« first day (1356 days earlier)      last day (3565 days later) » 

12:00 AM
@GeorgeCapote I think you're really missing the point here. But it's nice to see you miss it.
 
He is confusing Brazilian for Portuguese, I keep tell yuz.
 
speak for yourself. my uncle is Portugese and I'm from Chicago, where there are more Poles than in Warsaw.
 
And you are not.
 
but I hear them both almost daily when I'm back home.
 
QED.
 
12:00 AM
one sounds like angels, the other like a Polish guy.
actually, good point @RegDwigнt
 
Do they have angels in Polakia?
 
Angielky.
 
I think they have some lumber.
and tools.
they all build things for a living.
 
What city in Portugal is your agèd uncle from?
 
Lisaboaaoo
uncle being the guy my aunt married. not a sibling of a parent.
 
12:02 AM
Leezhboacnzhtrktr
 
So anyway. Before random passersby start missing points, too: the idea is that everything foreign sounds foreign by definition. Once you immerse yourself in a language, everything starts sounding lovely.
Which is why a true polyglot will never consider any language hideous. Except, of course, Romanian.
 
The demonym is Lisboeta.
 
in Romanian it's Lisabona.
 
That’s immaterial.
 
not the demonym. just the name of the place.
 
12:04 AM
Who is Lisa and do you have a picture?
 
you're immaterial.
 
I need an aconda.
 
and, I consider all slavic languages hideous.
 
I need a norange.
 
and I am a true polyglot. but one who hates the slavic languages.
because they are hideous.
 
12:04 AM
What do you expect for stinky slaves captured in the heart of the Congo?
 
what's a norange?
 
It's a fruit.
 
Children.
 
I need some sporange.
 
This is like taking candy from.
 
12:05 AM
from whom?
 
@GeorgeCapote You should go read some Lermontov or Yesenin, or even just Pushkin, then you'll never stop weeping at your own ignorance. Alas.
For that matter, you can start with Kharms.
 
se pregunta, ¿qué sera un naranjo?
 
Es una fábrica de coches.
 
De cockcrochets serán.
 
Y no puede caminar por causa de sus bigotes.
 
12:07 AM
Y su falta de maría.
O falda. Nunca me lo acuerdo.
 
here's what I see: @GeorgeCapote You should go read some Yuri Gagarin or Khruschev, or even Stalin, then you'll never stop paşol na turbinca
 
Ysus y María!
 
Russians are awful.
 
Not sure why you dis poor Gagarin like that.
Even Martha never did that.
 
Santa María que viene en faldas con fajitas vaginescas.
 
12:08 AM
And her family was like personally maltreated by the Soviets.
 
actually, sorry, I'm just playing about Gagarin.
 
Khrushchev was a cool guy, too.
 
first Russian name I could think of.
 
Now Stalin you can dis to your heart's content.
 
@RegDwigнt Sulu was better.
 
12:09 AM
and this Putin guy is a mentalist.
 
@GeorgeCapote what, not even Putin or Lenin?
 
may be more of a lunatic than tchrist here.
 
He's not a lunatic, it's just the praerie dogs.
And with Putin it's friggin praerie bears, so what do you expect.
 
One of the nicest little townlets along the mighty Miss is Prairie du Chien.
 
I'd expect someone in that country of lunatics to just strangle him or something.
 
12:11 AM
Hint: no hounds were harmed in the building of this burg.
 
@tchrist Prairie du quien?
 
@GeorgeCapote He’s too macho for his pants.
Wait, I meant shirt.
Not skirt.
 
@GeorgeCapote how so? All the people capable and willing of that have long fled.
 
I bet he secretly wears women's underwear. that nutcase.
 
Did you expect Um-err-I-can!s to strangle Dubya, too?
 
12:12 AM
or he's killed them all!
 
Every country has the government it deserves.
 
@GeorgeCapote You make that sound like it’s a bad thing.
 
Yeah that too.
 
do the other countries deserve it?
what if he shoots my plane down next?
 
Some of my best friends wear women’s underwear.
 
12:13 AM
are they women?
who am I kidding
your friends are weirdos.
 
Well, first off, he didn't shoot off any planes.
So take a deep breath.
 
So far as I am aware, probably.
 
takes a deep breath
 
This chat is rapidly deteriorating.
 
sorry.
 
12:13 AM
You don't need to bring up Putin.
We were talking language.
Putin did not invent Russian, and indeed hasn't even managed to patent it.
Shit, now I'm giving him ideas.
 
Do your people eat tapioca pudding?
 
Whose now?
 
haha. it's okay.
 
Tapioca ist u. a. Eine Bibliothek für VoIP-Telefonie Tapioca (Software) Eine andere Schreibweise für die Stärkeart Tapioka…
 
I'm actually just sobbing quietly. I had to go and watch Mufasa's death scene for some reason.
 
