The cause of the strange horizontal spacings seems to be the assymmetric filling of the table cells -- \resizebox exaggerates the vertical lines widths/dots size.
I tried to 'improve' the tabular usage and suggest to wrap the layout in an outer tabular.
The caption should be used with a [] a...
@LaRiFaRi: Well, the first \tabularnewline is 'correct' for spacing unless caption package is not used, in my point of view (no information on this ... by the OP)
I just had a look on your example with lua-visual-debug and wanted to let you know, that the error is not gone but just almost disappears due to the wider tabulars you have typed
Just do ` \begin{tabular}{|l*{4}{|r}|} & a & b & c & d & \end{tabular` for the second table
@LaRiFaRi: Actually, I have the impression too from looking on the output, that's not completely centered... I think, I should delete my answer. It's no solution at all
@LaRiFaRi: There are three weapons to stir up @JosephWright: 1st ... A reference to Monty Python, 2nd ... mock him about LaTeX3 3rd.... link a 'spam' post in here ;-)
@JosephWright: Well, seriously spoken, I won't have the opportunity to attend TUG 2015, most probably. I am considering to apply for a position as 'supervisor' for student teachers in Mathematics at a local seminar institution for teachers and this a very long application run... multiple steps/hurdles must be jumped over, finally ending in some hot phase sometimes around 20th of july
@DavidCarlisle: Act of sabotage? ;-)
@PauloCereda: Rumours has it, that there are some ... looking carefully around ... TeX fundamentalists sabotaging any development in TeX towards LaTeX3 ;-) Don't spread this message around!!!!! Don't!
@JosephWright If my reading of the lua is right we only clean the test directory at the start of the tests, if I put checkengines = {"xetex","etex"} in either order, the second one fails tlb0027b as it picks up the earlier toc file so effectively has three runs and takes 2 pages rather than 1.
Good day people,
Today, I was wondering how to correlate the bookmark numbering with the table of contents. As the attached picture shows, the Titulo and Declaracion share the same number page at the bookmark part. In the documento, Declaracion correspond to i (Roman number for one). I have try ...
@Johannes_B: I am looking forward for your upcoming redefinition and "Johannes B's New Exciting Grammar of the even more exciting New English" ;-) Can I have a signed copy? :D
@PauloCereda: There's too much butter on those trays... No, senor, it's un, dos, tres :-P
I demand the closing of Hachie's "Buch der Weisheiten" as a duplicate of my "Buch der Weisheiten"... immediately..... Come on, come on (Read/sound like John Cleese!!!!)
@PauloCereda: When I was a teenage boy I found Polly really cute :D
@ChristianHupfer She's very cute indeed. :) I think I read it somewhere, when John Cleese and Polly wrote the second series, they were already divorced.
@DavidCarlisle I'll see if I can sort the normalisation stuff. My plan is that there will be an l3build and expl3 release around the same time as the LaTeX2e update as there are things to 'match up'.
@Ramanewbie people who post math in $ and then remove it are 99 times out of 100 seeing if it renders as mathematics as it does on math.stackexchange. So it was worth a guess:-)
@PauloCereda The site has not been created yet. Once it's created, it'll be in Private Beta for 7 days and only the committed users will be able to participate. This is to create the minimum necessary amount of question so that it doesn't look empty. Then it'll go in Public Beta. You'll get a mail once this happens ;)
@JosephWright \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc} I suspect that there isn't time to finalise a design of that that works, so we should just check in whatever nonsense xetex makes as the etex tlg for those cases.
@JosephWright tlb1816 so chardef of \AA is 197 in classic tex (in particular fam 0) so you get no ^^c5 in cmr10 but in xetex it's 29125 and you get no ^^c5 in cmmi10 feature or bug (and where do they get set these days?)
@DavidCarlisle A few of the XeTeX failures are to do with T1 versus UC encoding. Wondering what to do here: 'in the wild' any XeTeX (or LuaTeX) users will see the failing behaviour but then they really shouldn't be doing \usepackage{t1enc} or really even \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
@DavidCarlisle Wanted to be sure I'd not messed up in ltunicode :-)
@DavidCarlisle Understood: there was a smiley there
@DavidCarlisle I mean only that we have no real position on this or at least have not had one, and so other people have naturally reacted in their own way. See for example EU1, EU2 which I think should both be UC.
