« first day (1617 days earlier)      last day (3135 days later) » 

01:54
short workshop paper, I will look into what that is. I dont expect to compete with a tenured professor, but I think a few papers here and there over the next year or so will go a long way towards getting dissertation and research funding,
02:14
hello
when I applied to college, I read a bunch of books on things like "factors to consider when applying to college" by stuff like Princeton review, etc
What are the analogous sources one would consult if considering a PhD in statistics?
 
1 hour later…
03:18
@Storyteller At many conferences in e.g. computer science, there are also co-located workshops held the same week in the same place. The workshops are intended for work-in-progress, that is not quite mature enough for a full-length conference or journal paper.
@StanShunpike While this Q&A is phrased as "How should I choose which offer to accept", I think for the most part it works equally well for "How should I decide where to apply":
32
Q: I've been admitted to multiple PhD programs, how should I choose between them?

ff524I've been admitted to more than one PhD program, and I'm having a very hard time making a decision. The programs I'm accepted to have advantages and disadvantages with respect to one another. How do I weigh the relative importance of difference aspects of the program in order to make an optimal ...

It's a Q&A that consolidates advice from many other questions and answers on this site.
@ff524 That's definitely a helpful link. thanks for sharing it
also thanks for your other comments. they were very helpful.
@StanShunpike Also: I just googled "factors to consider when applying to college" and was not impressed with the advice I found :)
03:41
@ff524 hmmm that's good to know
I was concerned that just googling around wasn't a good place to start
A couple friends of mine are interested in doing PhDs in the US but were unsure about things like funding and what not. They are a year ahead of me so I thought I would help them research a bit and see what we could find
i had a chance to write a chapter in a book for a proff, I got tied up in other things and focused on finishing my coursework as fast as possible
@StanShunpike Probably a good idea to just click around the [graduate-admissions] tag on this site for a while to just get a feel for things.
i am trying to stay in contact, she mentioned wanting some input on a course
hmmm nice idea. that might help stimulate thinking and more questions
@ff524
@StanShunpike Especially this one:
67
Q: How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?

StrongBadWhen applying to a PhD program in the US, how does the admissions process work? If an applicant is weak in a particular area, is it possible to offset that by being strong in a different area? Note that this question originated from this meta answer. Please feel free to edit the question to impr...

Basically, your friends should be trying to prepare themselves to apply to and get accepted to the strongest departments that they possibly can.
Ideally they'll then end up with a few attractive offers, including funding, and can then choose the one that is the best fit for them.
03:51
@ff524 That's a really good one too.
@ff524 How does the finding an adviser process work? Do you have to get in touch with an adviser before you apply or is that something u do once in the program?
@StanShunpike I'm pretty sure we have a question about that, one sec and I'll see if I can dig it up for you :)
Do all PhDs have single advisers or is it like committees?
@ff524 Thanks so much. This is such a cool SE. Never really used it before. Very welcoming.
@StanShunpike Hmmm, I'm pretty sure we have one question, but I can't find it.
Anyways, the "finding an advisor" thing varies by department. Sometimes, a department admits a bunch of students, and then afterwards assigns them to advisors, or they have to assign themselves to advisors. Sometimes, students are admitted to work with a particular advisor, but the students don't do that themselves - the admissions committee does. Sometimes, the student finds the potential advisor before applying.
Does finding a potential advisor beforehand influence your chances of getting in?
@StanShunpike See this question:
9
Q: Is it unwise to contact the professor directly before getting admitted to a program in US?

OokerIn his answer of Details an applicant should include/exclude in an introductory letter to a prospective grad school adviser?, aeismail says If the program in question is in the US, for instance, you should probably never contact the professor directly until after you've been admitted into the...

