« first day (510 days earlier)      last day (4709 days later) » 

17:00
"Yet gentle, non-caustic Lysol will not harm delicate tissues."
At least appealing daintiness is preserved.
so i don't see what Kit's problem is
user19161
Wait are we thinking of the same lysol?
And there is no greasy aftereffect.
@JSBᾶngs It's scientifically correct so it must be true
17:01
tries to imagine what you would stick in your cootch to clean it that would leave a greasy aftereffect
I'm going to dinner.
Maybe I could send mail to Lehn & Fink, the gynecological authorities.
user19161
@Carlo_R Carbonara!
@Carlo_R That probably would leave a greasy aftereffect.
17:02
Yes: "Spaghetti alla carbonara"
I can't imagine that it would be a useful cleaning tool though.
thanks @Kit. now you've put me off my lunch.
Rob
Rob
@KitFox If aftereffect is one word why isn't "after affect?"
This is getting too complicated for me.
Commute. Laters.
17:04
Cya!
@Rob It is "after affecting."
Bye!
@RegDwightѬſ道 Bye!
@Carlo_R Bye!
@JSBᾶngs Sorry. Try seafood.
giggles
user19161
The carbonara picture has made me crave for carbonara.
Rob
Rob
@KitFox But not "afteraffecting?"
user19161
17:06
@Rob Just because.
@Rob No. It's easy. Affect and effect are in pairs. When something affects something else, it's an effect. When something effects something, it's an affect.
Rob
Rob
@WillHunting why, why, why...
user19161
@KitFox Deep.
You are not likely to ever use "affect" as a noun or "effect" as a verb.
So if it's a verb, it's probably "affect" and if it's a noun, it's probably "effect."
Rob
Rob
Then please explain "aftereffect?"
17:08
Like special effect.
Rob
Rob
one word
Or afterimage.
user19161
@Rob It's simply the effects after something happens.
What he said.^
It's a noun.
user19161
Like aftermath.
17:08
afterglow.
afterburner.
afternoon.
user19161
Afterlife
gets dizzy, sits down
Rob
Rob
cool thanks guys
hands Kit a glass of water
Danke danke.
Rob
Rob
I didn't mean to get you dizzy.
17:13
Too much brainwork, not enough coffee.
user19161
... makes kit dizzy
Rob
Rob
makes Johnny a dull boy...
;-)
user19161
@rob I see you changed into another skull.
Rob
Rob
Skull
patrol
for
life
user19161
@Rob You like to waste vertical space huh.
Rob
Rob
17:18
or at least when I can change my name back....
user19161
@Rob What are you going to change it to?
Rob
Rob
back
user19161
By the way what happened to the sexuality site?
user19161
It seems to have been shut down.
Rob
Rob
What could you talk about on a sexuality site that wouldn't get flagged as offensive?
17:25
Just about everything.
user19161
I knew too many things to even join the site.
Really? looks skeptical
user19161
Hehe.
Rob
Rob
@KitFox There is a site for people with that look ;-)
I'm a member.
Rob
Rob
17:28
What a surprise(!)
(!)= punctuation for sarcasm
@KitFox have you seen or used this punctuation before?
Never.
Rob
Rob
I guess (!!) would be overly sarcastic.
In writing and often subtitles, especially in British English, a (!) symbol (an exclamation point within parentheses) implies that a character has made an obviously sarcastic comment e.g.: "Ooh, a sarcasm detector. That's a really useful invention(!)"
I wish I could undertake the expenditure of your trip, unfortunately I'm short of cash this month. Makes sense?
Undertake and expenditure don't go together.
You could undertake the trip.
I think.
What's the appropriate verb to use with expenditure?
17:40
It just sounds excessively formal to me, but ok.
Oh, yes, you can undertake an expenditure, I guess.
user19161
@Gigili I wish I could pay for your trip but I am short of cash this month.
user19161
In any case, that comma is misplaced.
Great, thank you @KitFox and @aedia.
@WillHunting No, it's not.
17:42
@WillHunting Umm, no? Why?
But there probably should be a conjunction.
Like but?
"I wish I could undertake the expenditure of your trip, but unfortunately I'm short of cash this month."
Or use a semicolon.
Uhum.
More coffee!
Rob
Rob
17:43
me to
Wait for meeee!
user19161
@Rob too
Rob
Rob
@WillHunting Oops ...
Sorry, @aedia, it's decaf.
Rob
Rob
I have a preference for short words is that bad?
user19161
17:47
@Rob I think it's good. I only have half the vocab of most people in this room.
What was your rating, @Will?
user19161
@KitFox Well, I would say taking the average maybe around 16,000?
Is that all? Really?
user19161
Yes, I know and use very few words.
user19161
Also, my honours project was only 20 pages long while the rest wrote 100 pages.
user19161
17:51
I think I stopped reading fiction in middle school.
Rob
Rob
is that where you pick up a lot of vocab
user19161
Well, I would say if I were to increase my vocab I would do it by reading fiction.
user19161
Maybe certain kinds of non-fiction can help you learn many words too, but I don't know.
Rob
Rob
i knew a guy who read the dictionary
user19161
Now and then I flip through the D too.
Rob
Rob
17:55
OED?
user19161
Nah! Do you think I am crazy enough to get the OED?
"Reading" the OED is pointless and stupid. Your friend was probably lying in an effort to look intelligent.
user19161
It is 20 volumes in book form.
Reading any dictionary is just a dumb idea.
user19161
Anyway I currently use the OALD as my favourite D.
Rob
Rob
17:57
By "reading" he meant memorizing definitions
is that a dumb idea?
user19161
@Rob Well, depends on why he is doing it.
@Rob Yes.
user19161
But the Americans should just get a copy of MW Collegiate. It's cheap and good.
Rob
Rob
Increase clarification of meaning was his goal.
user19161
@Rob I guess memorizing stuff here and there could increase one's proficiency to a certain extent. But there are better things to do with one's time.
user19161
18:04
@mahnax Boo!
@WillHunting Ohai.
user19161
By the way, MW has an advanced learner's dictionary too. There is only one edition so far. It seems not many know about it.
Rob
Rob
@WillHunting Thank you, I'll have a look at it.
user19161
@Rob The websites are m-w.com (MW Collegiate) and learnersdictionary.com (MW ALD)
user19161
But it's nice to get the paperback too.
18:09
@WillHunting I've got one, but just the regular M-W.
user19161
@Mahnax Yeah, I remember that. Nowadays I use oald8.com (OALD) and oxforddictionaries.com (ODE).
@WillHunting Oh, never heard of the latter.
2
Q: One and a half minute/minutes

