« first day (142 days earlier)      last day (4095 days later) » 

00:00
@TildalWave There's no way to do that anyway.
We never got told about that.
@UndotheSnowman you used to see upvotes and downvotes on your profile dropdown before
not which posts, just the numbers
per day, week, month
@TildalWave Ahhhhh.
at least you saw if there was any change
I inferred meta activity levels through that
Go report it.
too lazy, it'd involve effort
I'm thinking of watching some movie now or just generally not do much
I wish you luck in that.
And I'm going to go get something done. Bye!
 
1 hour later…
01:20
Wow, chat is empty.
01:35
back ;)
I decided to upgrade my rig a bit too
I added a disk and another graphics card to try something out... can I run AMD and Nvidia at the same time to some use? I thought the older NV one could run hardware accelerated Physics (I think it's possible with some older drivers), and maybe add another monitor to it (not sure that'll work tho)
01:50
posted on December 06, 2013 by Chris Bergin

The United Launch Alliance (ULA) are preparing to launch an Atlas V rocket on the NROL-39 mission for the National Reconnaissance Office. Liftoff from Vandenberg Air Force Base... Related posts:ULA Atlas V marks 50th EELV launch by lofting NROL-38 uphillUnited Launch Alliance (ULA) have launched their Atlas V on... Atlas’ 600th Mission launches with DMSP F18 from VandenbergAfter nearly

02:19
@TildalWave Sounds like fun.
03:14
@Tildal do you know how to set system path variable ?
 
2 hours later…
 
2 hours later…
06:56
Live stream for the Atlas 5 launch on the NROL-39 mission is not available on United Launch Alliance web page
Now starting planned 10 minute hold on T-4:00
L-9 minutes
L-5 minutes
T-3:30
T-2 minutes
wakey wakey!
T-1 min
T-30 sec
liftoff
that's all folks ... payload fairing jettison was completed and the rest will happen in news blackout as per usual with NROL classified missions ;) everything about it: spaceflight101.com/atlas-v-nrol-39-launch-updates.html and launch replay video: facebook.com/photo.php?v=610144985711829
Next up, Proton in 2 days:
 
3 hours later…
10:55
@TildalWave time to hunt some spams in this question space.stackexchange.com/questions/2871/…
<a href="http://space.stackexchange.com/q/2871/414"> link</a>
11:21
@PearsonArtPhoto spam here @TildalWave @Chris
 
3 hours later…
14:38
It always bugs me when spam shows up and I don't know what I'm supposed to be buying.
anyone awake?
@Hash Nice job finding those. I wish I was awake to stab them with my pitchfork too.
15:01
@UndotheSnowman Not just awake but also hard at work. Or, at least physically at work.
15:48
@Hash Thanks for posting! ;) Also, if mods are not around, please flag it as spam, downvote and ask others in the chat to do the same, then the posts will be handled by all of you (deleted by flags / votes) and all mods have to do is check if the user account needs to be deleted too. BTW, Chris has stepped down as a mod here (lack of time he said) so it's @Pearson and I for the moment ;)
posted on December 06, 2013

On Dec. 6, 1998, the crew of space shuttle mission STS-88 began construction of the International Space Station, attaching the U.S.-built Unity node and the Russian-built Zarya module together in orbit. The crew carried a large-format IMAX® camera, used to take this image of Unity lifted out of Endeavour's payload bay to position it upright for connection to Zarya. Zarya, launched on Nov. 20, 1

16:11
@TildalWave auto save... hmmm ..studied what they have answer
@Hash don't be too bothered by that, it's just pure nonsensical gibberish, likely to test the way the anti-spam engine detects spam around here.
16:27
@TildalWave i have an image
@TildalWave the address he provided is in India
16:57
@Undo Undothesnowman
@Hash Yes?
@Undo i saw that spam because it pinged me
@Hash Yup.
Good job on flagging it out of existence ;)
In related news...
13
Q: We need to improve the quality of our spam!

Undo the SnowmanRecently, I've noticed a downhill effect in the quality of spam posted on Stack Exchange websites. Take this as an example (found on Space.SE): There are a great many things wrong with this artifact: There is not one capitalized letter in the entire post. (-1 grammar point.) The only pun...

