« first day (1250 days earlier)      last day (3436 days later) » 

08:06
Aromacity?! Again?! :O
Lol. Aromacity. J had a Chinese colleague who always called it this way. :D
@Wildcat :D
meow
Found an unanswered qc question from Sep 9 and answered it!
@pH13, hello!
@Wildcat do you know books about theo chem that are not esp about comp chem?
@pH13, hmmm... Let me think...
@pH13, but what information do you want to see there if not compchem?
08:12
@Wildcat maybe it's sth like the helgaker ... don't know
Any general physical chemistry textbook is probably about theory, but not about computational chemistry specifically.
@pH13, oh, wait.
that's really about how wavefunction methods and the underlying math works but not really about it's use or at least the focus doesn't lie on the "real" comp chem part
@pH13, you mean about quantum but not computational chemistry. :D
I got it!
yeah ... xD
that also lead me to think about, if the szabo ostlund might need to get into that theo chem category
@pH13, I think Szabo & Ostlund nicely fit into quantum chemistry category rather then computational one
they mostly discuss theory and not applications
applications are there just to clarify the theory
08:15
exactly
and I think it's the same with helgaker's book
Another book which I like is one by Prof. Mayer entitled "Simple Theorems, Proofs, and Derivations in Quantum Chemistry"
I will write a meta answer on the thread about that
the theo chem category might need to be renamed to theo/quantum chem or only quantum chem
@pH13, well, theoretical chemistry is not limited to quantum chemistry. We have few other theories heavily used, such as, thermodynamics & kinetics, for instance.
so?
But in this sense theoretical chemistry is a synonym to physical chemistry.
08:19
All chemistry is theoretical until you get into the lab :D
So, we don't need both theoretical chemistry and physical chemistry.
ok
so quantum chemistry?
well, we have to think carefully indeed do we need to divide quantum & computational chemistry into two separate categories or not
these two usually goes hand-by-hand
I think, I came up with both to separate the "applied theo chem" == comp chem from the "real" theoretical theo chem
but you are right, maybe this is not necessary
What do you want to learn about?
08:31
@skillpatrol what do you mean exactly?
22 mins ago, by pH13
@Wildcat do you know books about theo chem that are not esp about comp chem?
I was just rethinking the current two categories and if books are currently correctly categorized or not
and Steven Bachrach's book is one good example for separating the application from the theory
and that leads me to think if there are books that do it the other way around
because most books that I have, do work about both points, the theory and the application to a certain degree without diving into both very deeply
 
4 hours later…
12:06
so fed up with people thinking chemistry + biology = Drugs and pharmaceuticals
@Secret Just organic.
biology is not just for making drugs, yet a lot of universities and professional societies such as ACS tend to associate them together
12:48
@Secret Yeah, but biology ~ 0 without chem. :P
No I understand that, I mean, they tend to associate biological chemistry fields with pharamaceuticals

So many researches presented in that field tend to focus on how some drug X can supress cancer Y, or diabetes etc.

There's also fluoresence imaging and fluoresent labelling of cells, but most of the researches almost always have a disease as part of their aim

But there's more to biology then just medicine, such as stages of growth, microbiological nutrient cycles, environmental chemistry where biotic factors play a major role in degradation of waste products or other metabolites, geneti
Not interested in biology that much. You might talk to my nerd friend @Berne . . . When he meets the Table.
But I agree Bio can be interesting.
It's big molecules anyway.
@Secret I tend to some "citation needed" for your they tend to associate biological chemistry fields with pharamaceuticals ... i.e. who is "they"?
@pH13 It's them.
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M ah, them ... then everything is clear
12:55
So is there any further questions?
ok, found a counterexample to my claim:
http://chemistry.harvard.edu/pages/chemical-biology
Some examples (one of them is my uni:
http://www.chemistry.unsw.edu.au/research
http://sydney.edu.au/science/chemistry/research/research-areas.shtml

