« first day (212 days earlier)      last day (4025 days later) » 

 
8 hours later…
13:04
posted on February 14, 2014 by Erika Nesvold

Close encounters with a passing star can excite a planet into an eccentric or inclined orbit. But a circumstellar disk can damp a planet's eccentricity and inclination. Who wins? Find out when the authors of this paper model a stellar flyby with two circumstellar disks!

 
1 hour later…
Stu
Stu
14:13
Do you think it would be possible to get some of the ISS astros on Space Exploration to answer questions?
14:29
Know any?
Anyone up for upvoting a question? I am trying to see if I get a Revival badge, for answering my own old question?
2
Q: Why did Zarya (FGB) come with a single docking port?

geoffcInitially, the Russians did not wish to launch the FGB (Functional Block), now named Zarya, which was the first ISS component launched. But the US wanted it, so they could launch a US component sooner. That is, the FGB could provide control, life support, storage, a Canadarm grapple point, so tha...

Stu
Stu
15:04
got it.
15:34
And that did it. Ok, so you can get the Revival badge for answering your own old question. :) Easy badge bait then. :)
Go find all your old questions, answer them, wait for 2 upvotes and done. :)
16:01
@geoffc already have two of them, they're only bronze :P
it was more fun when we had hats and that earned you a new one
Is there a silver version of Revival?
posted on February 14, 2014

This Chandra X-Ray Observatory image of the young star cluster NGC 346 highlights a heart-shaped cloud of 8 million-degree Celsius gas in the central region. Evidence from radio, optical and ultraviolet telescopes suggests that the hot cloud, which is about 100 light years across, is the remnant of a supernova explosion that occurred thousands of years ago. The progenitor could have been a comp