@Undo they spammed my question ..
Yup. And we deleted it.
17:04
@Undo how many vote to delete is need to delete an spam ?
@Hash Six spam flags.
You can always try pinging me in chat if you need an extra spam vote
although sometimes I fall asleep with chat open so ...
@John ok i will from now
ok going to shutdown my brain night!;-)
night!
17:07
night!
17:39
@UndotheSnowman hahaha this is hilarious
@TildalWave Thanks ;)
"Keep in mind that, like humans, lizards make mistakes too"
@UndotheSnowman <- has a snowball effect on mSO
Yup. In this case, the snowball effect went the right way. Sometimes it doesn't.
@UndotheSnowman It's December. If you posted it in January it'd be deleted as NaRQ :)
:P
NARQ doesn't exist any more.
17:45
I meant last January :P
It'd be 'does not seek the input of the community'.
Oh. Right
hehe
nice save huh?
@TildalWave Yup :D
Has @JonEricson been around lately? I haven't seen him in here recently.
@UndotheSnowman Dunno, he should be around, prolly busy with other stuff.
1
Q: Does anyone know why three of Jupiter's largest moons orbit in 1:2:4 resonance?

MarkThree of the first four moons ever discovered outside of our own planetary sphere of gravitational influence orbit in very close to perfect resonance. Europa's orbit is almost exactly twice as long as Io's, and Ganymede's is almost exactly twice as long as Europa's. Perhaps it is just coincidence...

Anyone wanna answer this one, it's a great question. Had to ask in the comment if it's related to the last XKCD tho
I really want to close my algebra book as too broad.
18:04
@UndotheSnowman Algebra?
Algebra is good for you, it's like broccoli.
18:20
Broccoli is good for you, it's like algebra for your stomach.
18:46
Stunning Moon tonight if you get a chance to see it
@DavidFreitag As soon as the guy said 'complex numbers' I though, 'yeesh, they aren't complex enough already?'
19:09
@UndotheSnowman Heh, just wait until Differential Equations and Linear Algebra. That's when math gets fun.
Multivariable calc is just the beginning of the fun. Once you get Derivatives and Integrals down, Multivariable is pretty much just plug and chug.
Like, a+b=90; solve for a and b? Eeeeek!
I would, however, recommend that you take a CAD class before you take multivariable. It helps with the 3D visualizations.
I am homeschooled :D
19:11
@UndotheSnowman No, like triple integrals in cylindrical coordinates :]
Oh god.
Hmm... would it be bad if I started imagining i to be 42?
Potentially...
@DavidFreitag Am I supposed to write sqrt(5) * i or i * sqrt(5)?
(not sqrt, of course, but the little square root symbol)
@UndotheSnowman What do you mean?
@David Do I write the i after or before the square rooted thing?
(common practice, etc)
19:19
I would write the i first, but I don't think it matters..
I'm very confused. Do you have my MathJax extension or the bookmarklet?
Nope. Where I get?
$i\sqrt{2}$
Didn't work. Oh well.
^ Yeah, that.
19:21
You need this extension to make that work in chat: chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/se-chat-mathjax/…
Only works for chrome
gtg now, brb.
But that's good, because I only work in Chrome.
$/huge{\TEST}$
Meh, whatever. It works.
@DavidFreitag I'm wondering if I should be writing $i\sqrt{2}$ or $\sqrt{2}i$
@UndotheSnowman The former is clearer, although both are technically correct
So the former it is. Thanks!
Well, think about it this way, in front of the root symbol you will never mistake the i for being underneath the root symbol.
19:34
But then it could be confusing and it might look like the i root of 2, $\sqrt[i]{2}$
posted on December 06, 2013 by Ryan Foltz

Could the strange-looking irregular galaxies actually be remnants of the birth of galaxies? This paper demonstrates a method to find such galaxies.