12:15 AM
I don't think I ever eated eine Bibliothek. For VoIP or otherwise.
 
heeeeeey...
 
@RegDwigнt Youse peoples.
 
that's not what Tapioca isch…
 
I wouldn't know where to get tapioca, for starters. So that places me.
 
Either the Russo-Germans or worse weizer.
 
12:16 AM
@GeorgeCapote oh, switching to Swabian, I see.
 
@RegDwigнt I get mine from a box from the grocery store.
 
resists pun on mine and maniok.
 
⅓ cup white sugar, 3 tablespoons tapioca, 2¾ cups milk, 1 whole egg beaten not stirred, 1 teaspoon of vanilla.
Now, why do I remember this was a recipe that demanded one separate the egg? Hm.
It was the first thing I ever cooked as a lad.
 
@tchrist actually I bet they have said boxes in my grocery store, too. They have all kinds of weirdo stuff. Like, even coconut milk. And soy milk. And almond milk.
 
Ahah!
Skip the soy milk.
 
12:20 AM
And whatchacall it, Hafermilch.
 
It tastes funny.
The vanilla rice milk is ok though.
 
Oat milk.
@tchrist too late. Been drinking for a long time.
 
Ahah, I found another recipe that demands the separation of the egg.
thought so.
 
Those are literally a dime a dozen.
And we are talking kopeks, not pences.
 
The most important element is the one with the most flavors.
 
12:21 AM
I want müesli.
 
@RegDwigнt Čapek?
 
Bitteschön.
But I must be going. I didn't realize how late it was.
 
@GeorgeCapote That’s a queer way to spell granola.
 
Even the dog is asleep!
 
No, he’s hunting.
 
12:22 AM
Whatever happened to him anyway?
Hunting who? Praerie hounds?
 
He is weeping over his lost prairie puppies.
 
Yo veo.
 
hunting whom
 
Déjà dit.
 
akkusativ
 
12:24 AM
No such thing in English.
Who you gonna hunt? Ghostbusters!
 
Do not cross the streams, nor cricks.
 
sure there is. at least whom.
 
Nope.
 
Stuff and nonsense.
 
Not accusative.
At all.
 
12:24 AM
if you hunt something, something is certainly accusative
 
Give him the ball. Give whom the ball?
 
What, you accuse it before killing it? Of what?
 
@GeorgeCapote No, it isn’t. Whose lies have they been lying you?
 
give the ball to him. then it's dative.
give him the ball, him is also dative
 
@GeorgeCapote That’s two strikes.
 
12:25 AM
am I out?
I don't know how spoarts work.
 
I think so.
 
Children. Children. We only just determined that English had zero cases. Plus vocative. No need to quarrel.
 
damn.
 
You don’t seem to understand English.
 
I most certainly do not.
and never will.
but do you?
 
12:26 AM
I’m trying to make an oblique reference here, but he seems too obtuse for it. I’ll need a cuter angle.
 
@GeorgeCapote It's okay, at least you'll have tried. English, on the other hand, will never understand us!
Anyway. Goede nacht etcpp.
 
I let this chat send me os x notifications and now it makes a stupid springy sound every time someone highlights me.
 
Ouvert et haut !
 
tschüs
 
@GeorgeCapote You’ve spelt that wrongo.
 
12:27 AM
and actually, sur et haut
or dessus
 
It’s tschüß.
 
ouvert et haut makes no sense
not in schwyiieetzserdüüüüütsch
 
@GeorgeCapote Ok, this isn’t kindergarten. It’s preschool.
 
or in regular German apparently.
so you enjoy that utter failure while I go make some müesli.
 
@GeorgeCapote TSCHUESS and tschüß are supposed to be case-insensitive matches of each other in the German_Phonebook locale. You’ll just ruin things otherwise.
It’s a standard test.
 
12:33 AM
ah. Swiss people don't normally use the eszett. not used to it.
is there an English word for the ß
 
0
A: When should you recommend deletion?

KitFoxDeletion of low quality content is a sticky wicket. I'm not sure that we have any clear guidelines, but your instincts are pretty much exactly what I would recommend. If content is off-topic, spam, or offensive, you should feel free to vote to delete it. That's clearly content that we don't want...

 
scharfes s
 
@tchrist Did I miss anything with this answer, do you think?
 
sharp-s maybe?
 
‭ ß  00DF       LATIN SMALL LETTER SHARP S
        = Eszett
        * German
        * uppercase is "SS"
        * in origin a ligature of 017F and 0073
        x (greek small letter beta - 03B2)
        x (latin capital letter sharp s - 1E9E)
 
12:33 AM
@GeorgeCapote Yes.
 
