« first day (4996 days earlier)      last day (220 days later) » 
00:00 - 01:0001:00 - 00:00

00:00
I feel quite a cultural difference here ― The South Korean government almost always told South Koreans "how to speak"; inventing new words and polishing existing words for instances.
@Cerberus Eh, new spellings/pronunciations promoted by governments tend to catch on. Nobody calls it "Peking" anymore.
@alphabet Umm everybody does.
It is the standard word.
The U.S. does have a board governing use in the federal government, though:
>The U.S. Board on Geographic Names is a Federal body created in 1890 and established in its present form by Public Law in 1947.

>The Board was created to maintain uniform geographic name usage throughout the Federal Government. Sharing its responsibilities with the Secretary of the Interior, the Board promulgates official geographic feature names with locative attributes as well as principles, policies, and procedures governing the use of domestic names, foreign names, Antarctic names, and undersea feature names.
And quite a few of such attempts were successful.
@Cerberus You almost never hear it in the US (except in "Peking duck" for some reason). "Beijing" is the standard spelling and it's always pronounced with a /b/, not a /p/.
I don't think I learned that "Peking" was just an older romanization of "Beijing" until I was in high school at least.
00:03
It is not good style.
Obeying Mao.
Style is about using your own judgement, not following bad examples or the masses.
@Cerberus Look at ngrams: books.google.com/ngrams/…
It doesn't matter.
If you want to be understood by most people, or are writing for any serious publication, you call it Beijing.
Most people lie. That doesn't make it good.
Coerced speech is the mark of authoritarian assholes everywhere.
00:05
@alphabet That is not true.
Everyone knows Peking.
If you use "Peking," don't expect it to get published in any major newspaper.
Exactly. And everybody uses it.
@Cerberus Maybe you do. It's pretty obscure to anyone born after 1990.
Believe me, no South Korean calls it Peking. It's Beijing.
@alphabet That doesn't matter.
@alphabet Not anyone who matters.
00:06
@DannyuNDos You aren't speaking English, are you?
@Cerberus Surely you of all people want to sound educated and refined.
@DannyuNDos This is about English, not Korean.
@alphabet I just want to use the words as I always have used them.
Following the masses is a really bad basis for judgement.
If some autocrat tells you to use a foreign word in your own language, it makes no sense to obey.
The radical left and the reactionary right are alike in trying to force speech upon you that is not yours. Ignore the bastards.
00:07
And when you know how to pronounce Türkiye, start thinking about declensions.
@tchrist The horseshoe.
@jlliagre I decline! :)
Les extêmes se touchent. The far-anything tend towards totalitarianism.
@Cerberus This has nothing to do with politics. All right-wing news sources use the modern Romanization also.
I mean... There has been the National Institute of Korean Language, but I understand there will never be the Royal Institute of English Language. You don't need it because y'all are so conservative about the English orthography.
00:09
Diversity of speech is intolerable to them. They think it lets people think outside their rules.
@alphabet If it doesn't, then who made people stop using Peking?
@alphabet but but but!
Somebody made us stop? I think not.
Made some people stop.
@Cerberus Yeah, but educated people today will almost universally think less of you for using what is now considered the incorrect form.
00:11
You are again using arguments based on masses.
Following the masses leads to bad style.
French still use Pékin.
It's easily pronounible as much as one can in English, yet people insist on saying 'Bei zhing' instead of the closer 'Bei djing'
Some petit tyrant with delusions of grandeur then. Stupid people are forever stupid and bent upon remaining that way. Let them.
And also to other bad decisions sometimes.
I WILL NOT DIE ON THIS HILL
00:11
@Cerberus I dunno. But now it's used by everyone; the old spelling is generally considered wrong.
@Mitch Haha seriously! That is so silly: Mao's whole system was based on translitteration to English. The only reason it uses j there is because English pronounces j like /dʒ/.
and Turquie.
@Cerberus I mean, you're welcome to keep using it, as long as you're OK with most people either not understanding you or thinking you're wrong.
