« first day (1584 days earlier)      last day (3634 days later) » 

20:01
@tchrist Wait... Poles think Germany is both the least and most trustworthy? Obviously something fishy in Denmark. Which is noticeably missing. NO one gives a thought to them till it starts smelling.
@Mitch They’re in there. Remember: Danes are really just Germans who think themselves English.
@GlenTheUdderboat Yeah, but that sounds like you think you're better than everyone else, rather than that particular nation is worse.
In London back in the 1980s there used to be a home for physically disabled people which straddled the boundary of two London boroughs, one Labour controlled, and one (more leafy suburban) which was Conservative controlled. Approaching from the Labour side (I think it was Enfield) there was a sign warning traffic to Take Care, Disabled Persons Crossing. Approaching from the other direction the sign read Cripples Crossing. It caused some mirth in the media. — WS2 4 mins ago
@tchrist I thought that was the Dutch. It would account for their unfriendliness.
@Mitch You’re thinking of William of Orange.
20:06
apotemnophobia AND dysmorphophobia
mentalism
Don’t be mental.
The whilom cripple is now differently abled.
The Mentalist is an American police procedural television series that ran from September 23, 2008 until February 18, 2015, broadcasting 151 episodes over seven seasons, on CBS. The show was created by Bruno Heller, who is also its executive producer. The show follows former "psychic" Patrick Jane (Simon Baker), who is a consultant to the California Bureau of Investigation (CBI), using the highly developed observational skills he previously employed to "read" people's minds. On May 10, 2014, CBS renewed the series for a 13-episode seventh season which premiered on November 30, 2014 and later announced...
@tchrist who's the second one? Vaguely familiar but I can't place him.
20:15
Sorry. Wrong genre?
@GlenTheUdderboat No eyebrows, no fair!
@tchrist @Ron (@Robusto)
maybe not a great song but nice with live coding
crl
crl
Well jsbin is like live coding too, a bit cheap right
20:32
never tried it
20:53
Sea & treeline, fjord. I guess ~400m there.
user116848
Eyebrows look big.
user116848
By the by, I upload my pic with a beard. Not many people find the idea attractive.
yes he liked imperial units.
user116848
21:00
Sorry, I have a habit of writing what's on my mind XD
hard to write other things no?
user116848
Yeah :-)
@terdon Freddie Jones as Thufir Hawat in the 1984 version of Dune.
crl
crl
21:31
I remind a bit to have seen Dune (the movie) with those gigantic sand worms
with 3 lips
I don't remember why they had to ride those worms
talking about eyebows ^
And Sting playing..
22:25
Hi.
I need some help with conditionals.
English conditionals are easy.
       I: If he will jump, you will not have to.
      II: If he will jump, he can win.
     III: If he will jump, he may win.
      IV: If he will jump, you must follow.
       V: If he will jump, you dare not follow.
      VI: If he will jump, you need not follow.

     VII: If he escapes, catch him.
    VIII: If he escapes, you can catch him.
      IX: If he escapes, you catch him.
       X: If he escapes, you could catch him.
      XI: If he escapes, you may catch him.
     XII: If he escapes, you might catch him.
Just about any combination is possible, but some are not.
@tchrist Thanks, I am glad to hear your style of answering again.
But my question is more concrete now.
I am writing a story about the past.
If you will please present your sentence, I shall be delighted to attempt an answer.
Can I use second type of conditional?
I have no idea.
22:35
For example.
Do understand that "second conditional" is a dubiously convenient myth foisted off on non-native learners. Native speakers don’t think that way.
The purpose for giving learners just a tiny handful of valid conditionals is to avoid the few invalid ones.
@tchrist Hm, interesting.
May I see your sentence?
I don't have any, I am trying to translate it from Russian. I'll try to come up with an example in English.
Is this an "if ... then ..." type conditional?
22:39
Yes.
Slavic conditionals are rather different from Germanic or Romance ones, so it is good that you are asking.
You said this in the past.
Let’s just look at the if part first.
Did the thing actually occur, or is this more hypothetical?
