« first day (4165 days earlier)      last day (1052 days later) » 
00:00 - 14:0014:00 - 00:00

00:01
Hmm not specifically, to me.
@Cerberus The last time I was in Paris, in the '90s, I didn't have any trouble walking around there or anywhere else in Paris. But then, I'm used to American traffic chaos.
@jlliagre Most Americans and Scots also have simple /e/ internally not /eɪ/ except at the ends of words.
But é and è can be pronounced to sound alike in less precise speech, I should think.
Well yes, or in singing.
@RobustosupportsUkraine Did you try crossing it?
Never cross the French! It annoys them.
Would you say it was a pleasant avenue to stroll about and flirt with strangers, as Dassin says he did?
You have to cross the CdE to get to the Seine!
Both /e/ and /ɛ/ can start Élysée, that depends on the people, doesn't make a difference. There are a few places trickier to pronounce like Neuilly.
@Cerberus Last time I was there was with my wife. So I wasn't doing a lot of flirting with strangers!
00:04
Well, it is a big stroad full of horrible cars now, and it was the same in the early 2000s.
And I doubt whether it was any better in the seventies.
@Cerberus Would you take a pleasant evening paseo down la Rambla in Barcelona?
Hm, by evening I meant afternoon in English maybe. It's still light out, but not hot direct noontide sun.
Brain was thinking tarde. It doesn't translate cleanly.
This just isn't a pleasant street.
It's dirty.
There are 1001 nicer streets to flâner.
I don't think I've been to the Champs-Élysées this millennium. I was there in the eighties and nineties. It was rather busy to my eye, approaching the craziness of the Puerta del Sol in Madrid, which always seems insane. You have to get rid of the cars for it to be pleasant.
@Cerberus It's easier than trying to cross Madison Avenue in Manhattan.
@Cerberus Agree.
00:09
@tchrist I have not visited the city.
@RobustosupportsUkraine OK I have never been to American cities...
@Cerberus It's a nice place to visit, spend time in.
@tchrist I think Paris has been working hard on getting rid of cars. But it goes slowly still.
You can't drive down la Rambla.
@tchrist It's probably a bit too modern to my taste, but I'm sure it's great in many respects.
@tchrist Well, that changes everything.
Although I believe someone did drive down there.
Or was it bombs?
I forgot.
There are tiny little delivery-vehicle-only lanes.
00:11
It was a van.
On the afternoon of 17 August 2017, 22-year-old Younes Abouyaaqoub drove a van into pedestrians on La Rambla in Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain killing 13 people and injuring at least 130 others, one of whom died 10 days later on 27 August. Abouyaaqoub fled the attack on foot, then killed another person in order to steal the victim's car to make his escape.Nine hours after the Barcelona attack, five men thought to be members of the same terrorist cell drove into pedestrians in nearby Cambrils, killing one woman and injuring six others. All five of those attackers were shot and killed by police.The...
Right.
Ask the Google for the images of that street.
Yeah it is much nicer than the Champs-Élysées.
But I think those will be much better in ten years' time.
Amsterdam doesn't have a main street that large.
Ours is neither terrible nor good.
Certainly not one you waste on cars. :)
But it is being improved slowly as well.
And the canals don't count.
00:14
Alas, ours does have cars, though few.
I can't remember any broad streets in central London that are mostly closed to cars in favor of pedestrians all the time.
@tchrist I can't remember any broad streets in London at all.
@RobustosupportsUkraine That's why I'm scratching my head!
Even Picadilly is narrow and cramped, though crammed with traffic.
Yes.
Oxford Circus, Leicester Square. Everything is cramped.
00:17
Yes.
I had my baptism of fire learning to drive left-side ... in London!
It took two hours to get out of the city.
My first roundabout going clockwise took me ten minutes and maybe 40 laps to get the nerve to move to the outer ring and take my exit.
Lisbon and Madrid both have big thoroughfares that are extremely broad and nice to walk along.
The Paseo del Prado comes quickly to mind, but then I've walked it hundreds of times so it would.
The Paseo del Prado is one of the main boulevards in Madrid, Spain. It runs north–south between the Plaza de Cibeles and the Plaza del Emperador Carlos V (also known as Plaza de Atocha), with the Plaza de Cánovas del Castillo (the location of the Fuente de Neptuno, and of the Ritz and Palace five-star hotels) lying approximately in the middle. The Paseo del Prado forms the southern end of the city's central axis (which continues to the north of Cibeles as the Paseo de Recoletos, and further north as the Paseo de la Castellana). It enjoys the status of Bien de Interés Cultural (BIC), and as part...
> This densely tree-lined, wide and central avenue ....
(I lived right by Atocha.)
Michigan Avenue in Chicago is a great street to walk along. Busy during rush hour, but pleasant and pretty, even awe-inspiring.
Lisbon rebuilt after the massive earthquake and ensuing fires, so they deliberately made super-wide main streets.
@RobustosupportsUkraine I don't remember the awe part.
Hm, I think I may only have ever driven it, not walked it.
