« first day (1149 days earlier)      last day (3088 days later) » 

01:05
@kimholder Not enough, altho I'm actively working on it
 
3 hours later…
03:36
@Antzi it just sort of happens that you say good night, and then later i see you are on line again, and i do the arithmetic. hazard of lurking here so much, i guess :]
@kimholder I'll report you to the mods for Stalking !
Oh wait...
stalking is our job... :]
Altho this gives you a time box at best :p
well, when you tell me you are going to sleep, and then you are back here 7 hours later, that says something :P
I lied !
I went to watch a shojo before sleeping :p
03:48
yes, well i assumed i had to deduct at least an hour from supposed sleep time, unless your computer is strapped to you
So what time did you clocked me in ?
up there i noticed your icon had appeared in the sidebar, when i said i was involuntarily tracking you, and that was 6 hours after you'd last spoken in here.
i couldn't tell you what time it was where you are, it shows time according to the timezone of the user's computer.
Hmm, that would be 1:20 -> 7:20
which is wrong, i woke up after that
...but your icon had appeared in the sidebar...
i don't see how that can happen unless you reload the page
 
6 hours later…
10:11
Found in a piece of documentation: "The standard format for angles is radians. You can change it to degrees in the preferences. However, the program does not really like that, so it will give you radians anyway."
 
5 hours later…
14:41
@Hohmannfan all documentation should have an Easter egg or two like that :))
When is the launch?
Oh, this evening?
Welp, time to go to work.
4:30 your time. there's a party and everything.
at Goddard. we just get to watch.
 
2 hours later…
17:07
@uhoh so, are you going to ask the edited version of your question as a new question?
 
5 hours later…
22:15
50 minutes until launch now!
22:28
Anyone else watching NasaTV right now?
Yes
10 mins to launch.
22:44
6
T-5 hours, 20 minutes?
5 minutes, 20 seconds I guess...
5 minutes.
Except of course for the 15 minute hold at T-4 minutes...
I like SpaceX's missions better. The build-in holds are REALLY annoying...
Also, SpaceX missions have more cool explosions and barge landings/crashing.
Even the static fire tests!
I HATED space shuttle launches.
But they had explosions too!
22:48
There was two holds as I recall, one at T-9 minutes, and one at T-4 minutes.
You never knew how long it actually was until launch.
@PearsonArtPhoto grump
Was I the only one who heard T- 5 hours, 20 minutes?
I think this is my favourite rocket launch streaming moment: youtube.com/watch?v=rgNRINLfNrs&t=45
3
No, twitter heard the same thing as I did.
They said they expect an on-time liftoff
22:52
Ooh for once the mission sounds more exciting than the launch
Once upon a time I applied to work for this mission.
@PearsonArtPhoto Please explain?
Well, I used to live in Tucson.
The mission is being run by the University of Arizona, in Tucson.
I was bored with my job at that time, and applied to work for that mission.
The problem is, it would have been a large pay cut to join that mission, and not particularly safe employment.
I would have worked with the systems ground software team.
Launch on time verified!
So even if the rocket will blow up, the launch on time has been verified, so...
OSIRIS-REX is being run out of the same building where the Phoenix mission was run.
Wish I had some peanuts
Damn, my stream is nearly a minute behind :-(
Also if you're going to always have a compulsory 15-minute hold at T-4 why don't you just call it T-19
22:58
Wow, that's an old school control room...
Two of them.
What millennium is this?
Hey, they have flatscreens, it's not too bad
The OSIRIS-REX control center is a bit nicer...
I guess since the fastest normal launch would be without a delay.
Pesky real work time messing with scheduled things :)
I solid looks weird. Non seymmetrical
The video looks way better for F9 missions too...
23:09
@PearsonArtPhoto Maybe they don't have to use disposable single-use cameras :-P
23:26
Oh and a return mission also lets you analyse the materials with >10 years more modern/advanced equipment
Time travel at 3600 s/h
23:50
The electric rail blimp guy is back again.
Ooh they just flew over MH370
apogee -3443.92 ?
@Hennes Isn't that what KSP says when you're on an escape trajectory?
NO idea. I played it a bit, but I never noticed it
@Phiteros wat
23:55
I must say this particular scheme has a disturbingly high concentration of 'wat' :
-1
Q: Electric powered blimps, plane, and rail

JenThis question is similar to my previous ones but configuration is different and so is the question. Could an electric turbine engine plane create enough of it's own lift not to burden an electric rail that is evenly supported by electric powered blimps?


« first day (1149 days earlier)      last day (3088 days later) »