@alphabet It doesn't matter what 'everyone' does. So it is little use to try that argument on me.
If you're OK being perceived negatively by educated audiences, I won't try to stop you.
00:13
@Cerberus The quirk is, Mandarin distinguishes /ɖʐ/ and /dʑ/.
@jlliagre And you never have random passersby hearing you say that suddenly kick you in the nuts for that? Don't come to America then, at least unless you get to skip over the sybaritic coastals.
@alphabet How long have you known me? Do you really think I care about opinions I consider wrong? Especially if it is some majority?
@DannyuNDos Right, so it would even be ambiguous. Even sillier.
The best way to know something is wrong is to see what the majority is thinking.
@Cerberus The idiocy of the masses.
And go the other way.
00:14
That's what you get when you try to pronounce a word in your own language following the rules of a language you know nothing about.
@Cerberus Again: if you don't care, you're welcome to do so. But don't expect most people not to understand you or not to judge it as incorrect.
@Mitch Voilà.
@alphabet Then why are you saying this to me?
To convince me?
@alphabet Most of history is pretty obscure to anyone born after 1990.
They do know how to play video games, though, I'll give them that.
Peking aside, should I capitalize it "Eswatini" or "eSwatini"?
@Cerberus usually but presumably Americans thought it would sound fancier a la française
And zhuzhed it up
00:17
The silliest thing.
@DannyuNDos Hahaha please.
@Cerberus I can't tell you what words to use. I can try to tell you why most would consider it unwise to do so.
@DannyuNDos It is English, so use the basic rules of English writing.
Yeah... I guess.
@alphabet You keep repeating the argument "follow the masses" for the 100th time. Why, when you know I consider it invalid?
Also: earlier you claimed that "everyone" calls it Peking, which is just obviously false.
00:18
And what was that a reply to?
@Mitch Glory be to Him, the Exalted!
Even the frog one.
18 mins ago, by alphabet
@Cerberus Eh, new spellings/pronunciations promoted by governments tend to catch on. Nobody calls it "Peking" anymore.
18 mins ago, by Cerberus
@alphabet Umm everybody does.
Some people give up trying to think for themselves.
You were the one who started appealing to the masses, not me.
It's safer that way. When you live in North Korea.
00:20
Yes, "nobody" → "everybody".
Or, apparently, on the coasts.
Poor mind slaves.
@Cerberus I have said multiple times that I cannot tell you what words to use. I'm not giving commands.
I'm not saying you are.
@Cerberus What does that mean?
I am saying exactly what I said there.
00:21
I don't know what you were trying to say then.
@alphabet I merely used "everybody" to reply your "nobody", which is of the same type.
@Cerberus Yes, but your statement "Everybody calls it Peking" is false.
It is appropriate in context.
@tchrist What coast are you referring to, if I may ask seriously?
You can't take my statement literally but not your own, to which it was a reply.
00:24
Is tar and feathers and getting dragged off to the stockage really all that much better than torches and pitchforks and getting dragged off to the stake or tree? Well yes, but not by much, and the one leads quickly to the other.
@DannyuNDos The American East and West Coasts, full of people who think they know better than you.
And expect you to do what you're told when they tell you to do it.
I cannot say much of the US, but what about the south coast?
@Cerberus Huh? Even if you just meant "Most people call it Peking" or "Educated people call it Peking," you're still wrong.
There are no overeducated pansy élites there in the Deep South.
@alphabet It doesn't matter, it was just a reply to your own exaggeration.
@tchrist And I guess that was a compliment for me, or for South Koreans in general?
00:26
But you could say, everyone who cares about good style enough.
@Cerberus My statement is basically accurate. I don't think I've ever heard anyone use Peking, with one exception--someone else making an argument on the Internet, ironically enough.
No knowitalls in the bayou.
> The Geographic Names Server (GNS) is the official repository of standard spellings of all foreign geographic names, sanctioned by the United States Board on Geographic Names (BGN). . . .The GNS can be used for finding places, GIS data, cartography, and GEOINT products.