Well, the expanse of architecture kind of overwhelms you.
There are broad vistas of it.
Of course, there isn't just one Michigan Ave.
When I worked on Michigan Ave. it was mostly north of the river.
South of the river is nice too, by the Art Institute and all that.
Michigan Avenue is a north-south street in Chicago which runs at 100 east on the Chicago grid. The northern end of the street is at Lake Shore Drive on the shore of Lake Michigan in the Gold Coast Historic District. The street's southern terminus is at Sibley Boulevard in the southern suburb of Harvey, though like many Chicago streets it exists in several disjointed segments.As the home of the Chicago Water Tower, the Art Institute of Chicago, Millennium Park, and the shopping on the Magnificent Mile, it is a street well known to Chicago natives as well as tourists to the city. Michigan Avenue...
Lake Geneva still has "Maxwell Street Days" where the shops put everything out on the sidewalks.
00:24
Are we talking about streets?
As a little kid, I never realized what Maxwell Street "really" was.
@tchrist Maxwell Street, the famed market area, is south of the Loop.
Or why we would call that sidewalk-sales period that.
You could say this is Amsterdam's main street.
Not great, not bad.
There are cars, but not many.
00:25
Amsterdam always looked very restrained to me. Petite, in a way.
Lots of ugly tourist shops and hotels, though.
@RobustosupportsUkraine Yes, that's certainly why it was called that. Pre-drivers aren't always the best informed.
@RobustosupportsUkraine We never tore down pre-nineteeth-century blocks to build large avenues, that's why.
Unlike Haussmann.
@Cerberus Yeah. Chicago burned down in the 1870s, so they had to start over again.
That's late for a big fire!
00:26
Like I used to live on LaSalle Street in the 60s but never knew it was named for a Chicago street.
Still has the best big-city architecture in America. Maybe in the world.
Did Chicago have wooden buildings?
@tchrist Heh. But yours might have been named after LaSalle himself, not the Chicago street.
I think great city fires stopped here once wooden buildings were outlawed.
Peut-être.
00:27
@Cerberus Used to and still does. But the downtown is not wood.
@RobustosupportsUkraine Peshtigo Fire day.
Was it in 1870?
Everything was alight that day there.
@Cerberus I thought it was 1871.
There were fires just everywhere, not just in Chicago.
00:28
Perhaps lots of wooden houses can cause fires so large to develop that eventually also nearby brick/stone blocks are destroyed?
1871, October 8-10.
The Peshtigo fire was a large forest fire on October 8, 1871, in northeastern Wisconsin, United States, including much of the southern half of the Door Peninsula and adjacent parts of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. The largest community in the affected area was Peshtigo, Wisconsin which had a population of approximately 1,700 residents. The fire burned about 1.2 million acres and is the deadliest wildfire in recorded history, with the number of deaths estimated between 1,500 and 2,500. Although the exact number of deaths is debated, mass graves, both those already exhumed and those still being...
There's your dating.
@RobustosupportsUkraine My greatest admiration... someone in London asked me to drive their car and I got in and I just couldn't. Being on the other side of the street is really no problem, but the stick shift and pedals all being swapped hands and feet just blew my mind.
@Mitch Well, the stick shift is on the left, but the tricky bit is that it's the same pattern in the same direction as if you were on the right.
I don't think we had any large fires after the 1450s, when wooden houses and thatched roofs were banned after another great fire.
00:29
The pedals are the same. Right foot accelerator/brake, left clutch.
There were fires all around the southern edges of the Great Lakes that day. It was all powder-keggy / red-flag weather.
Oh, were those urban fires caused by wildfires?
@tchrist Yeah, same day as the Chicago fire start.
The legend is that Mrs. O'Leary's cow knocked over a lantern to start the Chicago Fire. But that has not been conclusively proven.
@RobustosupportsUkraine Not coincidence.
The Great Chicago Fire was a conflagration that burned in the American city of Chicago during October 8–10, 1871. The fire killed approximately 300 people, destroyed roughly 3.3 square miles (9 km2) of the city including over 17,000 structures, and left more than 100,000 residents homeless. The fire began in a neighborhood southwest of the city center. A long period of hot dry windy conditions, and the wooden construction prevalent in the city, led to the conflagration. The fire leapt the south branch of the Chicago River and destroyed much of central Chicago and then leapt the main branch of...
00:31
> Speculation since 1883 has suggested that the start of the Peshtigo and Chicago fires on the same day was not coincidental, but that all the major fires in Illinois, Michigan and Wisconsin that day were caused by impact of fragments from Biela's Comet. ... All that was necessary to trigger the firestorm, plus the other large fires in the Midwest, was a strong wind from the weather front which had moved in that evening.
@tchrist Did sparks from Chicago start Peshtigo?
Nope.
Oh, wooden constructions.
Too far away.
It was the weather.
