« first day (2749 days earlier)      last day (2166 days later) » 

1:06 AM
@Suren I don't fully understand the sentence. However, use "that" with restrictive clauses and "which" with nonrestrictive clauses. Search online for "that vs. which" for more information.
 
1:33 AM
Thanks, KannE. I will.
 
 
3 hours later…
4:14 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, potentially bad NS for domain in body, potentially bad NS for domain in title: convertidormp3.live/juveniles-wifisfuneral-mp3-song-download/ by reignsets on english.SE
 
 
4 hours later…
8:43 AM
Exploring a new culture
It's fascinating the kids learn how they respect others and how they work as group, etc.
 
9:39 AM
0
Q: Antonymm for "derived"/"derivative"

einpoklumSuppose an idea or an artistic work A is derived from another idea or work B. We would call A the "derivative" or the "derived". What would we call B? I looked for antonyms of derived on thesaurus.com and couldn't find any.

 
 
2 hours later…
11:22 AM
-1
Q: A word for something that is currently relevant

BenJacobI feel like there is a word on the tip of my tongue for something that is particularly relevant in the current climate but I can't quite get it. Can anyone help me out?

 
11:39 AM
@Mitch I'm aware of that, and that gives me even more reason to identify as an Iranian and defend that name.
@FaheemMitha As I said, it's hard to define what it actually means, but it definitely smacks also of ethnic pride. MAR here for example doesn't identify as due to his Trukish ethnicity, but he is unquestionably an Iranian. Why would I want to exclude him when I refer to my nationality?
All this is about what to call these people in English, BTW. In Farsi, it's always Irani (= Iranian).
(Correction: "MAR doesn't identify as Persian due to ...")
 
12:01 PM
@Færd I see.
@Færd In India (or at least Bombay), Irani is some kind of Iranian minority group.
The Irani are an ethno-religious community in South Asia; they belong to the Zoroastrians who emigrated from Iran to South Asia in the 19th and 20th centuries. They are culturally, linguistically, ethnically and socially distinct from the Parsis, who – although also Zoroastrians – emigrated to the Indian subcontinent from Greater Iran many centuries before the Iranis did. == Distinction from Parsis == The Parsis and Iranis are considered legally distinct. A 1909 obiter dictum relating to the Indian Zoroastrians, also observed that Iranis (of the now defunct Bombay Presidency) were not obliged to...
But you may already know that.
So does Persian also have the connotations of ethnicity?
 
12:37 PM
@Færd Turkish?
 
 
2 hours later…
2:33 PM
@FaheemMitha I don't think that creates serious confusion, especially that they are of Iranian ancestry, and that they don't even call themselves Iranians (in English).
Nor do those Zoroastrians in India who call themselves Parsi. Although if I could I would probably revive Parsi as the name of the language that we have come to call Farsi.
@tchrist Azerbaijani Turkish, to be accurate, yes.
(@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ)
@FaheemMitha Do you mean the language?
 
3:08 PM
@Færd No, I mean if a person refers to himself/herself as Persian, does that have any ethnic implications?
Ethnic or racial, if you prefer.
 
 
3 hours later…
6:18 PM
@Suren writingcenter.unc.edu/relative-clauses Here's a handout regarding relative pronouns and clauses that you may find useful. BTW, it states that using "which" in a restrictive clause is "acceptable" but "that" is preferred, and some people object to using "which" in a restrictive clause...fiercely object--see Grammar Girl--ha-ha, really though. Good afternoon.
 
6:42 PM
Hi
please, which is formal : 1- It's come to my attention that 2-It has been brought ot my attention that .
Are they have the same meaning ?
1 sentence used in this scene in seinfeld :
second one I found it in Email
would you please Explain to me the differences between them ?
 
@Educ "It's" is relatively informal -- nearly all contractions are informal. "It is" is more formal.
@Educ Otherwise, "It has come to my attention" and "It has been brought to my attention" are both pretty formal. They have similar meanings. The difference is that the second one implies some third person was also involved, the person who "brought".
 
