« first day (987 days earlier)      last day (4227 days later) » 
00:00 - 15:0015:00 - 00:00

00:00
Oh my.
I thought @Reg would comment on my addition to Bernie Taupin's lyrics.
I just voted on a comment twice -- and got both.
Armie Maupin?
How do you do that?
Cheated.
It forgot me when it migrated, but kept my vote.
So I voted on it again.
And got both.
People's ideas about grammar often tend to lend themselves to such behavioral phenomena. People's ideas about grammar are, for pretty much everybody in Anglophone systems, received from their English teachers. So be careful about pointing fingers, is all. — John Lawler 23 mins ago
Which parts are those? Oh, and pssst! You don't have to subscribe to this site. You can just come and go as you please. — Robusto 10 secs ago
00:05
At least it makes him laugh. That's something.
Bush shaved his head.
@tchrist by design. I always do that.
Bush shaved his bush?
00:06
Is that Bush, Sr.? If so, he's starting to look more like Walter White.
Nobody did more to make George Bush Sr. look good than George Bush Jr.
Heisenbush.
Yes, it is.
@tchrist he's not even from an English-speaking country...
@Robusto So "around these parts" is Ananasland.
@RegDwighт GWB || Lawler?
00:09
The teacher with 25 years of experience in not being anal.
@RegDwighт Oh that is to explain how works it for in world.
I was wondering about that.
Well I answered the anally clenched question.
My job here is done.
Night all.
Oh and speaking of Bush senior, @Rob should really watch that interview.
00:28
@RegDwighт The interview with Bush?
01:05
> This afternoon, the House of Representatives narrowly shot down an amendment that would have stopped the NSA from engaging in any warrantless collection of telephone data on a 205-217 vote.
At last some of those people are waking up.
01:29
@Cerberus I'd like to see the roll call. Do you have a link?
@Cerberus Well, at least my representative voted the right way.
Fucking Republicans want a police state, though, don't they just?
@Robusto Great.
@Robusto Didn't many Republicans vote for the amendment?
> Opponents came from all political stripes as well. Former House speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), a voice from liberal San Francisco, voted against the amendment, as did Michele Bachmann (R-MN), a favorite of the conservative Tea Party. Current Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) voted no. The House's final roll call shows supporters of the amendment included 94 Republicans and 111 Democrats.
I think comprised/comprise would be better than included, though.
Or were. Or just recast the sentence.
01:55
@MετάEd I miss doing that to monitors.
> Molecular signals identified that let some organisms regrow lost heads
There is yet hope for you people!
Would it be "He is fat sense he never exercises", or "He is fat since he never exercises"
Which spelling of sence/since do I use?
or is it sense?
@Cerberus
which spelling of sense/since/etc do I use?
If I have a proposition A, and then I claim it logically follows from another proposition B, I could say "A sense/since B" , which spelling of sense/sinse do I use?
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者
02:20
@Ethan since in both cases.
thanks
Improving English is so exciting
I have never seen anybody who writes "sense" to substitute the proposition "since". However, I have come across several people who speak "since" as "sense".
02:42
I wonder how much portion of users on Stackexchange can speak 2 languages fluently.
I am definitely not one of them =D... Because I am still improving my English proficiency
0
Q: Why are there no organisms with metal body parts, like weapons, bones, and armour? (Or are there?)

CerberusReading this question, Why are there no wheeled animals?, I wondered why no organisms seem to make use of the tensile and other strengths of metal, as we do in metal tools and constructions. I am obviously not talking about the microscopic uses of metal, as in human blood etc. Why are there no p...

@Cerberus I heard some women are capable of murdering other living creatures with their gigantic breasts, this actually happened around in Russia if I am correct.
Okay.
Thanks for informing me of your interests.
No worries.
03:41
> July 10, 2013 - American voters say 55 - 34 percent that Edward Snowden is a whistle-blower, rather than a traitor, according to a Quinnipiac University national poll released today.
> In a massive shift in attitudes, voters say 45 - 40 percent the government's anti-terrorism efforts go too far restricting civil liberties, a reversal from a January 14, 2010, survey by the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University when voters said 63 - 25 percent that such activities didn't go far enough to adequately protect the country.
> "The fact that there is little difference now along party lines about the overall anti- terrorism effort and civil liberties and about Snowden is in itself unusual in a country sharply divided along political lines about almost everything. Moreover, the verdict that Snowden is not a traitor goes against almost the unified view of the nation's political establishment."
 