> At the same time, another fire burned parts of the Door Peninsula; because of the coincidence, some incorrectly assumed that the Peshtigo fire had jumped across the waters of Green Bay into the Door County regions. However, the fire did not jump across the bay. Most likely, the firestorm spread and created a new ground fire in New Franken which then spread and burned everything northward up until Sturgeon Bay.
By the way, isn't it interesting for how long fighting city fires has been done in the same way?
With water?
00:33
When you see multiple fires in the same place, it is not unreasonable to wonder whether one started another. But you should also think about shared conditions.
You really can see how Chicago has grown when you look at the limits of the Chicago fire. It stopped at Fullerton, 2400 North, and Western, 2400 West. Not sure on the South Side, but probably around Cermak.
@Cerberus How else to do it?
@RobustosupportsUkraine I don't know!
And isn't that funny?
> Hand squirts and hand pumps are noted before Ctesibius of Alexandria invented the first fire pump circa the 2nd century B.C.,[1] and an example of a force-pump possibly used for a fire-engine is mentioned by Heron of Alexandria. The fire pump was reinvented in Europe during the 16th century, reportedly used in Augsburg in 1518 and Nuremberg in 1657.
I don't know either.
Remove all the oxygen.
Water is easier.
00:35
There should be various new technologies to more efficiently extinguish urban fires.
But there aren't!
Can't you just blast open all your dikes?
Or we'd see them used.
Can you imagine the amount of chemicals you would have to use to blanket the Sears Tower?
00:36
Removing oxygen may be simply too dangerous in a city.
And infeasible.
What do the people trapped inside breathe?
That's for starters.
Exactly.
I don't know what you think you would use to put out a towering inferno.
It's like our firestorm here. The only technology we have that could have put that out is a major thermonuclear explosion.
The cure being worse than the condition.
You could spray large amounts of e.g. nitrogen or carbon dioxide on a burning building?
But I think it would be too dangerous for people.
00:38
What, in liquid form?
And, yes, it probably won't work on a conflagration of many houses.
Maybe if it was an outhouse.
> General Philip H. Sheridan, who saved Chicago three times: the Great Fire in October 1871, when he used explosives to stop the spread; again after the Great Fire, protecting the city; and lastly in 1877 during the "communist riots", riding in from 1,000 miles away to restore order.[12]
So he used explosives.
That's a new idea.
Fancy that.
Did he use explosive to prevent the fire from spreading, or to extinguish it?
00:39
We tend to idealize the past. When Joe Dassin sang the Champs-Elysées, there was almost no trees, no really enforced speed limits, more lanes for the cars, and smaller sidewalks...
At any rate, an explosion does damage...
@jlliagre That is exactly what I thought.
So I wondered why didn't choose some other street, like the Seine banks?
@Cerberus Yeah, but destruction is how they contain forest fires. They make firebreaks by bulldozing swaths of trees.
@Cerberus Prevent it from spreading.
00:41
@RobustosupportsUkraine Yeah OK.
@jlliagre Lovely.
It was what people considered 'modernity' in the sixties.
Tree fell on my house again today from the windstorm.
Broke of the top of the cottonwood.
People tend to think if 'modernity' as some very specific development that cannot, must not be stopped.
@tchrist Oh, no!
Is it bad?
No. Only an 80 mph gust, though. Thank goodness it wasn't the whole tree.
@tchrist It was windy here today too. Couldn't exercise because of all the blowing dust.
00:42
Possibly some minor damage.
Hmm.
@RobustosupportsUkraine I was trying to do stuff outside and got too stuffed up from the dust. Also too cold. Wind chill was 7 below, real temp 30s and then 40s. Fraser had a 113 mph gust yesterday.
50s tomorrow, 60s Friday, 70s to almost 80 on Saturday. Snow and low 20s by Tuesday.
@tchrist Wow, that's cold.
It was near 70 here today.
We had another red-flag day, of course, but I don't know of any ignitions.
sweltering on Sunday
00:47
@Mitch Well, he said 70, didn't he?
We keep getting waves of weather rolling through on a weekly cycle.
Weekly? How nice for you.
Do you have a different periodicity?
Here it keeps oscillating between chilly and balmy like every other day.
But it wasn't cold until the wind.
@tchrist i was adding on to what you said
00:48
That's our forecast.
Looks very in line with our recent weather.
This is what they call an unsettled cycle.
> IN EFFECT UNTIL 9 PM MDT THIS EVENING
FOR WIND AND LOW RELATIVE HUMIDITY FOR ALL OF THE COLORADO PLAINS
AND I-25 CORRIDOR...FIRE WEATHER ZONES 238 THROUGH 251...
...RED FLAG WARNING REMAINS IN EFFECT FROM 11 AM TO 8 PM MDT
THURSDAY FOR WIND AND LOW RELATIVE HUMIDITY FOR ALL OF THE
COLORADO PLAINS AND I-25 CORRIDOR...FIRE WEATHER ZONES 238 THROUGH
251...
@tchrist But about 8-10 degrees warmer down here.
00:52
@RobustosupportsUkraine The NCAR chart shows that this new cold just got here. What you have now had been being our trend line.
I probably shouldn't use verb combos that would freeze the lurking pineapples.
1
Q: How do I use "would" when talking about the past in the context of storytelling?

