« first day (767 days earlier)      last day (4450 days later) » 

13:00
That'll be him!
how is everyone today
@MattЭллен You have no idea the depths of Internet depravity to which I was forced to stoop — nay, crawl like a worm on my belly! — to locate the original video from which your gigglesnort-worthy whirligig gay-sex gif was derived! And they say research is an unsullied pursuit!
@tchrist sounds like you've learned some valuable life lessons
13:11
@tchrist Was it worth it? Is the original video better than The Hobbit? Cuz I saw that movie and was somewhat disappointed
Only somewhat? After all the criticism?
I didn't listen to the criticism
@MattЭллен I have to admit I learned more from the two US-vs-UK food videos linked from the helicopter sex one. Did you watch those? Very funny!
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 there's your problem right there.
All the whinging I did hear was "ooh, 48fps will make you puke", which I don't believe, and anyway I think I saw a 24fps version, and "wah, he's going to ruin the story", which I wasn't worried about, and anyway he didn't ruin the story.
13:13
It was ok.
I have my complaints.
I will only go in if I actually get to see the 48fps. Meaning, I won't go in.
My complaint is that he was too true to the story, which is far too silly a tale to be told in the format that he told it.
Also, the movie was too damn long
But that was all the whining.
My problem was the dumb Azog plot-line.
The length was ok.
The true problem was it has no true plot arcs when it covers only six chapters of the book.
You cannot have Act 1, Act 2, and Act 3 when you have only 1/3 of a book.
It is just a serial installment, not a full movie.
Oh, what was the deal with the boxing mountains? That was lame.
13:16
The storm giants are in the book. I actually liked them.
But I get tired of seeing Peter Jackson’s fear of heights/falling writ large in every scene.
I didn't remember them from the book. I felt like they could have cut that scene.
Well Frodo was not in the book and they didn't cut him.
> When he peeped out in the lightning-flashes, he saw that across the valley the stone-giants were out and were hurling rocks at one another for a game, and catching them, and tossing them down into the darkness where they smashed among the trees far below, or splintered into little bits with a bang.
@RegDwighт It’s the framing device: looking back as Bilbo tells Frodo the story.
Stone giants then, not storm giants.
@tchrist aka the Episode I device.
Aka crap-nobody-needs device.
I also thought the goblin scene was too silly. It makes no sense that the goblins have built this huge underground city, have a king with a scribe who speaks clearly the Westron tongue, who capture and disarm the dwarves, but then let them escape through sheer incompetence. If goblins were so incompetent they couldn't possibly dress themselves, let alone make clothes or weapons or bridges.
13:18
@RegDwighт Eh? How’s that?
@tchrist This movie already doesn't stand on its own. No need to make it stand on its own even less.
The weird thing is that this is trending much higher in a younger age demographic. 9–12-year-olds really love it, including that silly stuff.
It seems to peak around ten and a half.
It broke all box-office records, you know.
Yeah, the intro scene was too much, plus I thought it harmed the continuity. I'm pretty sure Bilbo had written far more of the book by the time of the party. After all, in FotR he says he wants to finish his book.
What was the movie Peter Falk narrated?
@tchrist uh, I thought it did not?
13:21
@tchrist I suppose I just might not be in the target audience for this film? But That's odd to me because I both loved the books AND the films.
He didn't hit the mark they were aiming at, 100 mils.
@tchrist The Princess Bride?
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Right.
> December 16, 2012 at 1:28 pm – “The Hobbit” brought home a big box office treasure over the weekend, setting a December movie record with $84.77 million in U.S. and Canadian ticket sales as legions of fans turned out for the long-awaited big-screen return to Middle Earth.
Yes, a December record.
@RegDwighт well, his other three films launched in December too
13:22
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 wait, I only just read this morning that the LotR movies had better starts.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Uh, spoiler alert.
@tchrist here.
@RegDwighт That is not true; read the link.
13:23
Anyway... I always found "The Hobbit" to be a silly story. And I always attributed it to Bilbo being an unreliable narrator. So I find it odd that Jackson included all the silly bits.
@tchrist read mine.
I am, I am.
@Robusto spoiler: The ring is a Ring of Power, the One Ring, and Bilbo finds it, and then sits on it for decades, before sending it off to Mordor with his nephew/adopted son.
From what I can tell, they got to about Chapter 6 out of 19 chapters in the original book.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 OH NOES!
So instead of "There and Back Again" it should be "Not Quite There Yet" or "Just Getting Started" ...
@RegDwighт Right. 85 < 100.
I didn’t believe the 100 number.
13:26
@tchrist not only that.
Oh, they are using inflation-adjusted dollars!
