« first day (1077 days earlier)      last day (3861 days later) » 

12:01 AM
Maybe he's trying to puzzle it out now. "How can they be different? Merriam, Marriam . . . "
 
@Cerberus I never said that there isn't any influence at all. My only point is that it is not -necessary-. People compartmentalize all the time. In the US at least people are very aware that other people have different religious beliefs and whateer one believes is not necessarily good to be so open about it or to push it on others.
 
@Robusto Ugh, annoying. Yes, that happens. But Google does it too...
You should root it and install Titanium Backup: then you can remove or freeze "system" apps.
 
@Cerberus It was mainly Google apps. And when I went to IMDB via Chrome it asked me if I wanted the IMDB app. And I said, "No, never!" And it got installed anyway. I deleted it, but this kind of shit pisses me off no end.
I don't want apps that can be handled by a browser! There, I said it. I don't want to give all my private information to every stupid company that makes a widget that needs all those permissions.
 
@Mitch I'm not entirely sure what you mean...yes, normal people are not trying to convert each other all the time. Doesn't mean their beliefs don't influence others in some ways through other, subtle, slow means. And the theory goes that the essential bit of "influence" happened in the 17th/18th centuries.
@Robusto Wow, that sucks. But surely you had to click "install" before it installed?
@Robusto If you root, you can also install Xprivacy, which lets you forbid any and all permissions to all apps, including system apps.
You can all fine-tune them.
 
@Cerberus No! That's just the point! I deliberately clicked, "No."
 
12:07 AM
It even has an automated database that can pick only the permissions an application absolutely needs.
@Robusto That's wicked. I am thinking weird LG bug?
 
@Cerberus I can't root my phone without committing a felony. Not gonna do that.
 
Umm that is not true.
 
@Cerberus How could it be a bug.
 
Device-unlocking is legal, SIM-unlocking is not.
@Robusto No idea! But it has to be a bug somewhere.
 
@Cerberus It is a bug in the universe. The same bug that keeps fucking up all our shit, gives us George W. Bush for 8 years and keeps the home fires (literally) burning in the Middle East, etc., etc.
 
12:16 AM
I find this site more trustworthy.
@Robusto I say we go back to a universe that's just 01.
1 bit should be easy to debug.
Another trustworthy site, with quotations.
 
@Cerberus This time maybe we should have a Small Bang.
 
What does it cost?
We don't seem to get a big bang for the bug.
 
I dunno. The mere fact that every interprets the DMCA differently gives me pause.
 
@Cerberus I never said ones beliefs don't influence ones actions. Of course they do. We're not all totally insane. You were going in the direction of one's religion necessarily influencing ones actions. You were going in the direction of a Mormon -must- act a certain way and someone Amish necessarily in some other way.
 
@Robusto Finally I present the EFF:
> First, the good news. The legal shield for jailbreaking and rooting your phone remains up - it'll protect us at least through 2015.
If anyone knows, it is they.
 
12:23 AM
How did you get your paws, Cerb?
 
@Robusto Only that amateurish site just didn't really understand the subject matter. Notice how they confuse "root" and "jailbreak" and don't give any references.
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 I don't remember. I was not conscious when they were shaped.
 
Pause... paws.
I'll show myself out.
 
@Mitch I would never say that and haven't. But it's bed time!
 
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 Is that out as in outmaneuver?
 
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 And I don't possess a pause, that I know of.
 
12:25 AM
@Cerberus Pah!
 
I do possess pahs, yes.
 
3 mins ago, by Robusto
I dunno. The mere fact that every interprets the DMCA differently gives me pause.
 
> To my readers who have recently purchased a smartphone and were hoping to root it, you can get away with doing that through legal means up to 90 days after your purchase. You just need to call your provider and get their permission. No worries!
Like Verizon will give me permission.
 
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 Ohh haha. Missed that.
@Robusto Who says this?
 
12:26 AM
@Robusto ask Tim.
 
@Cerberus That was in the first link.
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 Tiny Tim?
 
@Robusto Well, it's bad. Just read what the EFF says. They have the best lawyers in the country and they tell you it is legal.
 
@Robusto yes, but it's a crutch.
 
Of course you are free to remain unrooted if you wish. But it is not illegal in your country at the moment.
 
You asked for that.
 
12:28 AM
Okay, it's bed time!
 
Night.
 
Good night, lady and gentleman.
 
Who are you calling a lady and who a gentleman?
 
disappears in a rooted and slightly sagging cloud of smoke
 
Ohhhh, that Tiny Tim.
Bai!
 
