« first day (732 days earlier)      last day (4200 days later) » 

12:06 AM
@JSBձոգչ Which one did you say this was for? Where did you say this was from? What time did you say the movie was at? How can this be something you expect to get through? Whence came the hobbit’s ring? Who did you say was coming in? When did you say this was for? Whose shall the horn be? Whither was he bound? What has it come to? Whom then shall you condemn to enduring such tortuous syntax, if not in whole, then at least a part of?
 
12:26 AM
Hello, folks.
 
user19161
@StoneyB Welcome to this chat!
 
@StoneyB Hi there.
 
@WillHunting Rather chary of words tonight, aren’t you? Parsimony can bring but querimony.
 
I've promised MattUnicodellen a blogpost on What to Do When Your Q is Closed as GR. Supposing a person actually edits his Q, what if anything should he do to get people to take notice -- should, not can!
 
user19161
@StoneyB If it is not answered yet, he can actually just delete the old one and post a new one too.
 
12:30 AM
@WillHunting Do we really wish to encourage that?
That looks more like can than should.
 
@WillHunting Does that screw over folks who got an upvoted answer in before the Q was closed?
 
user19161
@tchrist Well, I think it is not a bad idea if the two are sufficiently distinct. It also helps to keep the site clean if the new question is well written and the old one poorly written.
 
user19161
@StoneyB Well, if an answer has been posted, the asker cannot delete the question anymore.
 
Should he Meta? Should he come to Chat and announce his born-againity?
 
Either.
 
user19161
12:32 AM
@StoneyB So much flowery language!
 
user19161
What did you just drink? Whisky?
 
@WillHunting Is one better than the other?
(sorry that was for @tchrist, but I got confused.
@WillHunting Alas, no ... drunk on words and too tipsy to remember the right ones.
 
user19161
@StoneyB You should go to bed then.
 
@WillHunting No more queruling!
 
@WillHunting A Pepysian recipe.
@tchrist Or we run the risk of a pheruling?
Pherulinguistics. That's got to be good for something.
 
user19161
12:39 AM
Ah ELL is still a long way to beta.
 
@StoneyB Either: chat is fine, or should our felinity prove wanting, then meta.
@StoneyB That’s the language of lighthouses.
 
@tchrist Hokey-dokey. Learn where the good dictionaries are, learn how to use a dictionary, fix the Q, bell the chat, metathesize. I have an Outline, just like a Real Writer.
 
user19161
@reg It is late so you should go to bed. Stop editing stuff on the main site.
 
@tchrist Unhappily lost when the Library burned.
@WillHunting You keep trying to send everybody to bed. Are you planning on throwing a party when it's empty?
 
user19161
@StoneyB I am waiting for everyone to start dreaming so that I can go to their dreams.
 
12:46 AM
@Mahnax You should try the -A option to oedlook, although you will probably often want to use -AX once you realize that you don’t want the xrefs all that very much.
@StoneyB It’s when he runs amok on the main site, editing everything willy-nilly, will we or nill we. And I assure you, we nill.
@WillHunting recommends Neil Gaiman’s Sandman series
 
@tchrist Dirty work, but somebody has to do it. ... If-and-when ELL reaches the Promised Land are all the questions going to migrate with the tired-poor-huddled masses yearning to be prescribed at?
 
@StoneyB Summarily unlikely, I aver.
 
@tchrist Tabula rasa. That's a relief.
 
@StoneyB Fear not: rascalry shall doubtless set in anon.
 
@tchrist I read Good Omens by him and Pratchett and it was fantastic.
 
12:57 AM
@tchrist I had this vision of a new Versailles: opposing mods carving up the corpus. We all remember how that turned out.
 
Corpuscularly.
 
@tchrist And crepuscularly. Cue Rheinmusik.
 
@Mahnax Really? Hm. Well, ok, but don’t spread this around: somebody leaked the entire opening track for the new movie. It won’t be up long, so listen while you can, if you care to. It’s quite nice, actually.
Think of it as an operatic overature.
 
@Mahnax Back to the 60s. I have Winnie Ille Pu around somewhere.
 
1:00 AM
@tchrist Oh, awesome! keeps quiet
 
user19161
@Mahnax You just made some noise.
 
