My friend today started lurking around SE chat rooms. He asked my about the purpose of the stars. After several seconds of laughing, I told him that, in theory, the star wall is for people who don't lurk for a long time to find relevant important news, discussion points, and other interesting things regarding the site to which the room is related.
@TerryChia delete the record of the Bears achievement.... not me !
@TerryChia yeah that's not one I'd be too interested in, although would be interested to hear how well that 5K screen works and what Graphics card they're using to drive it...
RFID/NFC technology is used in credit cards and many other personal identification applications.
Is it possible/how easy is it to clone a card using a simple RFID reader?
In other words, can the retrieved information be reused in the future by the attacker?
@RoryAlsop cool! it's good to see an Android manufacturer take that seriously, the key however is, how long will they provide patches for. With the rumoured 2+ out next year, you'd hope they'll commit to updates for the 1+ for at least 3+ years...
@RоryMcCune Cyanogen has sorted things pretty well now, in that you don't even need to be a techie to use it. Grab cyanogen from play store, and it updates automagically
@RoryAlsop ooh so they sorted the cyanogen in the play store thing cool!
@raz more worryingly as people move more of financial life to mobile devices is targeted malware that compromises phones as it provides access to browser info. plus common 2nd factor channels (e.g. SMS)
Does Google catches and keeps users typing patterns for identifying purposes?
for example when I'm logged in my Google account and Searching for things Google records my "Typing Pattern" like typing speed and ... and makes an unique signature for me and then Identify me when I'm using Google fro...
@Adnan well it's v. stormy which is the most likely reason. Apparently there was a big problem with the network which is now <fingers crossed> resolved
@RoryAlsop could be worse, a digger could go through your backhaul, and then the redundant links could fail due to some form of cascade, and an entire county could be without connectivity for a very big ISP.
@Tinned_Tuna yeah sorry I have anti-amiguous Rory pinging protection on... last year I did have a tree take my Phone line into a river. ADSL kept working surprisingly well untill it moved and snapped the line
only too BT 6 months to do the permanent repair (luckily their jury-rigged, "throw the line over a tree" method worked well in the interim)
@Tinned_Tuna weirdly all the engineers seemed to know about the "hammer trick" which is how they get lines across rivers when they're sent out on their own...
Fido Solutions is a Canadian cellular telephone service provider owned by Rogers Communications. It used to be owned by Microcell Telecommunications. Although Fido's parent company, Rogers Communications, also operates another wireless brand named Rogers Wireless, customer service call centres, network servers and CEO. Fido pioneered the concept of providing unlimited service in select Canadian cities. Fido was the first carrier in Canada to launch a GSM-based network and the first wireless service provider in North America to offer General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) on its network.
== History... ==
Yea, I saw that! I was kinda excited to go read the FIDO specs and see how they hold up. The web presence is banding a lot of terms about in a very marketing-heavy style, but they have links to the actual spec.
@Tinned_Tuna The crypto behind it is solid, it doesn't look difficult to implement and they have an actual spec plus products out. Pretty well done job so far imo.
3DES uses a 168-bit key but suffers from a meet-in-the-middle attack that can be used to reduce the strength to 2^112. It is not inconceivable that a similar structural flaw would affect any other algorithm, e.g. AES
There are folks who're convinced that there will be a serious (as in, akin to DES's linear cryptanalysis) break of AES in the next 5 years or so. I don't take them all that seriously.
@AJHenderson I'd have to double check, in all likely hood, I think they're just more confident of the ability of the researchers around at the moment and scared by the apparent simplicity of AES
which got awfully inflamed by snowden, but lets be honest, nothing he revealed was really a surprise to any serious IT Security type, more just a confirmation of means and methods we already expected as likely/possible
@AJHenderson That reminds me, I saw a vendor marketing a product at a recent con that customizes the AES s-boxes and store them in a hardware device. I was laughing pretty hard.
Most conspiracy theorists think in terms of: "I don't know this information because they hide it from me"; instead of: "I don't know this information because I am a complete doughnut".
I believe it had something to do with the way they are being selected potentially leading to encryption with an achilies heel, but I never paid that much attention to what the arguments were because I thought they were silly
@Tinned_Tuna According to Don Coppersmith, the smart guy at IBM (including Coppersmith) had actually strengthened the boxes all by themselves, and the NSA merely verified that fact.
Which would mean that differential cryptanalysis had already been discovered twice before Biham and Shamir published it in 1987.
the thing that people always forget about the NSA is that while they may make back room deals to get access to things through covert methods, at the end of the day, if they compromised major protocols intentionally in a way that could be exploited and it got used against US corporate interests, they would be screwed 6 ways to sunday
Is it true that we can’t allow any machine to sleep that may need to be accessed var a VPN connection?
(I am asking this on server fault as it is as much about VPN servers as about the end user PCs sleeping)
@Adnan To active WoL, you need the target ethernet card (physical) to see a packet that contains the magic sequence.
Since the target machine is off, it won't respond to the ARP protocol, so you have to use some sort of broadcast packet.
I.e. the ethernet frame must be "broadcast".
This is relatively easy if you have access to another machine on the same LAN.
If you don't then it depends on whether the various routers will accept to propagate an IP packet that contains a "broadcast" UDP or ICMP (the packet types that, at the ethernet level, turn into a "broadcast frame").
@ThomasPornin Any comments to this? security.stackexchange.com/questions/71187/… Because you have the top answer (and accepted) so it's unlikely any other post will ever get on top... If I'm not making some mistake in my comment, it might be a good idea to change your answer.
At the very least so it favors the mktemp solution instead of some hexadecimal output.
@Luc Hexadecimal means 16 distinct characters. Same-case letters means 26 distinct characters. The difference is not huge.
With 26 possible letters, you need a bit more than 27 characters to encode 128 bits of entropy (so, really, 28 characters). With 16 signs, you need 32 characters.
The difference between 28 and 32, in terms of ease of remembering and typing, is not huge enough to warrant modifications.
The point of the exercise, as I see it, was to make a one-liner that works everywhere and fits in one line.
Hence my insistence of using only commands from coreutils, called from bash.
The exercise is indeed a bit pointless, but hey, that's the Internet.
I think the question is good and not pointless, in fact I generate passwords like this regularly (well, using pwgen instead of some coreutils oneliner)
and nobody is going to remember a 32-character or 28-character password anyway, not if they're not words and not edward snowden himself
so if we're going to use max 12-character passwords, better use the available character set
what I meant by same-case characters is that hex is not easier to remember than same-case alphanumerics, so we might as well use the latter because it increases security at zero extra cost. Maybe mixed-case and special characters also make no difference to memorize (it's all random anyway), but I'm not sure. At the very least we could use a reasonable character set instead of hexadecimals.
@Adnan - it looks like at some point they made the admin tools disabled by default, so first you have to run that hotfix, then you have to actually enable it from Windows Features
@ThomasPornin So basically your reasoning is that the OP asked an impractical question so you give an impractical answer? (because you can't tell me that 32 random characters is practical to remember)
@Xander Fair enough, but readers are going to come here who will simply want to generate a secure password. Don't we educate users anymore on what is useful and what is not?
@Xander Yes. I actually work with readable passwords myself; this is part of procedures where the passwords are huge, split into several parts, and kept in sealed envelopes.
Nobody remembers these passwords, that are used only once every three years or so.