@DannyuNDos I thought you meant the south coast of the United States: the Gulf Coast.
@alphabet Then you are not looking in the right places, it is not accurate. But again, it doesn't matter how many people use which variant.
00:28
@Cerberus I'm not sure who you include in "Everyone who cares about good style," since it apparently excludes newspaper editors, major authors, and people giving formal speeches.
@tchrist Yeah, exactly.
@alphabet Yes, of course it excludes many of those.
But I will no longer respond to the "many people use x, and there it is good style" argument any more.
@Cerberus So who does it include? All and only the people who agree with you? It must be a small group.
Large enough.
But it doesn't matter.
And what about the lakes between US and Canada? Do they make coasts?
00:29
If this doesn't stop, NOW, I'm going to call upon divine succour.
@DannyuNDos They do, actually, to those of us who live there. "The Coast of Lake Michigan" is commonly said as a thing.
Yeah it was just a repeated repetition.
@Cerberus I'm not making that argument. I'm saying that most people who care about good style--which surely includes some of the writers and editors of all major publications--don't follow the rules you've come up with.
I disagree, but let's quit that line of argument.
Holy insularities!
Narcissus, watch thyself.
He always does.
00:32
Even if you only think that 5% of major authors, editors, and speechwriters use "good style," you'll find that those authors use "Beijing," that being the standard spelling.
Or 2.5%, or 1%.
I'm not responding.
"Beijing" is from pinyin Běijīng, which is romanized from 北京, the Chinese name for this city. The pinyin system of transliteration was approved by the Chinese government in 1958, but little used until 1979. It was gradually adopted by various news organizations, governments, and international agencies over the next decade. == Etymology == The Chinese characters 北 ("north") and 京 ("capital") together mean the "Northern Capital". The name was first used during the reign of the Ming dynasty's Yongle Emperor, who made his northern fief a second capital, along with Nanjing (南京, the "Southern Capital...
Such tiny, pathetically self-absorbed cliques.
@DannyuNDos nobody ever refers to that as the 'south coast'. It's called the 'Gulf coast'
Who believe the world without can but reflect the world within. Fools.
00:33
Thanks, TIL.
@Cerberus Well, I can't argue with that, I suppose.
Good.
It doesn't work to use a quantitative argument on me regarding style.
Regarding food, it works.
So, eat a lot?
Not a good idea.
Pablum is as pablum does.
I didn't say it had to be a large quantity.
The NYT switched to Beijing in 1986, the BBC in 1990.
00:35
I try not to binge eat.
Here's a deal: if you can find people who you consider to have good style and, in recent works not intended to make some sort of political point, use the spelling "Peking," let me know.
@Cerberus Peking duck?
Even though it is nice.
Welcome to the Twenty-First.
<ignoring quantititative argument>
00:36
@Cerberus you know of the taxonomy of food eaters, right?
Not yet?
Ok. If you can't find any, that settles it, no? Since it means that everyone who you consider to have good style uses the spelling "Beijing."
Southern and Oriental restaurants get to do whatever they Belize, of course.
Peking duck and Peking man have managed to hold on, though.
@Cerberus oh man you know me!
00:38
@alphabet Quit trying to get the last word in.
First there's 'gourmet'
Then there's 'gourmand'
And lastly 'gour-moo'
Ugh that had better be in French...
Who eats like a cow
And Peking robin. And Peking spaniel. And Pekin stripe. And Peking stitch. And Peking opera. I could go on.
I can do that.
00:39
I'm laughing I'm crying
@Mitch Gorthaur, is that you?
@Cerberus How am I trying to get the last word in? I wasn't making a statistical argument; I was directly contradicting the view you've been defending.
Still doing it!
I'm not replying!
@tchrist is that from the Silmarillion?
That's gotta be from the Silmarillion.
@jlliagre Pequín in Spanish, of course. Or sometimes Pekín if you accept "k" as a legit letter, which few do.
00:42
What is it when you're at a chicken fight and the chickens are fighting and...
Oh
It's a chicken fight
That's what you call it.