AugustoI'm currently translating a book from my mother tongue, Portuguese, to English. When translating certain sentences about the past, which describe recurrence, I repeatedly resort to would in situations in which I believe I could also use the simple past. For example: When they saw her coming, the...

I don't think an unadorned past tense would do him as much good as what he has been using with would. And I'm pretty sure he started from an imperfect preterite, not a perfective one.
@tchrist Does Portuguese have the -aba form for continual actions in the past?
@RobustosupportsUkraine Yes, but they spell it -ava.
May I presume that the Portuguese you're translating from uses the "imperfect" (pretérito imperfeito, and so like viam/paravam/sussurravam) for both clauses to signal that this was a repeating habitual pattern, not the "preterite" (pretérito perfeito, and so like viram/pararam/sussurraram) to mean this happened just once and was completed and done already, not ongoing? — tchrist ♦ 1 hour ago
PT -aram = ES -aron.
PT -avam = ES -aban.
That -am suffix is pronounced exactly like -ão would be apart from stress. They spell that diphthong -am when unstressed but -ão when stressed.
So like "au" but nasalized.
It's just the normal 3rd person plural inflectional suffix for first conjugation verbs, so like -an.
In case you want to visit 1979 Paris the no speed limits way : vimeo.com/305211187
01:07
As in ação is how they write what the French write action and the Spanish write acción. The Portuguese version might sound to your ear like they're saying aSSAU.
But it's got phonemic nasalization of the diphthong, which you may not perceive.
@jlliagre heh
@jlliagre That's awesome
@jlliagre I wonder what made them add speed limits. Also, mufflers. :)
Maybe Princess Grace. :(
@tchrist Didn't help with Princess Di.
I'm thinking our driver must be red–green color-blind.
@RobustosupportsUkraine Kind of a bad streak they've had offing princesses there.
01:18
There was speed limits in cities, but they weren't that much enforced. Lack of technology. Policemen were sleeping at 5 AM anyway.
"Sleeping policemen" is what the Brits call speed humps.
It's like at -all- the intersections the lights were red
The engine sounds remind me of some of what you hear in James May's Cars of the People.
The engine's sound must have helped, to warn people.
Tiny hamlets often have a police cruiser parked at the entrance of the town to try to quell out of town traffic.
Unmanned.
01:23
At any rate, I'm glad to be living now and not some decades ago.
I hope you keep saying that.
Noun: sleeping policeman (plural sleeping policemen)
  1. (Britain and Caribbean English, idiomatic) A speed bump.
  2. 2000 July 5, William Weir, "They're looking up 'Yankspeak' for the Oxford English Dictionary," CNN.com (retrieved 18 Sep 2007):
  3. We don't care much to figure out terms like "brolly" (umbrella) and "sleeping policeman" (speed bump).
Speed cameras never stop traffic. For that they invented moats and drawbridges.
Yeah, speed bumps seem to be the final solution.
Short of banning cars.
Those barriers they added to la Rambla. What were those called again? In English?
Texas has some curious inventions for that, too.
Hmm what do they look like?
Amsterdam also has them.
01:29
They have "flowerpots" here.
Big things that stick up.
Usually.
Rob knew the word.
I can't recall it.
We have had "Amsterdammertjes" since forever, but those are weak.
Jersey blocks?
01:33
Anyone can walk up the buildings of parliament and into the central courts.
But they installed these things somewhat recently.
Some years ago.
A sleeping policeman is called un dos d'âne in French (A donkey's back)
Makes sense.
bollards?
@jlliagre We call it a drempel, a threshold.
Bollards sounds appropriate.
those mini pillars that retract into the ground?
01:37
@Cerberus No metaphor then.
Alas.
@tchrist Are you talking about bollards?
The pop-up kind?
4 mins ago, by Mitch
those mini pillars that retract into the ground?
@Mitch Yeah. Those are bollards.
> Retractable or "rising" bollards can be lowered entirely below the road surface (generally using an electric or hydraulic mechanism) to enable traffic to pass, or raised to block traffic. Rising bollards are used to secure sensitive areas from attack, to enforce time-limited traffic regulations, or to allow access only to particular classes of traffic.
@Mitch Oh, you suggested that already. Well, that is the right term.
@RobustosupportsUkraine Yes.
@jlliagre Where "donkey" is being polite. :)
Nativity scenes always have ox and ass at the manger. Now we just call them steers and burros to avoid offending the Oxonians.
01:51
Oh, I had forgotten about steer.
We have stier for bull.
It's far from clear to almost anybody whether an ox is just an old male bovine or one that has been caponated.
Or whether that's a steer. Which it is.
bull
or noble
Takes balls.
I know that caponated is a vulgar formation, but I didn't think capated works in English.