@geoffc Necromancer: Answered a question more than 60 days later with score of 5 or more
16:30
Now that you remind me, I earned that somewhere...
Can't remember which site, but I did earn it once.
No, I earned the one for an edit on a 90 day old question.
People, we really need more TOTW suggestions but also votes on those that haven't yet been selected and you might like to see featured for a week. If you can't think of topics, go through our tags and check which seem to have too few questions, or you're particularly fond of. Thanks!
If there's gonna be more suggestions than we can fit in this quarter of the year, we'll move them to a new TOTW thread for the next quarter, so don't worry that there's only a few more we need to select now. We'll need them later on ;)
17:03
@TildalWave You editor, you ... (+:
What're the specs on the assy?
Is it merely the bell?
p.s. bbiab - Sir D wants out
@Everyone I've added a new tag "mapping", low rep users can't do that ... I've added this tag to a few questions that it applies to but I'm gonna stop now not to completely change the main page vista :)
@Everyone no idea
17:27
@TildalWave Just pulling your leg. I do that at times
Hm. More ToTW ...
@Everyone it's easier to just hold the shift key :)
Shift key? Eh?
for uppercase
blinks
17:44
one other task for all of you is to vote more often. I've noticed that especially new members have difficulties getting as many upvotes on good contributions as they used to when we were in early beta days. To some extent I guess reasonable, but we also have many more members now. If you could think how to improve your voting habits or make others appreciate why this is important, please do!
@TildalWave True; we're flagging (no pun intended - glares @Undo)
@Everyone Oh about that, there's also a need to use review queue and vote to close on questions that have severe problems. I often notice mods have to close a clear case on our own even though there's plenty of comments under the question that it is off-topic, unclear, etc. Problem with mod-hammering is that I then we ourselves risk having to excuse our decisions (points to a long meta answer) when we could have had support from community.
Flags can be helpful, sure, but even more helpful are votes. Up, down, votes to close, votes to delete even,...
In short, the SEx.SE community need to get off their asses
18:00
Well, no I wouldn't put it like that because we're IMO better than similar communities in beta, but I would appreciate if we can be even better, there's no good reason not to be. It really takes a small amount of effort to do it like the system suggests, it's actually easier to vote to close as off-topic than to add a comment that you think so. Stuff like that. So no, not nagging, just optimisations that we could all easily do and help ourselves.
Never meant nagging (+:
Just meant we need to get off our Asses
And I just meant that getting off one's ass seems too strong and implies effort. My point is we could actually do more with less of it ;)
((+; We need more asses in here
j/k
Is the question too broad?
@Everyone IMO no, seems fine
I ran a quick one by google; couldn't come up with mention fo the specs though
Perhaps I need to work on my google skills
18:12
added a few tags, some new ones that I'm a bit surprised we didn't have yet
human-rating?
@Everyone I searched for similar stuff not too long ago and it's pretty difficult to find anything specific on ISRO. I did find their budget for 2013-2014 and human flight isn't supported that much, so I guess their GSLV problems pushed activities further down the line, possibly to 2015. They used to have one unmanned test flight with crew module scheduled tho, we'll see...
The animal rights people may come up in arms at that one; I know I would.
More like live-stock rating
Human-rated or man-rated are terms used to describe the certification of a spacecraft, launch vehicle or airplane as worthy of transporting humans. NASA and the U.S. GAO now uses "Human-rating" when describing requirements for these systems. The terms "man-rated" and "human-rated" are mostly used interchangeably. In spaceflight, a human-rating certification is the assurance that the space system accommodates human needs, effectively utilizes human capabilities, controls hazards with sufficient certainty to be considered safe for human operations, and provides, to the maximum extent prac...
(+: Didn't mean the certification recommendations; scroll up
18:21
@Everyone There's no place for complacency in spaceflight, and personally I find such poking offensive so they better keep it together. I've seen some disturbing comments along those lines before. Frankly, I didn't know if I should delete it, or leave it for others to see too. But with interests in keeping everything civilized, I just hit delete.
I understand; don't agree whole heartedly though.
I think we might be talking of slightly different things, maybe I didn't get exactly what you meant
Well, taking creatures other than humans up to LEO, or elsewhere should require systems to cater to their physiological needs. Sort-of to paraphrase the happy employee, productive employee adage as a happy animal is a productive animal
February 14 - Happy Southern Winter Solstice on the Red Planet! :D
18:36
(+; Make love to the Warlord day
If the humans ever get a colony going on Mars, could it ever be self-sustaining without terra-formation?
18:49
Right. System's winding down; 'nini
18:59
@Everyone If there is water on Mars, sufficiently available, then I would think so. CO2 plus water means you can run plants to trap solar energy and release oxygen. That means you can probably self sustain with enough effort.
Stu
Stu
@geoffc yeah that would be a HUGE help in colonizing the planet. might even make it possilbe
:D
Plants are amazing things! Easy to grow, and they turn light and C02 + water into glucose and oxygen. You could not build a device that efficient, and self reproducing! :)
Stu
Stu
Let's build self-reproducing launchers that use pollution as fuel. jaja
What's your take on the latest fusion developments? rt.com/usa/fusion-energy-power-ignition-806
Launch in 2 hours, chat event about 20 minutes before
Stu
Stu
hmmm where is the launch scaffolding? is it just folded back?
19:13
@Stu you have to be pretty ignorant of basic science to call CO2 pollution. (Or brainwashed by the media hype). (I do not mean to call you a name, rather to point out that the statement has a real problem.)
Stu
Stu
Oh, i wasn't calling CO2 pollution
I meant more like nuclear waste
@geoffc problem is loss of hydrogen through ionosphere, so it would need a magnetic field too
CO2 is anything but pollution. IN fact, we are far more likely facing a global winter, shades of Fallen Angels by Niven. Great story.