12:33 AM
Hey, where did this rooted and slightly sagging cloud of smoke come from? More to the point, how do we get it off our clothes? Eeeuwww.
 
 
4 hours later…
4:38 AM
I feel like tip toeing through the tulips :D
 
 
2 hours later…
6:56 AM
I wonder why can't you just directly write binary into code in most language like
0b11000
 
7:10 AM
@EnglishMaster Hi
 
oh hi
 
How you doing
 
just lviing
how are you?
I'm watching
 
just enjoying my life
 
7:11 AM
let me get straight to my question
 
NICE! TELL ME MORE
ok
 
what's the meaning of Waiver Plan?
 
sure, nvm I'm not interested in ur life anymore
 
You can get the savings if all of the following are true:

• You’re currently enrolled in a Medicare Prescription Drug Plan (including employer group health and __waiver plans__) or a Medicare Advantage Plan (like an HMO or PPO) that includes prescription drug coverage
 
Like stopping the plan?
Sorry I had to search this XD...
 
7:15 AM
I don't know. I am asking.
So you are not that master in English as your name implies.
 
Hey,
Human being constantly makes mistake no matter how good they are
at something ^_^...
Whatever ^_^...
What's your TOEIC score
?
 
I aint have no TOEIC score man
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 ping
@Mitch ping
 
Never mind then any ways, I've never come across the word before so I am not too sure
 
@Cerberus ping
 
What's your dress code when you go out?
 
7:22 AM
casual
 
Nerd or geek or police officer?
 
no suits, no tie
 
I wear like a golfer
Kids nowadays are funny because they copy what Justin Bieber wears but make fun of him on Internet
 
7:52 AM
@MattЭллен Do you know what Waiver Plan is?
 
No. Sounds like some kind of insurance thing
insurance against things you have to waive, perhaps
 
 
2 hours later…
9:58 AM
@Robusto I didn't. I don't know why. I should have.
 
@KitFox: today I used source control to diagnose a bug.
 
What did it have? A cold? Mad cow disease?
 
a broken optimisation
it turns out that I should redraw something despite it being invisible
 
I hope you cast it in plaster.
Or plastered it in cast.
Which requires really still hands, for a bug.
 
indeed, they're fragile and wriggly
 
10:09 AM
Brittle.
 
quite :D
 
Brittle Litain.
 
No but, yeah but
 
So yesterday on Reddit I learned that in Canada you can demand a portrait of the Queen be sent to you, and so it will be.
Is it the same in the UK?
They also give away flags that flew on Parliament Hill. The waiting list is currently 39 years.
I can has flag in Britain, too?
 
this is news to me.
 
10:16 AM
Hi
 
Jez
news to me too
 
What's news to @MattЭллен
@RegDwigнt For free?
But who would want that?
 
You can get old photo portraits: gac.culture.gov.uk/work.aspx?obj=31710
 
@Noah Well, everyone's paying for yours, but you're also paying for everyone else's. That's how taxes work.
 
I don't think that's the same thing, though
 
Jez
10:18 AM
@Noah it might make good tinder i suppose
 
@MattЭллен yeah she doesn't seem to sport Canadian insignia in those. Fake!
 
@Jez And Canada is cold.
 
Hi, can anyone please tell me what this means? "She sprang up and ran across the grass, swift and sweet of limb."
 
Jez
probably means she ran quickly and in an attractive way
 
10:24 AM
hmm, ok thanks!
 
10:35 AM
0
Q: looking for words that best describe the product

Razi FakihAm looking to create a tagline for a chicken product that has the following qualities tender, marinated, herbed, flavored, juicy

Xblast time.
 
I am looking for a word that best describes a chicken
 
Hello
 
Jez
clucky?
 
@Noah chicken
 
Could anyone tell me please which preposition should be used here 'to' or 'on'? ''A written personal response on/to a painting''
 
10:43 AM
to
 
Thank you
 
@MattЭллен I big to differ
Both could be used
But would mean different things.
 
@Noah people respond to things
@Noah I was going with the most likely. I don't think Monica was defacing a painting
 
a painting can't ask something..
 
Right. But people also have a comment on things.
 
10:44 AM
And people don't comment to things
different verb, different prepostion
 
10:55 AM
I would be grateful if you checked this sentence too.
As it has to be based on what the painting makes me feel and think rather that on knowledge, I didn't read anything about the painting in advance.
 
"rather that" should be "rather than"
 
Oh, I didn't notice that I put 't'
Other than that?
 
my personal preference would be to put a comma after think, too
making "rather than on knowledge" parenthetical
 
I will put it.
Thanks a lot.
 
no probs :)
 
11:33 AM
@MattЭллен Hello
@Monica hi
 
11:59 AM
@MattЭллен What?? That makes no sense.
 
