RELOAD!

heya

[Cardshifter/Cardshifter] 1 opened issue. 2 issue comments.

[Cardshifter/HTML-Client] 11 commits. 1 opened issue. 7 issue comments. 340 additions. 32 deletions.

[Hosch250/Rubberduck] 1 commit. 62 additions.

[Hosch250/VSDiagnostics] 1 commit. 431 additions. 421 deletions.

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] 2 commits. 2 additions. 2 deletions.

[ShearOfDoom/CactusReborn] 5 commits. 51 additions. 37 deletions.

[Vannevelj/RoslynTester] 2 issue comments.

[Vannevelj/VSDiagnostics] 2 issue comments.

[Zomis/Brainduck] 3 commits. 160 additions. 38 deletions.

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] retailcoder merged pull request #780: small adjustments and typo fix from INOPIAE/Rubberduck/#translation into rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/next

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] INOPIAE pushed commit 9b6ad1eb to next: small adjustments and typo fix

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] retailcoder pushed commit 7b434c5e to next

Hey.

yo

Ya.

[retailcoder/Rubberduck] retailcoder pushed commit 6d6fa63a to next: added SninyTreeView style, applied to TestExplorer and InspectionResults treeviews; added NavigateCommand to InspectionResults control; needs a nice way to expose "fix all instances in

Bug Report (ish): Whilst the GitHub integration works, it can be very slow to actually pick up changes. It seems variable. There are times when stuff seems to show up in minutes, and times when it seems to take hours.

[ckuhn203/VBEX] macressler starred us

[ckuhn203/VBEX] macressler forked us into macressler/VBEX

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] macressler starred us

@Zak status-norepro probably a github thing

also. wrong room?

@Vogel612 It's about Rubberduck, if there's a room more appropriate than this one, I haven't found it yet :)

@Mat'sMug @RubberDuck is there any RefactorCommand that doesn't need access to VBE, IRubberduckParser and IActiveCodePaneEditor? If no, would it make sense to extract a base-class for these (possibly even in a separate namespace below Rubberduck.UI.Command) and constructor-inject these?

@Zak "github integration" is a duga thing

if I understood correctly what you mean.

I meant the Rubberduck Github integration (source control)

ohh hmm..

then I didn't understand correctly :D

@Vogel612 I'd say no. We can't change the code without going through the VBE, so good call.

@Zak local changes, or remote changes?

Local changes should get picked up any time you click refresh.

107 stargazers btw. =;)-

@RubberDuck Ah, I missed the refresh button :)

Moved RemoveParameters and ExtractMethod into their own classes, inheriting from a new BaseClass for RefactorCommands. Fixes #761 and #762

question, does the rubberduck git support script out views to SQL files for MS Access?

@JustinDearing I would think if you have tracked files in the repo folder that aren't loaded up in the VBE they're still tracked by git, so yes

no I mean will rubberduck go through the access objects and turn the VIEWS into CREATE VIEW [foo] and save it to foo.sql?

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] retailcoder closed issue #778: Problem starting RubberDuck on a German Office 2013

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] retailcoder merged pull request #782: Locale independence from Vogel612/Rubberduck/LocaleIndependence into rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/next

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] Vogel612 pushed commit 06ab8c0e to next: Replaced String-Based access with named integer constants, as per #778

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] Vogel612 pushed commit 21e5db1f to next: Corrected spelling error in German locale, removed duplicate entry in English locale

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] retailcoder pushed commit 23604036 to next

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] retailcoder commented on RetailCoder.VBE/UI/Command/Refactorings/RefactorCommandBase.cs of pull request #783: Refactorings

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] retailcoder closed issue #761: Implement RefactorExtractMethodCommand

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] retailcoder merged pull request #783: Refactorings from Vogel612/Rubberduck/Refactorings into rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/next

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] Vogel612 pushed commit cf847ff3 to next

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] Vogel612 pushed commit 4ca8758f to next: Moved RemoveParameters from the RefactorMenu into a Command class, see #762

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] retailcoder pushed commit 49ae3938 to next

@JustinDearing ooh that would be nice! v1.4 doesn't do that I'm sure. But with 2.0 we can inject an IHostApplication and soft-cast to an AccessApp and if that isn't null, then the host app is MS-Access - and then we can write any Access-specific code there.

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] build for commit 49ae3938 on next: AppVeyor build failed

BUILD FAILURE!

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] Vogel612 commented on issue #762: Implement RefactorRemoveParametersCommand

> fixed in #783 , but github didn't catch it. NLP is hard

@Duga Crap did I break stuff??

Must be a failing test

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] retailcoder closed issue #762: Implement RefactorRemoveParametersCommand

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] retailcoder commented on issue #762: Implement RefactorRemoveParametersCommand

> Thanks @Vogel612!

@Vogel612 actually yeah you did ;-)

ci.appveyor.com/project/retailcoder/rubberduck

> UnitTesting\PermissiveAssertClass.cs(47,30): error CS0506: 'Rubberduck.UnitTesting.PermissiveAssertClass.AreNotEqual(object, object, string)': cannot override inherited member 'Rubberduck.UnitTesting.AssertClass.AreNotEqual(object, object, string)' because it is not marked virtual, abstract, or override [C:\projects\rubberduck\RetailCoder.VBE\osdnp1tw.tmp_proj]

C# isn't like Java that lets you override anything anywhere ;-)

In my defense...

mono didn't complain

Wuht!

Still complains about "No overload of Application.Run takes 1 argument"

so there's that.

freshly compiled just now.

you're welcome?

It worked for libgit2sharp

btw. why is appveyor not checking PRs?

No idea. Something broke somehow.

I had to manually run the build

have you checked the hook?

It's there, unchanged since forever.

hmm.. yea my travis suddenly started checking PRs...

but that may be because it was a PR into a protected branch....

which reminds me... is the appveyor build sufficiently stable to require merges into next to pass it?

At this point... not quite

Unless... what do you mean "stable"?

it breaks when it should, basically

ideally it doesn't when it shouldn't but...

that's partly optional

Yeah it's stable then. Failing tests break it

then you could protect next. basically all merges to next would then require the build to pass

IT'S ALIVE

nope. I killed it

Dies a gruesome death

O.O

I miss VBA...

Damn you better job that pays better but doesn't involve coding.

go participate in Open Source if you still want to code :)

@Vogel612 except... open-source VBA will only really pick up once Rubberduck goes mainstream ;-)

because git integration is really really difficult. Let's get this rolling :D

the webhook looks right, it's Duga that isn't picking 'em up

these run over status events...

I know duga implements those...

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] retailcoder created branch gh-pages

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] retailcoder pushed commit ad963ca2 to gh-pages: Create gh-pages branch via GitHub

@Vogel612 any idea how to set up github-pages?

like, why did it create a branch?

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] retailcoder pushed commit 91df1cba to gh-pages: Create gh-pages branch via GitHub

ah

rubberduck-vba.github.io/Rubberduck

so it just lives in its own branch... and I edit it via the repo settings??

I think @phrancis is maintaining the .io site for Cardshifter, I'll ask him (ping!)

I have no .io sites.

If there is a way to fork it, I can take a look in 6-8 weeks.

Back to writing essays

The name? Eh, try it - it kicks serious MZ-ass

@Hosch250 it's in a branch, but the only link I've seen to an editor is through the repo settings page...

just edit after checking out the branch...

should be simple enough.

any branch can be considered a repo of their own

Hi @Brandin!