« first day (2680 days earlier)      last day (2244 days later) » 

12:48 AM
0
Q: Is there a word to describe a person who helps another person to focus?

Ben McCormackI'm looking for a word to describe a person who helps another person to focus? Example usage: "It's amazing to work with Jane. She's such a good ______, what with her ability to help her team focus on exactly what's needed to move the company forward." I had thought about the word focuser,...

 
1:04 AM
Coffee
 
 
2 hours later…
3:08 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted username, few unique characters in answer, repeating characters in answer: What does 'provision' exactly mean in a legal document? by nigger killer on english.SE
 
 
2 hours later…
4:48 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +2 more: growxlsite.com/vivrax/ by yarxgriod on english.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +2 more: growxlsite.com/vivrax/ by yarxgriod on english.SE
 
5:46 AM
0
Q: Is there a word for releasing a fish or an animal into a (natural or artificial) habitat?

Ignat InsarovI can always say "put a fish in a bowl" or "release a hare into the woods". But I wonder if there is a more specific word for this. The point is that, after the action is taken, the animal will become less restricted and more happy than it was immediately before. Examples: "The fisher took t...

 
 
1 hour later…
7:11 AM
0
Q: What is the single word or any other short alternative for or synonym that can be used instead of this phrase: "Movers club"?

user286660I need to use this word to write a report which I need to use common alternatives or single word version of this phrase "Movers club".

 
 
4 hours later…
10:59 AM
RIP Stephen Hawking:(
He was so cool
 
11:17 AM
1
Q: Word for when someone was being sent back and forth between lots of places to get something done

DraxDomaxLike when your Bulgarian national insurance record gets corrupted and, now, you need to prove that you didn't earn 500,000 USD back in 2001... So you go to NOI, who tell you to go to MVR-IP, who tell you the case is actually with NAP, who tell you everything looks fine, this is a NOI problem, so ...

0
Q: My glasses has "prescription?" (comparing with fashion glasses) What is a better/correct term?

Juan Tamad FernandezI know you can say prescription glasses but how do you say it in this sentence: My eyeglasses has ______. My eyeglasses is _______. if you want to compare it with fashion eyeglasses. In my country we call it "grado" (grade) and "walang grado" (no grade) Ang salamin ko ay may grado. = My eyeg...

 
11:33 AM
0
Q: Is there a word that describes something cheap, reliable and simple?

dotbitcodeAn example might be a car like this: or a laptop like this: Both of which are simple and cheap yet reliable. If something breaks down, replacement parts are also cheap or even free. Is there a word that describes what they are?

 
 
2 hours later…
1:54 PM
1
Q: Cinematic term for: A known symbol confirms the location of the scene

HjalteWhat is the term for when a scene in a film shows e.g. the Eiffel tower so that the viewer knows that the scene takes place in Paris. I know the term exists but I cannot recall it.

0
Q: Synonyms of Talk about

Mango GummyI need some synonyms of talk about. For instance, “today I will talk about two topics.” Right now, I am thinking of “express”, “address” or “deliver” but I am not sure whether they are desirable. Could you please advise me? I need some very formal words. Thank you. If this post has any proble...

 
2:31 PM
@M.A.R. He wasn't that smart
 
2:46 PM
@Mitch well, I'd certainly be sadder when you die. Don't worry
 
3:03 PM
1
Q: What is this verb noun association called in linguistics?

a bsssNot all verbs work with all nouns. It is better to say "fix errors" than "solve errors", for example. In linguistics, is there a name for semantic compatibilities between nouns and verbs that go before them like this?

 
3:54 PM
@Mitch Smitten is not commonly used these says outside a narrow context.
Unless one is trying to be pseudo-biblical.
 
4:07 PM
To be precise, it's usually used in a metaphorical fashion. And I think usually in a sexual sense. It's literal meaning it just hitting (or to be hit), I think.
 
@M.A.R. That went a different direction than I expected.
@FaheemMitha 'smite' is very rare (let's say archaic and/or biblical as you suggest).
 
@Mitch Yes, smite as opposed smitten. Which isn't that rare (for some reason) when used to have a sexual meaning.
 
