I can’t believe even Lawler missed that the Indian was using present subjunctive after his even if — as hit is stad and stoken / in stori stif and stronge / with lel letteres loken / in londe so hatz ben longe. Don’t make me bring out Visser.
I am going to buy a public address system, such as they use in football stadiums, place the speakers outside my neighbours' front door, and play the Dies Irae from Mozart's Requiem continuously, 24 x 7 until they get the f***king hint and learn some f***king consideration.
Haha, as soon as I typed that, they turned the volume down. @Cerberus, are you my neighbour's sock puppet?
@DavidWallace I disagree. A related book has part of its subject matter in common with some other text. An unrelated book is just different, it has little in common.
@PeterPAD Relate and connect can be somewhat similar in some situations. But a word only gets its full meaning from its context.
I have a little confusion whether "smugness" implies a "low opinion of others" in contrast to a "high opinion of oneself"
I have consulted ODO and wiktionary; they showed the meaning of "Smugness" is
Smugness(noun)[ODO]: having or showing an excessive pride in oneself or one's achievements
...
The problem with that question is, if you ask me, that the example you quote is from a non-standard or low-quality text. It is rife with what I would call mistakes. Perhaps those mistakes are acceptable features of English spoken in India, but not in the Anglo-Saxon world, nor in other countries where people learn Anglo-Saxon English, if I may call it that. If you want to learn standard English, I advise you to make sure you don't pick up non-standard grammar from texts like that one. Read texts written in standard English (and by a skilled writer: many websites are poorly written). — Cerberus51 secs ago
@simchona Yeah, so I noticed. I'm actually not sure why this question should be closed?
Somebody should simply explain to him that no clear distinction is made between "high opinion of oneself" and "low opinion of others", since the two usually (or nearly always) coincide.
You are not obliged to respond if you don't feel you can help him.
Or if you don't feel like it.
@simchona: I believe I am showing the research my best. Do you think is there much to show here? If yes can you please explain what else that we can show in the given case. I am very happy to show that in my future posts. — Ramya30 secs ago
I have to agree with him or her: there is no lack of research in this particular question.
So my perticular question is, is the usage valid? Can adjectives like this be used in contrasting situations also?
Yes, we do that from time-to-time, particularly in conversation. In other-side-of-the-coin contexts, words are often used in ways that don't fit their precise definitions. For ...
JR's answer is OK.
He probably addresses the question and answers it too.
A sure sign of a bad question is that it's impossible to provide a good answer. And yet, here is a good answer. I would prefer for this question to stay.
Observing the debate between evolutionists and creationists, I've noticed that the evolutionists refer to their theory as "evolution" not "evolutionism," whereas they refer to the creationists' theory as "creationism" not "creation." Why the discrepancy? In addition to the grammatical considera...
I can think of two possible resolutions, but I don't know if either of them is the accepted view. I could ask someone, but it's not particularly important to me.
Is the theory of evolution, and specifically, theistic evolution, compatible with Islam? That is to say, is there any official doctrine in Islam (or if not agreed upon in Islam as a whole, in a specific sect or area of Islam) that teaches that evolution is expressly wrong?
Evolution in the sense of Darwinism is neither compatible with Islam nor with science. I strongly suggest you read the documentary movie named "Expelled". It is highly criticized but you must see the movie before judging the two sides. — owariDec 23 at 18:29
Now that Ahmadi has been suspended, and Gigili and Meysam have both lost interest, Owari is probably the most vocal of the Shi'a minority, on Islam.SE.
OK, I believe that evolution is true, but that Adam and Eve were created in Paradise. The Islamic version of the story with the apple is true. God expelling them from Paradise meant expelling them from the bodies they had there, and moving their souls into hominid bodies, which had evolved from apes and from which we are all descended.
But I would welcome it if some other Muslim could come along and correct me here.
I am absolutely not qualified to give my own interpretations of what I read in the Qur'an. So take the above with a grain of salt. It's only my personal belief as at today.
OK, but referring to it as an "interpretation" makes this a bit clearer. More to the point, once it has been interpreted, it is no longer the literal word of God, but a collaboration between God and the interpreter.
If we called it a "translation", we'd be suggesting that it's still the word of God. It would never be obvious that it's not a literal translation, because the poetic nature of the Qur'an would have been lost.
I have no objection to calling my English version of The Qur'an a "translation", other than the fact that I know there are people who would find it offensive if I did so.
But this is the reason why every Muslim should try to learn Arabic.
The Qur'an is very succinct with its language. That is part of its poetry, really. So, I would certainly expect that any interpretation of it would be considerably longer than the original.
I have an Indonesian friend, he's 23 years old and on his way to learn conversational English.
I told him that he needs to start reading books, but he's an ordinary Indonesian guy (they do not read books), so he's not convinced.
Maybe there is an easy to read, thin book that's exciting enough to keep someone like him entertained?
Currently he speaks like so: "you are so kinds" "could you help me and friend to practice about english on tusday?" "what time will you free?" "what place will you like?" "we will go to swim, are you agree?" "I'm less busy but layer I will join but I will late" "yes I will wait you"
I have an Indonesian friend, he's 23 years old and on his way to learn conversational English.
I told him that he needs to start reading books, but he's an ordinary Indonesian guy (they do not read books), so he's not convinced.
Maybe there is an easy to read, thin book that's exciting enough t...
@Tom This is fine to ask here in chat, but it isn't appropriate for the main site.
Try asking here again after the holidays.
We don't do discussions or open-ended questions on the main site, and your question there isn't about English language either, so it is really not suitable.
E.g., you can go to Rebrickable right now, then click on, oh I dunno, my sheep, and it will tell you which parts you are still missing. You can then click on the link "add to BrickLink wish list", and a popup will show you some XML you can copypaste.
@KitFox yes. And you can do more. You can, for example, create several wish lists (though I never did that), or click on the "By Shop" subtab, and it will show you which shops have the most parts from your list.
Let's say I spent a couple of hours yesterday sorting through my mother-in-law's box of LEGO because I remembered that I helped my nephew put Anakin's starfighter together several years ago.
You can also, on the wish list itself, set stuff such as max price, or min quantity, and then it will take that into account. You can also tell it to email you as soon as a part is available that suits these criteria.
Two classic failure modes when chatting 1) Making a joke and have to explain it was a joke 2) Try to help and offend someone by doing it :) I do both all the time
@KitFox yes, e.g. on BrickLink (Catalog -> Parts -> etc) or on Rebrickable. Both allow you to see exactly in which sets a given part in a given color was included.
@KitFox Well the thing with kids is, you can sort your stuff every which way, as soon as you're finished counting to three they'll be lying around unsorted again. In your driveway.
@KitFox so anyway, one possibility is to just look at the size of the thing and search for that. There are not that many pieces that are 6x8x4, or what have you.
I didn't see it there. I have some black crenelations and two large panels that look like they fit together to form a chamber. Probably the design hinged them with the crenelation at the top.
I'll look. I'll be back regularly after the New Year, but please ping me or email me if you're getting swamped, and I'll jump in.