@TildalWave No arguement. But the question Everyone asked was about, without terraforming. :)
@Stu Good! That would be nice.
Stu
Stu
haha
i love me some CO2
@geoffc ah shoot I missed that detail :D
Stu
Stu
19:17
plus, the term pollution is all relative
depends on what form of life you might be :]
@Stu there's a b-roll in a loop now here showing how it's positioned over the "launch hole" (or whatever name it has, maybe a "service and exhaust tunnel") turksat4a.imgondemand.com
the launcher is brought there horizontally, then lifted upright with an arm
Stu
Stu
ah yea thanks!
Stu
Stu
they should hook up the launch hole to breifly heat homes in the vicinity heheh
great image though
OK, I give in, I really tried ignoring this Valentine's Day but here you are:
there's a heart-shaped sugar candy with "Gas Planets Rule" written on it, I couldn't resist any more :)
Ben Reed (NASA SSCO) is doing AMA on Reddit on 18th: ssco.gsfc.nasa.gov
should I put events like this in our schedule, or it's beyond the point since it's a Q&A session on another site?
and since I'm going photo crazy, here's another one for @Stu with a mobile service tower next to Proton (looks recent):
Stu
Stu
19:40
that is crazy. i cant believe how powerful the hydraulics on their service tower and life arm must be.
@Stu Do they lift it fueled, or do they fuel it once upright?
F-9 is lifted empty, as will F-Heavy. F-Heavy will be as big or bigger than a Proton, empty, I would think. (Guessing at that one. Three smaller cores have to be massier than one single core...)
My Nexus card application was approved! NOw to get an interview appt, for which I have to fly back to Canada, and I can get faster entry into Canada and US. Yay!
Stu
Stu
Hmm they must lift it with no fuel. Seems dangerous otherwise. I would liek to know more about the service tower, like how quickly it can fill the launcher with fuel.
And Proton is NASTY fuel/oxidizer wise. MMDH, Nitrogen Tetroxide or Hydrazine. I forget which exqct combo, but they all SUCK horribly badly!
As in, you get exposed to them, you start sucking air through the holes it corrodes in you as you die a miserable death.
Stu
Stu
nitrogen tetroxide?? that's old school
@Stu And on the scale of a first stage engine of a proton! Amazing, eh?
Yep N2O4/UDMH
Proton (Russian: Протон) (formal designation: UR-500) is an expendable launch system used for both commercial and Russian government space launches. The first Proton rocket was launched in 1965 and the launch system is still in use as of 2014, which makes it one of the most successful heavy boosters in the history of spaceflight. All Protons are built at the Khrunichev plant in Moscow, and then transported for launch to the Baikonur Cosmodrome, where they are brought to the launch pad horizontally and then raised into vertical position for launch. Like many Soviet boosters, the names of r...
19:50
upper stage and payload are fueled before they lift it upright
Hmm, only 1.9 million lbs thrust. That is F-9 class! 1.4MLbs.
Stu
Stu
aren't the first stage engines rather small?
Upper stage is relatively puny, compared to first stage, usually. :)
Stu
Stu
maybe i an just thinking about the nozzle
I still find it strange, since it's a cryo stage
19:51
SL isp of 285. That is pretty crappy.
Only 375K lbs per each of the 6 engines at Sea level.
they lift it up with an arm and then the mobile service "tower / scaffolding" is rolled along, so I guess they can still refuel whatever is lost due to cryo "breathing"
F-9 is 1.35MLbs thrust. assuming the 85% quip by Elon is true, and they can be run 15% higher thrust that gets them 1.58 Mlbs. 1.9 Mlbs is not that high, and it has such a larger payload. Interesting.
Stu
Stu
unrelated, but here is something cool before the launch: arstechnica.com/science/2014/02/…
20:11
I like the diversity of Ars Technica. Good gaming, Mac, PC, technology, Space, etc.
Hmm, Angara, is using URM's witha single 470Klb thrust engine. That is not very big for a single engine booster.
Even 5 of them in an Angara 5, that is not a lot of thrust to get off the pad.
20:34
the "doughnut riddle" solved:
Stu
Stu
i was really hoping it would be a doughnut
BTW I've heard that some Cali nutcake sued NASA for not trying to investigate the rock... and that he claims it's a lifeform and demanded first 6 scientific papers related to it hold his name as the first author
Stu
Stu
i'm really enjoying this weather-channel-esque music. updated for a modern russia.
ah this jazzy fusion seems to be the choice for pre-launch pijama streams, SpaceX has it, Arianespace has it, now ILS,...
oh and ESA too
maybe a bit more Jean Michel Jarre-esque
Stu
Stu
haha
20:44
hello
Stu
Stu
hey
yikes
Live webcast for the launch of Proton-M w/ Turksat-4A from Baikonur Cosmodrome is now available via International Launch Services web stream with English commentary, and raw streams on Tsenki TV Baikonur. Launch scheduled at 21:09 GMT (4:09 p.m. EST), launch updates on Spaceflight 101
T - 20 minutes
Stu
Stu
21:03
i love the ground tracks for GTO
T - 1 minute
Stu
Stu
looking good.
not veering to the side haha
not this time :)
I heard a lot of people lost their jobs on that launch when it rolled over and went kaboom
that's official terminology BTW
Stu
Stu
aren't these launchers suppose to have self-destruct software if it starts to behave that way?
it nailed the ground in a huge explosion and could have easily killed a lot of people
@Stu range safety yes
it does have it
Stu
Stu
21:13
maybe it would have been better to have it explode in the air? although certainly it would have rained burning debris
oh i see
time to go! enjoy your weekend
that one just disintegrated on its own I think, or maybe range safety was activated as it started falling apart, but it was still an awesome explosion, there's some cool videos on YouTube
you too, cheers @Stu
posted on February 14, 2014 by Chris Bergin

International Launch Services (ILS) have opened their 2014 campaign with the launch of the Russian Proton-M launch vehicle, this time carrying the TURKSAT-4A communications satellite on a multi-hour... Related posts:ILS successfully launch Intelsat 16 via Proton MInternational Launch Services (ILS) have launched the Intelsat 16 telecommunications... ILS Proton M in debut shared payload launch

hey @Manish
@ManishEarth ??
¿
21:23
?!
<insert interrobang here>
21:38
I always thought the name "interrobang" sounds a bit ominous
22:11
@geoffc You know I find it surprising you didn't come even close to hitting rep cap these past two days when you've been fairly active, I think that's a clear sign that voting habits went south and we need to find ways to encourage folks to vote more somehow. It can't boil down to a few of us that regularly vote. Any ideas how to do that?

« first day (212 days earlier)      last day (4025 days later) »