'smitten' on the other hand is much more common, used for something like 'recently fell in love hard with', like a crush, but the tiniest bit more adult/serious
 
Curious how words linger on in some fashion.
 
so to be blunt, I WAS MAKING A JOKE
you know, word-play.
a grammatical pun as it were
Irrelevantly, I think of 'smite' and all its cognates, however teutonic its meaning of 'to hit', it is somehow involved with ... chimney sweeps?
Is it soot?
It must be soot
Like if you get smote, then not only have you been hi badly, you also have a dirty face like a can of fireplace ash was thrown at you.
Is that a video game thing?
@FaheemMitha There should really be a complete turnover every couple of generations. Keep everybody on their toes.
except I see some unintended consequences to that.
 
4:21 PM
@Mitch Um, a joke? Sorry, I lost track of the context.
 
when the turnover date looms closer, all the kids will give up bothering to learn al the old people vocab. And the old people will huddle in their dark caves muttering about 'kids these days and lawns' and the kids these days will laugh at them and run through all the lawns.
 
Western sexual idioms not infrequently involve violence. E.g. hit on, hit that.
 
Because they don't call them lawns but just grass.
@FaheemMitha floow the thread back. The link said 'smited', and I 'corrected' saying 'smitten' which really has the modern meaning I just gave (and for all I know may be truly the past tense of 'smite', but it's funnier if the guy doesn't want to get 'smitten' even though she's already his girlfriend. Also I think 'girlfriend' questions on ELU tend to be puerilely motivated.
@FaheemMitha Yeah. I read that too in Carl Sagan's Dragons of Eden.
 
@Mitch My own observation.
 
There's besmote. That's an option.
 
4:27 PM
@Mitch Yes, I see what you mean. But as humor goes, that tends to the obscure.
 
@MetaEd I'm having trouble keeping track of you visually. Are you some prolate spheroid pi-denier?
 
I certainly didn't get what you had in mind.
 
@MetaEd Sure, for crazy people.
And I mean that in the best possible way
 
@MetaEd That's getting really obscure.
 
@Mitch Oblate. Oblate.
@FaheemMitha That's probably because I'm really obscure.
 
4:28 PM
@FaheemMitha Humor is in the eye of the I say it is funny which makes it so
 
@Mitch That wouldn't fly in a sitcom.
 
@MetaEd Are you OK? You have some kind of stutter
@FaheemMitha Uh... what are laugh tracks for? TO tell you when I think it is funny.
 
@Mitch Good point.
Something as important as laughter should not be left to chance.
 
exactly.
haha
I laughed on purpose
 
@Mitch Acquit. Acquit.
 
4:31 PM
So you know when you realize that the actors on show are talking directly to you?
It doesn't happen to everyone, but just a select few.
I mean I'm not_crazy_ they can't hear you when you talk back.
 
@Mitch That's just a show. The real insight is when you realize that the actual people are just actors.
 
@Mitch In psychiatric wards, presumably.
 
But the message is to you, personally.
@MetaEd Well, now you sound like a rapper
 
@MetaEd It's crushing when you realise all those nice families in the TV shows and movies are just a bunch of actors pretending to be a family.
 
@FaheemMitha No, I mean actual people. Like your friends and family.
 
4:33 PM
Well, realise as in you knew it all the time, but engaged to a sufficiency of necesary doublethink.
 
I've heard from the kids these days who are currently walking over my lawn (they call it grass or some reason), call them a 'hip-hopper' or 'hippity-hopper'
like they're some sort of Easter poet
 
@MetaEd I don't follow. Your friends and family are actors?
You mean like in The Truman Show or some suitable Philip K. Dick novel?
 
Things fall apart, the center cannot hold, widening gyre blahty blah bhla, stand up straight Bethlehem... And the rabbit is served!
@MetaEd what?
 
@Mitch Pardon?
 
@FaheemMitha Yes, exactly, the chosen
@FaheemMitha They probably enjoy each others company more than an actual family, because they're all having fun play-acting and sending coded messages about the end days to the chosen ones.
 
4:38 PM
@Mitch End days? Chosen ones?
Have you been watching Twelve Monkeys, or something?
Or maybe one of those Christian Armageddon shows.
 
@FaheemMitha Easter is coming pretty soon, Passover too, they're pretty much the same thing. lamb vs brisket, horseradish sauce vs also horseradish sauce, parker house rolls vs matzoh.
Peeps are kosher doncha know.
 
I'm finding the intellectual pressure of this conversation a bit too much for me.
 
and then once it's all over you have a plateful of chocolate covered eggs laid by rabbits to eat for the rest of the month
 
@Mitch Sounds indigestible.
 
