« first day (921 days earlier)      last day (3316 days later) » 

00:04
I'm sure the same thing. I'm just curious if there's any even close...
Did they also say that it would be on a very inclined plane? I imagine in most directions, that would be it very difficult to intersect.
Would that be the case?
I suspect they imagine it to be roughly along the ecliptic plane, but I imagine there's a fairly wide range of inclinations that it could be based on the data.
I've seen 30 degrees in a few places.
Hmmm. Could be.
00:22
Planet Nine is a hypothetical large planet in the far outer Solar System, first proposed in 2014, which would explain the unusual orbital configuration of a group of trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs) whose orbits lie mostly beyond the Kuiper belt. The planet would have an estimated mass of around 10 Earths and an estimated radius of 13,000 to 26,000 km (8,100 to 16,000 mi) (approximately two to four Earths). On 20 January 2016, researchers Konstantin Batygin and Michael E. Brown at Caltech announced additional indirect evidence of Planet Nine based on a new scientific model of the orbits of several...
How do you guys do your fancy quote formatting? greater than?
> and its inclination estimated as 30 (± 20) degrees.
Woohoo!
Actually, this could be kind of fun to figure out.
I need a break from these Cisco videos.
I wonder if I can come close to finding anything. :P
Go for it. I bet the question hits the supercollider, so it'd be a good way to gain some reputation.
 
3 hours later…
03:56
0
Q: What is the status of Space SE's beta rating?

My Other HeadWhat is the status Space SE's beta rating, as at January 2016, and when will we become a full site?

04:06
0
Q: Orbital dynamics or Celestial Mechanics symbol sets for Space SE

My Other HeadAre there any schematic symbol sets for celestial mechanics or orbital dynamics terms like periastron, perihilion, apogee, perigee, etc.for incorporation into ?MathJax for Space SE?

Welp... I think I'm in over my head.
 
8 hours later…
11:38
worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/34100/… Can this question belong here or should I put it in Physics SE?
I've been told it doesn't belong in Worldbuilding SE.
12:01
How did I miss Scott's ama? :-(
12:26
@MyOtherHead might go here but it doesn't make much sense to me, you won't be increasing surface gravity by increasing rotation, but decreasing it
i.e. you're increasing centrifugal acceleration but that points away from the focus, in the opposite vector to gravity
@TildalWave, thanks for clearing up my misconception.
otherwise it's a simple exercise of calculating angular momentum change
could be part of , and
so I guess it would belong here
one interesting thing is that depending on which direction you'd change angular momentum to, it might cause the Moon to move closer or farther from the Earth (slowly, as tidal torque works its magic)
but since the Moon is way above geosynchronous orbit, it would be much easier to move it farther away than closer
It's starting to come back to me. I should have revised the circular motion chapter in my Halliday & Resnick, before I posted. But one thing I do remember from 35 years ago is my lecturer saying (in a Scottish brogue) "There ain't no such animal as centrifugal motion - there is only centripetal!!!". :-)
12:48
wrong, and this is so often explained wrong it's almost upsetting
centrifugal force is real, but it only applies in a rotating frame of reference
that's why it's sometimes referred to as a fictitious force
but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist, that's just a common misinterpretation of what that means in physics
in layman terms, you'll feel it while your motion is being affected by the circular motion of the body you hold onto, but as soon as you let go that force doesn't exist for you any more
it basically boils down to difference in speed and velocity in uniform circular motion
velocity as a vector quantity changes because its direction changes, speed as a scalar quantity remains the same... and if a body of non-zero rest-mass is a subject to velocity change, you get a force
I will reread that chapter and others. I've gotten too many misconceptions of statics and dynamics over the years, though my electricity/magnetism/light is fairly current. Makes sense to do that /before/ I start on studying BMW.
TL;DR when you're driving on a roundabout, you're not imagining the force pushing you outward of the roundabout center
13:05
yes. What does TL;DR stand for?
too long; didn't read :))
ok
what's your time zone? I'm AESuT
CET, it's now UTC+1h
or is it CEST
what is AESuT?
Oz?
Australian Eastern Summer Time
gotcha, so Sydney and such... NSW/Tasmania/Queensland,...
geez it's past 11 pm there
2 pm here
13:11
Yes, eastern states except Queensland - Qld doesn't have daylight saving. not sure if AESuT is an official designation.
Are there 24-hour wall clocks in Europe or US?
13:30
only as novelty items, I haven't seen many
12 hour dials are most common
 
3 hours later…
16:55
I've never seen a 24-hour wall clock before.
Maybe digital ones were meant that can switch between 24h and 12h am/pm display?
for dial ones I think that 24h ones are awful... mostly because 60 mod 24 != 0
also, if someone shouts at you to check out your 6 o'clock, do you turn by 180° or by 90° then?
2
17:17
@TildalWave lol a very strong point.
 
5 hours later…
Revolution?
noooooo omg that's awful
@duzzy i once used to go to an office that used a wall clock like this. i didn't notice until one day i was having an argument about the timing of something and went to reference the time to support some central point i was trying to make.
it's decimal time, from the french revolution.
I'm gonna pretend that's a pressure gauge
le pressure gauge then
@Hohmannfan hey, you know it :]
22:29
@TildalWave lol
That clock is crazy.
not only that it isn't even a standard decimal clock face.
that's a standard decimal clock face. i think...
binary time!
LOL :D
22:34
no solid state time?
time ... is
Solid state? Like this?
yes
like, someone asks you what the time is and you say "yes" :D
What if you say "no"?
lol that's awesome
22:37
oh hey that's a lovely freehand circle!
3
My freehand circles are crappy by intention
circle hipster.
Ah, the good old times where it was not that important with accurate circles, and pi was just 3
@duzzy Circle hipster? That's like an euphemism for rolling one's own?
22:39
i propose we make the number three exactly equal to pi, to simplify trigonometry.
pigonometry
@TildalWave lol it was not meant to be, but undoubtedly it could mean that.
@kimholder A representation of a regular piangle in pigonometry:
lovely angles of $\pi - 2$ radians
No mathjax?
$\frac{Math}{is}_{broken!}$
22:45
do you have david's mathjax extension?
@TildalWave Fox?
you can make roll your own ;)
yeah, that one doesn't actually work, I just tried
@TildalWave Same here :(
it does make MathJax on the site look a bit different tho
22:51
But hey! It was amazing when mosaic added PICTURES to browsing, so why complain?
Yeah.. the add on makes the math look terrible. With the extension:
without:
that's not too bad, but search for "mhchem" on the site and embrace the awful LOL
23:15
Nobody else thinking that "NASA Small Bodies Assessment Group" sounds weird?
23:46
it's just you
:))
oh shoot I missed the space show tonight
anyone listened to it?
TildalWave has added an event to this room's schedule.
^ (tomorrow, The Space Show w/ co-host Tom Marotta and guests Charles Miller and Joshua Jenkins, more info: thespaceshow.com/newsletter, podcast: thespaceshow.com/content/listen-live)
TildalWave has added an event to this room's schedule.
^ (on 26th/27th, The Space Show w/ Loretta Hall re her book "The Complete Space Buff's Bucket List", same links as above)
TildalWave has added an event to this room's schedule.
23:58
^ (on 29th, The Space Show w/ Frank Wwhite & Steve Rotfeld re The Overview Effect, same links as above)

« first day (921 days earlier)      last day (3316 days later) »