Had TTT and RotK been in 3D and 48fps, they'd had higher figures.
I was not bothered by the 48fps. But I pretty much hated the 3D, especially at first.
Have you seen those Christmas cards that when you open, they pop out at you?
Are those nicer than regular Christmas cards?
Is it only in 3D? No alternate screenings?
I saw it in 2D
and I think it was 24fps
at least, I didn't notice anything unusual about the presentation
13:28
Good. I don't care for 3D.
I'm waiting for the 1D 0fps release
Also don't like paying the premium.
@MattЭллен That'd be the book, then
@MattЭллен That's been out for years.
13:28
Semi-jinx.
But books are still 3D.
Coca Cola C2 (also referred to as Coke C2, C2 Cola, or simply C2) was a cola-flavored beverage introduced by The Coca Cola Company first in Japan, then later on 7 June 2004 in the United States (and shortly thereafter, Canada), in response to the low-carbohydrate diet trend. This Coke product was marketed as having half the carbohydrates, sugars and calories compared to standard Coke. It contains aspartame, acesulfame potassium, and sucralose in addition to the high fructose corn syrup typically found in cola beverages distributed in America. It is an alternative for those who prefer th...
I was thinking of a grey line, but the book would be far more interesting
Semi-jinx!
Anyway, overall I liked the movie, but I liked it less than RotK, which I liked least of the LotR trilogy.
13:31
I wonder what all the frames compiled into one frame would look like...
There were a few scenes of slapstick humour that I thought were dumb. And the boxing mountains I didn't like at all. I guess that's in the "problems with the source material" category.
I liked TTT least of the three. But RotK went on way too long. Too many endings. FotR was by far the best of the three.
@MattЭллен compiled how?
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 modular addition
I'm guessing 24bit colour
@Robusto Yes. In FotR Jackson did the right thing: good adherence to the source, but cut out anything unimportant to keep the length down, and the humour was good. Not too silly. There were a few scenes that I thought were dumb. like the falling staircase scene in the mines. That was lame, and it has a counterpart in the Hobbit which is just as lame.
@MattЭллен Hm, interesting. I guess it'd be essentially random then
13:34
yeah, probably just noise.
I also hated the "nobody throws a dwarf" trope.
@Robusto yeah. Actually all the dwarf jokes were annoying. Well, most of them. Poor Gimli got no respect. And in this movie there are 13 dwarves.
And the trumped up "kill competition" between Gimli and Legolas.
Only one of them is the "Brooding, angry King", so no slapstick at his expense. usually.
@Robusto That was in the books though, so I thought they did alright with it in the movie. Except that they seemed to show Legolas shooting way more than 20 arrows. And with the number of orcs that showed up to the fight, each good guy would have to kill dozens of orcs by the end of the night.
@Robusto I watched TTT just last week, for what must be the twenty-seventh time, and it struck me how poorly cut much of the stuff in Helm's Deep is. And Howard Shore helps a lot in noticing that.
13:37
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Was it? It's been so long since I read the books, I didn't recall it.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Yes, right. I like the Fellowship more than the other two, too.
@Robusto It comes in six different presentation formats. Kinda nutty.
@RegDwighт Agreed on the former, and am curious on the latter.
@RegDwighт Yeah. And it's funny how not-believable the CGI seems now, a dozen years or so later. I remember saying at the time that what we're marveling at now will look as phony as the original Star Wars movie in a few years.
I think if Jackson just forced himself to make a 2.5 hour film, the films would kick ass and nobody could complain. But because he lets himself ramble on and on, his films loose focus and he isn't forced to cut scenes that deserve cutting and tighten up weak spots.
I just rewatched the first season of Babylon 5. It was actually embarrassing.
13:39
I hated the Azog thing. He added Azog after the 2-to-3 resplitting.
And he missed a bunch of story beats that he had already foreshadowed, like Thranduil and the spiders of Mirkwood.
It is because he wanted a villain, and an arc.
So he made one up, when in fact, there just isn’t one in six chapters.
Smaug is the villain, ultimately. Or so I thought.
One thing I did like was the Megaloceros.
Which we would get to if he just did a single movie.
@tchrist when Legolas is sliding down the stairs on that shield, for example, Shore goes all the way to the eleven, out of nowhere, and then immediately has to tune it down for the next cut. It's quite pathetic, actually.
Thranduil was riding an Irish Elk!!
13:41
@RegDwighт That is horrible. A shameless pandering to the X-Games crowd.
The whole Goblin Town sequence is pandering to video-gamers.
The 48fps actually helps in various places though.
Can’t much say the same for the stereovision.
But at least he wasn’t in your face with it.