@DavidCarlisle Doesn't actually produce any output with pdfTeX, so it's not that much of an issue in a practical sense (you have to fix a document of this form whatever!)
@DavidCarlisle Question is what is 'right' here. For example, with tlb2203 there are chars printed by pdfTeX that don't appear with XeTeX/LuaTeX, but then the test uses inputenc which means there's an error in any case with a newer engine.
@DavidCarlisle So what is 'right'? Fix inputenc and test again, accept that the docs have to be modified, say that TL have things wrong about default codes for the format, ...?
@JosephWright when we just modified inputenc not to do completely the wrong thing for utf8 in xetex last time it was months of calming down public worries that we'd break everything. I suspect leaving inputenc alone this time is the thing to do, there will be enough worries about the other things..
@Johannes_B: No, not really... Let me make an educated guess: You offered her some of your Liver puree.... a liver steak ..... baked liver with beans .... fried liver ... cooked liver with noodles.... ?
@ChristianHupfer Most of the time i am looking very stern (espeacially when the topic is templates) and i wear a black shirt with SECURITY printed on the front. I look as if i could barely read.
Gut reaction given the phrasing of the question is: off-topic. But if the OP can edit into some specific requirement he/she is having trouble meeting, it could become on-topic. ;-)
@DavidCarlisle Yes, I saw the site proposal. It's going through commit right now, at approximately 200 miles an hour. Will probably reach 100% in the next day, if not before.
Please, anybody interesting in participating in the announced vim.SE site, you can use this link to commit to the site (commitment means you promise to ask or answer 10 questions within 3 months from the site's creation): http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/80441/vi-and-vim?referrer=AuXaas64fLrnou2V41ekZw2
@DavidCarlisle -- more likely a bunch of missed punctuation, and more emoticons than she figures are necessary. (brevity is the soul of wit, i believe someone said.) and checking links, and finding paulo's "first" and "favorite" questions and answers. besides, paulo's script rather trashed my first attempt at editing, so it needs to be checked again. real soon now -- we're expecting snow this weekend, so a good time to look at stuff on paper.
@DavidCarlisle -- and now that i've read it, i'm more sorry than ever that on the day of the event, i had other commitments. i really wanted to be there to "raise sand".
@DavidCarlisle -- hello to you too. got to watch out for lurkers.
@DavidCarlisle -- well, a quick mouse-over will tell you who's hiding behind a square. i've contemplated posting a picture of my hat, but i think remaining semi-anonymous lets me hide better from people like you. <smirk> (will you ever come to another tug meeting?)
@PauloCereda -- no apology needed. i've been faced with worse. (at least the result is in an encoding that emacs can cope with, and the language is one that i can read. and i know enough to save backups. been there, done that.)
This is a follow-up question to Xparse Adding backslash after each command.
xparse allows for conditional tokens to be inserted into the parameter text for a macro using the t<token> directive (from the documentation:
t An optional <token>, which will result in a value \BooleanTrue if <token>...
@DavidCarlisle I think you are probably right: loading an encoding file should deal with all of the possible input, or at least that bit not in the ASCII range
@DavidCarlisle On a modern system the time required is more-or-less zero
@JosephWright the reason for not doing it at the time wasn't time but concerns over changing encoding mid-paragraph, but while you may switch between cyrillic and latin 8bit encodings, it seems that switching between unicode and 8bit is sufficiently rare that we should be able to do something, and anyway just having one fixed set of lccodes isn't really an option anyway so teh mid-paragraph case will just have to be dealt with as pragmatically as possible...
@JosephWright that was my thought too. so I'll leave it out. xetex diffs all seem understandable even if it isn't definite what we should do about them, which is pretty good considering.
@DavidCarlisle My plan currently is simply to move files 'out of the way', but I also need to make sure they are not 'fixed' support files. Give me two mins!