@GeorgeCapote We also say ringel-s in Dutch.
I don't know why.
 
weirdos.
 
nods
 
hugs you
 
12:35 AM
10
Q: During what period of history did English use “ß”, the “sharp s” ligature?

tchristThe ß glyph is a lowercase letter than represents a ligature between a long s and a round s, and is still used today in (some versions of) German. Its uppercase equivalent is two characters instead of one: SS. It was apparently also once used in just the same way English, but I cannot find just...

 
what's a sticky wicket?
marvels at these funny words
 
A difficult subject.
 
@GeorgeCapote Ask @Matt.
 
@GeorgeCapote Feel good in your mouth, don't they?
 
crickets
 
12:35 AM
yeah giggles
 
I think the most I've learned on this site is that English had a lot of cool shit way back hundreds of years ago when Perl was cool and now it's just kinda lame.
 
May I please flag him?
 
chuckles
 
Either will do.
 
12:38 AM
@tchrist Does he know?
 
presses tchrist's buttons
press press press
 
splooges spunkily
 
Oh. Ick.
I just wanted some input on the Meta answer.
 
The deletion question is very interesting.
 
I agree. I'm not sure I've given it enough consideration.
 
12:40 AM
Because they gave us the Power without really giving us guidelines for its use.
 
Feels like a stock answer that might require some more subtlety.
 
I do know that it is there to be used.
Did you scour metameta?
In general, I believe a site works best when people use whatever powers they’ve been given. For good, of course.
 
there's a metameta?
:O
 
@GeorgeCapote Yes, it’s near Hobbiton.
 
@tchrist No. I preferred to use the sensible approach.
 
12:42 AM
so you're saying if someone has the power to post an idiot question, they should?
 
@GeorgeCapote Non sequitur.
I’m saying that if you have the ability to cast this and that kind of vote, and are not doing so, then the site misses your participation.
 
non sequitur is my middle name.
 
Well, if you think of anything, leave a comment. Tschüß.
 
Here’s my hunch, Kit.
 
Oh. waits
 
12:43 AM
I believe that the reason it was given is because to be scalable, some moderator powers should be vested in the hands of regular users.
Otherwise there is too much for the mod team to fuss with.
 
Right.
 
The problem is that this one is a hard one to call.
 
We'd spend all day deciding to delete content.
 
There are times that a very negative answer that I do not delete vote because I want it left there as a counterexample.
But truth be told, that is not very common.
@KitFox And get pissed on for unilateralness. This way it takes 3 votes.
So it feels more community-minded this way.
 
@tchrist Well, that will happen anyway.
 
12:45 AM
So I have recently seen.
I haven’t checked the yoyo question today.
 
Part of the issue with deleting content is that then other users who can't see deleted content will sometimes post the same content again, thinking they are being original.
 
But closevotes and deletevotes fail to share certain interesting properties in ways people probably don’t know.
 
That's for low quality stuff, not for spam and crap.
 
Besides that delete votes do not evaporate, they are also not idempotent.
Both those are different from closevotes.
You can only closevote something once.
Even a nonmod can cast more than one delete vote on the same question.
Hence “yoyo question”.
 
I didn't know they don't disappear. How is it possible to vote more than once then?
 
12:48 AM
Delete votes do not expire. Close votes can.
As for voting more than once, I’ll tell you but please don’t chastise me.
 
You said a nonmod can cast more than one delete vote...
 
If you vote to delete something, and it gets deleted, and then you or others vote to undelete it and it comes back, you are free to cast a second delete vote on it.
In fact, I just have done that very thing. That is why I do not wish to be chastised. :)
 
I can't promise not to chastise you, you know that.
 
I don’t mean in a moderator way.
I meant as being a poor sport or something.
Here, I’ll find it.
 
@tchrist Why is it that I am totally disrespected as a mod right up to the point when it's convenient to throw mod abuse in my face?
 
12:50 AM
1
Q: “Recover against” vs. “recover from”

LePressentimentFrom page 53 of Frederick Schauer’s Thinking Like a Lawyer: If Judge Cardozo had said, “We hold that in all cases involving a nonbusiness consumer and a manufacturer of goods, the consumer may recover against the manufacturer for defects in manufacture. . . .” Could anyone please explai...

I’ve delete-voted that question twice now.
 
@tchrist Oh, no, I think that is by design.
 
Since I have not cheated, I do not think I should be chastised.
 
It's like an edit.
 
I think it rather must be by design, because they would never do that by accident.
 
It's interesting though. I wonder about the rationale. Maybe to help if a user goes through and vandalizes a lot of content?
 
12:52 AM
I was afraid you might tell me it wasn’t sporting of me to cast a delete vote more than once even if I am allowed to.
 
I seem to be having connection issues.
 
The peril of course is yo-yo wars. The moment I see that happen, I would flag it for a possible lock.
Because there would be no guarantee of progress or stability otherwise.
 
Yes, that would be the solution.
 