@Mahnax I wish I could get my Safari to safe the current track via Opt-Command-A and double click, but apparently I’m too ancient.
@WillHunting You want noise?
@WillHunting Noise we can give you!
 
@WillHunting Shh.
 
I really like all the brass, and the minor key. And the interwoven leitmotifs.
 
Vale. @WillHunting, you may play your phonograph softly, but no girls.
 
1:14 AM
@Mahnax This “behind the scenes” video was just released a couple of days ago, apparently officially, although I haven’t seen an announcement, which confuses me; I prolly just missed it. Similarly these photos are immensely many, like 76. Both links are of course spoilerish-to-spoilerissimo, and delightful.
 
user19161
@StoneyB HAHAHAHA.
 
1:42 AM
Sometimes I feel like applying a , , , , , , or tag to all the megamyriad questions that are fundamentally incapable of conceiving of a world in which there can be more than one right answer to some spelling or grammar matter. Or less than one, for that matter. What in the world is wrong with people? It’s ridiculous, I tell you!
 
2:05 AM
Arthur eastward in arms purposed
his war to wage on the wild marches,
over seas sailing to Saxon lands,
from the Roman realm ruin defending.
Thus the tides of time to turn backward
and the heathen to humble, his hope urged him,
that with harrying ships they should hunt no more
on the shining shores and shallow waters
of South Britain, booty seeking.
Seeking booty they were.
 
2:21 AM
@tchrist It's built right into the site software too. Only one answer can be "accepted". Questions which invite lots of "correct" answers are forbidden.
 
2:39 AM
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 What is the correct spelling of /məˈnuːvər/? Am I supposed to spell it manœuvre, manœuver, manoeuvre, manoeuver, maneuvre, maneuver, mainour, or manure? I can find all those used in books, so I need to know which single one of those is right so I can not use the all the wrong ones. Can anybody pleaze help me!??? I need to know the grammatical answer right now for my thesis. Thx in advance!!!
Answer: manure.
 
@tchrist of course. The feces thesis.
And while you're getting all boldy about this, I'm building a tiny wall for miniature men of Rohan to defend from similarly tiny uruk-hai.
 
Although it's a bid odd that they included Eomer in the set considering in the movie he wasn't there for the battle of Helm's Deep.
 
Erkenbrand.
bit it.
 
yeah
well, the movie simplified it and it didn't so much harm the story, excepting the implausibility of men of Rohan carrying out an order to banish Eomer.
But that isn't the worst plot hole introduced in the second movie, so I'll ignore it
 
2:46 AM
The second movie is a pit.
 
The most annoying mistake in the whole trilogy is the part where all the horses disappear at the gate of Mordor.
 
> a. Fr. manœuvre (OFr. also manuevre, maneuvre, 13th c.) = Pr. manovra, Sp. maniobra, Pg. manobra, Ital. manovra: -late L. manopera, vbl. sb. from manoperāre: see manœuvre v., which occurs in Fr. earlier than the sb. The OFr. word is represented in Eng. by mainour and manure sbs.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Ya think? I could come up with a couple of dozen more than pissed me off more.
 
@tchrist Oh, there are lots of mistakes. That's the one that makes me grit my teeth.
 
I’m glad we no longer have those interminable manoperas of old. They were just too lame to live! I mean, come on, how the hell is it supposed to ever get over without a fat lady to sing?
 
That's the one that says, more than almost anything else wrong in the train-wreck of film production which was part III: "We are out of time and no longer know what we are doing"
 
2:51 AM
I really don’t feel like ranting. It saps me. The first movie was least bad.
Then he got cocky/stupid.
How can’t this be off-topic?
0
Q: Is programming easier to learn for English native speakers?

DanielEven knowing that logic is the core to learn computer programming, I'm wondering to know if there are any studies showing that natives can learn programming faster/easier than non-natives. The reason for that seems obvious, since all the programming languages make use of English for them syntax.

Plus it’s wrong.
Dumb dumb dumb.
Bad programmer, obviously.
I wish @Reg were here for that one.
 
welp, I guess Sim is here, cuz she closed it
 
He doesn’t have a good history.
 
@tchrist I agree. But the second and third books are harder to make into good films, IMO... and he had less time to do them.
 
