« first day (906 days earlier)      last day (3331 days later) » 

02:25
another inspirational video, this time about VASIMR
it's a lot less geeky than the thumbnail suggests ;)
 
13 hours later…
15:07
have we lost europe? there's no tildalwave, no brian thomsett, no hohmannfan, no localfluff, no rory...
15:57
maybe a megasharktopus snapped the cable :)
well, it's looking more normal now. i'm reassured :)
16:14
WiFi problems here, Europe not nuked
And sometimes, this is the problem: :)
@Hohmannfan how long is your day right now?
16:30
0
Q: How is the process of launching a rocket mathematically modeled up front?

Markus DittrichWhat I am looking for is an example where real persons in the real world really need to mathematically model a situation before they need to calculate the average and instantaneous rate of change. I want to to use this example as an entry point to calculus for students. It's supposed to be a big ...

isn't this "a tad" too broad?
@kimholder this question doesn't make sense LOL
you know what i mean :/
yeah but that would be too simple wouldn't it?
@TildalWave there isn't a simplification that works for that?
dunno
that's why I asked
I can't think of one, and there's several questions in it
> I know there have been engine tests for the Saturn V rocket. Did NASA – in simple words – use the data from these tests to project the velocity the rocket would reach in order to calculate the average and instantaneous rate of change?
In simple words, yes. I'm not sure how helpful that is tho
it gets terribly complicated from then on
well, this one's above my pay grade
16:38
think plume physics, CFD, continuum mechanics / dynamics... dunno, it seems odd to ask for "simple terms" then give Saturn V as an example, for one, there were 5 main engines on it
they were doing such crazy things as installing explosive charges below it to explode into the plume to try to desync pogo oscillation
which, if not controlled, will result in RUD
heehee that does sound pretty wild
I think that was von Braun's own idea
but doesn't all that come after you've calculated the forces needed at each moment?
not necessarily
there's lots of parallelism involved, one thing affecting the other ad nauseam
16:42
i.e. lot's of chicken and an egg problems :)
rocketry basically evolved from giving it our best effort, there's no clear line to draw between models and tests, both improved one another
this is exactly what i did for my undergraduate thesis project
(in tandem with a team of other people)
Really? Sounds like an answer in the making then :)
it's essentially an overlap between trajectory optimization and vehicle integration
so what would be a good "simple" example, max q?
yea I should be able to answer but as usual it is from an academic perspective -- I've never worked at NASA or SpaceX obviously so I don't know how they actually do it in practice for their vehicles
simple example of what?
of a calculation you need to do?
16:46
yeah I think he wants to find some real life calculus problem
it's mostly what you said here -- chicken and egg, keep simulating, use the results to modify the design, repeat
oh right
in Dalek voice: integrate! integrate!
(I should clarify by integration I mean the combination of the different systems, not the area under a curve lol)
I think max-q as a function of time would be a pretty good way of going about it, you need to first integrate a couple of other things to get that
it's almost not a good question for calculus because you can't just integrate the equations of motion since they are too non-linear
16:48
@BrianLynch yeah I know, you said vehicle integration
and I said calculus :P
oh yea haha
we all understand each other, all is well :))
I'm just getting started so I'm a little foggy
i have no tea. or milk. i'm drinking green tea with no milk. life isn't fair.
huh? no goat in the neighborhood that you could chase for a bit of milk? LOL
16:50
I suppose that the OP is really just looking for an example of calculus related to curve slope ("rate of change")
it sounds like maybe the best service to this OP is explaining that it isn't so simple?
@kimholder or a Tim's on the corner?
we should point him to my answer about SRB launching
@BrianLynch oh, now you're taunting me. not nice. :P
or SSTO
I can't remember which one but I show the equations
yeah keep it to a single stage
16:51
21
A: Could the shuttle's SRB alone reach orbit?

Brian LynchNo, a quick calculation yields a $\Delta v$ of about 4.6 km/s and you need about 9 km/s to get to low-Earth orbit. You'll lose a lot of that velocity to aerodynamic drag as well as the vertical portion of the flight, so a rough estimate of the final speed at burnout would be somewhere around 3 km...