03:56
@ff524 yeah that is spot on
very interesting
@StanShunpike Most PhDs have a single advisor. Some may be co-advised by two advisors, if e.g. their research incorporates part of both advisors' areas of expertise. There is also a thesis committee, but they don't play nearly the same role as the advisor.
Interesting. Do graduate students ever work without an advisor or is that a central part of the PhD process?
the program I am trying to get into, I am told repeatedly to contact people and try to get in good with them
i might as well not have had an adviser for my masters work
@StanShunpike For a PhD, you definitely need an advisor.
@ff524 Why?
03:59
I am seeing that. its almost like they sponsor you as a candidate
@Storyteller Was your advisor just unhelpful?
@StanShunpike A PhD is basically a research apprenticeship. You are apprenticed to your advisor, and they train you in doing research.
inexperienced, in a department where that is not as central
now that I have my masters, i can actually get in to some of the programs I want, and having a team of people I can work with is more and more important
@ff524 Does this mean they train you primarily in like research methods and how to write and prepare papers? Or is it also partly networking and helping you make connections with other researchers in the field so you have social capital to work with once you complete your degree too?
@StanShunpike All of the above, if you have a good advisor. (And having a good advisor is really, really, really important.)
@Storyteller Supervising masters students is really hard, and there isn't really much of an incentive structure set up to reward faculty for doing it. Masters students have it tough :(
04:03
she was dept head, first year on the job, Im no easy student, Im driven, ambitious and focused
@ff524 You had a really good answer that explained the differences between international students vs US residents in getting funding for PhDs
@ff524 Why are masters programs not funded as well?
that seemed to be the drift i was getting in the comments
@StanShunpike Yes, masters programs in the US don't usually come with that kind of funding.
I can say, I never got an email offering suggestions on books or papers, never once asked to read an assignment
there were 2 admin and 2 teaching assistantships in the dept
for a masters
@ff524 So I was looking at the University of Chicago's statistics department and they said they usually admit 10 PhD candidates. When you compare that to the number of college students they admit, that is smaller by a magnitude of 100 at least. Why so few candidates?
@ff524 I know it probably varies between programs
@ff524 but how many students does that mean likely apply? cuz 500 applicants for 10 spots isn't great odds
@StanShunpike PhD students require a LOT of department resources, particularly for supervision. So of course the ratio of undergrads to full time faculty can be a lot higher than the ratio of PhD students to full time faculty.
04:09
That makes sense and was kind of what I was thinking.
But, from an application strategy standpoint, if 500 apply for 10 spots, then you need to do a LOT of applications to different programs or else you'll get rejected from everywhere.
@ff524
@StanShunpike You do need to apply to a lot of programs. But it's not just a numbers game; you need to apply to programs where you are a good fit, and have a better chance of acceptance, not just spam every program out there.
Also 500 applicants sounds like a very high estimate
I made that number up
I have absolutely no idea
Stanford for example gets about 120 applicants a year for 10-12 phd students: statistics.stanford.edu/academics/phd-admissions-faq
@ff524 that's a good one too
interesting
@ff524 Here's another one that's been bugging me. So colleges make a large effort to create a diverse body. What about Ph.D. programs? Do they discriminate based on race, gender, etc? For minority candidates, is this something applicants can leverage during the application process?
or is the number so small this won't matter
@StanShunpike Undergraduate admissions is totally different from PhD admissions.
Undergraduate admissions is handled by an undergraduate admissions office. They do all kinds of... things.
04:15
@ff524 :`D you're making this difference clear
PhD admissions is by a committee of faculty members in the department. They are basically trying to admit strong students, who have shown evidence of research potential and look like they will be good, contributing members of the department.
So given the small numbers, it's very merit based only?
@StanShunpike Let's just say that an undergraduate admissions office is concerned with admitting an interesting, diverse, group of students. A STEM PhD admissions committee is mainly concerned with admitting strong researchers.
@StanShunpike There's this:
11
Q: Are ethnic "minorities" given preference in PhD admissions in the US?

GPerezI have a question about college education, or more specifically, admittance into college education in the US. Since as far as I remember, I've always heard that colleges or universities in the US have a sort of special preference for admitting people that are considered "minorities". I would lik...

