« first day (1123 days earlier)      last day (3792 days later) » 

12:10 AM
 
 
2 hours later…
1:42 AM
@TRiG Pretty fuckin' good.
 
Indeed.
 
2:01 AM
posted on December 07, 2013 by sgdi

On the night, there was a full moon And everyone started to swoon The heat of the day Had faded away And they danced to a hypnotic tune

 
2:23 AM
@Moss: you'd never be able to post it anyway. The minimum length for answers is thirty characters. — RegDwigнt 26 secs ago
@tchrist.
@Robusto well I can't do anything about it now... And actually I am quite certain I would have deleted them myself if I was to handle those flags. The dependencies are not obvious to a human, and the engine issues no warning. I don't think the engine even knows we have a blog.
I suppose devs can undelete.
 
Mary’s father has 5 daughters – Nana, Nene, Nini, Nono. What is the fifth daughters name?
 
Mary.
Night all.
 
later
!!Merry Christmas
 
@badass That didn't make much sense. Use the help command to learn more.
 
Scrooge^
!!wiki Scrooge
 
2:33 AM
Scrooge McDuck is a cartoon character created in 1947 by Carl Barks and licensed by The Walt Disney Company. Scrooge is an elderly Scottish anthropomorphic white duck with a yellow-orange bill, legs, and feet. He typically wears a red or blue frock coat, top hat, pince-nez glasses, and spats and is portrayed in animations as speaking with a slight Scottish accent, also sometimes known as a Scottish burr. His dominant character trait is his thrift, and within the context of the fictional Disney universe, he is the world's richest person. Named after Ebenezer Scrooge from the 1843 novel ...
 
!!wiki Ebenezer Scrooge
 
Ebenezer Scrooge is the principal character in Charles Dickens's 1843 novel, A Christmas Carol. At the beginning of the novel, Scrooge is a cold-hearted, tight-fisted and greedy man, who despises Christmas and all things which give people happiness. Dickens describes him thus: "The cold within him froze his old features, nipped his pointed nose, made his eyes red, his thin lips blue, and he spoke out shrewdly in his grating voice ..." His last name has come into the English language as a byword for miserliness and misanthropy, traits displayed by Scrooge in the exaggerated manner for whic...
 
@Robusto I'm thinking of turning it into a Toastmaster's speech. Would take some creativity: Toastmasters is, in some ways, a "professional" environment, and therefore swearing would not go down well. Yet the tension created by that effect would in itself be an interesting counterpoint. Vsauce dealt with that same tension pretty well in that video. (Swearing is, of course, allowed on YouTube, but he's chosen the role of educator to kids, so I suppose he chose not to.)
On the other hand, I wouldn't be able to use the line I came up with in a comment on this site: There's nothing fucking wrong with profanity.
 
Have you seen the Ted Talk?
 
3:03 AM
 
3:16 AM
It's confusing. That's a probly-not. And it's not colloquial English to say "will not" and "does not"; native speakers say "won't" and "doesn't". That makes the sentence a little more accessible, but not enough. Horn's rule is Simplex Negatio Negat; Duplex Negatio Affirmat; Triplex Negatio Confundit. Single negative negates; double negative affirms; triple negative confuses. — John Lawler 2 days ago
 
3:29 AM
@badass Not yet. Shall do shortly. Thanks.
It's that time of year again,
 
 
10 hours later…
1:58 PM
Christmas Songs is the third extended play by California punk rock band Bad Religion, released October 29, 2013 on Epitaph Records. It is their first full-length Christmas album, featuring eight covers of seasonal songs and an "Andy Wallace mix" version of "American Jesus". This is also the first Bad Religion album not to feature Greg Hetson on guitar since 1983's Into the Unknown, and the first time they recorded as a five-piece since 2000's The New America. Background Although Bad Religion had played many Christmas songs in the past, mostly during the KROQ Almost Acoustic Christmas show...
Really weird.
 