Note that whenever biology is mentioned, it is focused on the medical side of things
I think there might be more uni examples...
@Secret, yeah, but wait.
another example
http://www.chem.ox.ac.uk/researchthemes.asp
and counterexample
http://chemistry.mit.edu/research/biological
Who told you that these guys are not doing medicinal chemistry?
I mean
biology is not limited to medicine
right
but what if they indeed do only the medical research?
How should they call it?
Medicinal chemistry, for sure.
For department names, journals categories etc.
I understand, what I am trying to say is that (at least for the examples up there), the research themes labelled "biological chemistry" are actually more medical oriented if you look into them in detail.
13:05
@Secret, but that is fine, i think.
Bio chem is more general than medicinal.
which this caused me to become curious, is the medical side of bio chem more popular than other aspects of biochem?
Not sure if is popular, but seems to be the most 'popular'.
Argh, I mean the other sense.
@Secret, it is surely the most popular part of bio chem.
Like, the normal people's beliefs.
I think for a very simple reason: money talks.
13:08
gah, conflict of interest at play again...
as always
Did anyone say play?
13:23
Did anyone say conflict?
Thinking tree:
Money talks->Some groups of people unhappy->conflict of interest->mess->and mess->My brain go BSOD
but anyway that's just my opinion
Someone will always be unhappy.
 
1 hour later…
14:37
@Wildcat are you still there but invisible like ninja cat?
I'm still there.
but you will have no idea on how to answer my question correctly :(
so ... whazzup in tabriz?
Tabriz's gas molecules.
No CV to review (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
9
A: Is 3,5-diethyltoluene an accepted IUPAC name?

inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.MNames like toluene are "retained names". In chemistry, a retained name is a name for a chemical compound that is recommended for use by a system of chemical nomenclature (for example, IUPAC nomenclature), but that is not fully systematic. - Wikipedia ‘Retained names’ are traditional or c...

One vote away(ノT_T)ノ ^┻━┻
:o
Whoever that upvoter was . . . (/¯◡ ‿ ◡)/¯ ~ ┻━┻ (づ。◕‿‿◕。)づ (づ。◕‿‿◕。)づ
Jan
Jan
15:07
Hello everybody and -molecule o/
0
Q: Why is H3PO2 more acidic than H3PO4?

Mitradip DasPlease explain why $\ce{H3PO2}$ is more acidic than $\ce{H3PO4}$ logically. Please do not provide experimental reasons like $pK_a$.

Anybody know why this is the case? It seems very non-trivial to me …
15:31
@pH13, now I'm there! :D
ninja cat :D
@Jan this might be a possible solution
@Wildcat when excitations are calculated with i.e. tddft
then I get the information about from where to where an electron is excited
do negative coefficients for such an excitation have any meaning?
Jan
Jan
@pH13 But that doesn’t really rationalise it imho. An OH group should provide a much better electron withdrawer than a hydrogen, especially since the P-H bond is polarised towards phosphorous.
@pH13, yes.
9
Q: Interpretation of TD-DFT results

WildcatFor the first time I'm doing TD-DFT calculations (wB97XD functional) in Gaussian 09 for an open-shell system and the results look like the hell of a mess for me. The molecule is rather big, so I started with just 10 excited states to see how it would work. First off, the ground electronic state ...