But realistically, it is not something that makes a meaningful difference.
@ff524 In terms of prestige, is there a sensible / logical way to decide whether a PhD is worth doing at a given school?
@ff524 Would a worthwhile plan be to just apply, see where you can get in, and then ask people if it's worth it to go to the best option you have available?
@StanShunpike I think that question I referenced above gives some good advice on that.
1 hour ago, by ff524
32
Q: I've been admitted to multiple PhD programs, how should I choose between them?

ff524I've been admitted to more than one PhD program, and I'm having a very hard time making a decision. The programs I'm accepted to have advantages and disadvantages with respect to one another. How do I weigh the relative importance of difference aspects of the program in order to make an optimal ...

It's not like there's a list of departments that are "worth it" and others that are not "worth it." You have to figure out what is important to you and what your short- and long-term goals are, then see if any of the departments you were admitted to will get you there.
04:24
@ff524 Yeah, you're right it does a good job.
@ff524 When I applied to colleges, I had like tiers of schools. Like ideal, middle ground, safety
Once I got into a prestigious enough safety school, I didn't need to do a lot more
other people I knew did like 17 or 20 apps while I did 8
In contrast to this experience
Many of my friends applied for internships for this summer in finance. And they had to submit several dozen at least each to companies because it is so competitive.
For a statistics PhD, how many apps do you expect one would need to do?
Sorry that was a really long question. I'm just contrasting two experiences I have had
and trying to understand how to think about the PhD application process
@StanShunpike I'm not in statistics. Sorry, I have no idea. Normally I would advise someone to consult with professors in their undergrad university on where to apply and how many programs to apply to. But it sounds like your friend doesn't have those kind of resources, so I'm not sure what to suggest.
I have those resources
and I'm planning to do that
as I'm interested
okay that's helpful too
@ff524 alrighty, i think thats all I had. thanks so much for your advice
it was super helpful
what area are you in by the way?
out of curiosity
@StanShunpike Electrical engineering. specifically, communication networks
omg that was like the most hardcore major when I was at Caltech
EE is super interesting but so difficult
@StanShunpike Lol. I agree with "super interesting", at least.
04:30
:) difficulty is all relative I suppose
@Storyteller Have you finalized your plans for next year? Last time you were in here you were considering a Plan B, if I recall correctly.
I just got into a grad certificate program in life science innovation
so im at least out of the rain for the year
What is "life science innovation"?
It sounds fascination, but I have no idea what it is :)
and Im going for an Ed. S on the way to a PhD in Information Sciences and Learning technologies
its exactly what it sounds like
It sounds like an entrepreneurship course specifically for biotech startups and things like that. Am I close?
04:35
its just 12 hrs, 4 classes, one from bio on life science, one from engineering on bio engineering, one from management on managing life science projects and one on clinical trials and clinical research
Ah, ok. sounds interesting.
yeah, I thought it would be good, I am trying to write grants for my company
I have been following the Theranos drama...
and I want to work with EEGs for computers and such
Theranos?
link plx?
In cartoon form :)
I like Ars Technica's coverage, if you are interested in getting into the whole thing: arstechnica.com/search/?ie=UTF-8&q=theranos
04:41
no thats plenty thx, yeah, its a grad certificate in regulatory and management issues with bring life science technology to consumers
like fit bit, and mindwave and probably pacemakers too
How does that lead towards "Information Sciences and Learning technologies"?
though thats not my focus
well its a bridge program for me, but using EEGs, eyetracking and biometrics
specifically trying to correlate n400 and eyetracking events
I should probably study up on this stuff and write a grant proposal and learn about a lot of funding agencies
I need 9 hours that arent ISLT anyway for a support area
What are you trying to get funding for, specifically?
so, I think there is some cool stuff we can use a few biometric devices for
I want a bunch of EEG headsets and some software for my department
You mean for a university department?
04:45
yes
if I got a few extra bucks to help get people in for the study and extra eye tracking bars great