And it never gave a headache.
Just a mindache.
Is Avatar still the top-grossing single film ever?
Not sure.
@Robusto There are two villains, Smaug, and the Necromancer. In the book, the Necromancer is hand-waved while Gandalf goes off to deal with him. In the movie, it is a present thing that is happening.
@RegDwighт Where did all the elves go whom he had come to Helms Deep? Did they all bite it? Disbelieve.
I really, really wanted to hear: ‘Radagast the Brown!’ laughed Saruman, and he no longer concealed his scorn. ‘Radagast the Bird-tamer! Radagast the Simple! Radagast the Fool!’
13:45
Oh, that reminds me, I am annoyed that Gandalf apparently had no idea that the Necromancer was around. That is completely wrong, since he is supposed to get Thror's key from Thror who is a prisoner of the Necromancer. Instead, he just has it, and Thorin doesn't know or care why Gandalf is only bringing it out now.
@tchrist I think that was a shameles pandering to the LEGO crowd, who ten years later would get a Helm's Deep set the size of an apple.
But that would have been a tad out of character at this stage.
Saruman did dress him down a bit though, with the shrooms bit.
@Robusto exactly. I thought it was cool.
Dunno about Gandalf giving Radagast a hit off the pipe. Is that right for 10-year-olds?
Who cares as long as they don't bleed.
13:46
@tchrist what's in that pipe, anyway?
Avatar was the best worst movie ever.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 For one thing, I think they shot some of the sequence of Gandalf getting the key. It may be in EE or in part 2.
For another thing, they have compressed the awareness/recognition of the Necromancer.
@tchrist But didn't the movie establish that Dol Guldur was presumed uninhabited?
They want the discovery to happen during these films.
13:48
I guess so. But it bugs me.
Gandalf learned that the Necromancer was Sauron when he got the key from Thrain lo a hundred years ago.
@RegDwighт I so yawned on the plot.
It was actually painful.
Or non-plot, or whatever.
From scene one, no less.
Aye.
@tchrist And wasn't it at that time that he also went through moria? On his way back west.
Sauron can raise the dead? Why only an army of orcs and men then, in RotK?
13:49
They start by explaining to each other, in second-grader terms, what it is they have been doing on that planet all along.
what a lazy bastard
On the plus side, that allowed me to switch my brain off right away.
They always explain things for the double-digit IQ crowd that by definition comprises half the populace.
@MattЭллен Again, a problem with the source material. Tolkien didn't intend for The Hobbit to be part of the larger storyline. So many pieces don't fit.
@MattЭллен Raise the dead? It isn’t clear. He studied Black Magic, which of course is all a Necro Mancer is.
13:50
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I see.
So basically I left all hopes right at the door, which is arguably less cruel than making me hope for something, anything, for two hours only to get sorely disappointed. The latter is actually more of a Peter Jackson approach.
But there seems to be some communing with the dead spirits, yes.
And of course, he promises the Nine that they shall never die..
@tchrist "Necro" from the latin for dead?
Black.
13:51
Morgûl.
Black Magic gives me happy feet.
= Necromancy.
Devil moon?
Can’t click.
Teleconfing.
@tchrist my mistake, from the Greek for dead.
@MattЭллен oh, and Showgirls? What the actual f.
Inja.
13:52
@RegDwighт Biggest NC-17. Not exactly the same thing.
I guess that's what you get for being so prude.
People spend millions on the last crap just because it has some tits.
Showgirls was, like, one of the worst pieces of shit ever to hit the big screen.
Greek νεκρός = corpse.
Oh!
It has become confused!
I also feel obliged to point out that Lion King was not good in the least.
Etymology: a. OFr. nygromancie (more commonly -mance: see necromance) = Sp. nigromancia, Ital. nigro-, negromanzia, med.L. nigromantia (1212 in Du Cange), an alteration, by association with L. niger, nigr-, black (cf. black art), of L. necromantīa, ad. Gr. νεκρομαντεία, f. νεκρο- necro- + μαντεία divination, prophecy.
From c 1550 the form necro- has been restored after Gr., as in Fr. nécromancie. In Merlin (c 1450) pp. 375 and 508 the form egramauncye occurs; for an archaic 19th c. example see egromancy. This dropping of the n appears also in the OFr. form igromancie.
13:54
And not a children's movie, either.
Bambi’s mom bought it. Is that a children’s movie?
Yes, but Simba's father got trampled to death by a stampede in front of his very eyes.
Bambi's mom killed my car.
Box office records should be in (tickets sold)/(screens showing).
@Robusto So it's good that she got shot.