Look who asked it! :O
so
I read that but don't think, that it helped me :o
oh, yeah
true
there is no example of negative coefficients
15:35
you have got A -> B and A <- B but both with positive coefficients
I've got only A -> B with positive and negative coefficients
@pH13, generally speaking, that should be fine.
You have a wave function as a linear combination of singly-excited Slater determinants.
it's not about fine or not fine, just about if it has a meaning like your arrows, or if it is just a solution and only the squared coefficients have a meaning
The coefficients can in principle be even complex numbers/
But they are usually restricted to be reals.
@Jan hm ... I have to do my tdddft stuff right now x)
Negative coeffs are as good as positive.
15:38
@Wildcat ok, so it's nothing like positive = "->" and negative "<-"
@Jan I am not quite convinced that this is actually true. I found contradictory values for the pKa of phosphinic acid.
no, i don't think so
@Wildcat did you find out more about your de-excitation?
@pH13, no. :( Not enough time to dig deeply.
@Wildcat that's sad
15:41
I'm learning DFT currently...
TD-DFT is next on the list
The problem with learning DFT on your own is that there are 2 kinds of books:
1) Those that are too "mathy".
2) Others that are completely messy. XD
true story
but from what I can see, you don't have problems with math :o
@pH13, but I have problems with time. :D
the day has got 24 hours and if this is not enough, use the night also
Need to understand just the basics but as quickly as possible.
@pH13, no way. Nights are for sleep. :D
nights are for sleep ... pfff xD
15:45
for hunt also
hunt for humans
=^.^=
xD
Jan
Jan
@Loong Interesting, but Wikipedia seems to state ones, where H3PO2 is lower than H3PO4.
thx @Wildcat
@pH13, my pleasure.
@Jan Most sources show lower pKa for H3PO2. However, German Wikipedia refers to research.chem.psu.edu/brpgroup/pKa_compilation.pdf which includes thermodynamic values of 2.23 for H3PO2 and 2.12 for H3PO4.
Jan
Jan
16:30
@Loong So what is a thermodynamic pH as opposed to a non-thermodynamic one?
@Jan I don’t know. But we should make sure that we compare values of the same kind.
The pH scale as shown above is called sometimes "concentration pH scale" as opposed to the "thermodynamic pH scale". The main difference between both scales is that in thermodynamic pH scale one is interested not in H+concentration, but in H+activity. What a person measures in the solution is just activity, not the concentration. Thus it is thermodynamic pH scale that describes real solutions, not the concentration one.
Go with thermodynamic scale.
Since it is the reality.
Jan
Jan
That makes the whole thing even more interesting. Thanks cat =3
In fact, if i remember correctly, pH is defined in terms of the hydrogen ion activity, not its concentration.
p[H] is one which defined in terms concentration
But many still use the same symbol for both.
They, they don't follows STANDARDS! ⋋_⋌
one does not simply follow standards
Jan
Jan
16:44
Who needs standards when you can have randoms?
Quick, someone give me a question to answer.
Jan
Jan
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M How many milligrams are in my flask?
This guy keeps screamin', he's paranoid. Quick! Someone get his ass another steroid. :D
@Jan There are no milligrams in your flask. There's only . . . chemistry . . .
16:51
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M, give the answer in a very easily understandable way!
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M, I'll check that!
@Loong What's today's date?
@Jan there is no flask, Neo!
@Loong wait for another month please. Answering now won't get me a necromancer.
Don't fret! I'm trying to write (a) canonical answer(s) to this question, will hopefully get it done tomorrow. — inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M Aug 21 at 20:28
Well, well, well.
tomorrow
hopefully tomorrow
I deny. I didn't comment.
(•_•)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿ – =͟͟͞͞ =͟͟͞͞ ヘ( ´Д`)ノ
^ me ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ^ whoever starred that
16:53
I deny your denial!
Better.
@Wildcat I'LL KILL YOUR DENIAL AND HIS FAMILY! (•_•)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M, try to catch it first!
Tries to catch it first
"One does not simply answer tomorrow." starring: @inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M
@Bon you don't wanna come here. There's so many bullets flying around.
@pH13 I could've meant tomorrow in a figurative sense.
16:57
c'est @bon c'est @bon ♫
Jan
Jan
Oh the fun =D
(it's 15.1)
@Bon talk or I'll shoot. (•_•)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
bon
bon
Je sui @bon
Try harder.
Jan
Jan
You're lacking a letter, @bo.
bon
bon
16:58
@Jan :( I never did french
Jan
Jan
That explains it ,)
Tomorrow may refer to:
The future, that which occurs after the present
Tomorrow (time), the day after today
It doesn't. Even I know it's Je Cyrus @Wildcat.
Damn, there are two meanings. :|
Hah!
In your bullets!
bon
bon
16:59
I learned something new today
21
Q: What is a nerf?

BeofettIn the classic scene, Princess Leia slams Han Solo by calling him a stuck up, half-witted, scruffy-looking nerf herder While clearly this cuts Han to the bone, I'm curious what this actually means. Presumably it is someone who herds "nerfs" for a living, ...