3 hours later…
06:22
I found a guy who wants to try and help his country grow though asking a question on Yahoo answers
 
2 hours later…
08:46
@Robusto yes, the interview with Walter White.
09:17
[wanders in] Hi!
Hi! I would ask to the users a question about two website designs and have the votation, is there a free service?
Afraid I can't help with that question, I'm just in off the street myself.
09:48
Anybody here read Dickinson or Neruda?
 
2 hours later…
11:32
Morning.
Hi.
I recognize you...did you come to Writer's chat sometimes?
Unlikely.
I answered an RPG.SE question that got migrated here a while back.
I've popped into this chat once or twice but not said much. You may have seen me in rpg.se or scifi.se?
I missed the crazy fun time with Ricky and his question about mashed potatoes and paste.
What a jerk.
[blink]
11:42
@BESW could be. I go there infrequently.
But his attitude is probably representative. So we have low tolerance here for presumptuous unthought out questions.
@Mitch he wasn't a jerk, just wayward. Everyone reacts like that when they don't lurk first.
My boys are awake, so later!
Hm. That's a rather different approach than rpg.se. Does eng.se have high traffic?
@Cerberus You should ask KitFox directly. She'll give an answer like metals when in compounds tend to be too ... disruptive and when together are just too heavy. Bones are made of calcium which is a light element, also metals don't lend themselves to sparse constructions like bone. QED
@BESW fairly high
11:56
Fair enough.
currently 7th on the list
I've noticed that the higher-traffic an SE site is, the less able its community is to accompany new members, and thus those sites require more upfront work by their newest citizens.
It's fair to say that we request people put effort in before they ask a question here.
also, we've spun off a whole nother site for people who are just beginning English, so that they have an easier time
Aye.
But I think it was easier to get going when I first joined.
12:01
rpg.se is much smaller, and we're more able to supply personal accompaniment. I've begun a campaign of adding comments to all first posts that welcome the citizen, point them at the help pages, and invite them to chat when they hit 20+ rep.
We've seen it increase chat population already.
It's less possible to say quantitatively, but I think it's also making people more willing to work on making their questions better rather than just giving up.
possibly. sounds likely
It has the amusing side effect that I regularly have to explain that I'm not a mod.
I think we fear that most of the new users that come here are just passing by hoping we can tell them which is the right preposition or, more often, checking their work for errors. They don't care about English, only their initial question. Questions that are helpful in the wider scheme of things are normally welcomed.
12:06
That's an interesting paradigm.
Scifi.se has a similar one; they're plagued by "Can you identify this story/film I read/saw ten years ago?"
I've thought of asking one of those myself :D
But scifi.se also has the challenge that aside from ID questions, their subject matter is difficult to frame in the usual SE context of "real problems." Questions about science fiction and fantasy stories are almost definitionally idle speculation and curiosity.
It's very interesting to watch, but it leads me to being a fairly quiet citizen in that site.
@BESW Well, frankly, so are the questions on Skeptics.
12:10
I think that at the very least it's good to have these sites in order to better learn what is and is not a fit for the SE context.
It's been pretty cool watching rpg.se recently re-examine a lot of SE-standard rules in light of the RPG medium, and seeing what can be altered without losing the site's direction.