poor students :)
does it help much if there is no air?
might even be solvable with no air
although I think still non-linear
(too non-linear)
but even without an atmosphere you're left with many incredibly complex problems, if you want... no end of those
16:55
maybe he can talk about rendezvous with an upper stage from the moon's surface?
> What I am looking for is an example where real persons in the real world really need to mathematically model a situation before they need to calculate the average and instantaneous rate of change
I can think of Cassini's trajectory here and making sure it keeps clear of bodies we'd like to protect even in case of a complete failure
yeah, doesn't work for that part. but it already looks like he's going to have to say to his students 'okay, i was wrong'
oh, okay
the instantaneous rate of change makes sense, the average one is bonkers to me
I think he means total
yea I think so too, but that is definitely not a "rate of change"
from a launch perspective
16:58
indeed
I still think that making sure that dynamic pressure stays within limits could be a good example
red is plot of say altitude over time
purple is overall average slope, blue is average slope over some interval, and green is instantaneous
they are all the same lol
but the only thing that is helpful is the green instantaneous one
at least as a rate
hmmm how about gravity for average?
maybe the final altitude relative to the initial altitude is important
like average gravity acceleration?
might make sense, although not really a rate
i.e., the average gravity acceleration is not the rate of change of some other parameter
perhaps average g load though
which would be rate of change of speed
17:04
The question mentions "[insert plausible function and add some explanation what a function and a graph is] ". Really using this for an introduction to functions?
why not?
it's not really that complicated
(when you simplify it of course)
^ words to live by...
although maybe not quite the best first example
haha yea
here it is as a starable comment lol
it's not really that complicated (when you simplify it of course)
2
famous last words
oh, thankyou. i was just about to point out its on two lines so not a good star item :D
makes me think of another good one
the best mathematician is a lazy one
17:08
is that a way to make sure they don't reply?
no reply .... right :)))
lol
ok I'm off to finally see the new Star Wars
it's really good. but you know that.
yea hard to imagine being disappointed!
i am wondering about a comment on that question to the effect that in the real world, which he seems interested in conveying, it is actually much more complicated.
17:44
...but then i read brian's srb ssto answer and decided that covers it, especially since i don't know what i'm talking about.
18:07
In a vacuum, the vapor pressure of water is lowered. Any water left would be in gaseous form (and eventually drawn out by the vacuum pump) rather than condensation. — Hobbes 57 mins ago
Why is it so difficult to understand that water can freeze solid in vacuum of space too? Just because lack of pressure moves it to triple point on the interface doesn't mean it will vaporize, it just means there's no transition phase between solid and gaseous state, that's all.
Anyway I was obliged to comment, because that was obviously an assumption in design of Gaia which caused significant degradation in quality of data gathered by it.
18:25
hmm turns out that Gaia didn't have those problems, my bad
@Hobbes Apologies, apparently Gaia didn't suffer stray light degradation due to ice, but it was later discovered that detached fibres from its MLI are the most likely cause. I confess, I didn't follow-up on that and assumed that then working assumption was the true culprit. Apparently not, but it was considered, so my point stands that water ice can potentially be a problem and there is a point in making sure there isn't any. — TildalWave ♦ 1 min ago
some links, I only read the second one just now
heh thanks @kim :)
good question to bump, too :)
is it?
nitro purging is kinda industry standard
interesting read, specific and more technical than a lot of recent questions
ah yes the good ol' days :)
nothing i would have known without reading that. mind you, i don't get to reading many articles, i just bookmark them
18:30
I read everything. So please don't link to War and Peace!! LOL
heheheh - maybe you more scan everything and read bits
but I wouldn't mind if @BrianLynch links to that Asimov's short story he mentioned the other day
@kimholder you'd be surprised :P
I really honestly love to read
then i'm going to sniff a bit that you were commenting on my dome construction proposal without being aware of much of it.
so i figured you scanned it only or something
or you are reading more than you can remember
at that point yes, I just scanned it... I like to read but that doesn't mean I'm a scanner with an OCR :P
@TildalWave i know that story. doubt i could find it though.
i could totally give you a spoiler :)
18:36
I thought I read most of his works but I don't remember that one
A book or five a day, does not exactly keep the funny farm away
i haven't read much asimov. don't like the way he writes characters. gave up on foundation.
18:48
Hi, guys. May I jump in with a question?
I went to answer a comment to a question, and commenced the reply with "@xxxx", but the tag didn't show up. Did I miss something while I was a way from SE for a few months?
was the comment to the person who posted the question or answer it was under?
by default that person is always pinged, so the tag is dropped automatically
18:54
ok, thanks
no prob
@MyOtherHead since you're here, what did you mean with this question?
-1
Q: Multimedia playlist requirements for a trip to Mars

My Other HeadWhat are some requirements for a music (and multimedia) playlist needed for a trip to and from, and manned exploration, of Mars?