@FaheemMitha Bruce Willis knows how to choose them
@FaheemMitha The Cadbury-Schweppes empire is built on them.
 
4:42 PM
@FaheemMitha Right. The real insight is when you realize that you're Truman Burbank.
 
@FaheemMitha no pressure
wait...
sea level air pressure
 
@MetaEd Are you making a point about how all of life is an act? Or something like that?
 
@MetaEd You've been playing Jim Carrey all this time?
 
@FaheemMitha That sounds metaphorical. I'm talking about the insight that everyone else is just actors.
And I have to say they don't pay y'all enough. Look who you have to put up with.
 
@FaheemMitha It's an act inside a simulation inside an enigma inside a tortilla
 
4:44 PM
@MetaEd Um, not sure I follow. You mean in a solipsistic sense?
 
@FaheemMitha Y'all exist, that's not the issue.
 
Like in "The Mysterious Stranger"?
 
I came up with the idea of solipsism myself
 
Well, more like The Prisoner.
 
Don't know that one.
 
4:46 PM
me neither
choose a better cultural reference
Count of Monte Cristo?
Man in the High Castle?
I'm just throwing those out there, no idea if they're relevant
A Hundred Years of Solitude?
If On A Winter's Night A Traveller?
ba-dum ba-dum ba-dum ba-dum bump
Speaking of which, did you all have snow?
 
@Mitch No
 
Conversation about the weather is the last refuge of the unimaginative. #OscarWilde
We did. Lots. 2 feet
and the thing about it is, it's really hard, while in the middle of all of it, in the middle of everything changing it's look so radically in such a short time (everything all white, and all the streets narrowed considerably from the plowed snow banks squeezing them in)...
it's really hard to think that elsewhere they don't have it.
Like here, yesterday really, but also somewhat today, everything is shut down.
But it just doesn't feel like only a few hundred miles away things just aren't shut down.
It's not that it's unfair or wrong or whatever.
It's just like... oh... you're not all covered in white and can actually drive safely? Weird.
 
@Mitch The weather here is actually really boring most of the time.
Well, except for the monsoons. But even that is a bit boring in a way. Lots of rain.
 
5:04 PM
Too much of the same thing
 
5:27 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad NS for domain in answer: English, Latin, or Malay pronunciation of betta fish by Gerald on english.SE
 
5:41 PM
1
Q: Word for "can become a result"

xavierm02The process of running a program (or evaluating a λ-term) can either yield a result / value, or go on forever. Those that yield a result / value are called ??? / valuable. While this does not correspond to the usual meanings of the word valuable, the fact that the word already exists and that th...

 
6:00 PM
@Robusto Hmm I'm never entirely sure myself as to what it means.
I think it was originally a euphemism for (clearly) homosexual men.
But it seems to have evolved into an umbrella term encompassing all the various abbreviatory letters.
 
I think words like "queer" and "gay" should continue to mean what they used to mean.
 
It is admittedly nicer than those silly abbreviations, and its etymological meaning ("odd") supports this meaning.
@FaheemMitha They still can.
 
@Cerberus It's harder now.
 
Yes.
Those words were kind of hijacked.
Beware queer hijackers!
 
Kind of what happened to "naughty".
Which used to mean "wicked". Or something like that.
 
6:06 PM
@BillJ For all intensive purposes 'cowtail' is an eggcorn for kowtow. Don't take it for granite, check out the link. — Mitch 21 hours ago
Nice one @Mitch :)
 
@terdon Intensive purposes?
Oh, I see, @Mitch's sense of humor at work again.
 
@FaheemMitha yep :)
 
I just hope no English Learners read it.
This reminds me of when I asked my father how the play Pygmalion got its name.
He replied that Pygmalion meant "male pig".
I didn't actually check with him about this, and I can't now (he died in 2008), but I'm pretty sure that was deliberate misinformation.
Very naughty.
 
heh, sneaky :)
 
Of course that was before the Internet. Which, as we all know, is a more reliable parental substitute.
 
6:35 PM
@terdon haha. What the hell is the 'LGBT brigade' anyway? Is that like the 'TIL running-dog capitalists'?
TIL = Today I Learned (which I just learned, well, not today, but the other day. These things are hard!)
Is that TMI (Too Much Information (which is probably just enough information))?
 
@Mitch I'm going to say it's an insult, akin to "feminazis" or "social justice warriors".
 
@MetaEd He's probably in the TLA contingent
 
Trespassed Lawn Anger?
Too Many Letters Acronym?
 