Hey, does anybody here read much poetry?
On Skeptics, you'll ask, "how do we know that we've really been to the Moon", and get the answer "here are actual pictures of the landing site shot by the Hubble telescope". Well, duh. How do I know that that telescope actually exists? How do I know you didn't draw up these pictures five minutes ago in Photoshop? Etc. You get the idea.
They replace one speculation with a different speculation. Except that it's less fun than on SciFi.
I've been asked to do some kind of talent/performance at a fundraiser tomorrow night, and I'm looking to do a selection of readings. So far I've chosen Canción del jinete (Pablo Neruda Garcia Lorca), I started Early - Took my Dog - (Emily Dickinson), and Inalahan (by a local poet).
@BESW Not especially. I've been reading this tumblr and the odd other thing that comes my way
@BESW I only know the Lorca version.
...why did I say Pablo Neruda? [face/palm] Yes, Garcia Lorca.
12:14
@BESW if @Robusto were here, he could give you some pointers
I used to read much poetry, and then I used to write much poetry, and then I used to have the best of both worlds and translate much poetry. But these times are gone.
@MattЭллен I'm here. What's the question?
3 mins ago, by BESW
Hey, does anybody here read much poetry?
Yes. The answer is yes. Next question?
12:15
Context:
2 mins ago, by BESW
I've been asked to do some kind of talent/performance at a fundraiser tomorrow night, and I'm looking to do a selection of readings. So far I've chosen Canción del jinete (Pablo Neruda Garcia Lorca), I started Early - Took my Dog - (Emily Dickinson), and Inalahan (by a local poet).
Question: I'm looking for recommendations on other shortish poems I might add.
I chose the Lorca because it sounds beautiful, and the Dickinson because it defies the conventional perception of her work, and is fun to read dramatically.
I always recommend Edward Lear.
I liked The Prophet but I don't read much poetry.
Last time I read The King's Breakfast (AA Milne).
Ooh. Owl and the Pussycat?
@BESW Try "The Snow Man" by Wallace Stevens. It will explode people's minds.
@BESW Yes! Or The Quangle Wangle's Hat
12:18
The Jumblies.
Or you could try "The Second Coming" by Yeats.
@Robusto A little bleak, even if I do like it and it would be appropriate.
Jez
Jez
finally
i've finished all the core functionality in the system :-)
@BESW Which of his two Canciones del Jinete did you choose? The one that starts “Córdoba. / Lejana y sola. /Jaca negra, luna grande, / y aceitunas en mi alforja. / Aunque sepa los caminos, /yo nunca llegaré a Córdoba." or the one that starts “En la luna negra/de los bandoleros,/cantan las espuelas./Caballito negro./¿Dónde llevas tu jinete muerto?”?
Jez
Jez
everything left is a long list of nice-to-haves
now i can relax
only took 3 quarters of a year
12:19
@BESW Well, the point of poetry is to shake people out of their complacency. If you want to make them comfortable, read them a bedtime story.
@tchrist I memorized the first one in high school, so that one.
Yes, it is haunting.
@Robusto Disagree. Poetry has many purposes, and can't be pinned into a box like that.
But carrying the dead guy is troubling, too.
Besides which, there are many ways to shake people out of their complacency.
Persepolis's author visited my campus when I was at University.
12:21
@BESW I agree about the many purposes, many moods. But poetry that doesn't make you think isn't poetry.
She said that she knew she could write a very sad book, but realized that being sad doesn't bring people together.
If you can make someone laugh, then they will feel closer to you and be more sympathetic.
So she wrote a humorous graphic novel about growing up as an Iranian woman.
Jez
Jez
-5
Q: Why is this site filled with useless, pedantic fussiness?

