« first day (3568 days earlier)      last day (669 days later) » 

00:02
A de Laval nozzle (or convergent-divergent nozzle, CD nozzle or con-di nozzle) is a tube which is pinched in the middle, making a carefully balanced, asymmetric hourglass shape. It is used to accelerate a compressible fluid to supersonic speeds in the axial (thrust) direction, by converting the thermal energy of the flow into kinetic energy. De Laval nozzles are widely used in some types of steam turbines and rocket engine nozzles. It also sees use in supersonic jet engines. Similar flow properties have been applied to jet streams within astrophysics. == History == Giovanni Battista Ven...
Cool. Interesting concept. But, back to humans. How would you open (accelerate) someone's mind? Role model, Art, Desperation and pain?
searching for it on Space SE may have been illuminating
ah, but that was the whole point of the metaphor! opening isn't accelerating
being selectively open is a useful adaptation
Interesting. I think I understand now. Freedom of mind can diffuse your thoughts. But narrow circumstances can critically focus your mind.
@fyrepenguin - you are correct. I was talking about the Starship's dry mass plus cargo.
 
6 hours later…
06:37
@ErinAnne Thanks! The linked question is not useful to me because "Riding a bike during EVA would be a very different proposition, and I will not comment on it." The first page of questions on that tag is even further removed from my intent. Should I ask a regular question?
06:57
that's what the site is for, though I'd lay out explicitly what you want answered that isn't answered in the existing questions about bikes
 
14 hours later…
20:41
They say that reporting (on engines) was incorrect because an engine cannot be restarted inflight (after shutdown).
 
2 hours later…
22:42
6 engines out, some of the other engines working at 70% capacity or less . Maybe there is still hope for this Super Heavy.
who says? where do they say it
@TheMatrixEquation-balance Why “maybe”? The program seems to be going successfully enough
@TheMatrixEquation-balance well, they certainly are supposed to be able to relight twice when not on the pad, so I don’t know what you mean by not being restarted in flight
Terran Space Academy - youtube.com/watch?v=13KtGfpZtDw ("Exterior engines cannot restart..."
oh, a Youtube channel I've never heard of. Good to know!
It’s plausible that re-light capability is not on all engines. Would be good to have a proper source for that
22:53
yeah. On the one hand, not all the engines need to relight (though I don't know if I've ever heard how many engines are supposed to be used for boostback). On the other hand, it's surely tempting to have all the Raptors be identical aside from the nozzles
@fyrepenguin - This is a critical junction. They don't have room for more than 33 Raptors (in Super Heavy). And they can't realistically scale up the current Raptor engine. If it turns out they have a critical power deficiency in Super Heavy, they will not have any easy solutions.
I don't understand why you think a critical power deficiency is a risk
aside from "if we can't actually get all the Raptors to run at full power"
ascent analysis simulations are trivial. It's really, really easy to figure out what the power margins are
So far, given the information, it could be the case that the current Super Heavy configuration is the bare minimum for a loaded Starship launch.
Assuming that all the Raptors are firing.
@TheMatrixEquation-balance given what information? They’ve mentioned that they should have engine-out capacity. Where does this mention of barely having enough power to launch come from?
@fyrepenguin - we don't know what the margins are. At what percent of capacity, Raptors can work during assent.
23:00
lol
if you see an analysis out in the wild that says there may not be sufficient power, bring it
or if you put together an analysis yourself somehow
I'll sleep like a baby, if you provide some insider information confirming that my fears are not founded.
there's no particular reason to believe that SpaceX don't know what the margins are, though
the same as you'd give up your StackExchange account if it turned out that Super Heavy was going to make a landing attempt?
Elon always exaggerating.
ahahaha. ok
Elon, maybe. Particularly with timelines. But not so much talking to the FAA

« first day (3568 days earlier)      last day (669 days later) »