2:43 PM
@Cerberus Insofar as one on occasion places a diaeresis on the second of two vowels to indicate that there is a syllabic hiatus between them and that they do not form a diphthong or long vowel, sometimes as an alternative to a hyphen (Noël, naïve, reëlect, coöperate, intraätomic, periïntestinal), how might we similarly indicate a doubled or geminated consonant? Consider ill-lived, non-native, unnamed, unnoticed, circummundane, circummure, counter-revolutionary, dysspermatism, for example.
The Catalans have a special punctuation mark for a pronounced /l/ in <ll> to distinguish it from an <ll> that should be pronounced /ʎ/: they write <l·l> with central dot separating them, as in novel·la, to indicate it is to be pronounced [nu'βɛlə] instead of as *[nu'βɛʎə]. But theirs is a special situation; Italian doesn’t mark geminates (all double consonants geminate there) and use alternate digraphs like <gl> for the other sounds.
In Spanish, there are “no” double consonants, in that things like pero/perro and *llama/lama represent distinct phonemes (and hence minimal pairs). The occasional “new” compound like connotación with a does indeed geminate into two different pronounce n's, although historically those did something else: annus > anno > año or illiberālis > iliberal through normal sound changes.
In short, why are we more finicky about marking vowels with a special pronunciation than we are consonants?
Façade notwithstanding.
 
3:00 PM
Hello
 
I think it is because we are Western European languages. In Eastern European languages, there are many “Latin” consonants that regularly receive diacritics of distinction.
 
What is the difference between I went back to see my father vs. I went back to see Father.
 
One is spelled wrong.
 
Which one?
 
The latter.
 
3:01 PM
Father.
 
When unqualified, it becomes a proper noun.
Right.
 
Which means?
 
Correct.
 
I mean is there any difference in meaning?
 
Can you imagine one?
 
3:04 PM
I cannot. I think it refers to the same person.
 
Then unless we’ve just been discussing Father O’Malley, it probably does.
 
But I am confused because I couldn't explain it to myself.
Is this the only thing where we can change a common noun into a proper one?
 
3:17 PM
I have no idea.
The point is that when you address someone using their title in place of their proper name, it takes on the properties of a proper noun, and moreover one in the vocative case insofar as determiners are no longer permissible.
We are still locked out of the double digits. Gosh!
Even by day.
That sucks.
This is reasonably entertaining:
 
 
2 hours later…
5:57 PM
Why doesn't YouTube have "Who Say" by Primitive Radio Gods? Thought for the day.
The Bad Religion reference made me look for it.
I'm getting no reaction, that ain't no joke
I've had bad religions shoved down my throat
 
Dunno
 
posted on December 08, 2013 by sgdi

There once was a man from Kildare Who had a tendency to stare At the female form Since he had been born But staring, it got him nowhere

 
6:19 PM
!!youtube satisfaction
 
!!youtube Rolling Stones I can't get no satisfaction
 
6:52 PM
@tchrist Because the difference between [two syllables] and [one syllable, with a different vowel sound] is a lot more significant in our languages than that between [consonant (cluster)] and [other consonant (cluster)]. Only in highly phonetic languages, like many of the Romance languages, does it seem necessary or worth while to mark differently pronounced consonant clusters that look the same, whereas even English, least phonetic of all, finds coop jarring or difficult to parse.
@NeilFein Great! So then your version with tomatoes much resembles what I made two days ago. I found mine too bitter, I didn't like it without the mango chutney. So I think our spices are very different, which was to be expected.
And I defer to your recipe.
The thin is, I like my garam masala in things like draniki (potato pancakes), but I think it is that which makes my chana so bitter. Or perhaps it in combination with the cumin. It's not the curry powder, because, the last time I made an Indian dish, it was still bitter without curry powder.
Protesters topple statue of Lenin in Kiev.
 
7:21 PM
@Cerberus I don’t understand why it’s taken them so long.
 
Well, the statue is a bit random?
The protests are against Yanukovich and his party's decision, not against communism.
 
7:42 PM
Toppling anything is something to do.
 
Have they completely toppled the Berlin Wall?
 
No.
Parts are kept as a monument.
The Berlin Wall () was a barrier constructed by the German Democratic Republic (GDR, East Germany) starting on 13 August 1961, that completely cut off (by land) West Berlin from surrounding East Germany and from East Berlin. The barrier included guard towers placed along large concrete walls, which circumscribed a wide area (later known as the "death strip") that contained anti-vehicle trenches, "fakir beds" and other defenses. The Eastern Bloc claimed that the wall was erected to protect its population from fascist elements conspiring to prevent the "will of the people" in building...
 
8:02 PM
@cerb did you see the grade inflation link?
 
@badass Yes, I read it. It's odd.
Perhaps if you correct students a lot and force them to improve their work several times before grading it, it's not such a bad sign if everyone gets an A in the end. But that didn't seem to be the case.
 