I didn't even know an ox had to be male.
Turns out Dutch os is also "gesneden".
@Cerberus I don't even know!
Oxen are just cattle?
Or are they old ones? Or male ones? Or gentled ones?
@Cerberus Snipped?
And why is oxtail soup a thing?
Is there such a thing as cocktail soup? Or is that too feathery?
Cocktail soup includes the yolk; oxtail soup, the yoke.
02:07
@tchrist Male, apparently.
Snijden = to cut.
@tchrist I think it is the portion of meat just above the tail.
Which is far from tender, so you use it for things like soup and stew.
I didn't know cocktale soup.
@Cerberus I was just looking for another compound word whose second element was tail. The only other one is swallowtail, which isn't suitable for a soup that you'd sip.
And nobody would know wagtails or whiptails.
Then again, I can't really imagine what cocktail soups would look like.
How does entail soup sound?
If you had hamachi soup it would be yellowtail soup.
@Cerberus Like tripe. :)
Wait, that's entrail soup.
Equisetum (; horsetail, snake grass, puzzlegrass) is the only living genus in Equisetaceae, a family of ferns, which reproduce by spores rather than seeds.Equisetum is a "living fossil", the only living genus of the entire subclass Equisetidae, which for over 100 million years was much more diverse and dominated the understorey of late Paleozoic forests. Some equisetids were large trees reaching to 30 m (98 ft) tall. The genus Calamites of the family Calamitaceae, for example, is abundant in coal deposits from the Carboniferous period. The pattern of spacing of nodes in horsetails, wherein those...
I knew that horsetails were ancient, spore-bearing plants, but I must have forgotten they were considered ferns.
@tchrist I suspect you'd say that.
I know those plants are ancient, but I had forgotten they were called paardenstaart.
> Because of its radial synangia (an archaic character that is also found in fossil Asterothecaceae) Christensenia has been considered to be an ancient lineage, despite the lack of fossil evidence. The reticulate venation, on the other hand, is often considered to be a more derived character, and it has therefore been placed in a family of its own, the Christenseniaceae (Ching 1940).
Yet another odd fern.
02:22
So you are familiar with them.
Birds of a feather...
Adder's tongues are also ferns.
That you'd never know from looking at them.
Ophioglossum, the adder's-tongue ferns, is a genus of about 50 species of ferns in the family Ophioglossaceae. The name Ophioglossum comes from the Greek meaning "snake-tongue". Their cosmopolitan distribution is mainly in tropical and subtropical habitats.The genus has the largest number of chromosomes in the known plant kingdom, but contrary to popular belief does not have the largest number of chromosomes out of all known organisms, falling short to the protist Sterkiella histriomuscorum. == Description == Adders-tongues are so-called because the spore-bearing stalk is thought to resemble a...
Liverworts aren't ferns, though. But they also have only spores, I think.
Bryophytes are a proposed taxonomic division containing three groups of non-vascular land plants (embryophytes): the liverworts, hornworts and mosses. They are characteristically limited in size and prefer moist habitats although they can survive in drier environments. The bryophytes consist of about 20,000 plant species. Bryophytes produce enclosed reproductive structures (gametangia and sporangia), but they do not produce flowers or seeds. They reproduce sexually by spores and asexually by fragmentation or the production of gemmae. Though bryophytes were considered a paraphyletic group in recent...
> The term bryophyte comes from Ancient Greek βρύον (brúon) ‘tree moss, liverwort’, and φυτόν (phutón) ‘plant’.
Why does it always come down to Greek? I feel like they're just trying to make me feel uneducated.
@tchrist No, indeed.
It was always a delight to find primitive spore-bearing plants in the forest.
I didn't know bruon either.
Don't all ferns use spores?
Yes.
But they're vascular plants.
02:30
I must admit, though, that I forgot what the difference was between seeds and spores.
I just know that seed-bearing plants are relatively new.
Cretaceous?
A spore is a single cell.
@Cerberus Yes.
Spores are haploid; seeds are diploid, already fertilized and fused and embryonic.
No, I was wrong.
> Spores and seeds are reproductive structures of plants which germinate to produce a new organism of the same species. Some spores are developed into male and female germ cells. The ovule contains egg cell in flowering plants. It is developed into a seed. Spores are produced by non-flowering plants. Fungi also produce spores as their reproductive structures. Seeds are produced by flowering plants.
> The main difference between spores and seeds is that spores do not contain stored food resources and require more favorable conditions for the germination whereas seeds contain stored food in their endosperm, enabling them to germinate in harsh conditions as well.