Obviously, you start with Holst's first movement of The Planets :)
Then some David Bowie and Spiders from Mars ...
Then Blur's Song #2 for the landing ...
What are some of the "must have" music or videos astronauts could have on a Mars trip in order to keep their spirits up, mood music, wakeup music, etc. But i've killed the question because it got voted down.
Exactly
yeah that's too opinion based I'm afraid
but it could be a cute question for some forum
Pink Floyd The Great Gig in the Sky. Could this go on meta?
19:02
Johann Strauss the 2nd shouldn't be neglected either, especially if you brought along some form of AI
@MyOtherHead not really, it would just end up being a small snapshot of an endless playlist and forgotten about with no real value to it
have you any idea how many bands from 60s to 80s smoked odd enough things for their works to qualify as must have on the way to Mars? :P
Several terabytes worth, no doubt.
yeah pretty much all the "new age" too
which reminds me ... sebpearce.com/bullshit
2
New-Age Bullshit Generator LOL
@TildalWave that is one more great bullshit generator to add to my list
NABG is priceless. Used to have one when I was studying geology. Just thought of another Q. Back soon
19:29
@TildalWave i'd never seen that before. really well done XD
it gets me especially hard because i have a definite new age side that tries to not fall into the mental traps
 
1 hour later…
20:50
@TildalWave I think you're conflating a couple of different things re. Saturn V engines. They used small explosive charges during development to try and induce combustion instability, modifying the injectors until the bomb effects were damped out quickly.
Pogo oscillation is separate from combustion instability, and involves resonant feedback in pressure waves in the fuel lines (I think?)
Combustion instability is all in the chamber; pogo is chamber + pump + fuel lines
yeah makes sense
it's been a while since I read about that
I think (from what I remember) what they were trying to do is to disharmonize oscillation due to combustion instability which would propagate further up the launcher as pogo oscillation, something like that
and again IIRC it was von Braun's idea but he didn't have the time for it and just told them to go ahead and try that while he was busy with some PR thingy, I think it was Disney LOL
Combustion instability I think just breaks the engine directly, doesn't need to start a pogo.
there's always only that much of a good thing one can have, huh? :))
I was cringing a bit at a comment in the reliable rockets thread that suggested that Saturn V was a highly reliable machine because of the money put into development. Pogo was still unsolved and nearly broke Apollo 13, the sixth manned Saturn V flight. Probably a good thing we shut Apollo down before that thing got someone killed.
Didn't want to get into it in comments though.
there was some post-Apollo analysis of Saturn V reliability floating around that basically concluded that average LOM was at all Saturn V's ever launched + 1 LOL
21:00
I'm only an armchair rocket scientist but that sounds about right to me.
you're saying that as if it's something wrong with it ... yet the first attempt at human spaceflight might have been made exactly out of an armchair :)
"Probably a good thing we shut Apollo down before that thing got someone killed." I remember something about pure oxygen....
"that thing" = Saturn V.
armchair rocketry :)
21:04
@RussellBorogove I am adding "that thing" for Saturn-V in foxReplace now.
Why do we make a distinction between the Apollo 1 fire and See&Bassett's plane crash?
yeah, Apollo 1 was not a space flight either.
@Hohmannfan but we all know it's called Up Goer Five
(and Williams, and Freeman)
@TildalWave Of course!
T-38s are clearly as dangerous as rockets!
@TildalWave you will not go to space today
I'm sure there's some José Jiménez quote to reply to this
Oh, I hope not.
that's the one :)
21:24
Stages To Saturn says "Investigators deliberately set out to introduce combustion instability in the H-1 (Saturn I/IB engine) to see if the engine could recover" -- bomb in the chamber in 1963. "It was hoped that the injector could recover in less than 0.1 second but the Thor-Atlas injectors uprated to 836kN failed to effect recovery in 8 or 16 tests..." Baffles on the injector face solved the problem and improved engine perfomance as well
An F-1 came apart on a test stand on 28 June 1962 due to combustion instability
The book isn't written strictly chronologically so it's hard to tell when bombs in the F-1 chamber became a thing
Rocketdyne still asking for more money to work on the stability problems in july '64, Marshall SFC approved the fixes by 1/65.
21:41
you're trying too hard :) It really makes no difference to me if I remembered something about this slightly wrong ... it started as a comment that it might not make the most sense to use Saturn V as an example for "simplified" flight dynamics, that it's even difficult to find reliable references for it only reinforces my point :P
@TildalWave It's called "Living Space" (1956)
cheers @BrianL!!
22:07
if you are ever looking for sci-fi books to read, I highly recommend my favourite author: Robert J. Sawyer
22:18
@TildalWave that is gold
(New-Age BS)
the comments are hilarious
23:06
@BrianLynch Canadian too! I reported a book he signed in a local library to the librarian as someone defacing a book.
hahaha
he's awesome
used to love seeing him on HypaSpace on the Space Channel before I even knew he was an author

« first day (906 days earlier)      last day (3331 days later) »