BloodPhiliaWhen talking about "one and a half" of any object, do we use the subsequent noun in plural or just singular? I'm aware that "A minute and a half" is also correct but I'm looking for the specific "One and a half"-construction here. So for example, which of the below phrases is correct? You'r...

Why oh why is this still open?
Rob
Rob
@WillHunting Do you prefer the Oxford or Cambridge ALD and why?
user19161
@Rob Honestly, they are about the same. But note that the former is in its 8th edition and the latter only the 3rd.
18:13
Okay now I know why it's still open. I can't find that answer of Kosmonaut's, either.
user19161
@RegDwightѬſ道 Hahaha. After thinking about it, I conclude that jsbangs was not joking. QED.
@RegDwightѬſ道 That's the one I was looking for too.
29
A: Plurality of numbers between -1 and 1

KosmonautYou could make the argument that English does not have singular and plural markers per se, but rather singular and "non-singular". (I'm not necessarily advocating this view, just throwing it out there.) The evidence would be that the singular form is used to refer to one of something, while the...

Rob
Rob
@WillHunting Have you read the Cambridge grammar guide?
user19161
@Rob Exact title is?
18:15
20
A: Should we use plural or singular for a fraction of a mile?

ShreevatsaR0.25 miles. The rule I follow is that you use the singular only when talking of exactly one mile. You'd also say half a mile, quarter of a mile, etc., but in these cases it's as though you're still talking of "a mile" first, and then taking half or quarter of it. Let me say something further, w...