I think flowering plants are from the Cretaceous.
> A middle Devonian (385-million-year-old) precursor to seed plants from Belgium has been identified predating the earliest seed plants by about 20 million years.
@tchrist OK makes sense.
Seed-bearing plants are either angiosperms or gymnosperms, the latter of course being naked seeds.
Angiosperms are Cretaceous. They have flowers. Gymnosperms don't.
02:35
> The ancestors of flowering plants diverged from the common ancestor of all living gymnosperms during the Carboniferous, over 300 million years ago,[9] with the earliest record of angiosperm pollen appearing around 134 million years ago.
Yeah, Cretaceous.
I've walked among the tree ferns of the Daintree Rainforest in Queensland.
They have gobs and gobs of ferns that grow only there.
Not to mention Fern Gully.
What is that?
So vertebrates and seeds colonised the land somewhat around the same time.
FernGully: The Last Rainforest is a 1992 animated musical fantasy film, directed by Bill Kroyer and scripted by Jim Cox. Adapted from the book of the same name by Diana Young, the film is an Australian and American venture produced by Kroyer Films, Inc., Youngheart Productions, FAI Films and 20th Century Fox. The film stars the voices of Tim Curry, Samantha Mathis, Christian Slater, Jonathan Ward, Robin Williams, and Grace Zabriskie. FernGully is set in an Australian rainforest inhabited by fairies including Crysta, who accidentally shrinks a young logger named Zak to the size of a fairy. Together...
@Cerberus I wonder whether there's some connection there.
There's some connection between Brisbane and Fern Gully.
Oh, they have a Fern Gully Rainforest there. That's why.
02:46
@tchrist Possibly.
Nice tree.
> In plants, spores are usually haploid and unicellular
While seeds are plant embryos.
Right. Diploid.
You can't make a new organism with just half the set.
There were arthropods on land before there were vertebrates there. But it's not like you had butterflies and flowers.
> It was during the Paleozoic Era that plants (first known from microfossils called cryptospores that appear in the mid-Ordovician, about 470 million years ago; Wellman and Gray 2000) and animals (known from Silurian fossils, at least 423 million years ago; Wilson and Anderson 2004) began to colonize the land.
> Land plants started as small, non-vascular mosses and liverworts (bryophytes; Edwards 2000), but by the Late Silurian, simple plants with axial organization and terminal sporangia (spore-bearing structures) were becoming common (e.g., Cooksonia; Kenrick and Crane 1997).
> Animals and plants had previously lived only in the oceans, but, starting approximately 470 million years ago, began to colonize the previously barren continents. This paper provides an introduction to this period in life’s history, first presenting background information, before focusing on one animal group, the arthropods.
> The first terrestrial arthropods predated tetrapods by tens of millions of years (Shear and Selden 2001). Evidence of animal life on land before the first known arthropod body fossils can be found in the form of preserved traces that are likely to have been created by macroscopic organisms.
@Cerberus It's a gigantic tree fern from New Zealand.
But you also see huge tree ferns in the Daintree.
> termites are actually highly derived, eusocial cockroaches
@tchrist But surely those are not true ferns?
Polyps.
Related to the Portuguese man-o-war.
Polypodium is a genus of cnidarians that parasitizes in the eggs of sturgeon and similar fishes (Acipenseridae and Polyodontidae). It is one of the few metazoans (animals) that live inside the cells of other animals. Polypodium hydriforme Ussov is the only species of this monotypic genus. The parent family (Polypodiidae), order (Polypodiidea) and class (Polypodiozoa) are also monotypic. == Taxonomy == Unusual characteristics have led to much controversy regarding the phylogenetic position of Polypodium within metazoans.Polypodium has traditionally been considered a cnidarian because it possesses...
> It is one of the few metazoans (animals) that live inside the cells of other animals.
So many odd relatives of jellyfish.
03:42
@Cerberus What do you mean? They are.
The tree ferns are the ferns that grow with a trunk elevating the fronds above ground level, making them trees. Most tree ferns are members of the "core tree ferns", belonging to the families Dicksoniaceae, Metaxyaceae, and Cibotiaceae in the order Cyatheales. This order is the third group of ferns known to have given rise to tree-like forms. Others tree ferns include the extinct psaroniaceae, which are members of Marattiales, some members of Osmundaceae and the extinct Guaireaceae within the Osmundales, and the extinct Tempskya of uncertain position.In addition to those families, many ferns in...
03:54
@tchrist Oh, cool, I didn't know.
 