Now I'm hungry.
For chicken
Speaking of foods... I've met someone who thinks there are Korean rice noodles.
Want some Beijing duck? /s
So I told him rice noodles are Vietnamese.
...Right?
00:44
I would know Tauron if I saw him. You must be Gorthaur instead.
@DannyuNDos Only you know!
I'm half listening to something with some Italians speaking Italian and I don't understand a thing but I am super impressed with their Italian accent.
You can make noodles from ryes.
But I guarawntee that if it were Americans speaking Italian with a bad American accent, I'd probably understand some of it
I told him also that there are Korean noodles, but they're not made from rice.
Namely, North Korean cold noodles. They're made from buckwheat or potatoes.
00:47
You know what annoys me? People who are so sensitive that they think any expression of disagreement with, or disapproval of, the language they happen to use is an evil attempt at coercion and censure and censorship and cancelling and communism.
@Cerberus Speaking of noodles, is 'bucatini' a new thing? (It's spaghetti but with a hole like a straw)
(Cerberus, that wasn't really directed at you.)
@alphabet How dare you!
I mean communism isn't the problem it's the implementation
@Mitch Sure it's not Ligurian or Lombard or Sardinian?
@Mitch Yeah, it's easier when people bend a foreign language towards your own.
00:49
Potato noodles, now why does that ring a bell?
@Mitch Umm I don't know the name, but I do believe thin, hollow pasta exists?
@alphabet Oof!
Oh because of kartoffelknödel.
@tchrist nah it's extremely clear standard Italian.
I only get annoyed when people try to give a moral reason for judging—and trying to make people change—their language. Especially if they do it just because others do.
@tchrist is that a thing? Awesome!
I just finished dinner and this whole conversation makes me want a second dinner
00:51
@Mitch Your German and Polish and Czech relatives never brought those to family picnics??
Mine certainly did.
@tchrist Err... Those doesn't seem to be noodles?
For comparison, here are potato noodles I was referring to:
@tchrist sadly my mitteleuropäisch Verwandte are from another century
Dumplings aren't noodle things?
I know gnocchi, not exactly noodles though.
yeah
00:54
@tchrist No, at least in South Korean standards.
I grew up in the South. So there was no such thing as foreigners. -everyone is assimilated-
Surely language use, like anything else, can be judged from a moral standpoint. Of course trying to force people to change their language would be wrong, but criticism isn't coercion.
Of course, you have to actually be right about the moral reasoning, and following the masses isn't a particularly good guide.
Goddammit
@alphabet OMG who are you!
To be honest, they're more like the dumplings in chicken and dumpling soup, but firmer.
00:55
starts rewriting 10,000 page work of staggering genius
I'm going to print that line and frame it in gold-plated ebony!
taps earphone
already written?
Wait, is wood plated?
@tchrist This?
@Cerberus This isn't really relevant to our earlier conversation, since I don't think there's anything morally wrong with using "Peking"; it seems imprudent to use it, and even more imprudent to insist that others use it, but that's not a moral consideration.
00:56
I made these a few months ago.
@Cerberus wood that is plated, yes.
And a tip: Don't ever say the Korean name of this food to a Portuguese speaker. It sounds like a horrible swearing.
@DannyuNDos I remember things like this from being a kid.
But you could also make potato dumplings using potato flour instead.
They weren't extruded noodles.
떡만둣국 /tʌŋ man du kuk̚/, it is.
I mean, it'd also be imprudent to use "I don't got any" when writing an article to be published in The Atlantic, since it might get your article rejected. But obviously there's nothing morally wrong about that.
00:58
@alphabet Are you sure? It isn't some P.C. idea?
So not noodles the way gyoza dumplings are.
@Cerberus There's probably somebody who thinks it's politically incorrect or somehow morally objectionable to use "Peking," but I don't.
PC speech bashing has only rules, not ideas.
OK.
@Mitch Are you suggesting unplated wood is not plated?
00:00 - 01:0001:00 - 00:00

« first day (4996 days earlier)      last day (220 days later) »