On this day in 1957:
@DavidFreitag You're OK there?
Uhhhh. I think i may have broken it.
@TildalWave Demonstrating some triple integrals to @UndotheSnowman
you can try MathJax out by simply going to ask or answer a new question and see it in preview ;)
ah OK
$\iiint_E{e^{-x^2}}dV = \iint_D{\left[\int{e^{-x^2}dz}\right] dA}$
$E = \{(x, y, z) | (x, y)\in\mathrm D, h_1(x, y) \le z \le h_2(x, y)\}$
$D = \{(x, y) | a \le x \le b, g_1(x) \le y \le g_2(x)\}$
$\iiint_E{e^{-x^2}}dV = \int_a^b\left[\int_{g_1(x)}^{g_2(x)}\left[\int_{h_1(x, y)}^{h_2(x, y)}{e^{-x^2}dz}\right]dx\right]dy$
There we go, had to split them up. @UndotheSnowman, that's a triple integral in cartesian coordinates. It's a "Case 1" example where you have a 3D solid E that has the projection on the xy-plane D.
20:01
@Tildal do you know how to give low rep users chat write access?
@JohnB on the right under room tags there's "room" link... hit "control access" and then add the user to "explicit write access"
yeah. that's not working for me
@JohnB where?
I try adding her profile to the "If you have it, enter the user id or the user's profile URL here:" box
nothin
I suspect that needs to be their chat account url? What if they don't have one?
@JohnB dunno
@JohnB have you tried an invite?
20:06
@TildalWave How do I do that?
> Superping the user with some stub message so a chat account is created for them
the superping does not work
@JohnB yeah if there is no chat account that won't work, I meant via comments when it invites you to "get a room" if you chat too much
@TildalWave As far as I know, that doesn't work if the user doesn't have enough rep meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/153417/…
I don't even see a "move to chat" message on the post
@JohnB then I'm out of ideas ... you want @ManishEarth or someone on TL
But can't low rep users still come to the room just not talk in it? Wouldn't that create a chat account if you then click on the user icon in the list of chat members?
but alternatively 1) hack user account for login data 2) login as the user 3) be useful to the site, gain some rep 4) write an email to the user that their password might have been compromised 5) invite to chat
Morpheus Live test burns at 20 ft
and that was it :)
20:24
So it didn't go boom?
@Tildal heck of a process, but Anna showed me how
the answer is "there is no easy simple way" :P
The problems of the ruling class...
17 mins ago, by TildalWave
but alternatively 1) hack user account for login data 2) login as the user 3) be useful to the site, gain some rep 4) write an email to the user that their password might have been compromised 5) invite to chat
what's not easy about this one?
That was plan B
so what's the procedure?
20:31
I got stuck on step 3: you have to search for their username on the access page
I was searching for it here like a dummy chat.stackexchange.com/users
@JohnB so where did you find the user id then?
First you superping them using @@userid@<insertsite>.stackexchange.com
Is it bad that I knew that?
then you search for them:
It's more difficult if they have a very common name :D
Is it bad that I knew that?
20:37
it's only bad because you didn't help! You know how I am with buttons
Actually, is it bad that I've read the entire mod FAQ on Meta?
I could set up a mod help vending machine.
@UndotheSnowman it's bad that you did it on Friday
It only took me 45 minutes to figure out, not bad for a moron I think
you're too easy to star :P
I could make it harder....
20:39
dammit, we just got rid of the fool one :(
@UndotheSnowman that's what she said?
@JohnB who?
no the fool message that every single person starred like it was a true statement or something!
How dare you all I am extremely offended!
right
that's why you keep coming back
unless you all starred it ironically like "ohhh that's not true, that's funny because of how wrong it is"
:]
neah we found it useful
20:42
haha
a disclaimer to all
that's what the alt text says on the stars ... "star this message as useful / interesting for the transcript"
oh hey it does
that is useful information, I agree
"do not listen to this guy, avoid at all costs"
I'm not biting
I missed the Morpheus test, are they still hanging it on a string and firing the rockets?
@JohnB found this useful!
then it's star worthy
@JohnB yup :)
20:45
they've been doing that for months! Do something interesting!
The post below this one stinks
cheater!
waves Ohai! Just doing some star maintenance....
21:01
@UndotheSnowman Had to pop over to the ol' dyson sphere did we?
21:22
@DavidFreitag Huh wha where WHA?