So what is a nerf?
Jan
Jan
Open the link.
Then start answering your own question.
If it isn't something I can eat, I don't care.
Jan
Jan
All for the self-learner badge.
I won't specially care if it's not a type of ice cream.
Jan
Jan
17:00
I think you may be allowed to eat it.
bon
bon
You could eat it
You can also herd it :D
Does it taste delicious? I could also eat hydrogen cyanide.
Jan
Jan
My Jewish colleague can eat it, so chances are, so can you ^^
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
I don't like that much hair in my food.
Jan
Jan
Well you shouldn't eat it skin and bones D=
17:06
In any ways, 23 upvotes for two sentences and a picture is way too much.
Jan
Jan
I've answered so many questions where I thought 'how the heck did I get over 10 score on that', that I've stopped questioning it.
@Jan that's probably the best
bon
bon
The number of upvotes on an answer is largely determined by how many views the question gets, not by how good the answer is. Some of what I consider my best answers only got a couple of upvotes whereas some really quick ones got loads
3
Jan
Jan
@bon This one exactly.
The only thing I'm happy about is that my top question is a good-quality and well-researched problem, not just something popular.
@bon Furthermore, rep isn't a measure of trust or anything, it just is a crude way of determining how much time you've spent answering/asking. It doesn't even do a good job of demonstrating participation.
Like for example, I have only 3k but I'm close to two steward badges. ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ
Jan
Jan
17:14
I don't even have reviewer badges *goes sulking in the corner*
That is, neither here nor on German Y,…,Y
0
Q: if ethanol mixed petrol comes in contact with water?.is it converts in water?

sanjay jadhavWe have now 10% ethanol mixed petrol .seller says that if this petrol comes in contact even 10 ml of water ,all ethanol which is mixed in the petrol is convert in to water ,is it true?

Could someone edit this? The random periods are on my nerves.
.
Jan
Jan
.God ,what is it with Indians and inverse punctuation spaces ?I really don't understand it
@Jan I wanted to write the same
Jan
Jan
Beatcha to it ;p
@pH13 No ,. but. you? wanted! to writ sth... prolly! better !!!
Haha it feels like a speed bump.
Jan
Jan
17:21
I think that question is a waste of editing time. I'm gonna wait for it to appear in the close votes review queue in a few minutes x3
Working towards reviewer.
Jan
Jan
17:34
Why does the late answers review queue exist anyway? So new users there get six instead of three eyes?
@Jan "Late answers tend to be seen by fewer people than answers posted soon after the question was asked, so the review queue helps ensure that these answers meet the same quality standards as all other answers." here
Well, they are often bad...
bon
bon
Which is why the queue exists I guess - so they get deleted
ICE CREAM TIME
bon
bon
CHOCOLATE FLAVOUR ICE CREAM
17:44
It has some chocolate.
Jan
Jan
Where is there ice cream? =D
bon
bon
In my freezer
In my hands
Jan
Jan
I disagree with the wordings 'first few posts' I found on meta. From what I saw on German.SE, only the first post of a user is put into first posts/late answers queues.
The first answer and the question appear in the queue.
Jan
Jan
17:46
It would make more sense, if all late answers of a new user be placed into Late answers; say having a threshold of 50 rep.
Even if that answer is two months later.
I wonder who reviewed my first post.
O.o I wonder what my first post is.
Jan
Jan
Probably a deleted one ;)
Jan
Jan
Actually no, you would see them.
Jan
Jan
17:48
Usually I only see only an answer or only a question by one new user. But then, I may have not seen any user who does both …
N00bie! :p
Jan
Jan
Speaking of late answers … that question just sparked my colleague to say: "who asked that? Does he have children? If not, he's a prime candidate for the Darwin award!"
3
Q: Hydrazine synthesis

MirloI'm trying to make rocket fuel by hydrazine and hydrogen peroxide with home products my question is: Is there any way to synthesize hydrazine with bleach and ammonia, using $\ce{H2SO4}$ as a catalyst? I wanna put an action figure in orbit. Thanks in advance!

That being the question.
 
3 hours later…
bon
bon
20:45
To all germans @Martin-マーチン @Jan @pH13. chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/38046/…
I guess it's easier to buy a new brush oô
and cheaper
bon
bon
On a side note - is this sort of question on topic. It doesn't really seem to come under any of the categories listed in the help centre
Yeah I don't really know why he's asking the question
for me it's not
bon
bon
I am inclined to agree
 
2 hours later…
Jan
Jan
22:43
I would agree with the off-topicness, too @bon @pH13

« first day (1250 days earlier)      last day (3436 days later) »