5 hours later…
09:20
Is it possible to watch UN Human Rights voting today? Online?
09:41
Yes
@CowperKettle Good. Isn't it risky?
Well if you run you are more likely to get caught?
 
1 hour later…
11:05
#Worldle #76 1/6 (100%)
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🎉
https://worldle.teuteuf.fr
Hahahahah it's so easy today! I wasn't sure about it but I guessed it right.
11:19
Wordle 292 X/6

⬜⬜⬜🟩⬜
⬜🟩⬜🟩⬜
⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜
⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜
⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜
⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜
Not easy
11:43
Wordle 292 4/6

⬛⬛⬛🟩⬛
🟨⬛⬛🟩⬛
⬛🟩🟩🟩⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

I was lucky. I didn't know the word. I tried the right one because it's vaguely similar to a couple of French words but finally it's unrelated to them.
Good
 
1 hour later…
12:50
#Worldle #76 1/6 (100%)
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🎉
https://worldle.teuteuf.fr
Ha, I'd better know that one!
Wordle 292 5/6

⬜🟩⬜⬜⬜
🟨🟩⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟨🟨🟩
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
@RobustosupportsUkraine Yes. I would troll you if you wouldn't.
Not an easy Wordle today.
Yeah
@Vikas Haha.
Sometimes you have to have the nerve to burn one or two.
Just to discover more useful letters.
My last 4 guesses made no differences.
13:06
Yeah, you got stuck with a pattern that had too many possibilities.
Finding the last letter really helped this time. But it was a bold choice that discovered it.
13:56
Wordle (ES) #91 5/6

⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜
🟩⬜⬜🟨🟨
🟩⬜🟩⬜🟩
🟩🟩🟩⬜🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

https://wordle.danielfrg.com/
The Spanish Wordle was hard today.
I've never heard of this word. Just did trial by error.
I thought I had it on guess 4, and was surprised the letter I chose in the 4th place didn't work.
00:00 - 14:0014:00 - 00:00

« first day (4165 days earlier)      last day (1052 days later) »