@Mitch What is this grammar?
 
12:18 PM
Morning.
 
@MattЭллен Great. I still hate source control.
 
Source control is great. Except when it doesn't work.
 
12:34 PM
Hello.
!!/define basement
 
@KitFox basement A floor of a building below ground level.
 
@KitFox You should love it!
simply because it helped me
 
Sometimes I do.
And I love all things that help you.
Naturally.
 
Hello, by the way :)
 
drinks coffee in ironic fashion
 
12:37 PM
has a beard in iconic fashion
I'll be a style icon one of these days. Just you wait
 
lies down in a laconic fashion
It's greek style!
 
Your style is bankrupt
 
snickers
 
mounds
 
knickers in a twix
 
12:39 PM
kit kat in peanut butter
 
Food fetishists, the both of you!
 
if it was a fetish, I would have used 'slathered on peanut butter'.
 
oh no, I know your sort. You revel in the merest hint of taboo
"Just the tip"
 
I'm still trying to figure out how to drink things ironically. I can't get the cup at the right ... approach.
 
@Mitch You have to drink the coffee before it was cool
 
12:44 PM
It's all in the eyes.
 
@MattЭллен What? No, I want to get paid for the whole meal.
@MattЭллен Said the bishop to the parishioner.
 
Your dirty mind!
 
You're dirty mind
 
you misspelled 'mind'.
 
12:47 PM
What's mind is mind and what's you'res is mind.
 
1:35 PM
@Noah chickeny. @Matt.
Chicken does not describe a chicken. It only names it. Describing is what adjectives are there for.
And if a chicken ain't chickeny, then chickeny has no meaning.
 
That describes something that's got chicken qualities. Chicken best describes chicken
What is it? A chicken
 
@MattЭллен see, not a description.
Just a label.
 
perfect
all the understanding of what it is in one word
 
But you do not understand what it is. Every chicken is different.
 
without the ambiguity of chickeny which could be describing something else
 
1:38 PM
Well, anything could be describing something else.
Your very own chicken could be describing Michael J. Fox. Now what.
 
No, your reduction to absurdity doesn't fly. just like chicken
 
One thing's for sure, though: he sure as hell ain't chickeny. That has been literally said zero times of him.
So you lose. I win. Again.
 
I think you'll find that Michael J Fox is a human, and humans have been descibed as chickeny
I win some more
 
@MattЭллен I am offended by the implication that my arguments have to first be reduced to absurdity.
They come ready for consumption straight out of the box.
 
No added water! Better than chicken
 
1:41 PM
Chicken is just one sound away from a fucking German.
 
Recordings one feels one must play over and over again
 
That is a garden path sentence with no exit.
"One feels one" sounds like the latest hit of George Michael's.
 
It's only gay if the ones do not touch.
 
1
Q: What's a common way to refer to the algae that is attached to the bottom of a stream/river?

janoChenI'm referring to this: What's a common name to refer to it? Or is algae common enough? (I know seaweed isn't very proper since it's not in the sea).

0
Q: How refer to the "strands" of algae and their movement in a current?

janoChenI'm referring to the algae attached at the bottom of a river. The one with long "leaves/stands." How are those "extensions" called? And which verb to use to describe their movement with the flow of the rive (I need everyday terminology not scientific one.) Examine: I saw some algae at the bo...

dupe?
 
1:46 PM
Ask him. I've long lost track of his strand of thought. That book's gonna be the bomb-.
 
@RegDwigнt You have recordings of Germans fucking?
 
Note Peter Shor's surprise at learning the truth
 
@tchrist you don't? This is the Internet, it's one click away.
 
Think of the children!
 
@RegDwigнt Nobody calls him chicken. Nobody.
 
2:00 PM
Chicken can be used, usually by gay men referring to other gay men, to mean a young gay man or young-appearing gay man - stereotypically describing an adolescent youth, usually one with an innocent nature. Author Bruce Rodgers defines the term as "1. any boy under the age of consent, heterosexual, fair of face, and unfamiliar with homosexuality ("So many chickens were flapping around that I thought we were touring Colonel Sanders' plantation”) 2. juvenile, youthful, young-looking." Others have defined it as a young man who engages in sex for money or favors. In the subculture of the gay ...
 
@tchrist In Russian it's cock.
Which in English is of course taken for non-gay stuff.
 
@RegDwigнt I think English has plenty of gay stuff associated with that.
 
Cocky.
 
Cockney.
 