TerryI am a teacher of English with 25 years experience, with a considerable reputation around these parts I might add. I would never consider subscribing to something as 'exclusive' and anally clenched as the purveyors of this laughable site seem to be...

hahahaha
@tchrist I'd do The Cremation of Sam McGee, but again: carrying around a dead guy.
Juana la Loca did that. :)
@BESW There are many paths to making people think.
12:24
@Jez I must say, there was a guy on scifi.se who argued against migrating questions to you that were rightly in your purview, because he felt eng.se wouldn't treat them seriously due to their science fiction context.
POETRY IS A DESTRUCTIVE FORCE
by Wallace Stevens

That's what misery is,
Nothing to have at heart.
It is to have or nothing.

It is a thing to have,
A lion, an ox in his breast,
To feel it breathing there.

Corazon, stout dog,
Young ox, bow-legged bear,
He tastes its blood, not spit.

He is like a man
In the body of a violent beast.
Its muscles are his own . . .

The lion sleeps in the sun.
Its nose is on its paws.
It can kill a man.
I'm just not sure it's legitimate to attribute intent to a literary form.
Perhaps one could try to say that a limerick has a particular goal as a format, but poetry?
"The function of the poet is to help people live their lives." —Wallace Stevens, The Necessary Angel
Depends on how broadly you define intent.
Jez
Jez
So many of Arqade's questions are about Minecraft
@Robusto I'm directly responding to "the point of poetry is to shake people out of their complacency," and "poetry that doesn't make you think isn't poetry."
12:32
@BESW Well, but that's the point of all good writing. If it doesn't make you think, give you new ways of looking at the world, what good is it? You might as well just read "A Visit From St. Nicholas" over and over if you don't believe that.
These are noble aspirations for poets, should they choose to use the medium in that way. But they are not inherent to the medium, and it smacks of elitism to be able to claim that some things which their creators call poems are not because they do not conform to someone else's standard.
@BESW Oh, you've reduced the discussion to name-calling. I am an elitist, therefore my points are not valid. And so it goes.
I don't mean to say you're an elitist, and I apologize for the implication.
I do mean to say that there is a troubling idea of privilege in declaring "this is" and "this is not."
I am not using "elitist" to invalidate points.
Well, for not meaning to say something, you certainly said it. This is a well known rhetorical device known as praeteritio.
I am using it deliberately to describe why I find them troubling.
12:36
You just said what something is. Don't you find that troubling, by your very own definition?
'... there is a troubling idea of privilege in declaring "this is" and "this is not."' Your words. Don't you find that a little self-contradictory?
I'm trying to present my views for discussion, not win a debate. Thus I use phrases like "the idea of privilege" and "it smacks of elitism," rather than declaring them to be such.
Now you won't own up to having opinions, and stating them.
I am saying "this is what I am seeing," or at least I am trying to.
Can’t tapdance on pussytoes.
....
12:38
I find this entirely disingenuous of you.
When did this turn into a debate?
You tell me.
Anyway, I was summoned to this conversation. If you don't like what I have to say, don't listen.
[blink] Can we step back for a moment?
I have to commute. Good luck with your problem.
I want to hear your ideas and have a conversation. Insight can arise from clashes of opinion, but I need some assumption of good faith.
I apologized and tried to restate my case. Clearly I failed. I apologize again, and have a good commute.
12:42
Mordred in secret   mirthless watched them
betwixt hate and envy,   hope and torment.
Thus was bred the evil,   and the black shadow
o’er the courts of Arthur   as a cloud growing
dimmed the daylight   darkling slowly.
12:54
Does Gawain rhyme with Duane or with the first part of now and then?
The first one he said sounded like the first part of now and then. Like gown with a bit of extra syllable.
Ah, gotcha.
/ˈgɑwɪn, ˈgɔ-/
...this may be a dialectic issue. I'm probably nonstandard compared to just about any common accent.
12:58
Go on!
Hm?
Sounds like gown. :)
Kinda.
I grew up saying it wrong. Sigh.
It was Sir Ga-WAYNE and the Green Knight when I was a kit.
Little did I know. :(
Naturally.
I think most of us hit that kind of realization at some point.
Many words not used in common speech I first ran into while reading when rather young.
About that word in particular, or in general?
In general.
13:00
Trying to think of others for me.
Epiphany got an accent on the first syllable until I was in high school.
Oh yes, the 4–5 syllable words often had wandering stress.
inNOVative
And of course, listening to the BBC we learn that we've been pronouncing nearly everything "wrong."
Something like that.
I'm born and raised on a very multicultural, multilingual island. So "right" and "wrong" really never come into it.
13:03
I can’t abide shedule, but conTROVersy can slip out if you care to put on airs. Or the radio.
(Unless you're trying to determine which orthography to use for the local language. Then you're in trouble.)
I slip in and out of accents depending on what's around me, but my "default" speaking style is often considered "unaccented" or "British."
(It's not British.)
Then again, I was once told that my speech is entirely unintelligible.
Jez
Jez
13:24
heh, i always pronounced it ga-wayne too
that sounds nicer for some reason
I think 99% of people who pronounce it will say ga wayne. I'm declaring the old pronunciation dead.
So. Um. Am I really the only person here to agree with that Java D guy how horrible our site name is?
So how do you pronounce "Gaheris" and "Agravaine"
@RegDwighт what Java D guy?
-3
Q: English language and usage?

Java D English Language & Usage OR English Language & its Usage I think its should be there.. What do you think masters of English language?