13:56
@MattЭллен Absolutely.
or (tickets sold for this movie)/ (all tickets sold that day)
Or box-office-revenue/production-cost
Actually, it should take into account how many people actually went after buying a ticket and stood there throughout the movie.
@RegDwighт in Canada we get to sit through our movies.
Nobody walks out of movies around these parts, but from what I gathered it's a national sport in the US.
@Robusto Be happy it wasn’t Thranduil atop a Megaloceros!
@RegDwighт Dunno. I have only done so one my whole life long.
13:58
@tchrist that is ∞% more than all of the people I know combined.
It was before you were born.
The Cook, the Thief, His Wife & Her Lover is a 1989 romantic crime drama written and directed by Peter Greenaway, starring Richard Bohringer, Michael Gambon, Helen Mirren, and Alan Howard in the titular roles. The film's graphic scatological, violent, and nude scenes, as well as its lavish cinematography and formalism were noted at the time of its release. Plot English gangster Albert Spica (Michael Gambon) has taken over the high-class Le Hollandais Restaurant, run by French chef Richard Borst (Richard Bohringer). Spica makes nightly appearances at the restaurant with his retinue of thug...
I know that movie.
I'm also older than it.
It would take Helen Mirren another twenty years to start looking hot.
0
Q: Is corrosion an onomatopoeia?

Trong TruongYes, no? If not, what is the term for words that suggest their meanings, with/out necessarily recreating the sound, but that aren't quite onomatopoeiae? There are a lot of similar ones, e.g. grind, shuffle.

Not this again.
"grind shuffle" must be a new dance craze
What the heck is the sound of corrosion anyway?
depends on the type, I suppose
mostly isn't it silent?
14:09
The only type of corrosion that makes a sound is called explosion.
And even that one isn't onomatopoetic.
maybe they've confused corrosion and dissolving
things that dissolve quickly fizz, and corrosive has a fizzing sound at the end
Your sugar sings when you add it to your tea? Funny Brits, always too much carbon acid in their tea.
yes
we have musical sugar
that's why we enjoy teatime so much
Andrew Lloyd Webber?
and Tim Minchin now
14:14
Honey is better.
14:56
Hi
Only just noticed something.
0
Q: Is corrosion an onomatopoeia?

Trong TruongYes, no? If not, what is the term for words that suggest their meanings, with/out necessarily recreating the sound, but that aren't quite onomatopoeiae? There are a lot of similar ones, e.g. grind, shuffle.

> with/out
facepalm
I have some questions. Can I discuss in the chat?
I would like to know usage differences of Embrace vs hug vs cuddle
15:00
For one thing: embrace is usually found in more formal circumstances than hug, or cuddle.
For another: cuddles are more intimate than hugs
of course, that might vary across dialects
e.g. people talk of "death's cold embrace" but never "death's cold cuddle"
This will never be "free embraces" or "free cuddles".
Cuddle is a cutie-smoochie word.
15:03
So in conclusion
Hug is more general word
Embrace is more related to circumstances
Cuddle is more related to intimacy and romance
Am I correct?
Yes, I'd say so. As long as you understand that it's fine for parents to cuddle their children, and that the word isn't exclusive to lovers.
cuddle is more related to feelings
> First we'll make snow angels for a two hours, then we'll go ice skating, then we'll eat a whole roll of Tollhouse Cookiedough as fast as we can, and then we'll snuggle.
Don't forget snuggle.
@Hanu cuddle is less general than hug. I think both are related to feelings
maybe cuddles are given between people are very close.
hugs are given to anyone
Still no free embraces, though.
15:10
Embrace is used figuratively far more than hug or cuddle (if either are used figuratively), e.g. embrace change
I like to cuddle change.
do you hug your fear?
I nestle down in fear.
Pictured from left to right: Nestle, fear.
pictured from left to right Far, nestle
> In a famous exchange with John Montagu, 4th Earl of Sandwich, where the latter exclaimed, "Sir, I do not know whether you will die on the gallows or of the pox," [John] Wilkes is reported to have replied, "That depends, my lord, on whether I embrace your lordship's principles or your mistress."
Cuddle or hug wouldn't have worked there.
15:17
> the only time we capitalise a personal pronoun otherwise is when talking about Him, or perhaps Her. Even Them, i suppose.
What is he even talking about.
@Robusto Cuckold, on the other hand...
Seriously. I do not understand people.
Like, hello?
-1
Q: should "i" be capitalised?

bharal Possible Duplicate: Why should the first person pronoun ‘I’ always be capitalized? Is it alright to use lowercase “i” or should you always use “I” (uppercase)? Is using i instead of I for first person singular really bad? We don't normally capitalise personal pronouns - you, they, he...