Ok. So. I am writing a story as if I were a Robinson Crusoe. I found an extremely nourishing fruit. Now I want to write about a possibility of eating this fruit and becoming satisfied.
> "If he called John, he must surely have called Mary as well."
That one I just wrote is not very hypothetical.
It's hypothetical, and it's not unreal at all.
There is that middle case, yes.
Not very hypothetical and certainly not unreal: If he ate the fruit, he became satisfied.
22:44
So, speaking about the past, I should say: «I ate this fruit, I would become satisfied».
Hm, why without «would»?
> Whenever he would eat the fruit, he would become satisfied.
@tchrist You option sounds great, but I cannot explain it knowing only what I know.
Is that the sense?
Like, a repetitive thing?
> Whenever he ate the fruit, he was satisfied.
I think that one is closer «If he ate the fruit, he became satisfied.»
The would isn’t strictly necessary in that case, but if you use it, you must use it in both places.
Right, so that’s one of those conditionals they never teach you about. The thing is, it is super-common.
Both sides are real.
22:47
@tchrist Which are not proper to be used?
@mikeonly I don’t want to give you bad examples. :) Just kidding. Really, I would have to see it to say whether it was not one that we use.
(I am referring to that long list of conditionals)
@mikeonly Oh those. Those are all valid examples.
Some are archaic, however.
Wow.
Yes, this is why the whole "numbered conditional" thing is rotten apple, so to speak.
22:49
If he will jump, he may win. — How is that right?
I know only several cases in which one can use future in conditional part.
I think your case of real past in the if portion is the most common case that is not normally taught but should be.
@mikeonly That is not the will that indicates futureness, but the one that indicates willingness, volition.
> If you would please take your seats, we can get started.
Yes, I know this case.
You can pretty much "never" use the future in the if part. If you see something that looks like that, it is actually something else.
> If only he would jump, he might win.
@tchrist And how real is this case?
That is the sense of the "If he will jump, he may win" except that it is more strongly hypothetical. It is still the volition case not the futurity case.
22:52
«If he ate the fruit, he became satisfied.» Can you please describe this sentence in different words so that I am sure that I understand it perfectly right?
At those times that he ate the fruit, he was no longer hungry.
Does that make sense?
@mikeonly Perhaps you have seen the expression "If only it were so!" As you see by the were marker, it is strongly hypothetical.
@tchrist Your explanation of «If he ate the fruit, he became satisfied.» is understandable. But it also reveals some inaccuracy of translation.
Oh I see.
Are you using the conditional mood in Russian?
What is conditional mood?
бы + past tense.
> If I were you, I would not go.
That is a hypothetical, not a real past.
22:58
We do use it, though not in the sentence I am trying to translate now.
Ok.
English uses would both for conditional-mood things and for um imperfect pasts.
Do you understand Russian? Maybe I'll try to write its initial form?
@mikeonly Alas no, you will have to ask @RegDwigнt, one of our moderators. I have no Russian.
Ok, let me continue my attempts of explanation.
Sure.
23:02
The situation: He managed to eat this fruit and became satisfied.
Why are you thinking of using if at all?
@tchrist Because, we now can assume, that if he (eat?) this fruit, he (become?) satisfied.
I’m thinking that this is more of a when sense.
Hm.
Maybe another sentence.
If he managed to eat the fruit, he was satisfied.
If he did not, then he was not.
@mikeonly Ok, sure.
23:05
Imaging him being extremely hungry, to that extent that even one fruit could make him be satisfied.
crl
crl
He envisioned himself eat that fruit and be very satisfied
He was so hungry that even a single fruit satisfied his hunger?
Is that the situation?
@tchrist Yes.
And now I am trying to make a conditional.
crl
crl
He has a low appetite, and is skinny
If he gets a fruit → he becomes satisfied.
23:07
If he found a piece of fruit, it satisfied him.
That's the "whenever" sort of if. It is not really conditional/unreal.
And I think it is a repetitive sense here.
But whenever means some sort of regularity.
True.
@tchrist Yes, but is there any?
Is this just one isolated event?
crl
crl
use "if ever" then
23:09
@crl Yes, that would work.
