« first day (2009 days earlier)      last day (3208 days later) » 
00:00 - 14:0014:00 - 21:00

00:02
@snailplane I don't think any licence could lift the obligation of attribution...
00:37
No, but y'all want top hit on Google or what does.
Money talks....
Is there an appropriate SE to ask about the inner workings of Google and their company policies?
01:21
@Mazura Where did those stars come from? (As if it's not obvious.)
What do you say to someone who has just finished a meal prepared by you and thanked you for it?
01:39
@Færd - I actually don't know, and really have no idea. Whoever it was has lurked the entire conversation. I don't recall anyone being on my side.
@Færd Is that a serious question, or is it supposed to mean something?
@Mazura No, I'm a learner. I want to know.
"Don't mention it." "You're welcome." The same things you always say whenever someone says thank you.
@Mazura Thanks. I thought there's a special response after someone has thanked you for a meal. Because there are special 'offering terms' for meals, like Enjoy your meal! and Bon appetite!
If there is, it's likely a loanword from French. Nothing's coming to mind.
@Færd - I don't know where the stars came from, but I'd bet money this conversation is the reason I got a DV on it.
@Mazura What's a DV?
01:55
Down vote.
Huh.
At SE (Stack Exchange) you either get "up votes" or "down votes".
I'd give you all my reps if I could, to console you.
Because they're not that important. :)
13
Q: How should I vote?

MazuraThis is the current FAQ for voting on Stack Exchange (long-windily mentioning what votes do and their importance, having little to say about how to conduct one's own voting habits. Plenty of questions broach the subject of voting without leaving a comment, when you should vote, how you should vot...

How you use them is very important to me.
Yes. But how people use them on me is not that much.
01:58
LOL... sry ;)
I'm not very good at abbreviations, you know!
( Laughing Out Loud ) You have a fair amount of rep, more than the average.
I meant sry.
sry = sorry
Ah, okay!
02:02
"How you use them is very important to me." - Rather, that you are consistent (!!!), on however you use them.
@Mazura A great chunk of that I got by chance. Posting a silly answer and getting a sh*tload of reps.
I like that answer. I couldn't have said it better myself.
I'd upvote it, but I haven't read the rest of the answers, and to do so without having done so, would be inconsistent (!!!). (for me personally)
@Mazura Wow you read all the page before voting anything?
At the very least I skim it. That's where formatting will get you the win (from me).
Very patient you are.
02:06
If I start to vote before I've read them all, then I feel I must read them all in full.
heh.
I guess I read the specific answer I want to vote in full. The rest of them, maybe.
Voting on SE is ... erratic at best. I try not to be skewed by scores.
Try.
Just look how many good postings there are on SE with so few votes.
Try posting at DiY sometime ;) It's nearly a thankless job, as far as rep goes.
But that's my 'easy' stack.
My relatively better posts have fewer upvotes.
looks up DiY
02:11
The better posts aren't understood by the masses and they don't read or vote on that kind of stuff.
I can be happy if there's one person I've helped with my answer. Whether I'm thanked or not.
You'll notice that I have the Tenacious badge at DiY: "Zero score accepted answers: more than 5 and 20% of total."
Each of those have one "thanks", from the OP.
Who couldn't even upvote LOL
Haha!
I just like being right. Imaginary internet points are secondary. A very close second:
11
A: What do you call someone who is addicted to a Q&A website?

MazuraNew and Improved; Made-Up Definitions: Altruistic Vampire -one who subsists on the dopamine released when they help another; for whatever personal motivation: an addict of altruism; someone addicted to answering questions online. -Similar and often found in conjunction, though not to be confu...