As written, it parses as “English Language and English Usage,” which sounds fine. — Bradd Szonye Jul 17 at 11:01
@Bradd actually it does not sound fine to me. As a matter of public record, it never did. I'm with the OP on this one. It sounds like "Car audio and installation". It is awful, as you do not install a car, you install the car audio. Or "Human beings and behavior". Or "Star Trek and episodes". Well, you get the idea. The and implies that it connects two things on the same level, while it quite clearly does not. I will refrain from using strong language here, but it is sloppy to say the least. — RegDwighт 5 mins ago
13:30
It sounds fine to me.
You said that.
Whence my question.
Does "Human beings and behavior" sound good to you, too?
What does Fowler say? He always has Opinions.
I wouldn't know where to begin to search for this. Under conjunctions?
13:32
@RegDwighт well, that's a different thing to me
I think that "2. Bastard Enumeration" under the "and" entry is the right one. Reading.
EL&U is ingrained.
(For the record, my copy is 50 years old.)
"Human mind and behaviour" sounds just fine.
or "Car drivers and passengers"
@MattЭллен exactly.
Precisely right.
13:35
"Cow milk and cheese"
Because they are on the same level.
@MattЭллен now try "Cow milk and pastheurization".
That entry was enlightening but not helpful. Looking up "enumeration."
...I love Fowler's snark, but sometimes he's useless.
[pokes Strunk & White]
@RegDwighт I see what you're getting at, but usage doesn't cause me that problem.
The thing is, in "English usage", the English part already means "English language". So there is no point in specifying it in the first part. It should either be "English and usage" or "English language and English-language usage".
Otherwise you are connecting ["English" where we do not know what it refers to] [so we specify "language"] and ["English" where it all of a sudden does specifically mean "English language"] [usage].
English (language and usage) works for me.
13:40
Yeah, but why?
How very mathematical.
What is the "language" part doing there? It's redundant.
What else could "English" possibly mean?
@MattЭллен Precisely.
So you are saying that "English (language and usage)" means "(English language or people) (language and usage)".
Which of course is nonsense.
13:41
I don't have an explanation for why it doesn't bother me.
Yeah I understand.
Ummm. If I can throw in my own two cents, the issue should be clarity, not concision.
Concision is lovely and elegant, but only when it does not impede clarity.
So in any case you all came down on that poor OP too damn hard.
Although "English" commonly refers to "language," it is a courtesy to those scrolling through a list or glancing at the site if we make that entirely clear.
I didn't think I was being harsh. I was trying to say "hey man, don't worry about it."
13:44
To put it another way: "Language" is the subject of the site. "English" is a modifier narrowing the scope of language the site addresses.
Oh I do not mean anyone in particular.
I'm just saying, "Car drivers and insurance" only makes sense if what you mean is "Car drivers and car insurance", but not if you're aiming at "Car drivers and car-driver insurance".
To use the modifier with an implied subject is technically correct but not... I'm not sure what the word is. User-friendly?
I'm not going to say I think I know what the title should be, but I DO think that whatever it is, it should include the word "language."
@BESW that is not my point. My point is if you imply it, imply it at all times; if you specify it, specify it in both cases. But do not mix and match on a whim.
@RegDwighт If those are the only two possible titles for the site, then I would support the repetitive but clear choice.
I suspect there's an alternative title which is both clear and concise while still being less likely to trigger the pedant in us, but I don't know what it might be.
Well it doesn't have to have anything to do with the current title. Gaming became Arqade.
13:47
English Usage and Language
You, sir, are very funny.
Seriously though, does that one sound more off to you?
Thank Heavens.
13:49
English as She is Wrote comes to mind.
Spoke.
Unless there was a sequel.
Or, @tchrist, unless there was a prequel.
@tchrist Perhaps the -ain ending simply follows other patterns for unstressed final syllables, as in captain, chamberlain, porcelain, etc. When it comes after a vowel sequence, as in Gawain, it may get almost entirely lost.
14:17
@RegDwighт Speech is primary.
@Robusto Apparently. I only became aware of this when talking with somebody who had been a reader (and/or subeditor?) for the OED. He had the “Gowin” pronunciation.
FWIW, I pronounced it "ga-WAYNE" when I read it in high school too. My teacher pronounced it that way, too.
@RegDwighт I still like the Arçade spelling for that SE site, kind like with Arsenal soccer team. It fits.
But that's what you get when you read a lot and don't hear things spoken. When I was a young child, for a long time I read misled as majzəld.
Obviously my teacher had never heard it spoken by someone who knew the difference.
I once relegated mishit to profanity.
Or at least to vulgarity.
Yeah, that's an easy one to do.
14:26
