« first day (3872 days earlier)      last day (365 days later) » 

17:02
Intuitive Machines-1 is soon going to land on the moon!
Let's hope it works because it is the first time that the US landed on the soon since 1972
17:28
So I've been doing some orbital physics calculations recently in code and I was wondering if y'all could confirm my suspicions
I have 2 coplanar intersecting orbits, and all 3 anomalies of the intersection point for both orbits. To calculate the delta v needed to switch between the orbits at that point I just use the vis-viva equation on both and subtract the velocities, right?
(I also have the parameters of said orbits)
@Seggan not quite, but close. The issue is if the velocity is in a different direction or at a different angle. Then to get the difference (or the delta v needed to change the velocity), you have to use Pythagorean Theorem
Ok, so I know I can get the angle from the anomalies, how would I convert that into delta v?
The explanations I've seen online assume circular orbits, which I can't assume
I don't see how the Pythagorean theorem would help here
Ah ok I get it now
I think the vis-viva is a special case of that?
ty either way, I literally spent days on this
Here is a simple calculator which you can use to calculate any length or angle of the triangle calculator.net/triangle-calculator.html
@Seggan The vis-visa can be used to calculate the velocity of an orbit
Oops I meant my original solution
You can calculate velocity 1 minus velocity 2 if both are in the same direction
Mhm I get it now
ty
17:47
Your welcome
 
3 hours later…
20:45
it's not the Pythagorean Theorem if it doesn't involve right triangles
it's sparkling vector maths
cosine law, I think it'd be generically referred to as
anyway. Fingers crossed that the Intuitive Machines stream isn't bad
it being on nasa.gov doesn't give me confidence
21:03
@ErinAnne Your right, it is not the Pythagorean theorem since it does not include right angles.
Hopefully the Intuitive Machine stream isn't bad. I never watched anything on that webpage before so I really have no idea if it is good or not.
Also for some reason I cannot edit the comment I made about Pythagorean theorem, so it looks like that it will have to stay.
NASASpaceflight is also streaming the landing of Nova C. I am not sure where should watch it.
I guess it depends on how much excited shouting you want
21:59
The live stream is now starting
22:15
I know too many of these guys. Each time I see one of them on the podcast it's weird
Shaun Stewart dramatically putting on his headphones
I bet they had to do that like five times because he wouldn't stop laughing
podcast? livestream, I mean. bad brain
at one point he was late for work because the wheels got stolen off of his truck overnight, which is obviously horrible. terrible way to start your day
before he got in, we took the wheels off his office chair and rested it on a bunch of textbooks
that's the kind of friend group that was
22:43
livestream guy doesn't know Descartes was French
23:26
I wonder why there's a comm switchover at / near landing
they had telemetry almost the whole way down
I am nervous. It might have crashed
We have no signal right now
They did say that it can land automatic, so maybe it is just a communication issue
Fingers crossed
automatic is nominal
this wasn't a piloted landing
I know. That is why I still have a bit of hope that it could be okay.
this is why high-gain antennas suck
always, always have a low-gain beacon so you can find out of the spacecraft is still alive if the high-gain won't point correctly
They said it was off by 8 degrees at one point in the live stream
OMG THERE IS A RETURN SIGNAL!!
23:33
and it seems like it gets deleted in all the missions I've worked on because oh it duplicates what the high gain antenna does, gotta get rid of mass
huh you must be like 30 seconds ahead of me
Where are you watching?
I am on NASA Spaceflight
the nasa.gov one
Okay
It seems like the signal is weak, but is there. It might take up to 15 min or longer to fully establish communications. That is the last I heard
sounds like they've landed intact and need to refine comms to get the full picture on if they're 100%
still probably better off than SLIM
I hope it didn't flip over
23:40
@ErinAnne that was honestly impressive that it restored functionality
there's basically no way they'd be getting signal from a high-gain antenna if it was that far out of attitude
it's almost certainly upright, maybe not pointed exactly the way they thought, but still
gotta admit I'm a little surprised--even if you land off-nominal, surely you've got some kind of attitude determination on board. A star tracker would get you your landed attitude
presumably your HGA can re-point, so why isn't it pointed right? or is it fixed?
maybe it's not a pointing error I guess
Maybe it landed on a slope and is now facing in a slightly angled way
yet more reason you'd think that, post-landing, you'd assess your attitude and re-orient your high gain antenna
it's common to be able to point those because high-gain is necessarily narrow-beam
@ErinAnne they already had some star tracking issues at the beginning that they pushed up a patch for - I wonder if they have more?
well that would be embarrassing
huh. I'll be curious to hear what's going on
23:47
Indeed
Maybe there is an issue with a gyroscope onboard.
oh god if they have another ground-interference-SIGI issue
I don't even know if those are SIGIs onboard, it wouldn't surprise me
a lot of IM is the old Morpheus team
We got an image from the spacecraft
23:59
I wonder if EagleCam worked. It sounded like they were going to eject that shortly before landing to get a photo from a separate perspective

« first day (3872 days earlier)      last day (365 days later) »