Thought of the day: if they don't change the naming convention, the name of the next in the Delta family of rockets will be causing a lot of confusion in the space community...
I'm not much of a person for SciShow, but this video about the Apollo guidance computers (in light of the code being released on GitHub) was rather interesting.
So the guy with the Tesla Model X just drove it down to the beach, opened the falcon wing doors. I was about to go take a picture of it. Then he got out and started taking pictures of it. :)
The acceleration is literally INSANE. (I tried one with Insane mode, no Ludicrous). People who have driven a Tesla with Ludicrous, agrees with the name. It is just too fast to be for real.
I await the car they deliver with Maximum Plaid, which Musk has kind of promised will the Roadster 2.0.
So right now, Ludicrous is supposed to be the max you can acheive with 4 tires on the ground. Any more and wheels begin spinning. So next rev of Roadster is the theoretical one that can exceed 2.8s 0-60 MPH. Which is beyond madness.
On the subject of autonomous cars, my friend was complaining that if they are programmed with rudimentary ethics which makes them prioritize saving the maximum number of lives over the life of the driver, you could assassinate people by getting a large enough group, and stepping out in front of such a car as it was going down the freeway.
Might be able to to find slightly cheaper but not so much
Hmm there's a possibility to take fewer lessons but ... I need friends to teach me then. None of them own a car and I don't think I can rent one for this purpose
Especially since I want a manual license but only automatic cars are available for rent
we're definitely on an upward trend, but for perspective it's pretty interesting to look at Stack Exchange's premiere site for comparison, Stack Overflow
questions per day: 7600 visits per day: 7.5 million
i hadn't realized before the vast scale of the difference. being so small in a business so large has its dangers, inherently. it just made me think about that more.
@kimholder Flip side - it is not clear the model works at the SO scale really. Hard to find the questions to answer, since there is a fire hose of questions. The moderatiuon queue is thousands deep I recall.
Experts, I think you have possibly "over-answered" Local's question...
Local, when you put a satellite (say, a communications satellite or spy satellite) in orbit around the Earth, it DOES NOT "just happen" to sit in the handy facing-earth direction.
Your first two points are precisely correct,...
the comments are in need of a lot of cleanup, i'm not sure how many to delete...
think i'll also post a notice on it of citation needed