@MetaEd It sounds negative, but that may be appropriate in context.
 
6:52 PM
@Cerberus The way to judge is the use-mention distinction. If "LGBT brigade" is being discussed as an epithet, fine. If it's being used there to mock people, not so much.
 
What's wrong with mocking people?
I wasn't entirely sure how to read his reference.
Though the general idea was clear.
 
@Cerberus Are you aware of the "Be Nice" policy? It's not a matter of what's wrong with mocking people. It's a matter of how mocking people subverts the purpose of the SE network by making people unwelcome.
 
It wasn't directed at any other user in specific.
In a healthy community, moderate mocking is OK.
 
@Cerberus SE management have been quite clear that mocking a class of people, even when not directed at an individual, will not be tolerated, because it makes anyone who identifies with that class of people less welcome.
 
It's dangerous to generalise that.
Context is always important.
Besides, I am my own moral judge, not management's puppet.
 
7:05 PM
I should hope so. But SE gets to decide what to tolerate on their property.
 
So?
Management is not really involved here.
It is we who are reading that comment.
And I don't really see a problem with it.
Let alone a reason for censorship.
But it doesn't really matter that much. Do as you like and so will I.
 
@Cerberus I know!
It's so much fun!
@Cerberus It sounded derogatory to me.
 
Well, is that a problem?
It wasn't aimed at anyone in particular.
Just a general remark about how "the gays" have stolen his precious word.
 
@MetaEd So close. TLA is a Three Letter Acronym for 'Three Letter Acronym'.
So is FLA, sort of. FLA is a Three Letter Acronym for 'Four Letter Acronym'. Doesn't have quite the same punch as TLA.
@Cerberus Well, yeah. Isn't that derogatory?
Are you saying derogatory is not a problem and should be tolerated?
 
If so, not in a way that matters, I should think.
 
7:19 PM
OK
I'm itching to say things about religious people. Would that be OK?
 
Sure? Depends on what you say, how, and where.
 
Or am I being derogatory about people with pruritis?
 
It's impossible to generalise.
 
OK, let's limit 'where' to here on chat
 
@Mitch Most probably.
 
7:22 PM
Itchy people are prurient
There. I said it.
Also puerile.
if they're young enough
 
If you were to say, "all Bahá'í are traitors and must be killed", then I would challenge you and disapprove.
 
wow. good thing there are quotes around that
what about 'X people are dumb'?
 
You asked for a comment about a religion.
@Mitch Impossible to say without more context.
 
And X is some obviously crazy, magical thinking group.
(in other words, not my group)
 
@Mitch My favorite has always been MUNG.
 
7:24 PM
googles
 
@Mitch I'd still need more context.
 
@Mitch Careful with that. There are ... other words with that spelling.
MUNG = MUNG UNTIL NO GOOD.
 
@MetaEd oh. I thought it was 'munge'
@MetaEd luckily did not find anything more. unlike cowtailing. Urban Dictionary can make anything gross
@Cerberus I thought 'LGBT brigade' was in the direction of flaggable, but too subtle to be actionable. Dog-whistly
 
Bleh.
I think our community would be better off if people chilled out a bit more.
 
@Mitch According to the fine manual, MUNG is equivalent to ER file $YHXYHKI text MY$$
 
7:28 PM
@Cerberus so you think a little more tolerance in general of everything?
What about tolerance of intolerance?
 
That is of course the old, diabolical dilemma of liberalism.
A balance must be struck.
Err on the side of caution.
 
but that's a bit vague
 
Yes.
 
caution in what way?
benefit of the doubt?
 
When in doubt, don't restrict other people's freedom.
Yes, benefit of the doubt.
 
7:30 PM
The paradox of tolerance was described by Karl Popper in 1945. The paradox states that if a society is tolerant without limit, their ability to be tolerant will eventually be seized or destroyed by the intolerant. Popper came to the seemingly paradoxical conclusion that in order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance. == Discussions == Philosopher Karl Popper defined the paradox in 1945 in The Open Society and Its Enemies Vol. 1 (in note 4 to Chapter 7). Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance ...
 
But there's a difference between doubt of the problem and strength of the problem.
I have no (very little) doubt that 'LGBT brigade' is a problem. it's just not that strong (as other things might be.
 
I think both of those should count.
In one's ultimate decision.
@MetaEd Yes. It is an old dilemma.
 