I agree.
 
8:43 PM
Hora aderat briligi. Nunc et Slythia Tova
Plurima gyrabant gymbolitare vabo;
Et Borogovorum mimzebant undique formae,
Momiferique omnes exgrabure Rathi.
 
9:01 PM
Is that like the Jabberwock?
 
9:17 PM
Yep!
 
9:44 PM
Funny.
 
 
1 hour later…
11:07 PM
0
Q: Does Nelson Mandela qualify to be described as a 'modern messiah'?

WS2If not, what is a suitable word for such people who are almost universally venerated as political heroes after their death?

I think as far as the English language is concerned, absolutely anyone qualifies to be described as a modern messian. I just called my tea kettle a modern messiah, so I'm speaking from experience here.
 
O Susanna!
(in the highest)
 
Dr. Susanna.
 
Doncha cry for messire.
Is "Q: What’s a dictionary for?” really about ELU?
wonders
 
I closed it as unclear.
 
Ok.
 
11:11 PM
A dictionary is for looking up what a dictionary is for.
Most dictionaries are written by Escher for that reason.
 
I would like to know which Country it is whose People think to capitalize their import Words.
English-speaking country, that is.
 
Why Sir, that would be England.
And then of course the United States.
To name but two.
 
Your vocative use is correct, but not in centuries recent.
Is it the Injuns who do this?
I have noticed in their many Messages that they like to capitalize things of Import.
I don’t know why the question has Dictionary not dictionary.
 
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility,.. ah screw It you get the Point.
 
Not even Johnson did that.
And he was 1755.
 
11:13 PM
Wow that's pretty old for a Catholic.
 
> 1755 Johnson Dictionary Preface P3, — I have, notwithstanding this discouragement, attempted a dictionary of the English language, which, while it was employed in the cultivation of every species of literature, has itself been hitherto neglected.
See, no big D.
 
He reserved the big D for the gossip he was writing.
On the side.
 
> Díctionary. n.s. [dictionarium, Latin.] A book containing the words of any language in alphabetical order, with explanations of their meaning; a lexicon; a vocabulary; a word-book. Quoth Dr Johnson
Interesting that bilingual dictionaries preceded monolingual ones.
These were for Greek lexicons and such.
 
I dunno, I find that quite logical.
You wonder what the f "Mutter" means before you do the same about "mother".
 
Because people figured they knew their own language, and just needed help with others?
mutters
 
11:17 PM
Do you write down directions to your own home from your own church?
 
If I am to have guests, yes.
Otherwise, no.
So it is for the Guests then.
 
The ananasses.
QED
 
Isn’t there a lemma about that?
Oh wait, no. That’s an analemma.
 
We could write one. Or seven.
Though not today, as I must be off in a few mins.
 
Which sounds rather nastier than it is, now that I look up its backside.
 
11:19 PM
Huhuh, you look up things' backsides.
 
In astronomy, an analemma (; from Greek ἀνάλημμα "pedestal of a sundial") is a curve representing the changing angular offset of a celestial body (usually the Sun) from its mean position on the celestial sphere as viewed from another celestial body (usually the Earth). The term is used when the observed body appears, as seen from the viewing body, to move in a way that is repeated at regular intervals, such as once a year or once a day. The analemma is then a closed curve, which does not change. Because of the Earth's annual revolution around the Sun in an orbit that is elliptical and ti...
It’s just analemma looks like an abbreviation for anal enema.
Or enemy.
 
@tchrist there are other kinds?
 
There’s the Italian kind.
Innuendo.
Wait, that’s still the same, isn’t it?
Programmers, logicians, and other mathematicians trying to think like a programmer with human languages are such a lost cause, aren’t they?
0
Q: "There is no A or B" vs "There is no A and B"

Eduardo BezerraIf A doesn't exist and B doesn't exist either, what is the correct form below? There is no A and B. or There is no A or B. What if the sentence is long, such as There is no bound on message delay or relative process speed. Would this construction be correct?

 
> What is a good resource for learning idiomatic verb-preposition pairs?
Um, the Internet?
-2
A: Order of importance , time order and space order

user59191I love Obie conobi. (: with all my heart.

 
Positing native speakers, of course.
Yeah, I love that one. They can’t even spell Old Ben’s name aright.
 
11:30 PM
They could try getting Ivan MucGregor's right. It's easier.
 
