A Região Centro-Oeste é uma das cinco regiões do Brasil definidas pelo IBGE em 1969. É formada por três estados: Goiás, Mato Grosso e Mato Grosso do Sul, mais o Distrito Federal, onde se localiza Brasília, a capital do país e a cidade mais populosa da região.
Com uma área de 1 606 403,506 km², o Centro-Oeste é a segunda maior região do Brasil em superfície territorial, superada apenas pela Região Norte, sendo um pouco maior que a área do estado do Amazonas ou da Região Nordeste. Por outro lado, é a região menos populosa e possui a segunda menor densidade populacional. Por esse motivo, apresenta...
Centro-Oeste is a noun-noun compound.
In English the first noun in an NN compound is the one used attributively, but in Romance it is the second of the two.
It's not Oeste-Central, which would be clearly an adjective in the second position.
The main noun is Centro here.
Which Centro? The Oeste one.
So it's really the Western Center.
If you would.
It's not the Central West.
So he's making a mis-assignment here. The American Midwest contrasts with the American Far West. There clearly West is the head noun, and Mid or Far are modifying it.
I'm probably going to have to give up and use Latin to talk about this if I answer the question. :)
That is, to use an adjective I'll need to use occidental and oriental for western and easterns, just as you would need septentrional and meridional for northern and southern. Well, or boreal and austral. You know.
Spanish has a few derived adjectives, so they can say norteño instead of del norte.
But Portuguese would just say do norte.
But for western you just have occidental; there's nothing derived from oeste.
That's because fricking oeste is not Romance. It's a borrowing from the French who borrowed it from the English.
Same with este.
Or leste is Portuguese.
These were English words in origin. They got borrowed as nouns only; they don't form derived adjectives.
@Cerberus For adjectives, you must return to Latin.
@M.A.R. I've had enought of conversations with people of his creed, and it was all a waste of time. They believe that an authoritarian rule is okay and emprisoning people for their views is okay, extra-judicial killings in order to support the regime is okay, dismantling of civil society institutions and elections is okay - as long as there is "stability".
It was all like playing checkers on a board on which you set your pieces on white boxes while your opponent places them on black boxes. There is no common ground for discussion, all arguments just fall into dead ground.
If a person believes that there is no freedom and democracy at all, that everything is relative, it's "moral relativism". You cannot hold an argument when there's absolutely nothing you can appeal to.
I was riding in a car where one woman was of this creed. We discussed the invasion of Ukraine, and her final argument was that yes, occupation is theoretically bad, you "Artyom, you are too naive. Sometimes a country must invade and occupy land to support its interests. And why are you raling against Putin if you have enough food and enough money to live well and to travel".
Against such an argument there is no counter-argument at all. A woman living in the Third Reich would have provided the same argument up to February 1943. There is no common ground, no basic common theorem or moral statement that you can ground your arguments.
@CowperKettle An unauthorized opposition rally in Moscow this month after the announcement of results in the referendum on amendments to the Russian Constitution. An unauthorized opposition rally in Moscow this month after the announcement of results in the referendum on amendments to the Russian Constitution.Credit...Yuri Kochetkov/EPA, via Shutterstock
Not to mention the tens of thousands in the Far East.
@CowperKettle well, there's a middle ground. Some of what he's saying makes sense, and some of what you're saying makes sense, but now I'm on mobile and can't be bothered to opine on the subject
A single anti-LGBT tweet can ruin a lifelong career in the west, so it's not like there are no repercussions to whatever you say, and freedom never meant that.
@CaptainBohemian in a broader sense, it's the part of a tool you hold with your hand, I think.
And there are more specialized definitions
Like in dentistry
@CowperKettle thing is, this subject seems to polarize you (pl.) and everyone grabs one extreme
And then there are Twitter images that can't prove anything in the history of things.
So a group of people are lying facedown, "Autocrats are the same everywhere"? There's some superman leap of logic there. Of course, could make sense with the context, but that's precisely what Twitter is designed like.
@CaptainBohemian well, take "spindle". It has a unique definition of its own, but it probably means a dozen different things in woodworking and has some specialized meanings in biology
@M.A.R. That was true of Greece once, and Rome, and many others. If history teaches us anything, it's that civilizations have their moment in the sun and then pass into the once-was and nevermore-shall-be.
@Cerberus Well, maybe you don't count as outsiders, maybe not even us, but we're the closest to being it. Of course the metrics aren't always meaningful but to be the most powerful nation is also associated with what, say, our youngsters want our country to be.
That might or might not be called the "epitome of civilization" if we're being pedantic, but who cares.
@Cerberus A person who's never been to America or isn't "in" on the picture that should really be portrayed of America does not differentiate between them.
Anyone knows that China is one of the most important civilisations on Earth.
It was no less civilised during its Century of Humiliation.
Your average bloke knows this, too.
Nobody would ever in his right mind have said that America was the epitome of civilisation just because it managed to loot the Summer Palace of the Chinese Emperors.
I doubt that. I think that's the average bloke associates "power" with civilization, not in the sense that powerful nations are civil, but in the sense that powerful nations are the best the humanity can offer.
If you're Peggy, hang. If you're Drummy, bang. If you're Tommy, gun. If you're Jerry, run. If you're Sonny, shine. If you're Sandy, grind. If you're Kelly, blue. If you're Barney, moo.
If you're Terry, rip. If you're Bobby, dip. If you're Fanny, blow. If you're Jackie, throw. If you're Donny, dress. If you're Betty, guess. If you're Henry, hank. If you're Randy, wank.
It's because of topography. Mountains. You just have no other way through. They've even had to close off some of the narrow little seasonal roads and passes because people are being stupid.
Normally it's around 4 hours of driving between Denver on the east side of the map and Grand Junction on the west. But now it will take a very long time, especially today. Cross-country trucking is detouring further even, and avoiding Colorado altogether by taking I-80 or even I-20 across instead of I-70; just depends where they're really going.