@Mazura It's natural. I have a bit of that too. But you won't be at ease if you care too much about other's opinion about you.
Actually, you will be very uneasy.
02:26
The whole discussion above is about SE policy. I've never met another human being who could care less than I do about what others think (about myself).
I see.
Being wrong or right is my main concern.
I upvote if its "useful" (at all: in any way, shape, or form). I only DV if it's wrong.
I am known to be guilty of voting to order, though.
@Mazura I don't think a public Q&A site will ever be able to fix that hole. Public opinion correlates poorly with something being right or wrong.
We try our best. The slogan for SE should be: Just the facts ma'am. Just the facts.
heh.
@Mazura To sort answers?
@Mazura BTW, our virtual cares are not very far from our actual cares.
And I gotta run. o/
03:22
@Færd Yep. I explained it here in my answer And in a comment:
Self-defined, voting to order is using DVs to rearrange the order of the results, regardless of if any answer is useful (which is nearly 75% of my up-vote criteria. The rest is formatting and trite other reasons) and a it becomes a war when users bandwagon over it. "Not that answer. THIS answer."
What astounds me is that some people think, that people don't do this. I have, not only my suspicions that I've seen it happen in real time, but have done so myself in the past.
@Mazura It was like @Cerberus was reading my mind. I wasn't particularly replying meaningfully to you but what you said gave me a chance to repeat a funny proverb.
It's making fun of people (namely everybody) who, despite even being well intentioned, have hard set beliefs (their opinions). We all know that reality is often different from opinions, and that facts represent reality better than (biased) opinion. So it's funny to say that you shouldn't let actual reality get in the way/change your beliefs even when those beliefs don't match reality.
Ha ha ha.
@Mitch - Heh. I should leave that as a comment on my answer.
@Mazura You are not astounded because you are doing it yourself. You think you are like others and so expect others to do it too.
True, but the word naive comes to mind.
I put nothing past the capabilities of any random human.
Murphy's law and all that. If it can, it will, and you can rest assured that it has.
On the other hand, with respect to this one thing, such voting behavior is very much orthogonal to most peoples expectations. You are being capricious, or gaming the system, or some other subversion of the intended process. Also, There is absolutely no way of knowing why anybody votes a particular way here, so I don't see how you can say that others follow your same behavior.
@Mazura It's pretty weird behavior.
03:35
Yeah, after I posted on that "Why am I getting DVs" meta, I realized I was responding to the title, which is unanswerable.
Which is what the answer I upvoted says.
@Mitch Mine or "VT order'ers". Or both? ;)
I'm confused. I thought we were talking about one behavior of yours , voting in order to get an arbitrary order of questions.
It just one possible way/reason why you can get a DV. From which, from first hand experience, I can tell you it has happened before.
I don't use DVs to do it anymore.
Because you've done it right, not because you somehow magically know that others have done it to you. People see most in others what they see in themselves.
Saying 'it has happened before' is a weird thing to say if it was actually you who did it.
I'm not trying to quantify it; merely to show precedence.
What I can quantify, are the two upvotes on it ;)
quantify what to show precedence?
Very confusing
This is a fascinating discussion but sadly for me, my time zone must be very different from yours and I should go to bed.
Sorry to cut the conversation short
03:43
I am guilty of VTO. Therefore VTO at least has existed.
We'll pick it up later I'm sure. Cya
logically, 'some VTO behavior has occurred'. but one shouldn't draw from that logical statement that it happens all the time. THere's been only one instance of it.
later
Don't let the facts hit you on the way out... :P
My 3 star comment has more upvotes than my answer. That sounds about right for SE voting ;)
@Mitch We've known each other for so long...
04:22
> from unus "one" (see one) + versus, past participle of vertere "to turn" (see versus)
@Mazura In this context, I'd day source = original document; citation = reference = enough information to find the source; attribution = crediting the author.
What does it have to do with to turn? The fact that the the universe turns around the Earth?
@Færd Turn in that context means become.
@Mazura It's not very contextual.
> versus ... from Old Church Slavonic vrŭteti "to turn, roll,"
@Lawrence Yes. Thank you. Attribution is silly IMO.
Quite pedantic I might say.
Overly so.
@Færd Versus: Old English weorðan "to become"
04:27
@Mazura Well, to become is also mentioned somewhere in the etymology of versus, but I'm not sure.
A common idiom is all rolled into one.
Hmm.
The universe is a place. The cosmos is that, and everything in it, IMO.
It's also one of my favorite documentaries (the original Cosmos, by Carl Sagan).
@Mazura Your idea seems to be better than mine.
Don't forget, that in the 12c, the sun still revolved around the earth ;)
04:35
That's what I thought the etymology of universe has something to do with.
Actually, they share the task. I forget what it's called.
Gravitational center?
Something like that....
They revolve around their center of mass.
@Mazura That's something else.
I'll go with that.
Well, the center of mass coordinates makes things easy in a two body system. For a many-body system (like the solar system) things are awfully complex. For one thing, they don't go round their center of mass.
I'm a big fan of orbital resonance being the cause of the late heavy bombardment.
04:42
I'm ignorant about that. Gotta look it up some time.
The resonance between Jupiter and Saturn throwing asteroids at us.
Ha.
Harmonic resonance*
@Mazura May they send one for you some time then!
I've talked about it here but there's another I'm trying to find.
I watch too many documentaries ;)
04:47
I like to watch the sky.
I used to get good grades in cosmology, but that's years back.
Cosmology was a class? In college or?
College.
I was about to be very jealous of your remedial classes ;)
I'm off to shoot at some pixels. Have a good one.
Bye. o/
@Mazura For what ill to remedy?
04:52
Beats me.
Remedial classes are those given to underachievers to remedy holes in their education.
Er, what's the word I'm thinking of that sound like that, that means grammar school?
Or am I totally off base here?
Hard to discount the second possibility :)
LOL
Primary school?
Grade school?
04:55
@tchrist You're staying up late, I see!
Remedial classes are for kids who aren't performing at their nominal grade level.
I took a two-hour nap. And I'm in bed.
Chatting instead of counting sheep is not a bad idea.
But yes, I have to be at work in eight hours.
Can you not say that anything below college level is (a) remedial (study) ?
Or that you shouldn't, unless they are (technically) college level.
Either way - Pixels must die! PEACE.
 