There are generations here who pronounce unusual words with a Midwestern US accent, because that's where the teachers of that time mostly came from, for a variety of reasons.
@BESW I have no idea what that means.
Broadcasters for decades were sent to the Chicago–Milwaukee area to lose their regional accents on the air.
But by the time I learned how acclimated was originally pronounced, the "wrong" pronunciation was the norm.
What words are you thinking of?
It was the closest thing to General American that you could get, and for a very long time.
Any word that you'd learn in a classroom and not use regularly outside it.
I don’t know any such words.
Well, maybe medical terms.
You wouldn’t believe how shocked I was by the pronunciation of flax.
14:28
Because I had teachers from the Philippines and... I'm not sure where... I learned about the Table of the Elephants and the PITH-iggorean Theorem.
Still, I resist the planing-off of nuance, especially in meaning, just because popular ignorance rules: noisome is not a synonym for noisy, and enormity isn't about size. draws line in sand
I always said lee-noom, but the botanists I know say *lye-nuhm".
I've even seen noisome used incorrectly in the pages of The New Yorker, which is famed for its fussiness about language.
I once attended a comparative religions class which taught me about Muslim EYE-mams.
@tchrist So how would you pronounce flaccid?
14:31
With a giggle?
And the mispronunciation of short-lived is my particular bête noire.
@BESW That’s impossible. That’s even worse than anteproparoxitonic stress! I have no idea what the word for pentasyllabics stressed on the first of five syllables is.
@Robusto Not like accidental, eh? :)
(While running a D&D campaign, I had to abandon the perfectly appropriate word taint and instead use stain to describe the fel influence of Lovecraftian horrors on the characters, because the players couldn't take "taint" seriously.)
Nor accelerate, accessible or many others.
@BESW Stain is correct historically.
14:34
@tchrist Do tell.
> Those who made them did not desire strength or domination or hoarded wealth, but understanding, making, and healing, to preserve all things unstained.
Citation?
> But you have not forsaken your companions, and the least reward that you shall have is that the memory of Lothlórien shall remain ever clear and unstained in your heart, and shall neither fade nor grow stale.
> Yet after the fall of Sauron their power was ever at work, and where they abode there mirth also dwelt and all things were unstained by the griefs of time.
...I'm not sure Lord of the Rings is "historical" in the context of Mythos, but interesting that he used the word that way.
> Galadriel! Galadriel! Clear is the water of your well; / White is the star in your white hand; / Unmarred, unstained is leaf and land / In Dwimordene, in Lórien / More fair than thoughts of Mortal Men.
'Build not thy hopes so high, O Bauglir --
I am no tool for thy evil treasons;
torment were sweeter than a traitor's stain.'
14:40
Being Tolkien, though, it's likely that he didn't arrive at that word choice in a vacuum.
I wonder if an inspirational source for it could be found with anything approaching not-just-guessing.
Nobody arrives at word choice in a vacuum.
yeah. too much dust
> OED stain 1. The action of staining; pollution, disgrace.
Jez
Jez
Humans (variously Homo sapiens and Homo sapiens sapiens) are primates of the family Hominidae, and the only species of the genus Homo. Humans are distinguished from other primates by their bipedal locomotion, and especially by their relatively larger brain with its particularly well developed neocortex, prefrontal cortex and temporal lobes, which enable high levels of abstract reasoning, language, problem solving, and culture through social learning. Humans use tools to a much higher degree than any other animal, and are the only extant species known to build fires and cook their food...
1563 Googe Cupido Eglogs etc. (Arb.) 114 - Vnhappy wretche that wolde Haue forced the Ladye of this forte with stayne of Royaltie To haue consented to his wyll in fylthye Lecherye.
1587 Greene Euphues Wks. (Grosart) VI. 174 - The staine of the one did ad a disgrace to the glorie of the other.
1607 Shaks. Timon v. i. 176 - Giuing our holy Virgins to the staine Of contumelious, beastly..warre.
Jez
Jez
14:43
I love how we are rated "least concern" for conservation status
> OED stain v. 5 fig. a. To defile or corrupt morally; to taint with guilt or vice.
@Robusto I mean specifically that a great deal of Tolkien's worldbuilding was taken directly from previously existing mythologies and lores, rather than simply generically inspired by such things.
1446 Lydg. Nightingale P. i. 287 - Moch peple viciously Were in this age..thorgh theire vice destreied sore & steyned.
1570 Googe Pop. Kingd. i. 8 b, - Lest that he shoulde be periurde calde, and staynde with heresie.
1657 Attest. Innocency Zach. Crofton 14 - A Master of a family this twelve year, or thereabouts, never stained with the least disorder or incivility.
1777 W. Cameron in Sc. Paraphr. xvii. vii, - Though your guilty souls are stain’d with sins of crimson dye.
1847 Yeowell Anc. Brit. Ch. x. 104 - The British kings were stained with every vice.
I think that tells the tale.
But still there is more.
5b. To impair the beauty or excellence of. Obs.