Anyway, believing in leprechauns is idiotic
 
There are people who actually believe in leprechauns, you know.
Is it OK to mock that group?
 
Yeah, that's my problem.
Not to their face of course.
Because you know how leprechauns get
 
7:44 PM
I actually think this is not that different from mocking religions.
 
@MetaEd types into shell script
 
The only difference is that this particular group seems more stupid to you.
And that it is much smaller.
 
runs shell script
.
..
 
But your action is the same.
 
...
....
ctrl-S
What?
@Cerberus That was my point
 
7:45 PM
Good.
 
but it puts me into a quandary. Or maybe a dilemma. Certainly some sort of difficulty.
 
@Mitch Are you trying to save us?
Are you Jesus?
 
@Cerberus Just myself. That's too much of a burden, to save everyone
 
Then we shall have to look for another Saviour.
 
But not that @M.A.R. is here, I can restart my shell script to see what Ed's command does.
ctrl-Q
.....
 
7:50 PM
@Mitch burp
Wait, why does my presence disallow you from shelling your restart command?
 
Looi, it's old people and 'not working' people who are massively in favour of Brexit.
Everyone else is opposed to Brexit by a large majority.
This is a poll from 2018.
So it's the old Onslows whom we have to thank for Brexit.
 
@Cerberus everyone else doesn't want Britain to be great again
 
Traitors!
 
@Cerberus looks like (no guarantee) that those who want a recount are bremainers.
 
@Mitch Naturally.
But even quite a few leavers want a second referendum (not a recounting of the old votes).
I don't think anyone seriously thinks there was anything wrong with the counting.
 
8:05 PM
A revote sounds weird. almost undemocratic. like p-hacking, doing the test until those in control get what they want (whether it is the government or the majority subset of the voting public who may not have voted before)
But then, the Quexiters (the Quebec leavers?) seem to have a referendum to leave every 5 to ten years.
 
And is it really democratic to have a giant leap of faith into the unknown when almost half of the people are against it?
Shouldn't you need a somewhat bigger, stable majority for such a big change?
 
I know. How about we let those who vote leave to leave? That is, standing in place, if you vote brexit, you get those benefits (and risks) or leaving, and if bremain nothing changes (legally) for you?
@Cerberus more than half want that. that's how voting works
 
Secondly, wouldn't it be better to have a referendum by the time people actually know what the consequences will be, what the choice is really about, once the final result of the negotiations is known?
 
@Cerberus Oh. Good point. stability
@Cerberus Oh of course. If anything should come out of this is that David Cameron should be... wait...what is it I can and cannot say here?
 
@Mitch Not always. A 2/3 majority is needed to change the constitution, and only after a second vote with several years in between.
Many EU decisions also require larger majorities.
 
8:10 PM
@Cerberus EU constitution?
 
No, the Dutch constitution (the EU doesn't have one).
But it applies to various constitutions, no doubt.
 
Totally tangentially, is there anything in the EU constitution bout freedom of speech?
@Cerberus Oh
 
It's not healthy if, say, a tennis club decides to move to a different city after a vote in which 51% of the people voted yes (at a turn-out of 80%, that's still only about 40% of the people).
 
They should use the Constitution of the United Federation of Planets. It's very dry, but has a good handling of self-rule, devolution of powers, but also federal inter community rules.
 
@Mitch Which shell?
 
8:12 PM
@Mitch It is in the European Treaty for Human Rights, which is a high law everywhere in the EU.
 
The rules become pretty obvious when aliens blow up your planet.
@MetaEd bash
 
@Mitch Except that this federation is ruled by the military...
 
@Mitch There's your problem. You want TECO.
 
I think we've had this conversation before?
 
@Cerberus What?? No. The UFP is ruled by a consortium of leaders from the planets. And they are distinct from the military. Star Fleet is simply a combined defense force.
 
8:15 PM
@Mitch Except that Starfleet makes foreign policy, judges people in civil cases, etc.
It's basically a stratocracy.
 
For narrative purposes, the stories in Star Trek fail to distinguish easily among scientific missions, trade, and rapacious colonization.
 
But it is Starfleet who leads, initiates, and decides in all such activities.
 
@Cerberus What? again that's just narrative expediency. And Capt Kirk should be court-martialed many times for his egregious flouting of interstellar laws.
 
The series is a glorification of the American military apparatus. As is much of the American film industry...
@Mitch Not judged by a normal court...
 