It's a proven fact that only people who can communicate clearly are easy to understand.
15:19
But I can't communicate clearly, do you understand that?
What?
No, where.
Come again?
I'm not your Dirk Diggler.
15:24
Thank u so much
> I truly do not understand why your answer was deleted. It was on topic.
@Hanu You're welcome!
Really, @Cerberus?
His answer does not even address the question. And what it does address it addresses wrongly.
He literally says, and I quote, that "no less than one million dollars" means "not quite meet the level of one million dollars".
this is no less than wrong
You honestly want us to have questions of the form "what does 'nothing less than'" mean?
15:28
What would be the Greek word meaning "fear of chocolate"? I bet those dumb Greeks didn't even have chocolate.
They do have words for "bitter" and "water", I imagine.
@RegDwighт My gripe exactly.
My gripe is different. My gripe is that @Cerberus never answers such questions himself.
He only says we should keep them open. The answering? Meh, someone else handle it.
Ah yes. But he certainly wants them answered, not closed.
One more question
15:31
Money. Mouth. Put.
@Hanu go for it
Usage diiferences of timid vs frightened Vs afraid vs fear vs apprehensive vs intimidate vs daunt
I would like to know usage differences of the above specified words
they're quite different
Q. Should I be capitalized?
A. Are you a proper noun?
Q. I am very proper.
A. Very well, I will capitalize You.
5
15:33
@MattЭллен “Fancy a little cuddle?” beckoned the Grim Reaper adoringly.
@tchrist is it bad that all I wanted was a pat on the back?
@Hanu timid, frightened, afraid and apprehensive are all related. intimidate and daunt are both related. fear sits alone.
Can I say I feel timid while watching horror movie?
you can. You'd be more likely to say you feel afraid
so timid, frightened and afraid are interchangeable. Am i right?
not in all circumstances, but yes, they can be
for example you use timid to mean shy, but you can't use frightened or afraid to mean shy.
15:44
is there any way to differentiate as per the circumstances?
practice. There isn't a rule as such. Timidity is at the lower end of the "fear" spectrum
frightened and afraid are around the middle
@RegDwighт Certainly jlovegren is energeticker than @Cerberus is in this regard.
someone who is timid is usually always timid. Someone who is afraid is usually only afraid at the moment.
@jlovegren Consider the ramifications of Christiansen’s Conjecture, which says “There exists no ELU question so surpassingly GR that a sufficiently creative, motivated, and assiduous writer cannot provide a useful and interesting answer to.” (Or something like that, whatever makes the pieces connected correctly.) Yet even if true, we seem to suffer from a chronic collective shortage of creativity, motivation, and assiduity, and I know no remedy to said shortage. Saying people could give answers doesn’t get them to do it. — tchrist 3 mins ago
@MattЭллен Stop trying to intimidate us with your opinions.
15:48
Yes, please use mine instead.
I'm undaunted by your interjections
Ouch.
Hallelujah!
is it a pun? I'll give it a look over when I get home
15:52
It may be punitive.
May 10 at 21:34, by Robusto
Very punitive.
So timid more belongs to personality trait
@MattЭллен I’m betting you didn’t grow up with Schoolhouse Rock.
Afraid is more related to outside world. Like it might be person, event or anything
@tchrist this is the case
@Hanu yes.
15:53
@MattЭллен Then you have an experience replete with wonder and joy yet awaiting you. AND SONG!
But you could also say, "I'm afraid I can't help you, sir." In which case you're not really afraid at all.
What about frighten?
I fear I can’t help, sir.
If you're frightened you definitely are fearful, usually in an alarming way.
@Hanu if someone is frightened then they are afraid. probably more extreme than plain afraid
15:55
Jinx.
yeah, what Robusto said.
Coumbia is for hiding crumbs, not crimes.
Which colum would that bia?
columbaceous, Columban, columbaria, columbarian, columbarium, columbary, columbate, Columbiad,
Columbian, columbic, columbier, columbiferous, columbin, Columbine, columbine, columbite, columbium,
Columbus, Columbus Day, columel, columella, columellar, columellate, columelliform, column, columna,
columnae, columnal, columnar, columnarian, columnarious, columnaris, columnarish, columnarity,
columnated, columnation, columned, columniated, columniation, columniferous, columniform,
column-inch, columnist, column-lathe, column-rule, columns of Morgagni.
a Coulomb?
Can I say frighten = Afraid ++
15:58
yes, that seems acceptable :D
Frighten is, or can be, a transitive verb.
Afraid is merely an adjective.
true. it should be frightened == afraid++
note the ed at the end

« first day (767 days earlier)      last day (4450 days later) »