user19161
@Rob This is what Cerb and Vitaly would recommend I think. But I think it's terribly huge and expensive, so I settled for less. I got a copy of the Cambridge Grammar of English instead but have not really studied it.
So Lysol can "insure feminine daintiness alone". Shouldn't that be "ensure"?
user19161
@RegDwightѬſ道 Finally closed!
user19161
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Maybe they pay insurance for it too!
user19161
18:24
Yay, now John Lawler also has 10k!
Oh thank Freya I am using versioning tools!
user19161
@KitFox I thought you would thank Frigga.
Same goddess.
user19161
One goddess, many names.
Many spellings, one name.
user19161
18:29
One God, three manifestations.
My new favourite quote: "If you've got a religious belief that withers in the face of observations of the natural world, you ought to rethink your beliefs — rethinking the world isn't an option." -- P.Z. Meyers
user19161
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Anyway, where did you see that?
on PZ Meyers's website
Still in my head.
Rob
Rob
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Why isn't "rethinking the world" an option?
standing on my own...but now I'm not alone AVENGERS ASSEMBLE!
bangs head to get demons out
@Mahnax NOU!
@KitFox YEA!
@Rob Because the world doesn't care what you think about it. Just because you believe something doesn't make it true. And if you observe a fact about the world that contradicts your belief, you should re-evaluate that belief.
user19161
18:36
@Mahnax Interesting!
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Suck on my Bayesicle, unbelievers!
@WillHunting Yes!
user19161
@Mahnax You can use it to hypnotise people!
@Mahnax They really really should animate that chicken
hums hi-yo chicken on a raft
18:38
chicken on a raft on a monday morning, oh what a terrible sight to see
user19161
I can't believe I am still listening to the stupid chicken.
giggles
Rob
Rob
@MrShinyandNew安宇 It is true that "the world doesn't care what you think about it," but you do have to think about the world to make those beliefs; don't you?
@Rob You're misinterpreting what Meyers said.
user19161
@KitFox Never watched that show.
18:40
@WillHunting I am not surprised. You are more of a Spiderman fan, eh?
user19161
@KitFox Yes!
eg: You believe, because you were taught, that inside every tree is a solid core of crystal put there by your god. Then, years later, you cut down a tree and find that there is no crystal. You cut down tree after tree and never find it. You should re-evaluate your belief in tree-crystals, not declare that the crystals ARE there after all.
> You have been on a raft with a chicken for 5 minutes 47 seconds.
The COAR song is 3:23 in length, then it repeats.
> You have been on a raft with a chicken for 4 minutes 8 seconds.
I'm at about four minutes too.
18:42
> She says she won't, but I think she will
Reg got to just under two hours.
user19161
I am off the raft.
JSB went over 2 hours.
That's a belief about the world. If she never does, it's foolish to conclude that she would.
I have spent all day trying to figure out why I can't get the other site to work the same way as the other two.
user19161
18:42
@Mahnax I did not know they are crazy too!
@KitFox this is the site that was created by restoring a backup?
@WillHunting Heh.
Rob
Rob
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Ah... my mistake these are " religious beliefs."
@Rob well, actually, any beliefs.
I have re-evaluated my belief that it will work, and instead deleted the m-fing thing.
18:43
The point is: when you believe something is true, and you find evidence to the contrary, you need to reconsider your belief.
Rob
Rob
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Not according to the quotation.
@Rob But it holds for any kind of belief.
user19161
@KitFox Maybe put it aside and come back to it later.
@WillHunting Too late.
