Maybe. That’s just a model of my own (mis?)understanding. I haven’t read it anywhere.
Hm, the Wikipedia page opposes a comparative superlative to an absolute superlative. That may be what I was thinking, poorly.
In grammar, the superlative is the form of an adjective (or adverb) that indicates that the person or thing (or action) modified has the quality of the adjective (or adverb) to a degree greater than that of anything it is being compared to in a given context. English superlatives are typically formed with the suffix -est (e.g. healthiest, weakest) or the word most (most recent, most interesting).
In English
:Example of superlative: "she is [the] most beautiful [of all the women here tonight]"
Simply put; the word 'superlative' is defined as
*(a noun) an exaggerated mode of expression ...
> Superlatives with absolutes Some grammarians object to the use of the superlative or comparative with words such as full, complete, unique, or empty, which by definition already denote either a totality, an absence, or an absolute.
> In contrast to English, in the grammars of most romance languages the elative and the superlative are joined into the same degree (the superlative), which can be of two kinds: comparative (e.g. "the most beautiful") and absolute (e.g. "very beautiful").
But relative superlative sounds as bizarre as comparative superlative does.
> There is a difference between comparative superlative and absolute superlative: Ella es la más bella → (she is the most beautiful); Ella es bellísima → (she is extremely beautiful).
So she’s the smartest vs she’s super-smart. I guess.
> The absolute phrase is a sentence modifier, adding particular description. It's like a close-up shot in a movie that follows an establishing shot.
Where do they get these things?
> Usually (but not always, as we shall see), an absolute phrase (also called a nominative absolute) is a group of words consisting of a noun or pronoun and a participle as well as any related modifiers. Absolute phrases do not directly connect to or modify any specific word in the rest of the sentence; instead, they modify the entire sentence, adding information.
Their reputation as winners secured by victory, the New York Liberty charged into the semifinals.
The season nearly finished, Rebecca Lobo and Sophie Witherspoon emerged as true leaders.
The two superstars signed autographs into the night, their faces beaming happily.
The season [being] over, they were mobbed by fans in Times Square.
[Having been] Stars all their adult lives, they seemed used to the attention.
The old firefighter stood over the smoking ruins, his senses alert to any sign of another flare-up.
His subordinates, their faces sweat-streaked and smudged with ash, leaned heavily against the firetruck.
They knew all too well how all their hard work could be undone — in an instant.
Wait, these have other names:
Your best friends, where are they now, when you need them?
And then there was my best friend Sally — the dear girl — who has certainly fallen on hard times.
The first is a topicalizer.
The second is surely an appositive, isn’t it?
The Queen of Hearts She made some tarts, All on a summer's day;
The Knave of Hearts He stole those tarts, And took them clean away.
The King of Hearts Called for the tarts, And beat the knave full sore;
The Knave of Hearts Brought back the tarts, And vowed he'd steal no more.
Sounds like a sticky card game.
Did you know we have 18 dinosaur questions?
Dinosaurs are always popular.
After all, they won Herbert Hoover the 1928 US Presidential election.
1
Here is what I have written:
Is it too late to say, "Don't go. I'm sorry"?
Here is my question:
If I add a period after sorry, within the quotes, is it absolutely incorrect. I don't know why, but the above looks wrong.
Give us the day our daily dupe.