not clear to me how the timeline on that will work. you're doing a short certificate program. Assuming your proposal is funded, by the time you write the proposal, submit it, get it reviewed, and the money comes through, you are long gone.
but I think it will be ok, I have a few years to get ready and start writing the code
well, it will be 3-4 semesters, they only offer 1 class at a time right now, here
division 1 research university : )
and that 'gets my foot in the door' and I will apply to the Ed S in a few weeks and then the PhD for spring selection
You are planning to stay there for PhD, you mean.
so, my support area for my phd in information sciences, will in using eeg to measure learning or cognition
yes
ed s, then phd
the edS, is 2 classes, then a year of design and a year of development. Im going to make an educational game
and that half my hours/most of my coursework
I'll have a year left, I have to do a residency of 1 year on campus, so I will conduct my study then
and then a year of dissertation and write up all my findings and present and do exams and defense and Im done
You know that a student won't be able to submit a proposal to a funding agency like NSF, you'll need a professor to be the PI.
04:50
5 years give or take
yeah
I found 14 places for possible funding, some I can apply for, some my dept does
Most science funding in the US is from NSF or NIH. Proposals are submitted by individual faculty, not department.
thats why this year on LSIE is cool, I can figure out which ones to write, get a grant manuscript going and submit to as many as allowed over and over until I get one
yeah, I gotcha
there are 2-3 people Im looking at asking
but there are private foundations that fund research students too
I'll be applying at 5-6
over the next 3 years I guess
until I have 10, $800 headsets in my department to run a variety of studies with
not just mine, but Ican think of 4-5 things Id do if I had them
Oh, you're only talking about 8k
...I think if I really go all out on trying to land the grant, they will count it as part of my 'professional service'
um, I want more than that
I will certainly write, at least once, for an OMG I wish $500K to build an addition on the building, but I doubt I'll get it
Im thinking 10-20K for stuff and if Im lucky, 35K over 2-3 years to fund me
I'm not sure that's a productive strategy for getting funding, but OK, good luck with that.
04:56
towards tuition and an apartment near campus
I want to write one that big for the practice
like, with help from the guy who has 14 million in funding on his cv
I really want to get on his good side, cookies or brownies?
its certainly the right place to learn how to 'win big'
and I really want very little comparatively, so I think I might be ok
I really should each year, write for a private grant to do an educational game, Id be happy doing that
but I love the direction eeg and bci is going
cyberpsionics is just around the corner
combining your eeg based input, with the internet of things and augmented reality
I get to work with all that stuff and educational videogames too
Im, excited about the future.
as for what money to ask for, from whom, and how much, well, thats why Im giving myself a year in this program to find out, I will ask a lot of people for help on these grants and what to do
There is an opportunity cost to all of the things you are suggesting. For example, writing a competitive grant proposal takes a lot of time and energy. If you are devoting time to that, you are spending less time on research, which in turn decreases the chances that your proposal will be funded (because you personally are less competitive).
I suggest focusing on quality over quantity.
thats a good idea
might only need to write once
but, I mean I wont give up if a few places turn me down, I'll keep improving and tailoring the proposal until I get it
have these guys with 'PI or Co-PI of 25 projects with a 37 pg cv' tell me what to change
That's really not how it works.
I dont ever want a CV thats more than 5 pages long
i dont get that, just, every little conference you so much as had a coke at
now if you wrote a book, or a chapter and you have 37 pages of published papers, sure
I just dont get that. I like the 5-6 page style, just the most important highlights
but, those guys with all those conference attendances and every student the had coffee with on tuesdays listed, they get the money
That's... also, really not how it works.
05:07
I suppose Im being a bit cynical
If your CV is padded with pages of stuff that has nothing to do with your research, teaching, and service, then it really won't help you get funded.
um, Im referring to CVs Ive been reading this week