2 hours later…
07:02
@Mazura You're welcome.
@Mazura In academic and creative circles, attribution is akin to payment and many consider lack of attribution a form of theft.
 
2 hours later…
08:37
@Lawrence I don't believe in IP but don't get me started on that.
 
1 hour later…
09:39
My question for John is "What do I do?"
Is that correct grammar for the quote?
crl
crl
If I call a library 'bareUI', will it sound like a nudist library or a just like a simple minimalist library?
internal quotes get single quotes?
My question for John is 'What do I do?'
crl
crl
10:19
you mean quotes inside a quote?
10:41
@Mazura Although belief is not required in that case, it does on occasion help to make sense of ensuing consequences.
10:51
@snailplane I'm sure it's all legal, I just don't like it. I know Google isn't a dictionary, so I'd like to know where they're copy pasting from.
11:11
> I am looking for an exact opposite phrase for as early as possible.
as late as impossible
or
not as not early not as not possible
11:54
Good ol' "What's the opposite of a multivariate thing?".
Answer: it depends on where you place your mirror.
No, it must be orthogonal to all the things.
*because I said so.
Whoops. My messages got split by ze fox. :)
Hello Ms Fox.
@MattE.Эллен spins head
11:59
@Færd He's just messing around, throwing nots around as much as possible.
not (as early as possible)
There. fixed it.
Now you just need to figure out the order of operations.
@MattE.Эллен Actually, the contemporary opposite would be "As early as possible. Not!"
@Lawrence That's about two decades old.
@KitZ.Fox :)
Thought so. Just wasn't sure about not as .. not as.
12:00
@KitZ.Fox Yes, well, contemporary may be somewhat dated, then.
What do people say these days for that?
And good morning.
@Lawrence I believe it's eye roll, scoff, look at Instagram
Ah, reversion to non-verbal communication.
The eye roll in particular seems quite adaptable to different situations.
Yeah. rolls eyes
Wow. Amazing.
I think I better go have breakfast now.
Ok, see you around.
Not as not early as not possible actually works.
13:03
@KitZ.Fox good factorising!
Thanks.
I had a two-egg omelet with spinach, feta, cheddar, and salsa.
And coffee.
And I want more coffee.
that's problem with coffee
so I've heard
@KitZ.Fox Hmm, just a thought about your recent chat about shortness of breath after exercise - an article on coffee and shortness of breath.
Please vote to close: Peeving disguised as a question english.stackexchange.com/questions/325145/…
@Lawrence Yes. Thank you.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Here's my helpful contribution:
All gas isn't unleaded. — Kit Z. Fox ♦ 30 secs ago
@Lawrence I had considered it. It's just that I've been gradually reducing my coffee intake since I turned 30, and I don't want to quit drinking it entirely.
Part of that is this stupid middle-age thing.
13:24
Just heard on the BBC "piles of rotting flesh"
The Sex Pistols revolution has succeeded
@KitZ.Fox You don't want to skip that stage
I'm not taking it as well as I thought I would.
@KitZ.Fox Few of us do.
Interesting article about financial hardship.
Drink tea. The label says it has twice as much caffeine as coffee, but it's really just extra dirty water.
> For the average married mother of small children, it is often cheaper to stay home - even if she would prefer to be in the workforce.
> When they attempt to return to the workforce, their years at home are held against them, considered a "blank spot" on the resume - a blank spot with a reason so obvious and laudable and often involuntary that it is sick we deride it as "choice".