> primarily opinion-based: Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise.
 
Oh, was he another Fitzroy?
 
I.e. voted to close.
 
Hold on, did Cerberus just imply that he wants a question closed? My mind is assploding as we speak.
 
He did indeed.
 
11:33 PM
Cunt be true.
 
Hold on, did Cerberus just say that he wants a question closed? My mind is assploding at twice the speed.
 
The question is neither interesting for experts nor useful for learners.
 
I need a drink.
 
Third time lucky.
Come on.
Assuming you, too, have three heads.
Meanwhile, I am on a Freecell spree.
 
There’s something at the corner I must be afetching. I shall return anon, or at least, ere long.
 
11:35 PM
Have fun.
 
It’s always fun to drive on snow-packed roads.
More like glissading.
 
Ugh, snow.
 
Yeah and I am trying to watch Twilight: Breaking Dawn Part I.
For the second time today.
 
Driving is better than any others means of transportation, though, except public transport.
 
I'm still failing miserably.
It is entirely unwatchable.
 
11:36 PM
You're watching a children's series?
You might as well watch...watch...
...something else! I don't know.
 
That's the sad part, it doesn't even qualify for an episode of a poorly done TV series.
Much less a movie.
 
Oh, it is a movie?
And they already knew there were going to be more?
 
Meanwhile, all my aces are at the back.
This sucks.
Can you win game #28258?
You can select a game.
 
What are you even talking about.
Make it quick I'm about to leave.
 
11:39 PM
Freecell.
One of the four games that are part of Windows.
 
I see.
 
You've never played it?
It is quite good, a lot more fun than Patience.
 
I've played Freecell a zillion times in my life, last week at the latest, but can't remember when was the last time it was on Windows.
 
Oh.
Well, does your version allow you to select a game?
 
I am still trying to find out if I have Freecell installed.
Ah here it is.
 
11:43 PM
Yay!
 
I have freed up two aces already.
 
Nice.
 
Well done.
So have I, actually.
But my table looks very different:
 
Yes, that might be better, you'll need those fours.
 
11:51 PM
I've been throwing away clubs like...someone who throws away clubs.
I'm not sure what to do. I wanted the fours, but now I don't think they're worth it any more.
 
I am pretty much done.
 
Wowie.
 
I want to be able to see Christmas lights again.
Is that really too much to ask?
 
And now I'm done for good.
 
The LEDs have ended that.
You can’t focus on the pure-blue spectrum the blue ones put out.
So they will always be blurry.
While their red and yellow and green peers are pinpoints of light, the blues are always going to blurry blue blobs.
 
11:53 PM
I am out!
Night all.
 
Congrats!
 
Have a pleasant spell away.
 
@RegDwigнt I won too! Yay.
It just looked unpossible, but it wasn't.
 
0
A: Name for words with same consonant sounds but different vowel sounds

nobody here;kjfhhdfjahjhajkhuahfjkashfsuidshkjdskjahfksdjkfhdiufghhfshkjasdhakkjsdhkjdiahuihfkjshisdukflakjhfisdakhfskdjhfkjdshfusihfkjhfkjahkdsjhfkhfkjhfu fkajfkj but nnnnnnnnnno fkaj fjoa;jlspsoeifjdidj;aha'";opfm 0n- i30p93] 'pkf o3ipo'i {)#0-9euilkdjm lkjkjlkajklsj'a ou aApopaj;oiah'ajLkjakjjahfdiKHKAH...

Someone took their time to type that up.
 
Haha.
*someone's cat.
 
11:56 PM
As in, they are not even curing baldness or prolonging erections.
 
meows
 
I don't need that any more, I have a spam box full.
 
My kittens are +50% of what they were six weeks ago.
Each gained 24 oz.
 
Impressive. They must be super kittens.
 
So Randy is now 4 lbs 13 oz and Lorin is 4 lbs 8 oz.
Lorin looks bigger, but he’s a long hair.
So he fluffs up.
Randy is longer and leaner, and despite appearances, 5 oz more massive.
 
11:58 PM
They are not siblings?
 
Lorin was 3#0 when I got him; now he is 4#8.
They are not.
 
What's that #?
 
lbs
 
Ah.
You use it for everything, don't you?
 
Usually it’s used in a prefix fashion though.
Not usually for cocaine, I hear.
 

« first day (1123 days earlier)      last day (3792 days later) »