« first day (934 days earlier)      last day (3303 days later) » 

00:41
One of the Apollo astronauts died.
00:58
yes, Ed Mitchell :(
 
2 hours later…
02:41
@TildalWave The article is really interesting actually.
 
11 hours later…
13:24
Hey, what is happening? @TildalWave seems to miss a blue diamond.
13:38
ohh.
 
2 hours later…
15:19
3
A: Are the Earth's Lagrange points big enough to park multiple satelites/space vessels

jcaronWikipedia tells us that the Sun-Earth L1 has 4 spacecraft, with a fifth one on its way.

is this the quality of answers I should expect around here?
15:46
@TildalWave apparently your expectations are no longer our concern :]
@kimholder Now I am only waiting for you to use the last type of brackets in your smiley :>
see, to me that's a bird. eyes and beak.
:) :] :} :>
16:28
@kimholder any more than yours :P
oh, i like the sound of that :]]
@Hohmannfan how about < : |
dunce cap :}
yeah, no more scary Tildal by position, only by virtue from now on :P
and attitude...
by virtue of attitude
placeholder as it did not render
mmmm simplicity itself
16:36
I have not yet understood why Tildal is not a mod anymore
he doesn't want to seems to be the crux of the matter
not really the crux of it, but an inevitable outcome
So are there moderator elections approaching?
betas don't have elections
only dictators then?
16:40
appointed dictators
that's not a very nice way of putting it if one of you two will replace me :P
but yes LOL
replace you? LOL
my former position
succeed ...
take over ...
I know, I just thought of all the work you have invested in the site
it's still there
16:43
Yes, and you are not dead yet. (presumably)
you don't actually think that there's some useful privileges by being a mod do you?
@TildalWave but nobody is going to accumulate that kind of record soon
short of Pearson, who is a mod already
@TildalWave I think I have the access to view low quality shit even faster
@Hohmannfan being a mod just means you're expected to deal with it before others have to, there's no glory to it, trust me
it also puts you in a receiving position for lots of it
It also takes a lot of time from RealLifeTheGame?
16:51
sure does
17:08
@TildalWave Your comment on that actually answered something I wasn't sure about. :P
Oh cool. Thank you.
not the best answer to the second one, but still useful ... there's more to it, let me know if you need some papers on the subject
17:52
David Hammens answer seems really interesting, but I'm not sure I'm smart enough for all of it. :P
It seems kind of weird that he only has +1 for it, though.
+2/-1
that -1 seems a bit hostile
Yeah, that other guy kind of jumped on him pretty hard.
I think that was the point when I accepted his answer LOL
lol
he could have posted another answer, instead he chose to bicker in the comments... that left me as OP with no choice
17:57
Yeah, makes sense.
I don't often see conflicting answers here.
but arguments in comments do happen. :P
yes, and they're really annoying
When they're constructive they make sense
looks e.g. at the comments here
2
Q: Are the Earth's Lagrange points big enough to park multiple satelites/space vessels

user1487195I know that we already have satellites in position at our Lagrange points, but what if we want to use them to park spacecraft sections for assembly reasons, or possibly even a meteorite for mining. Are the points big enough to have multiple objects stationed there without causing collisions? Do...

but more often than not, they end up confusing me.
I gave up in that case, now that I can LOL
Actually it's fine to ask about all five of Earth's Lagrange points - it would make for a more informative question and answer in the long run, which is one of the, and probably the main mission of Stackexchange. Much better than asking five identical questions about each point separately. — uhoh 17 hours ago
I was tempted to comment on this, but again, I don't have to :P
I think the answer it got proves it wrong well enough
And I'm not writing an answer for all 5 (or 10), and would want even less to write a reply in a general sense, because there wouldn't be any end of bickering over details in the comments then
18:04
Ah, yeah. Good point.
And if OP wants to discuss EML2 specifically, then it's probably a dupe
and this one ended up with an answer shorter than most of the comments. :P
not to mention that I already linked to another Wiki page that serves exactly that purpose to list all the objects in Lagrange points
lol
So... I guess that whole thing is a bit of a mess.
yes
I wouldn't even bring it up here but a +3 on that answer was a shocker
18:08
lol I thought it was just 0... but now I just clicked the 0.
Is EML1,2,3 etc. For the Earth-Moon system or SEL for Sun-Earth, or SML1 for Sun-Mars a naming convention, or was it popularized by Hollister David?
it's a convention, (P)rimary + (S)econdary + L[1-5]
How would you differentiate between Sun-Mars and Sun-Mercury? Ahhh!! Chaos!
@duzzy Is not the orbit of Mercury really too eccentric?
I have no idea. :P
I don't understand the math stuff well enough to know much about these L-points.
18:14
@duzzy Me for Mercury :P
or, better yet, Hg :))
(joking)
Funding failed for the SMeL1-1337 probe
lol clever.
@Hohmannfan lol
Not that it is going to be a problem ever, but you can probably solve it using the Greek godname Hermes instead. SHL
Not Hermodr?
Seems to have the same role, even the same name
(messenger)
Yes, but Hermodr is one of the most important figures in probably my favorite story from all mythology.
it's not that bad, there are worse places (that's for L2 halo orbits)
@duzzy Oh, you like that Balder story?
@Hohmannfan YES!
@TildalWave Which ones are worse?
Are big numbers good or bad? :P
2
@duzzy bad, that's perturbations magnitude
18:24
So, Venus wouldn't be good?
Why would it be bad for Venus?
none are really terribly bad actually
here dept.aoe.vt.edu/~cdhall/courses/aoe4065/OtherPubs/SPECS/… it's a collection of papers on L2's
Oh nice. That should keep me busy for a while.
also of interest, if someone wants to go through it and add an answer to that EML2 stationkeeping q of mine researchgate.net/profile/Gerard_Gomez2/publication/…

« first day (934 days earlier)      last day (3303 days later) »