I don’t know. The BBC Radio dramas are just fine. Why do you think he had less time?
More crappy proofreading. Gosh!
-1
Q: 'of yet' and 'as of yet'

user30551Can ‘of yet’ be used with the same meaning of ‘as of yet’? [example] Most importantly, he’s found footprints of dinosaurs that we haven’t found bones of yet.

I answered it instead of closing. I can’t decide if that was a good deed or a fell one.
It shows no research.
It’s just a question.
0
A: A noun for "someone who pays/compensates a part of a bill"?

April GardnerI am developing a web application, which will be used by medical clinics. Initially, patients get an invoice for the treatment(s) they received. Dependent upon the individual choices made by the patient, a part of the cost(s) may be paid by a third party to their medical care. Two examples 1. A...

Q ≠ A
@simchona Actually, there is something worse than weird with that one. Notice how she signs it “Jonathan”, as though she were the OP. I am really confused.
 
3:09 AM
@tchrist Because he had more than one year to make the first movie, and then only one year to make each subsequent movie. Also, while doing the second and third movies, he had to divert attention to the DVDs and extended releases, etc. He discussed it in the special features. In fact the third movie was so rushed that he never saw the completed movie before the premiere. There was one scene which wasn't yet finished in the "final" cut; he okayed that cut before that "ring melting" fx were done.
Anyway, I'm outta here. bye all
 
 
2 hours later…
5:30 AM
0
Q: Does English language stand special in terms of phonology?

AnixxI am a native Russian speaker. When I am listening to songs and music in other languages, which I do not know, such as Italian, Romanian, Greek, Bulgarian, and even Japanese, Finnish and Hebrew, I usually can write what I hear with Russian letters (with possibly adding 1 to 3 additional characte...

> When listening to English songs I can barely understand anything even though I can write and read in English well...as if they were singing with extraterrestrial non-human sounds or if it was just a noise rather than human speech.
Eat that, Britney.
I knew she was from Mars.
 
 
5 hours later…
10:18 AM
Hi
 
user19161
@Noah Hi!
 
Hi @WillHunting
What's up, dude?
 
user19161
I think that inhabitant is Nortonn S in disguise.
 
2
Q: Is "Thanks a ton" commonly used phrase?

inhabitantIs this correct to say so? Does this mean the same as "thanks a lot"?

Omm, that sucks
 
user19161
You have been tricked into answering him.
 
10:22 AM
Shouldnt have wasted my time
Hope it's not him.
 
user19161
Anyway, I don't bother about NS anymore, just let him post whatever he wants, as long as it is not rubbish.
 
But I dont know if he is really interested in learning English. I dont know where he comes from.
 
user19161
Wherever he comes from, he is from this planet.
 
Often, he tries to copy stuff from Yahoo answers and post it here.
 
user19161
On the other hand, I often feel I don't belong to this planet.
 
10:24 AM
I thought he was from Mars
I dont know abouot you, but I AM NOT FROM HERE
I come from Mars.
 
user19161
Hahaha, OK.
 
Here comes the commute guy
 
user19161
The guy who says Ouvert et haut !
 
I often get confused between commute and communist.
 
No, the guy who says "whoosh".
 
10:26 AM
Exactly
@RegDwighт That's used for animals
 
user19161
Ouvert et haut is so funny that I keep saying it and keep laughing.
 
@WillHunting Have to write this down.
 
user19161
@Noah I am not even sure what it means, haha.
 
Me niether. I was gonna ask you about its meaning
 
user19161
Might be something like Over and out! in French, or a pun on it.
 
user19161
10:29 AM
Better not say it outside, it might be a curse word.
 
Could be. But you never know and this guy is more like an innovator. So be careful with what he says.
 
user19161
I know some curse words in Tamil.
 
Do you?
 
user19161
Yes.
 
For example?
 
user19161
10:30 AM
Better not say here, too vulgar.
 
Okay. Is there a google translate for Tamil?
 
Yes.
 
user19161
I don't know.
 
Why don't you just check?
 
Fair enough. Let me do that
@RegDwighт Okay, there is. Confirmed!
 
