« first day (108 days earlier)      last day (1756 days later) » 

00:01
Familysearch gets me a lot better results when I work collection-by-collection
Usually I can narrow down a few collections that might have the information I'm looking for, but I don't like using their search-all-collections search unless I have to
 
2 hours later…
02:13
Hey @Verbeia :)
Hi @AmericanLuke
I find that the best strategy is to use Ancestry and FamilySearch in a complementary way. Most of my research is in the British Isles (the post-migration period was already thoroghly researched by other family members).
FamilySearch is very good for Isle of Man records, whereas Ancestry is hopeless.
It is also better for Scotland, though usually you end up having to pay for a few things from ScotlandsPeople.
I've never found findmypast to be much use, but I never subscribed either.
I don't think I've ever used findmypast
I could never work out what it added beyond what one already got from the combination of the other two.
I keep trees on Ancestry, as that saves downloading the images into my main tree on my laptop.
I take it you have an Ancestry account?
@AmericanLuke, yes, I do. That's where I started.
02:18
I'd get one, but it doesn't fit my budget right now
In terms of getting the most out of it, learning what searches are most effective is useful.
It's not cheap, I grant you. I think I will be able to drop down to a Britain and Ireland membership next year. At the moment I have World, but I don't really need more than Britain and Ireland now that I've filled out all the Australian and NZ bits.
Can you get just a US, russia, and germany version? :P that's all I'd need
Sometimes I contemplate making a giant list of everything I need and when I have a few weeks of nothing to do getting a free trial account
But I'd never have the time or the organization necessary
You have to be careful with trial memberships - they will convert to a permanent one if you aren't fast enough to cancel before the end of the trial. But cancelling a permanent membership is not hard. My partner also had one and we consolidated on the one account.
Especially when I'm researching in the US, I find local collections much more useful than broad collections on the big sites
02:35
I think it really depends on the location of interest. Ancestry is excellent for England, especially now that they are digitising parish and similar records from county archives. West Yorkshire and Lancashire are very good; some of the Home Counties like Berkshire and Oxfordshire less so. But more is coming on line all the time.
Yup. Familysearch is pretty good for germany, but stinks for a lot of the US (at least where I research)
FamilySearch is especially good for big-sweep queries, like searching on parents to find all the siblings of your ancestor. That is a very useful strategy to work out roughly when the parents were born, which allows you to narrow down dates for searches on the marriage and birth records of those parents.
18th and early 19th century families were often very large, with the eldest child born as much as 20 years before the youngest. So you need to know the siblings to narrow down the parents' likely birth date.
Ancestry is much better for Census records, so 1850s onwards. In general, the older the record, the more likely it is to be on FamilySearch rather than Ancestry, unless Ancestry has digitised a particular parish all the way back.
@Verbeia Definitely
Friday night here, so I'm getting off for the evening. I'll be back tomorrow :)
03:18
@AmericanLuke see you later
 
9 hours later…
11:51
@Verbeia Findmypast is enormously useful to me because it has the largest coillection of Welsh parish records online, plus other collections that don't overlap with Ancestry. Plus its indices to UK censuses were done independendetly of Ancestry, so someond who can't be found due to a mistranscription at one site may show up on the other.
 
2 hours later…
13:55
And I'm back :D
 
5 hours later…
18:25
Currently, there is next to nothing on-line on my own ancestors except what I've published myself. So, research these days is on collateral lines and modern descendants.
For on-line work, I have bookmarked websites and collections that I use frequently. I play the various searches to find records.
I have an ancestry account, but don't keep my subscription active continously. During lapses, I bookmark search results and to-do items in zotero for later follow-up.
One of my wish items for ancestry is sortable results tables. Often, I need to copy and paste to a spreadsheet to sort and/or filter.
 
2 hours later…
20:26
@bgwiehle What area do you primarily research?
 
1 hour later…
21:33
@AmericanLuke (Back from "The Day of the Doctor"...) Not sure what you mean - where am I when i do my research (Canada), what regions am I researching (ancestors in Silesia and Transylvania, relatives in Canada, USA, Germany, Romania), what sites do I use for on-line research (whatever site has what I need - depends on the locastion and the type of record).
Oops. I really need to read my messages before I post them :P
Sortable results tables would be useful, but I prefer to do my work locally :)
21:49
(Ditto on checking my spelling). Re sorting - sometimes filtering further on-line would be counter-productive, but I want to compare matches in a different order than the algorithm's presentation. One can't simply cut and paste without messing with column widths and unmerging cells, etc., before getting to the task.
22:07
I see what you mean, and that would be useful. I thought you were talking about a feature completely separate from the search
Do you make your tree online or locally?
FTM 16 Databases in my laptop hard drive. Over the years I've looked at gedcom to html programs, worldconnect, various on-line tree sites. All have different pros and cons. With ancestry and others, an initial stumbling block is gedcom size limits for upload.

« first day (108 days earlier)      last day (1756 days later) »