> You have been on a raft with a chicken for 7 minutes 7 seconds.
@Rob: restated: you don't get to decree that the world conforms to your beliefs. You should instead form your beliefs to match the world.
Rob
Rob
18:45
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Could you tell me your definition of belief please?
1. An acceptance that a statement is true or that something exists.
2. Something one accepts as true or real; a firmly held opinion or conviction.
> You have been on a raft with a chicken for 7 minutes 54 seconds.
> You have been on a raft with a chicken for 10 minutes 12 seconds.
Oh right! The chicken! I'll jump right in.
I had to close my first one after 3 minutes for a YT vid.
user19161
18:47
@RegDwightѬſ道 The elephant will sink the raft.
@Mahnax I don't understand. Is your hardware not powerful enough?
user19161
@RegDwightѬſ道 Conflicting sound.
@RegDwightѬſ道 No, I can't turn off the sound.
user19161
So now we have a fox, an elephant and a python on the raft with a chicken!
3 hours ago, by RegDwight Ѭſ道
Dear Will, seriously. Start getting jokes. Please. PLEASE.
@Mahnax never stopped a real man before.
user19161
18:49
@RegDwightѬſ道 OMG!
@RegDwightѬſ道 But I'm in class, and people don't want to hear a swearing Australian, ping noises, and a COAR at once.
@Mahnax well that means the people are super uncool.
If you conform, that makes you super uncool, too.
And you don't want to be super uncool except perhaps in winter.
user19161
I wonder what will happen to all the animals on the raft...
@RegDwightѬſ道 Actually, the problem is mostly the teacher.
@WillHunting I have to jump off in 12 minutes for English class.
Good good. The first step to solving a problem is localizing it.
user19161
18:52
@Mahnax Then you should not be here but pay attention in class instead.
@WillHunting Don't forget an opinionated Lego minifig
Hmm, he will be occupied if we give him a 90s Javascript manual.
> You have been on a raft with a chicken for 16 minutes 56 seconds.
> You have been on a raft with a chicken for 15 minutes 23 seconds.
My raft is ahead of the other rafts
user19161
18:53
@RegDwightѬſ道 You have been infected with reduplication!
My chicken will cross the stream first.
The stream is a lie.
@WillHunting Did he duplicate it again?
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Don't cross the streams!
user19161
@MrShinyandNew安宇 If I answer this, next thing Reg will tell me is "Start getting jokes".
18:54
@WillHunting Good good.
@KitFox I'm only crossing one stream.
It's like one-hand clapping.
you people. my bayesian belief-updating system leads me to believe that i DON'T WANT TO SPEND ANY MORE TIME ON THIS GODDAMN RAFT
user19161
@JSBᾶngs /ragequit
@JSBᾶngs as if we needed further proof that Bayes is of the Devil.
18:56
@RegDwightѬſ道 How dare you speak that way about a preacher?
user19161
@RegDwightѬſ道 I am now starting to think if "devil" should be capitalised.
@WillHunting "devil" is not, but "the Devil" is.
@KitFox Swiftly. I dare speak that way about a preacher swiftly.
Also, New Jersey Devils.
And Dirt Devils, but not dirt devils.
@KitFox Yeah, exactly. But I'm only crossing one stream, not streams.
18:57
@WillHunting believe me, JSB's Devil must be capitalized.
@RegDwightѬſ道 Is it HUGE?
It's like you know almost seven huges.
You had me at "It's like, you know..."
@RegDwightѬſ道 like 9000 huges
@KitFox I'm failing. Usually it doesn't take that long.
user19161
18:58
I am not even sure what jsb's devil means.
@RegDwightѬſ道 That's not a failure. It's good to vary your technique. Keeps things spicy.
@JSBᾶngs But is it also like 9000 usages?
@KitFox Do note how huges is almost an anagram of usages.
> You have been on a raft with a chicken for 23 minutes 16 seconds.
> You have been on a raft with a chicken for 21 minutes 52 seconds.
user19161
18:59
@RegDwightѬſ道 For sufficiently loose definitions of "almost".
I think I'm catching up.

« first day (510 days earlier)      last day (4709 days later) »