6:57 PM
@MetaEd Thank you so much, please what about : " It has come to my attention that some people think I am a troll."
3-It has come to my attention that
 
 
1 hour later…
8:03 PM
@Educ Sounds fine to me.
 
8:58 PM
@Færd so, well, I have no idea how to respond to that ping
Was it to confirm whether I am an Azerbaijani Turk and wear funny hats in winter?
I don't wear funny hats in winter
 
Why not?
 
9:12 PM
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Is it obligatory for Turks to wear funny hats? Is that what they call a fez?
 
@Cerberus 'cause it's not that cold anymore
@FaheemMitha no one wears traditional clothes anymore
 
0
Q: The Latin abbreviation/phrase meaning "rest"?

SasanIn my presentation sometimes I should continue the same topic in more than one slide. I kind of remember that some presenters used a Latin phrase or abbreviation in the title of the rest slides that continued the same topic. What is that phrase/abbreviation?

 
@Feeds restus
 
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ But if it's fun!
 
@Cerberus we hate fun! closing as POB
 
9:17 PM
Understandable.
Wat's POB?
 
Primarily Opinion-Based
 
Close me!
 
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ What, nobody at all?
 
9:47 PM
1
Q: Succinct form of inclusion only based on a condition?

Sean PiankaAn example: contains regions of brightness, excluding ones with densities below the threshold The opposite of exclude in this context would be include only, as in including only ones with densities above the threshold. Is there any single word for this, instead of include only?

 
10:35 PM
@FaheemMitha only in TV commercials
 
11:09 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive body detected: A word for someone who by mead cass on english.SE
 
Hi
@Cerberus what do you mean by « close me «
If it is close to me I will understand it as near to me
But close me do you meant it
figuratively or literally
 
@Educ It was a joke, responding to a joke.
I am a POB question, so close me.
 
@FaheemMitha It would depend on the intention of the speaker mor than anything else, but Persian would be far more likely to bear racial overtones than Iranian.
(I've come to use race for Homo sapiens only in a negative context, after an argument I had with Cerb about it. I don't remember if he was right tho. :P)
 
@Færd Ok. I'll take your word for it.
 
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Just wanted to let you know we was talking about you.
 
11:23 PM
@Færd I'm always right.
But my point was that it is better not to use it at all.
 
@Cerberus Better not to use what?
 
@Cerberus Yeah right! distorts mouth
 
@FaheemMitha Use the word race to distinguish between groups of humans.
 
@Cerberus That just flies in the face of conventional usage.
 
Not really.
 
11:25 PM
@Cerberus Hmm. However, it is widely done. And has some legitimate uses.
 
Racist?
 
There is only one country that is obsessed with this unnatural distinction based on 19th-century Eurocentric discriminatory theories and then misapplied to boot.
 
Half of language is misapplication originally.
 
But it is best avoided where possible.
 
And that country has hundreds of millions of native speakers who can have their own dialect(s).
 
11:28 PM
I don't think the commonly used concept of race has much meaning, biologically speaking.
 
Most especially with sensitive issues.
@FaheemMitha It doesn't.
Let's not be the big, imperialist Satan's pawns!
 
Most of the time, it's just a convenient way to classify people into groups that looks somewhat alike. And possibly have some cultural similarities.
 
It's just used in so many ways that makes in unclear.
And it's a concept from wrong theories.
 
But if you look at the human genome, every human on the planet is genetically virtually indistinguishable from any other. Billionaire or peasant.
But of course people don't care about science.
 
But we do.
Even people or tribe is better.
Or ethnicity.
Or even culture.
It depends on what you want to say, exactly.
 
11:33 PM
Sleep time. Take care, folks.
 
Sleep well.
 

« first day (2749 days earlier)      last day (2166 days later) »