I would rather there were more distinct voters, but honestly, just about no non-mods routinely cast delete votes.
And this is because there is no queue.
I have gone through the last like 8 or 10 pages of the lowest scored close questions and delete voted them.
I did that like years ago.
 
Deletion is tricky, that's why. For instance, I wouldn't delete that question above.
Even though I think it is off-topic.
 
12:55 AM
I did the thing I just mentioned because I think it makes our site look bad to have super low scoring closed questions sitting around.
 
can a question be permanently on hold/closed without being deleted ever?
 
Because it is close enough to offer some guidance.
 
in a bad way, not for mummification I mean.
 
But I am aware that this is not a universal perception.
 
Good evening.
 
12:56 AM
Certainly it would be wrong to deletevote a closed question on meta if the only reason is that it has a low score.
But on the main site, well.
@Mahnax Hi Lurker!
There are things on SO with very high double digit negative votes.
 
Well, I really have to go now. Check in tomorrow. Bye!
 
That nobody deletes. So they must be there for a reason. Maybe.
Bye.
 
Anyone here good with economics by any chance?
 
Hello.
@DemCodeLines I'm not specifically good with economics, but now I'm curious about what you want to know...
 
1:15 AM
It was market demand
 
@Kit I have just posted a bazillion SEE ALSO links on the when-to-delete question.
 
We should learn F#
 
@JohanLarsson No, but G♭ might be ok. Less Microsofter and all.
 
1:32 AM
I think Microsoft are less evil than Apple
 
1:58 AM
@JohanLarsson Yeah, probably.
 
2:10 AM
@JohanLarsson Even if it were true, it would still be completely immaterial. Plus you are simply too young to remember the way they evilly cheated at the POSIX wars and how they paid off George Bush to not enforce the antitrust ruling.
 
Mcrosoft isn't that bad now. At least not as bad as the time period you speak of.
 
But it is a hideous system.
Built out of the bones and flesh of good honest people sacrificed at the altar of Mammon.
"Embrace, extend, and extinguish", also known as "Embrace, extend, and exterminate", is a phrase that the U.S. Department of Justice found was used internally by Microsoft to describe its strategy for entering product categories involving widely used standards, extending those standards with proprietary capabilities, and then using those differences to disadvantage its competitors. == Origin == The strategy and phrase "embrace and extend" were first described outside Microsoft in a 1996 New York Times article entitled "Tomorrow, the World Wide Web! Microsoft, the PC King, Wants to Reign Over the...
Well, screw that.
I would rather never use computers again than be forced to live under the iron boot of the Evil Empire.
 
Haha, that's nice.
 
It’s an asshole company bent upon screwing you as mercilessly as possible.
If there were a real war being fought against them, I would enlist.
They are liars, thieves, and scoundrels, and I shall have nothing to do with such criminal scum.
The should have been exterminated. The George Bush payoff made me want to leave the country and the cult.
 
haha!
 
2:23 AM
I believe you.
Then again, aren't many large companies pretty evil?
Power corrupts.
 
>It’s economics, kid.
It has to do with money.
Who pays for what, and how.
 
I don’t want a technical spec, let alone a programming language or an operating system, which is controlled by a single company. I want international standards.
I want diversity, not monopoly. It’s the only healthy environment.
We get a million résumé proofreading requests.
0
Q: Is it correct to say “remarkable culinary skills” in a résumé?

user280902I’m writing a résume for someone and under skills I'd like to say that they have excellent skills at baking, cooking, and other kitchen-oriented things. Not sure if I’m phrasing it right, but I want to say that they are excellent at baking and cooking with their own company.

What is the Correct Response to this unending onslaught?
Unclear What You’re Asking? Offtopic Proofreading? Offtopic General Reference?
Offtopic Needs More Research?
phenry had a good idea: send it to the workplace.
 
@tchrist Agreed.
@tchrist I actually like that.
That way, the asker will get what he wants, which is to ask a question without its being closed.
And the question is moved to a place that better fits the subject.
(What a ridiculous site, by the way.)
 
2:43 AM
@Cerberus True that.
 
Most people have a workplace.
 
I guess they must not have a Primarily Opinion-Based close reason.
 
There is very little that is remarkable about it.
I haven't even looked at the questions, too boring.
> [Gomez] is being sued under a criminal law that was reformed in 2006, following the conclusion of a free trade agreement between Colombia and the United States. The new law was meant to fulfill the trade agreement's restrictive copyright standards, and it expanded criminal penalties for copyright infringement, increasing possible prison sentences and monetary fines.
So-called "free-trade agreements", like the ones under negotiation between Canada and Europe right now, or the one between Europe and America, or the one between countries around the Pacific, are all devils in disguise, these days.
 
Oh?
It’s a global oligarchy.
Everything is about furthering that goal.
 

« first day (1356 days earlier)      last day (3565 days later) »