10:32 AM
As demonstrated above, looking it up is actually faster than typing "I don't know". Consequently, it must be faster still than typing "Okay. Is there a google translate for Tamil?"
 
user19161
@Noah I use OK and not okay.
 
> okay |ˈōˈkā|
exclam.adjectiveadverbnoun& verb
variant spelling of OK1.
NOAD
 
user19161
@Noah It is correct, I just don't use it.
 
It saves one keystroke!
 
Okay. I am just used to the many <strikethrough>key</strikethrough>strokes...
 
user19161
10:34 AM
I am surprised almost everyone uses okay in SE chat rooms.
 
I think we are more traditionalists :)
 
user19161
OK is shorter and is the original form.
 
OK
 
user19161
I don't see any advantage in using okay.
 
But it's difficult to hold the shift key for two letters.
 
user19161
10:37 AM
The same applies to DJ and MC.
 
Well, technically the original form is ten characters longer.
 
And what's that? @RegDwighт
 
Oct 21 at 15:06, by RegDwighт
Oll korrekt.
 
user19161
Bullshit!
 
> ORIGIN mid 19th cent.: probably an abbreviation of orl korrect, humorous form of all correct, popularized as a slogan during President Van Buren's re-election campaign of 1840; his nickname Old Kinderhook (derived from his birthplace) provided the initials.
He is right, @WillHunting
 
10:38 AM
He knows it.
No idea why he's BSing me all of a sudden.
 
user19161
@Noah He said Oll korrekt.
 
No, I quoted Oll korrekt.
 
user19161
The Asses are made to bear question invited many naughty comments.
 
@WillHunting He might have a license for this. I think it has to do with his Ouvert et haut personality.
 
user19161
@Noah HAHAHA
 
10:45 AM
Okay, guys. toodle-pip
 
user19161
@Noah Haha, Matt = toodles, Reg = Ouvert et haut, Cerb = poof. QED.
 
user19161
They should lock the post when it is being edited. Sometimes people think their good edits are not accepted because it is being overridden by a more substantial one.
 
12:04 PM
@tchrist has been watching too much Jessica Alba. english.stackexchange.com/posts/10440/revisions
 
is a synonym of ?
yes. yes it is.
 
Hm. Not quite sure why he added the tag to begin with. -ible is not mentioned at all in that question. Or the answers.
 
i would rather have made the root tag, but wevs
 
4
Q: Tag synonym suggestions

jbelacquaI don't know if there should be a single thread for proposed tag synonyms, but I'll go ahead and leave this relatively generic in case that's desirable (and assuming there's not already a thread for this I've missed). One issue that might be controversial is the fact that "common use" and techn...

@JSBձոգչ because it's a less frightening word?
I think I argued on meta once that spelling is only one part of orthography.
 
@RegDwighт because anyone not us language nerds will use
however, as long as we map spelling -> orthography automatically it doesn't really matter
 
12:07 PM
Well if they are synonyms, they'll get remapped anyway.
Jinx.
3
A: Could mods catalyze synonym voting?

RegDwighтOkay so I've done some house cleaning. programming-terminology has been merged into programming. I couldn't quite make out a meaningful difference between the two. suffix has been merged into suffixes. Not the other way round, mind you, since a) we generally prefer plural in tags, and b) some q...

There you go.
> spelling has been merged into orthography. Again, not the other way round, because...
 
The upper one is orthography, and the lower spelling? Doesn't look very ortho to me.
 
1:07 PM
I suggest we merge with .
 
1:22 PM
0
Q: Is this past particle to be changed to present particle?

user30551In this sentence, is the past particle of ‘clasped’ in ‘with his hands clasped over his fat bottom’ to be changed to ‘clasping’? He brought the umbrella swishing down through the air to point at Dudley — there was a flash of violet light, a sound like a firecracker, a sharp squeal, and the ne...

A Google Books search turns up over 400 results for clasping over. Any idea why Barrie thinks it's incorrect.
I understand that clasped over is much more common, but I am curious to know why these many results are there for "clasping over".
@Robusto
 
@HenningKlevjer see:
 
@Noah Think of clasp the way you might think of grab. You can clasp a knife, or your bottom, the same way you can grab either.
 