some in my dept have 37, 26, 50+ pg cvs
Do you have an example in mind?
most others have 6-9
Long CVs are not a problem. People who have been doing this for a while will of course have long CVs
05:09
some of them have just as longof careers
Do you have a CV in mind that has lots of irrelevant stuff in it?
its not irrelevant, I just think half that stuff shouldnt go on a cv at all
it seems silly
some choose to list all the conferences they attend, and all the students they mentored etc
others just list their publications and teaching and such
Students mentored is definitely important and not silly at all.
I've never seen anyone list all the conferences they attend. Conferences they presented at, sure.
well, I think presented and conference mean different things here
I think they have a specialized meaning beyond common use Im not real sure on
to me, a conference is like a big deal with several thousand people in attendance
Why? Interesting and useful things happen at small conferences, too. Personally, I prefer small conferences. At the very big conferences there are many parallel tracks, and the audience for individual talks tends to be smaller.
05:14
going to a hotel in kansas city for a night and meeting up with 26 people doesnt seems like something Id put on my cv
thats just part of work to me
to me, well, a lot of stuff listed is just 'work' if you are an academic, I dont need to know what the person did every week of their career or whatever
often, listing a conference doesnt tell me much, just that that week, you were there,
so, I see another style with just the mor important items, and it seems more, idk, readable, sensible, less superfluos
wait, thats it, CVs are supposed to tell you what somebody has done and knows, and after a certain, they stop doing that and turn into a wall of text
they become to big to easily convey the information intended
too^
now, that said, the one that were long, were the ones that had gotten the most funding
A US CV isn't really supposed to be a summary. (Although some people also make a "highlights" CV.) It is supposed to be an exhaustive list of a person's academic accomplishments. There are other ways to tell people the most important things you have done.
is it ok to not have one or care about them?
or do I have to have this trophy case too?
I find it.. ugly
If you don't want to be in academia, interact with other people in academia, or get funding from places that fund academics, then sure, you don't need a CV.
is that the only way to be an academic? to do research and explore new technology?
It's like saying you find your transcript of your coursework "ugly". A CV is just a record of all the stuff that you did as a researcher, like a transcript is a record of all the courses you took as a student.
05:21
mind you, I have a handful of degrees, they are all still in the envelopes they came in, one is a bookmark
those things just arent what matters to me, the work itself is all I want to focus on
do I need one before I get a PhD?
You don't have to "focus" on your CV. Nobody "focuses" on their CV. You just write up the list of stuff you did and then when an application or something asks for a CV, you submit it.
I wouldnt even know what to put on it
I tell you what, if I ever do anything I think is worth telling the world about, I will have some nice student draw one up for me
until then, I see no use in it
The use of it is basically for when things require it. Like PhD applications, funding proposals, promotion and tenure reviews, etc. That's all it is.
would I put grant proposals I wrote but didnt get?
No
05:25
that I was a finalist in an entrepreneurial competition?
I wouldn't.
right, I wouldnt know what to list
I was published in a Phi Theta Kappa journal, its was judged/selected but not reviewed
I got that right before I got my Associates
only non-fiction selection
I have several essays Ive written Id like to compile and see about getting published
Degrees earned, publications, conference and seminar presentations not represented in the publications list, courses taught (or TAed), students supervised, service activities (like organizing conference session etc.), other research affiliations (like visiting scholar type things), major awards, outreach activities related to your field.
i put together and did the opening ceremony at a Phi Theta Kappa inauguration, donated stuff for a affle and to the Joplin tornado survivors, i went to our regionals at K State for the weekend
are honor's society memberships and functions worth listing?
I put my memberships on my resume
I don't put those on my CV
8
Q: Does membership of academic honour societies carry any professional weight / recognition?