13:37
@KitZ.Fox more importantly "a return to "natural living" much like the rise of ... gardening (cannot afford fresh produce)." is a LIE. Gardening is very expensive to set up and labor intensive. A working person cannot do all that!
But all the rest, yes.
But that article is just a 'redo' of the NYT op-ed.
@Mitch A criticism of it, I think.
But I think they're right, the US is exceptional again in developed nations in the burdens it places on individuals. Need better child care options (long parental leave, more/cheaper day care).
@KitZ.Fox I haven't found the NYT thing yet
I can't believe how high our infant mortality rate is.
The difficulty with opinions is that it's hard to see the stats behind them. their anecdotes are intended to be typical, but you have no idea
13:45
also, single parenting is pretty tough.
Also, I found the lead woman in the NYT oped to be annoying.
@Mitch Right. That's the point. It's not a choice.
not to say that sticking with a jerk is the better choice.
"This would be so much easier if you didn't have a job." <-- should have told the husband to quit his then.
Of course, that's the arrangement I have, but my husband still works part-time.
floating around in the back of my mind is I feel like I saw something recently where Sheryl Sandberg recanted (?) her 'Lean In' strategy. I don't know what that really means though.
I read something like that too.
13:47
@KitZ.Fox There are choices, but just none very palatable.
Specifically about single mothers, iirc.
Oh right. Because her husband died.
So now she's a single mom.
@KitZ.Fox ?? really?
Yeah. That's the one I saw, because I thought the picture was incongruent with the title.
But then as CEO of a bajillion dollar company she surely can have staff deal with difficulties. when you're rich, you do have lots of choices.
> Today, almost 30 percent of families with children are headed by a single parent, and 84 percent of those are led by a single mother.
@Mitch Can you imagine the hit to the income? We're well-off, and my husband works part-time, and we couldn't take losing either income.
And we live relatively conservatively.
13:51
right
who are these people who buy new cars?
Right? I've almost paid off my 2007 Civic.
That I bought four years ago.
Those last a long time so it's a good bet
I think
I've heard
I think I've heard
The majority of minimum wage earners are women as well.
So basically women get shafted across the board.
user208178
hello @KitZ.Fox @Mitch!
hey!
13:55
More likely to have dependents, more likely to have less income, more likely to get harassed on the street, more likely to be de-humanized by presidential candidates.
@VitaminC Hi.
But whatever. We owe it to our dates to put out, amirite?
@KitZ.Fox white males are oppressed, too, by not having anything to be oppressed by.
blaming the victim of victimlessness
@KitZ.Fox hahaha... gulps
I know. It's really hard to manage all that money while not returning the phone calls of the women you've knocked up. I should have more sympathy.
@KitZ.Fox is that how it works? Maybe I should have worn more rolexes?
@Mitch I'm getting feisty. Again. I should lay off.
@KitZ.Fox I'm riling things up. I didn't realize my 'middle east' question would be like that. Earthers are so sensitive.
Here's another one:
00:00 - 14:0014:00 - 21:00

« first day (2009 days earlier)      last day (3208 days later) »