I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because software naming issues are specifically proscribed on English Language & Usage. — Robusto1 min ago
@AllexKramer There's a distinction between opinion based and primarily opinion based. The P.O.B. closure reason itself acknowledges that some amount of opinion may be involved in answering a question, but necessitates that questions at least hypothetically be answerable with corroboration with facts, references or specific expertise. The more likely guesswork is to be needed, the less likely the question is to be on-topic.
Questions which have answers that are all equally valid irrespective of those are also almost always off-topic. What's your favorite programmer cartoon is usually considered the prime example of a P.O.B. question on the network, because votes for or against them are meaningless. Every answer is (short of psychic knowledge to the contrary) the answerer's favorite cartoon.
How widespread is the concept of count noun vs mass noun? I feel like Germanic has it, and Romance (but maybe not Latin?). But not Russian or Chinese.
It sounds like one of those grammar things made up for the teaching of English (like conditional of the third kind).
But I feel like any language with a grammatical plural vs singular will most likely also have similar non-plural items like 'water'.
also gradable vs universal adjectives. I'd think there's be a lesson in every intermediate or advanced language teaching everywhere that says [in that language] "Wow, you cannot say 'more unique' "
@Mitch Russian actually takes it a step further than English. There are nouns that are uncountable semantically, just like in English, but then on top of that it has nouns that are uncountable grammatically (but still might be countable semantically, just to confuse matters further).
Like, even if nobody in the entire history of English has ever said "waters" or "cheeses" or "fishes" or "milks", you could still go ahead and build those plurals at least theoretically. And in many cases the meaning would actually suggest itself, too.
In Russian you have those wealth of nouns that just do not have a plural form (even though, again, their meaning might or might not be countable), and you can't possibly make it up because unlike in English, there is no single default way of building plurals. Different nouns build their plurals in totally different ways. You can't just slap an S onto the end.
To think of the plural of a noun, you need to know what the plural of that noun is. But if it doesn't have a plural, you can't think of anything.
Non-gradable adjectives I don't know. I feel like Russian must have those too, because of course it must, but then again I also feel like this is an issue that I only actively became aware of when I started learning English. So maybe everyone has those, but only English is so up in arms about them because English is so simple and has very few things left to be up in arms about at all. So people make their own entertainment out of what little they have.
Also don't forget that Russian still has remnants of dual. So for lots of nouns, though again not all, you have two different plural forms, depending on whether there's five or more of that thing, or merely two to four.
It's a clusterfuck really. Better not think of it too much.
Inspired by multiple questions on ELU and in particular this recent question about 'correct', I wonder whether French has the similar concept of gradable vs absolute adjectives.
The idea is that some qualities are either the case or not. For example, if something is 'unique', only one thing can ...
So I should be more praecise about French: most Latin neuter nouns became masculine in French, so both adjectif and accusatif are masculine in French. The feminine form would be on -ive.
So, the story, as far as it goes, which is not very, was that one day, I missed the trash can when I was throwing away the empty but somewhat messy can of cat food.
and, I didn't bother picking it up.
I was at an age where I actively Just Did Not Care.
Now I'm sort of non-committal about not caring, which means sometimes it looks like I do.