Javeer BakerI understand honour societies have been around for years and it is a tradition more prevalent in the western world to recognise outstanding academic talent. The largest honour society is perhaps the Golden Key which operates worldwide and has over 2 million members. It provides a range of servi...

05:30
VP of Service in Phi Theta Kappa and member of Phi Kappa Phi
do you have a whole bunch of other stuff to list other than 'i got good grades in college so far'?
Yes, this stuff:
4 mins ago, by ff524
Degrees earned, publications, conference and seminar presentations not represented in the publications list, courses taught (or TAed), students supervised, service activities (like organizing conference session etc.), other research affiliations (like visiting scholar type things), major awards, outreach activities related to your field.
I don't have a "service activities" section but I have a little bit of each of the rest.
I dont really, and clearly I need to put something togteher so I will have enough academic/intellectual merit to actually get my company/education funded (because that does count)
as for classes taught, I need to send out applications to as many jocus as possible
and try to get a few classes as an adjunct
Probably not as good a use of your time as research/publishing would be, unless you plan to pursue a career as a professor. (And even then, research/publishing will still be worth more as long as you have just a little bit of teaching experience.)
Although it's a nice way to earn a little extra $
um, I figure I will do 10 years teaching at a juco to pay off the loans
unless I hit a grant and can fund an egame or some eeg software or something for the company
Do you know how much adjunct jobs pay in your area/field?
05:36
um, nothing
like, pennies
Then, probably not the best use of your time.
but if I do it for 10 years, they write off my loans
I could do peace corps, or do educatoinal material for a nonprofit, like homebuyer education
but, ten years of public service
doing that, would be worth doing
You won't exactly have time for research if you're doing public service full time.
money is nice, but I can build a couple houses and sell them if I want $250K to go to space for an hour
right, its the backup plan
write for funding forthe company, try among several things Im good at the get that startup money
Well, good luck with all that. I have to go.
05:40
and if I dont get that 'golden business grant' then I will teach, and do public service and well, work for ten years until I do
have a good night
ciao
 
9 hours later…
14:16
do you guys want this one? it's technically about job stuff but all strictly within academia
0
Q: Is it ok to send an email request to hiring manager for an interview for an internal position?

JoeI request your help for making the best move to get an interview. Here is the case. I am working under the President of a top university and due to funding issues, my project will not be extended. He tried to keep me within the team but due to administrative issues, he can't keep me for long. Me...

 
1 hour later…
15:36
@enderland I am not sure that this is an academical job. At least in my country, somebody working in the office of the president or similar is very likely a bureaucrat and not an academic. Even if we are talking about academics here, the situation is probably so far off typical academic employment situations that it is better fit for the Workplace.
 
2 hours later…
17:35
I love this experiment:
"An Expanded Approach to Evaluating Open Access Journals". The author evaluates the quality of the peer review at some spammy OA journals by submitting some (non-research) papers written by her 13- and 15-year-old daughters and their friends for school assignments.
You can bypass the paywall to read the full paper with this link: http://bit.ly/OpenAccess_Ray (via scholarlyoa.com/2016/07/19/…)
@ff524 … turns out that the daughters are actual geniuses.
@Wrzlprmft ?
@ff524 Well, I would expect that their papers got accepted with overwhelming praise.
at least by some journals.
> Six journals accepted the submission without revisions; one accepted the paper with revisions; and one decision was ‘revise and resubmit.’ Only one submission was rejected, based on the paper's word count, which was below the required minimum. The journal suggested that the paper be expanded and resubmitted.
That's quite a title, that last one: "International Journal of Research". I Googled it and the short tagline is: "Scholarly articles by scholars and researchers."
:)
Next time I feel like procrastinating with something fun but useless, I am going to write a "Sketchy OA Journal Title and Description Generator".
17:54
@ff524 You can even make money with this. A bot that completely automatically creates predatory journals, does the reviews, and caches in the money.
@Wrzlprmft You forgot "scrape recently presented conference abstracts and spam authors with invitations to submit to our journals"
@Wrzlprmft Actually, an interesting experiment would be to write a bot to:
1. Create fake journals and journal websites, ignore all submissions from human authors
2. Generate scigen and mathgen papers for publication in our journals with plausible-sounding titles containing latest buzzwords. heavily cite cross-cite other papers in our journals
3. Watch as human authors cite our highly relevant, highly cited papers without reading them (or worse, reading them and still believing that they're relevant).
2
The Sokal affair, also called the Sokal hoax, was a publishing hoax perpetrated by Alan Sokal, a physics professor at New York University and University College London. In 1996, Sokal submitted an article to Social Text, an academic journal of postmodern cultural studies. The submission was an experiment to test the journal's intellectual rigor and, specifically, to investigate whether "a leading North American journal of cultural studies – whose editorial collective includes such luminaries as Fredric Jameson and Andrew Ross – [would] publish an article liberally salted with nonsense if (a) it...
@Wrzlprmft but that didn't involve bots :)
18:09
Well, everything is better with robots …
So, let’s destroy academia with a bot-created stealth parody …
We should not forget to make the whole thing such that we cannot turn it off.

« first day (1617 days earlier)      last day (3135 days later) »