7
Q: How to deal with abbreviations like 'etc.' at the end of parenthesis which are closing a sentence?

nyuszika7hIn Hungarian, when there's a dot both inside and outside parens at the end of a sentence, we write it as follows: Sok állatom van (kutya, macska stb.). (Meaning: I've got many animals [dogs, cats, etc.]) I'm not sure though how do we write it in English. I've got many animals (dogs, cats...

and
31
Q: When "etc." is at the end of a phrase, do you place a period after it?

ShimmyExample: It's all about apples, oranges, bananas, etc. VS. It's all about apples, oranges, bananas, etc..

Tweened by Rob. What an awful thing to start a day with. Disheartening.
 
2:14 PM
@RegDwighт Brilliant! Thanks!
 
SNOW!!!!
☃☃☃☃☃☃☃☃
 
That's one dumb character. Barely discernible even at font size 48.
 
depends on the font, i suppose
 
2:32 PM
Can anyone here read Chinese?
 
@RegDwighт Ya gets what ya pays for. If you enroll in my premium service, I will put maximum effort into not tweening you.
@JSBձոգչ Are snow and snot synonyms? If not, why not?
 
@Robusto I can't pay you except in very old shoes.
 
@Robusto closed as meaningless whining
 
@RegDwighт I was looking for old rope. Sorry.
@JSBձոգչ Meaningless? I hope all your snow turns to snot.
 
I guess it is not entirely impossible to make at least some rope out of old shoes.
It's but a guess, though.
 
2:37 PM
Especially espadrilles.
 
Esplain how.
 
Closed as Gen Ref.
BTW, did I entrance you all with my entrance? Thot so.
 
@Robusto The only occurrence of "how" on that page is in Fashion Roundup: Karl Lagerfeld Discusses the Chanel Runway Show; ... by Irina Aleksander / The New York Observer.
 
Stephen James "Steve" Howe (born 8 April 1947 in Holloway, North London, England) is an English guitarist, known for his work with the progressive rock group Yes. He has also been a member of The Syndicats, Bodast, Tomorrow, Asia and GTR, as well as having released 19 solo albums as of 2010. Early influences Howe was the youngest of four children who grew up in a musical household listening to brass band music on 78 rpm records. He cites several influences from his parents' record collection including Les Paul and the singer Tennessee Ernie Ford who had Speedy West and Jimmy Bryant playin...
There, feel better now?
 
As if Asia needed another member.
Not Asia Carrera, mind you.
 
2:41 PM
Shows what you know. He is mainly famous for his work with Yes.
 
No.
Not famous at all.
 
Yes.
Yes!
 
I'm not saying that I'm not digging up the Argument Clinic video again again.
 
Yes you are.
 
No you aren't.
 
2:42 PM
No UR.
 
No urtext.
 
Kein Urtext? Wie herrlich, Herr Dwight.
 
Ich habe gar keine Uhr.
 
How do you clock in, then?
 
I don't. I watch instead.
 
2:44 PM
Time isn't on your side.
 
Seim is on my tide.
 
Siemens on your tide?
Or tied on your semens?
 
Seim, or Mende, is a Sepik language of Papua New Guinea. References
That is all you need to know. Proudly brought to you by Laconipedia.
 
Siemens AG () is a German multinational engineering and electronics conglomerate company headquartered in Munich, Germany. It is the largest Europe-based electronics and electrical engineering company. Siemens' principal activities are in the fields of industry, energy, transportation and healthcare. It is organized into five main divisions: Industry, Energy, Healthcare, Infrastructure & Cities, and Siemens Financial Services (SFS). Siemens and its subsidiaries employ approximately 360,000 people across nearly 190 countries and reported global revenue of approx 73.5 billion euros for the...
 
Never heard of them.
 
2:46 PM
Das is alles, was Du kennen sollst.
 
Ich will aber nicht.
 
Weiss nicht, sorg' nicht.
 
Wow, Robusto has just invented (himself as) a real-time Google Translate.
 
Hold your applause.
 
Come all here, listen what he to say has.
 
2:47 PM
Yes. Listen to the mean mod who would rather ridicule than help. Tickets are free!
 
@Zairja yes, a little
 
Note that I feel just as good as I did before your ridicule. So you may spare yourself the trouble next time.
 