A Dyson sphere is a hypothetical megastructure originally described by Freeman Dyson. Such a "sphere" would be a system of orbiting solar-power satellites meant to completely encompass a star and capture most or all of its energy output. Dyson speculated that such structures would be the logical consequence of the long-term survival and escalating energy needs of a technological civilization, and proposed that searching for evidence of the existence of such structures might lead to the detection of advanced intelligent extraterrestrial life. Different types of Dyson spheres correlate with i...
Yes... what about it?
You said you were doing some "star maintenance" :p
Also, did you look at what i left you earlier?
21:24
@DavidFreitag Yes... now I don't want to go on in Algebra :P
@UndotheSnowman My friend, that ain't no Algebra ;]
Yes, but I have to go through Algebra to get to whatever that is.
That would be multivariable Calculus
And, technically speaking, with simple enough equations you could skip algebra altogether. Derivatives and Integrals operate mostly with simple arithmetic.
21:33
@DavidFreitag Oh, question for you:
I got this in a problem: $5-4i = (a+3)+(b-1)i$
And somehow they solved for $a$ and $b$. How!?!
Solve for a, the plug the result back into the original equation for a
but we need b to solve for a, right?
so get $a=<expression>$
Yess....
Oh, so just manipulate it around until all the variables are b's?
then you get $5-4i=(<expression>+3)+(b-1)i$
21:36
...solve for B, then plug it back in to solve for A, right?
And a will be in terms of b, so your end equation will give $b=<something>$
@UndotheSnowman Yes. Or solve for A and plug in and solve for B.
Ok...
Lemme try it.
So we can say $(5-4i)-(b-1)i=a+3$
$(5-4i)-(b-1)-3=a$
You don't need all of those parentheses, $a=2-4i-(b-1)i$
Then say $5-4i=(2-4i-(b-1) + 3)+(b-1)i$?
Only the ones for the multiplication.
@UndotheSnowman Yep, now solve for b
21:40
Ah, ok.
Thanks!
Heh.
That problem is kinda silly. If you solve for b, then try to plug that back in and find a, you get $0=0$, and if you find a and plug in for b, you get $b=b$...
Yes...
But somehow they did it in the answer book.
Oooohhhhh!!! You're supposed to play off complex numbers!
So you can say $(b-1)i = -4i$
Heh, to be honest I've never used complex numbers :\
22:10
In linear algebra, the determinant is a value associated with a square matrix. It can be computed from the entries of the matrix by a specific arithmetic expression, while other ways to determine its value exist as well. The determinant provides important information about a matrix of coefficients of a system of linear equations, or about a matrix that corresponds to a linear transformation of a vector space. In the first case the system has a unique solution exactly when the determinant is nonzero; when the determinant is zero there are either no solutions or many solutions. In the se...
@UndotheSnowman you're doing these ^?
No, just regular Algebra
With the help of some complex numbers, at least.
@DavidFreitag Ah cool, we called them imaginary numbers ... I think. Is there any difference actually?
@TildalWave Complex numbers are the combination of both real numbers and imaginary ones
A complex number is a number that can be expressed in the form , where and are real numbers and is the imaginary unit, which satisfies the equation . In this expression, is the real part and is the imaginary part of the complex number. Complex numbers extend the concept of the one-dimensional number line to the two-dimensional complex plane by using the horizontal axis for the real part and the vertical axis for the imaginary part. The complex number can be identified with the point in the complex plane. A complex number whose real part is zero is said to be purely imaginary, where...
@DavidFreitag cool, nice definition :)
@TildalWave Like $a + bi$, where both $a$ and $b$ are real numbers and $i$ is the imaginary one.
22:23
I always had a bit of problems with maths terminology. I had great grades in maths but would often confuse one thing for another by their names. Still, in written tests that's often irrelevant, lucky for me LOL
Yeah, it gets tricky once you run out of letters and have to delve into latin and greek.
Vladimir Putin announced that Russia will launch a total of 11 military satellites by 2015 http://en.ria.ru/military_news/20131129/185149019/Russia-Plans-to-Launch-11-Military-Satellites-By-2015.html http://t.co/RC6B99b2oJ
well... more launches :)

« first day (142 days earlier)      last day (4095 days later) »