2:02 PM
coxswain
coxswained
coxswainless
coxswainship
 
@tchrist yeah first they took gay for themselves, then they took cock. Next they'll take chicken and it'll be too late.
 
Notice the cox’s wain’s hip.
Chicken works better than worms for gay baiting hooks, but only marginally.
 
2:59 PM
So... is this a more appropriate question for Writers.SE?
1
Q: Using quotes around a nickname that's in the possive

user54741I wanted to send a reading list to my dad about the state of the economy. One such commentator is known as "Dr. Doom". I went to write : "Dr. Doom's" view is ... but that didn't look right because his name is Dr. Doom, not Dr. Doom's, so I tried "Dr. Doom"'s view is ... but that looked pretty t...

I'm still trying to understand the differences between EL&U and Writers.
 
This is a question about punctuation. That is not normally covered at writers, afaik
it's covered here quite often
 
@MattЭллен Really? Bizarre. This doesn't seem like something EL&U can really answer, though. This is purely a stylistic opinion question.
 
yeah, it's for ELU
 
Not that I'm complaining about having it here.
 
i answered it
 
3:06 PM
 
It just means that I still have no clue what Writers is for. :P
@JSBձոգչ Right, but your answer is purely Writing advice, yes?
It isn't answering the question from an English punctuation perspective.
You just dodged the real question which is "How do I mark possessives when the noun is in quotes?"
Which, again, I think is a totally appropriate answer.
Namely the answer is, "You don't. Re-write it."
0
Q: Possessive pronouns in research papers

NickContrast: In order to develop a relationship between the energy spectra and their corresponding Fourier transforms... with In order to develop a relationship between the energy spectra and the Fourier transforms corresponding to these spectra The first, in my opinion, sounds much smoo...

Alright, how about that one?
 
his is a grammatical question with a writing example
 
Also, is there a way to search for questions that have been closed for a particular reason?
 
he wants to know if a possessive pronoun can be used when the antecedent is inanimate
the answer is "yes, duh"
 
"The first, in my opinion, sounds much smoother and more natural. But I'm using a possessive personal pronounce with "spectra". Is this allowed in a formal document like a research article?"
So you are reading "Is this allowed" as a grammar question?
 
3:12 PM
yep
 
I guess that makes sense
 
well he's misunderstood their to be personal
 
@JSBձոգչ Mmk. Thanks for the input.
 
Hiya. I have a workplace politics thing that I'd like to discuss. Anyone feel like it?
 
I'm around for 40 minutes more. What's up?
 
3:19 PM
(Yes, I am seeking advice.)
(Opinions, even.)
 
@JSBձոգչ I don't think I was quite that blunt.
 
my opinion is that we'll all be out of work in a decade, as we're faced with the consequences of rampant global warming
 
@KitFox sounds fun but I'm in a hurry, ask fast?
 
@AndrewLeach i was the one being blunt. you are much more polite.
@Kit give me your workplace politics
 
OK. Yesterday, we had a meeting with 4 employees and 2 bosses in which we discussed the meeting we are having today in 2 hours.
The purpose of this upcoming meeting is ostensibly to learn from the woman who is leaving where she got her data.
 
3:22 PM
Pre-meeting. Must be serious.
 
ominous
 
[x] Baklava|meta meetings
 
It was obvious to me in the pre-meeting that the bosses want the 4 of us to grill her on her methods and find fault with everything she did.
The woman who is leaving is the wife of the former project lead who up and quit last month, giving just one week of notice.
 
So they want to get at him through her?
 
3:25 PM
why is there even any confusion about "where she got her data"?
in any case, i would abstain from a mandatory two-minutes hate
 
Yeah, I don't much like her, and I'm pretty sure her work is crap at best. I thought so when her husband wrote the grant to hire her, and suspected that she didn't do anything while she was here. And the boss seems to think that we should all be as surprised as he is pretending to be that he didn't hold her accountable for any work so she didn't produce any.
 
ask nicely and politely, and ask about things you actually need to know
 
@JSBձոգչ That's what I want to do and that's what I said in the pre-meeting.
I made it very obvious that I didn't want to participate in evaluating the work of a person who was leaving.
 
It does seem more of a managerieal pasttime
 
And that I consider it a waste of time to have 4 people taken off task so that we can all write down the website and tables that she used.
 
3:27 PM
not something someone who is not her manager should be wasting time on
 
@MattЭллен I do
 
Well, her manager was her husband, except that the big boss was her manager.
Because her husband couldn't be.
 