@Cerberus It may well glorify militarism when thinly veiled by scientific research and alienism (exoticism and orientalism in its extreme), but if you just look at history...
 
8:19 PM
It portrays the military as a benign, but supreme organisation that makes all the important decisions in society.
 
The UFP was organized by the Vulcans, Andorians, Tellurians, and Terrans in that order of military strength
It's just history
Of course subsidiary and less well developed planets were colonized and resources 'redistributed'.
And then the killings began
Just read a book man. That's how it happened.
 
Have you watched ST Discovery?
 
Jesus shit @MetaEd, what's your avatar now?
@Cerberus I saw the first episode, but haven't bothered with any afterwards because you have to pay CBS something and do something else weird before you can see it.
I'd like to see them
 
Ah, and it isn't on Netflix for you?
 
Last year (or maybe more) all the series were available on Netflix and I was going through them one by one.
@Cerberus Is it on Netflix?
 
8:25 PM
It is for us. But maybe not for you.
 
@Mitch It represents person's impersonality to person.
 
@Cerberus Possibly. The UFP constitution allows local sovereignty on laws for public consumption of media.
@MetaEd Wow. That's a lot to get out of a little picture. I was just wondering if it's a doggy or a horsey.
 
It's a kitty then.
 
@Cerberus A more forward thinking show nowadays is Black Mirror
 
@Mitch You should revolt and hope Starfleet won't massacre you.
@Mitch Yes, I've heard of it.
 
8:28 PM
@MetaEd Oh. It looks like an anime character, but it's too small and light to tell.
 
@Mitch It's a machine's idea of what anime characters look like.
 
@Cerberus The Evil Empire? They wiped out half my planet in an ion storm created by experiment gone awry causing a rift (or was it an anomaly?) in the space-time continuum releasing an excess of chronotron particles.
 
0
Q: Is there a generic term for Lovecraftian horror that doesn't use the words "cosmic" or "horror"

AsmorI'm working on a comic book style universe which features a number of different genres, and I want to have official "tags" for what sorts of genres particular stories fit into. Cosmic and Horror tags already exist; Cosmic being stuff with aliens and space and yadda yadda, horror being ghosts and...

 
@Mitch So...
Why didn't you reverse the shield polarity?
 
We tried to reverse the polarity of the ion-decoupler intercoolers, but the vapor lock in the fusion cavitation mechanism discombobulated the matter-antimatter balance and...well, let me not go into the physics of it all but it was like a really really small Big Bang.
 
8:34 PM
@Mitch If you cross the streams, you could reverse the particle flow through the gate.
 
@Cerberus Good idea, but the shields have a graviton/tachyon barrier which is maintained by enthalpic symmetry (look it up), so reversing the polarity on shields just won't do anything.
A couple puffs of smoke, and then it rebalances.
 
@Mitch Hmm.
@Mitch Then remodulate the deflector array?
 
@MetaEd Oh that? I never could understand chaotic soliton monodromies.
@Cerberus Hmm... remodulation?
does calculations
 
@Mitch It's simpler to just shut down all the garbage mashers on the detention level.
 
8:38 PM
carries the 1
drops it
computes the interdigital cohomology group cosets
Which is kinda funny because that's a fancy way of saying 'implement carries in addition'
 
Umm quite so.
 
@Mitch Is that oral carries? Gym carries?
 
8:53 PM
@MetaEd Hey...are you making fun of me?
@MetaEd "A chronometric-flux toaster that toast bread after you’ve eaten it. "
@Cerberus Wait wait wait... reversing the polarity is what you do to get your portable radio to work by putting the batteries back in the other direction.
 
@Mitch I don't know how their shields work.
Oddly, the "hull plating" in ST Enterprise seems to work in exactly the same was as the later shields.
They do exactly the same thing with them, and they're also "down to 40%" etc.
 
9:53 PM
@Cerberus You can transport through polarized hull plating, not deflector shields.
 
@MetaEd Not even when the shields are at 5%?
 
It's like you've never even been on a starship.
3
 
Are you saying Scientology is wrong??
We have all been on a starship.
 
I've been on an airplane. The music was a lot better.
 
I don't remember.
 
10:31 PM
@Cerberus A lot of people from that time don't remember.
 
@MetaEd From when they were abducted?
 
@Cerberus No, silly, from the Seventies.
 
10:59 PM
People don't remember music from the Seventies?
 
@Mitch Crawling in a microwave oven will do it too.
 

« first day (2680 days earlier)      last day (2244 days later) »