE's search box doesn't like the â„¢ symbol.
@Sid Then it would be mildly too broad IMO :P I'm still confident the cat part is partially correct, and there's some other part to it. I just can't believe the OP just accidentally put that gray background behing 'cat' :D
@Randal'Thor, if you are talking about yours - by complicated, I don't mean bad - actually, although I am still bad at solving them, I like such puzzles very much - they require a lot of thinking and teach me a new way of interpreting stuff :)
Some of the puzzles on this site are almost like rocket science to me, written in Chinese with substitution cipher. :) But it is because I am still new to all this. :)
Wow... And there I was, sitting incredulously about how clean and similar to the prequels the answer seems, after I completely went crazy with overanalyzing the families of the people and the siginificance of the capitalized letters :D Great puzzle!
Yeah, the links and the capital YOUR and the "family tree" thing you mentioned in a comment were all just part of the flavour text, to make it look like a promotional email.
Once you ignore the stuff that just helps to make it look like spam, what's left as an actual hint is that they keep talking about where you come from.
I realized that all the capitalized words in the text have a total length of 17, which is exactly the number of people mentioned... After that point I completely lost it :P
Really?? That was it?? Well, I can take solace from the fact that I at least had took out the birth cities of the 17 people and then thought that @Randal'Thor wouldn't post the same logic twice.... I am a complete idiot....
@Sid I wanted to do something for the history topic challenge, so I came up with the idea of using historical figures somehow, and everything else sort of fell into place around that. But I'd better not use anything about lines on a map next time ;-)
I tell you though, it took a hell of a long time to come up with a good collection of names. Finding famous historical figures born in specific places isn't as easy as you might think.
Originally I was planning to draw two letters in the Americas, but couldn't really find anyone famous born on the west side of America long enough ago to count as 'historical'.
Originally I was going to use Stravinsky, Borodin, and Mussorgsky, who were all born in St Petersburg, and make the loop of the R very very small, but then I decided that would be too much effort.
Don't I just know it. I spent days on my first puzzle, making sure that not only did I have questions that have the desired numbers as answers, but that there is a way to deduce each... & Gareth cracked it in just over an hour.
I guess I'm lucky, then. My first puzzle took me around 10 minutes to construct, since it was a bad red herring simple cipher puzzle... Rand al'thor solved it in about 42 seconds, and I remember someone calling him a "puzzling nerd" :D
@Sid: I did the same and couldn't believe that the map thing would be used twice in a series of puzzles. I didn't see the Lambda shape was meant to be an A and screwed up the first shape by putting Chicago in the middle. Never mind.
@Randal'Thor Fairly quick :P Do you coincidentally know if there's any data-explorer query already for getting the fastest accepted answer on a specific SE site? Or do I have to write one myself now?
@MOehm Yeah... Just unlucky... I would wait for the next puzzle of Rand al'Thor unless it doesn't come out in the middle of those horrible things called Exams...
@Sid Yes. The record holder is actually for an answer to a bad closed question.
@Sid I may do another Mysterious Email puzzle quite soon, since the agent will obviously need another message when they get to Cairo to tell them where to go. Or would it somehow cheapen the Mysterious Email series to do two close together rather than keeping them as rare gems?
@Randal'Thor Like Sid, I've patted myself on the back for at least having the right idea. But I liked the puzzle. It's not your fault that I was operating under false assumptions.
@Randal'Thor I suppose everyone here will have their opinion here, I guess you could listen to them.. Personally I feel that you should do them maybe once in a few months or something like that...
@LukasRotter The best way to get into the fastest answers list is to hope to be lucky and find a puzzle just posted that you know the answer to... Then, post some nonsense and later edit it to give the correct answer.
@Sid Not "some nonsense"; that would be abusing the system. It's OK(ish) to post a minimal version of the correct answer and then flesh it out, but not just nonsense.
@BeastlyGerbil It was a self-answer, so I might have had the answer ready as soon as I posted the question. (I can't remember for sure, but that'd be my guess.)
@LukasRotter Shadow-editing only works as long as nobody posts a comment within that 5 minutes. If I see a nonsense answer posted just to get FGitW, I'll comment on it to make sure everyone sees what that answerer was up to ;-)
@Deusovi You can bypass that if you're really fast. (and also want to annoy people). Just start later like "I" did in the gif and you'll beat everyone, but the end result is like 40wpm :P
I'd really like to see a video of a race betweeen @Randal'Thor and @Deusovi. As @Areeb pointed out, this is possible in a private racing room.
Inspiration from @BeastlyGerbil's puzzle
In Puzzlville last night, someone stole the famous Stone of Wondrous Mystery! Can you help the police find it? But first... maybe you should read the news.
Note: I cannot confirm that all of the images came through clearly enough. If you find that th...
I'd like to put forth an idea which I think could simultaneously address two heavily discussed topics on Puzzling.SE:-
Adding more content about puzzle creation itself (in addition to being a repository of high-quality puzzles)
Rewarding good puzzles by awarding the questioner more than +5 per ...
@BeastlyGerbil If you count the title, there are 18 lines in the first column of the story. I tried taking that index of each line, but didn't get anything meaningful.
@Mithrandir So we just have to use the sequences 4, 1, 8, 8, 6, 2, 1, 9, 1 and 1, 3, 1, 3, 9, 9, 2, 3, 5 somehow on the initial image shown in the question?
I've already raised the issue of the title prompt for questions, which after community consensus was changed by Community Manager Shog9 to read "What's your puzzle or your puzzle-related question?" rather than "What's your creation and solving of puzzles question?"
But just now I noticed the "Ho...