@AndrewLeach ha! I make that mistake all the time :D
 
@KitFox So the big boss needs to find out where the data came from.
Or ask to see her documentation which explains it.
And if there isn't any of that, ask for what it should have contained.
 
sounds like the big boss has been negligent by letting her husband be her de facto manager, and is now involved in a CYA operation
 
3:28 PM
I agree, but he seems much more focused on slinging mud.
 
There's no point in doing that if it's going to obscure getting what you need.
 
And the long and short of it is that I am not sure what to do. I don't like her, I don't like the boss either, but I really don't like what I'm being asked to do.
 
go with the plan of being courteous. the boss can hardly cite you for refusing to be mean.
but get the stuff you need to get
 
Thing is, I don't need shit. It's not my project, it's not my problem.
 
aha
 
3:32 PM
yeah. get what is imporant.
oh
 
All he wants, all he cares about, is that we tell him all the things she did wrong.
 
Isn't that obvious without the meeting?
 
Yes, I think so. Which is what makes the meeting feel even worse.
 
So let others drive the meeting. Just chime in when you have something useful to ask.
 
Can you point out to the boss that you're not needed at the meeting because she's not handing anything over to you?
 
3:35 PM
No, that won't work, but thanks.
I am concerned that is it going to go down like this for me when I quit.
 
seems unlikely. you actually do work
 
@KitFox what is the point in doing it?
 
That's a good question, @Johan, and one that I wonder why the bosses think that we won't ask.
That's a complex sentence.
What I mean is, the bosses evaded it in the pre-meeting.
 
Then the first thing is to ask that imo
 
We did ask it.
 
3:38 PM
and they bsed around it
 
And the long-winded answer amounted to "We don't have a reason."
 
So they've said it's important but not why it's important. Without a reason, it's not important.
 
gotta afk now, back in an hour or so
 
Yeah. It went like this: "In the conversations since she decided to leave, we've had some doubts about her methods, so we're asking you all to ask her about it so we can have a better understanding of what she's actually done."
"Well, what was her project/what was the context of her work?"
"It was all an open-ended research grant, so she was supposed to have developed her own research questions."
"So then whoever is taking over her data is going to ... write a report, or what?"
"No, no, whoever comes in next will, I guess, um, come up with their own research questions."
"With the same dataset?"
"Uh. Well, it will have to involve the [great big warehouse thingy]."
"So...we don't really need to know what her research was, or what she did then, it seems."
"Well, we need to get an idea of what she accomplished while she was here."
So. What does that sound like to you?
 
it sounds like they don't know how to manage people.
 
3:43 PM
laughs Ain't that the truth.
I just want to stay as far away from it as possible.
But I also feel like I should say something to someone because this just isn't right.
I should not be pitted against co-worker.
 
Maybe they want to try and get money back from the grant, or a grant extension so that they have enough money to pay for the next person
 
Why don't they just ask her what she accomplished?
 
And I guess they'd need someone who is not them to figure out the shortfalls of the leavers in order to do that
 
That's a really good question, @Andrew.
 
because otherwise maybe they just make it up
I don't know.
They could have at least tried to come up with a reason
 
3:45 PM
Or: why don't the four of you tell her the bosses want to know what she accomplished...
 
They said in the pre-meeting that they didn't want her to know that's what they were asking us to do.
Which made it feel worse.
 
So invite her to present a paper (however incomplete) on her research.
 
The meeting's in a little over an hour.
 
I'll not participate in bashing her, but I feel she's being treated unfairly. As a good union member, I feel like I ought to tell somebody.
Even though I don't like her.
And even though I think she's a hack.
And especially even though I think this is the fruit of the crappy management here that allowed her to be hired in the first place.
I am particularly pissed off that the boss is complaining about her not being productive when he was the one who never held her accountable.
 
3:51 PM
aye
 
I'm afraid that if they want to know what the results are, that's what needs to be asked. But I have Asperger's; I'm not known for subtlety.
 
Yes, that's it exactly. Their actions are not in accord with their words. They are lying.
They don't care about any of it. At the core, they want to make her miserable.
 
But she's leaving. And you're being made miserable.
All she has to worry about is not getting a reference.
 
She's leaving for another position in the same University.
 
With her husband?
 
3:56 PM
No.
He moved up. She moved sort of sideways and down.
She was hired here as a research associate to do her doctoral work. She's moving to a research assistantship in a different place.
But she never, never have been hired as a research associate. That was just so they could pay her a lot of money.
The assistantship stipend is about a quarter of her current salary.
 
I've gotta run. Good luck!
 
Thanks!
 
Would it do to make some sort of non-specific threat about her future position if she hasn't fully documented what she's done in the current one before she leaves?
 

« first day (1077 days earlier)      last day (3861 days later) »