1575-85 Abp. Sandys Serm. xiii. 219 - Ought not we to doe the best we can to cast out all that steineth and marreth the perfect beautie of his Church?
1584 Reg. Privy Council Scot. III. 702 - To blott and stainyie the gude word of God.
1633 P. Fletcher Purple Isl. ii. xv, - Which my rude pencil will in limming stain.
True enough. He was an Old English scholar, after all. "Middle Earth" was taken directly from OE's middangeard.
> 5c. To be or inflict a permanent reproach to or stigma upon; to blemish, soil (a person’s reputation, honour, conscience, etc.); †to charge with something disgraceful. Also intr. of the conscience: †To suffer stain.
1513 More Rich. III (1883) 76 - With which infami he wold not haue his honoure stayned for anye crowne.
1540-1 Elyot Image Gov. 32 - If a knight..had used any unseemly thyng, appairing or steyninge the estimacion of the degree, whiche he represented.
1577 Kendall Flowers of Epigr. 102 - Thei would not haue ye Popedome staynde, with any more Pope Iones.
A. 1605 Montgomerie Misc. Poems ii. 5 - Conscience stenȝies if he steill.
1610 Holland Camden’s Brit. (1637) 545 - Shee that by her light behaviour had not a little steined her good name.
14:46
Shire, which comes from scir, is still evident in British place names.
Sure.
Eärendil/Orwandel as Venus never fails to amuse me.
@Jez yeah! we're of no concern. Least implies some
Many bosoms burdened with foreboding vague
their glooms disowned neath glad laughter.
In song and silence, snow and tempest,
winter wore away; to the world there came
a year once more in youth unstained,
r were leaves less green, light less golden,
the flowers less fair, though in faded hearts
no spring was born, though speeding nigh
danger and dread and doom's footsteps
to their halls hasted. Of the host of iron
came tale and tidings ever treading nearer;
Orcs unnumbered to the East of Narog
roamed and ravened on the realm's borders,
Note the four-stress lines with alliteration, and signs of coesura abound: it's aiming at that Anglo-Saxon poetry feel.
14:48
I don’t have Sir Gawain electronically in Middle English, but I hazard it contains similar uses of stain (but under bizarre spellings).
@Robusto It is.
2 hours ago, by tchrist
Mordred in secret   mirthless watched them
betwixt hate and envy,   hope and torment.
Thus was bred the evil,   and the black shadow
o’er the courts of Arthur   as a cloud growing
dimmed the daylight   darkling slowly.
There you go.
I like the last line.
@BESW Perhaps you should declaim some alliterative poetry of that sort.
Funny to see Tolkien doing Morte d'Arthur.
Jez
Jez
all hail the daily mail
I sure hope they won't use any of these horrendous fonts.
14:53
@Robusto How could you tell? :)
Jez
Jez
@RegDwighт "no enjoyment like reading" - there's a virgin
Isn't it obvious?
@RegDwighт My God, I think they letterspaced the lowercase!
@RegDwighт not any, they'll use them all!
@Robusto Hence my smiley. It’s about 1,000 lines.
14:54
@RegDwighт This is just a ploy to get men to spend their cash quicker, and for women to hang on to it.
@Robusto Don’t you mean the other way around?
Oh wait, women need no incentive.
[blink]
Jez
Jez
@tchrist well the Met police redesigned their signs with slogans on them a while ago from a cursive to a printed font because the former was "discriminatory to short-sighted people"
I never met a man who read Austen except under coercion; nor a literate woman who didn't simply idolize her.
Jane Austen: The chickflicks of yesteryear.
14:56
Except she keeps getting resurrected in film.
Jez
Jez
Austen & Boon
Let's see if I can't find that blog post...
@Robusto I know one who did, and he’s even married with two children now.
Jez
Jez
"Pride and Prejudice takes place in a small village called Hertfordshire"
is that right? i thought it was a county
14:59
Pride and Prejudice has been rendered in film four times: in 1940, 1980, 1995, and 2003. We haven't had a sighting for 10 years, but this thing could blow at any minute, like Vesuvius.
00:00 - 15:0015:00 - 00:00

« first day (987 days earlier)      last day (4227 days later) »