Yes, I am afraid it's an isolated event of being extremely hungry.
If ever he found even a single piece of fruit, eating it took the edge off the hunger gnawing at his empty stomach.
If ever he ate a fruit, he became satisfied.
Like that?
Yes, or just "was satisfied" instead of "became".
@mikeonly It implies a rare but real past event.
crl
crl
past event or hypothetic event?
23:11
He was satisfied to eat a single piece of fruit at such times as he was lucky enough to find one.
By the way, we don’t normally say "a fruit" in English. I mean, you can say it, but I’m not sure it has the sense you want here.
@tchrist Ok, I'll keep it in mind.
Normally fruit is not a count-noun. It is a mass-noun, so takes some partitive prefix like "a piece of".
There are times when it can be a count noun, but I’m not sure this is one.
Translation is really hard.
crl
crl
Oh fruit is both countable and uncountable?
@crl Unfortunately.
An orange is a different (kind of) fruit than an apple.
Can we terminate the result of becoming not hungry after managing eating a piece of fruit?
23:14
> Do you have any fruit? Yes, we have some.
@mikeonly Just put both in the simple past?
@tchrist But it would mean an undesired regularity.
Then you would need a longer sentence that made clear there was no regularity.
In Russian the second part would be in future.
> On that rare occasion when he chanced upon a piece of fruit, that little bit satisfied his hunger.
@mikeonly English uses would for "the future in the past".
My brother is coming tomorrow. Yesterday he said he would be here today, but he cannot leave yet.
Where can I read about all these types of conditionals?
23:18
Heh.
I do have a paper reference here somewhere.
I imagine a big book solely on conditionals with an extensive example giving.
“It is clear that a division of conditionals into the zero, first, second, and third categories does not adequately reflect actual usage.” —from “If only it were true: the problem with the four conditionals”, Christian Jones and Daniel Waller, ELT Journal 65:1 pp 24–32 (2011), Oxford University Press, doi: 10.1093/elt/ccp101. — tchrist Jan 24 at 14:26
There, that one.
Thank you!
Do you have some comprehensive and absolutely traditional English grammar reference?
Long discussions on whether one construction should be used but not another, explanation of word choice, etc?
[ SmokeDetector ] Repeating characters in answer: What's the word Copyright and `(C)' mean? by poooooooooooooooooooooooooooop on english.stackexchange.com
crl
crl
Found this on English grammar, it even has something on if conditionals ego4u.com/en/cram-up/grammar/conditional-sentences
23:26
@mikeonly I probably do not. "Absolutely traditional" is going to run afoul of some of the strange ways of changing the names of things that we see recently.
@crl That has the problem that the paper refers to.
So long as you still have "numbered conditionals", you are missing out.
crl
crl
Ah it's too simple
Because you see, English does not actually have any such thing.
@crl Yep!
@tchrist I am on the way of discarding them!
@mikeonly If you can catch Reg, I’m sure he could clear up your question here very very quickly.
Since you could show him the Russian. It’s one of his first languages.
He doesn’t come by very often on the weekends, though.
23:31
@J.Musser What, another?
Oh right.
@tchrist I like reading books. Books on English grammar. Those stylish and old ones. But you claimed there is no such a book.
no, just the user
You have to flag one of his postings.
Okay, I have just done that.
@tchrist they're all gone; just posting in here in case there was a mod
@J.Musser Just because they’re all gone is no barrier to me flagging them. :)
23:33
@tchrist true.
I have done that. I’m sure a mod will get around to destroying the account soon enough.
Sometimes I think all of ELU needs a Protect on it. I’m just kidding, but gosh.
The profile has already been flagged. I was simply posting in here in case a mod was in here; apparently there wasn't.
Oh I see. Then I did an extra.
Andrew was here earlier.
@tchrist drupal.se gets by far the most spam.
He may still be here for all I know.
@J.Musser Well, spam in the layman’s sense of vandalism.
23:36
@tchrist he hasn't been on the site for 45 mins now
We aren’t supposed to use the spam flag except for advertising, but I really wish it were "advertising or vandalism".
@tchrist use the 'offensive/abusive' flag.
You know, like you can do when rejecting tagwiki edits.
@J.Musser I do, when possible.
It gives the same penalties as a spam flag.
Yeah, I know.
Moreover, it carries the same auto-delete potential when there are enough of them.
23:38
and 6 of either will nuke the post. I think if a post is nuked that way, a 'flag user' option should come up.
That user’s post did not last long.
@J.Musser As in that it probably does, or that it does not yet ought to?
No, us MSE taverners got on it
Please inform me if somebody finds an old and comprehensive grammar reference.
@mikeonly I'm one xD
Heh.
23:39
@J.Musser And what is it?
@J.Musser We have smoke detector here too you know.
14 mins ago, by SmokeDetector
[ SmokeDetector ] Repeating characters in answer: What's the word Copyright and `(C)' mean? by poooooooooooooooooooooooooooop on english.stackexchange.com
@mikeonly He’s talking about himself. :)
@tchrist that option isn't a feature, I just made it up, and wished it was a feature.
@J.Musser Have you written a book or how do you suggest to be read?
@tchrist I know, but that one only posts elu junk.
@J.Musser I’m sure you know about question bans and answer bans.
23:40
I have 140 SE accounts, from which I flag network junk.
@tchrist yup
It isn’t especially common to find a user bent on vandalism who has accounts on multiple sites. It is not especially uncommon to find spamvertisers who do, though. Just not for long. :)
Currently, I'm the only user on all of Stack Overflow that has the Marshal badge, and hasn't posted on the site, or edited anything.
Heh.
So you complain a lot. :)
@tchrist Drupal gets the most spam, followed by Meta, and then the others.
I have four-digit flag counts on both SO and ELU.
@J.Musser I wonder why!
No, really. I do.
23:44
arqade gets the most offensive posts (no surprise there)
@tchrist I have a ton on SO flags also. 1562 alone are from flagged comments.
1562 comments flagged
1562 deemed helpful
all deemed helpful.
Well, I was only counting helpful ones. :)
@tchrist yeah, of course.
But does Meta.SE actually get more than its fair share of vandals?
I have only 47 helpful flags on ELU
mostly spam
Snap to it! :)
23:47
I've never used this stackexchange site before. Is it appropriate for me to ask if my answer... is an answer?
@tchrist Yeah, to be sure
@MotokoKusanagi Use the meta site.
Thank you.
@MotokoKusanagi actually, it depends.
@MotokoKusanagi what answer do you mean? Can you link to it?
1
A: What is it called when someone hates disabled people?

Motoko Kusanagi What is it called when someone hates disabled people? In my social groups, the word you are looking for is stigmatic; the root word being stigma. [Stigma is] a set of negative and often unfair beliefs that a society or group of people have about something[.] - Merriam Webster I am disa...

That is certainly an answer.
@tchrist Looks like an answer to me.
23:50
It may not be the one the original poster was looking for or expecting, but it is definitely an answer.
@J.Musser I never doubted. She is the one who asked whether it was an answer.
@tchrist If it is an answer (it looks like one by me), then there is no need to bring it up in meta.
@J.Musser Are you talking to yourself? :)
@tchrist No, talking for the benefit of the op
It is pretty easy to tell whether an answer attempts to answer the question without having domain-specific knowledge of judging that answer’s calibre.
@tchrist yeah. In any case, no need to bring that post up in meta, imo
23:53
All that is needed is that it be an attempt. Not that it be a good answer or even the right answer.
I would not bother, no.
@tchrist yeah, if someone disagrees, that's what downvotes are for :P
@MotokoKusanagi It is very considerate of you to ask, but I would not worry about this answer at all.
I see you're the room owner. Kewl.
one of them, that is
Yeah well.
One of those 100k network privs. :)
So you can manage feeds.
:D
23:56
Or mismanage them.
Mostly it's for cleaning up bad stars polluting the starboard.
there's one
Tsk. :)
I recently became a chat mod, so I can remove it too.
23:58
Then don’t make me work for it! :)
I could also edit your messages, if I was feeling extra evil. >:]

« first day (1584 days earlier)      last day (3634 days later) »