That's more than "a little Chinese" ...
 
is there some kind of wine or alcohol in this menu?
 
2:49 PM
That's a big Chinese.
 
@Robusto I never rid any cul. No idea what you're talking about.
 
Uh-huh.
> I never thought I'd say this, but can I go work now?
 
@Robusto lol well it's a list of food items, maybe drink, I'm just trying to determine what's on it in general heh
 
@Robusto You can try.
Make sure to avoid cul de sex on your way.
 
@Zairja That list exceeds my food vocab. Do you have a higher-resolution image? OCR for chinese works fairly well
 
2:51 PM
It's something with mountain, river, and three.
I can't get any more general than that.
 
@Zairja I would guess that, in general, it's Chinese food.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Afraid I don't else I would go for the OCR.
@Robusto Well, yes, it is. I'm just wondering about some of the dish names or drink names. If it's stuff like "beef with vegetable" or if it translates to something different. Thanks anyway though! :)
 
@Zairja I could be wrong but it doesn't look like drinks to me
 
@Zairja I would stay away from the ones with the character for "horse" in them. Also dog.
 
@Robusto Solid advice, to be sure.
 
2:55 PM
What is the last sign after the slash? The corresponding count word?
 
@RegDwighт I don't think so. The item count is listed on the left (cropped out).
 
MK.
 
It looks like 例
But I'm not familiar with how it's used for this
 
Maybe just "regular"
 
@RegDwighт Seeing as how yesterday was November 11th, people were talking about our two World Wars. I facepalmed to hear them call WW1 "just" the "prequel" to WW2 — obviously malapropping prelude. This happens ridiculously often. They completely misunderstand that a prequel must be a story that happens earlier but is written later.
 
3:01 PM
I should just call up the Westin Xi'an, but it's a trifle, like many of my interests hehe.
 
@tchrist Well seeing how just a couple years ago the word prequel didn't make sense to begin with, I am not surprised to see it not making sense again.
 
The Hobbit - J.R.R. Tolkien (Prequel to Lord of Rings) 0345339681 ...
www.ebay.com/itm/Hobbit-J-R...Tolkien-Prequel...-/310457626309
 Rating: 5 - 27 votes
The Hobbit - J.R.R. Tolkien (Prequel to Lord of Rings) in Books, Nonfiction | eBay.
That is just so wrong in so many ways.
 
Harhar. Serves that damn Tolkien right.
I would really love to see his reaction.
 
> "The Hobbit" is J.R.R. Tolkien's prequel to his popular fantasy series, "The Lord of the Rings." The children's book follows the adventures of ...
Idiot. Sheer idiots.
 
Ease up. Not the first word to suffer that fate. No word has any sense other than the one you give it. Everybody is a Humpty Dumpty.
 
3:04 PM
Tolkien himself did actually use the word prequel, and put it in scare-quotes no less, recognizing it as a brutal neologism. But he did not use it for what people are now using it for. He used it for a story that backfills the backstory, written afterwards.
 
It could be worse. They could write something like: "The Hobbit" intros "The Lord of the Rings".
 
Episode I.
 
It could be worse. They could be talking about how The Hobbit was retconned into being a prequel.
 
It will be worse. People will think that The Hobbit was written by Disney.
 
Star Trek: The Original Series is called the prequel to the Next Generation.
 
3:06 PM
They already think that of countless Brother Grimm's stories.
 
@RegDwighт Trying to finish off Christopher now, too?
You can tell that Disney did The Hobbit because of the songs. Plus if it weren’t Disney, there’d be more sex.
 
@Zairja So the first line in your menu is probably 盐水虾花/例 which is "saltwater shrimp flower/case" according to GT
 
It is now impossible to Google for the actual quote wherein the Professor actually used the word prequel. Damn it.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Sounds pretty. . . maybe. :)
 
@Zairja I had to do a bit of guessing for that one. The character for "shrimp" is almost the same as "insect under" and I got confused. 虾 -> 虫下
 
3:11 PM
 
I like the related Wonka Wilder video.
 
3:30 PM
@tchrist See the prescriptivist.
 
the stars have all gone out of the sky... i mean the sidebar
-1
A: Meaning of "reach out to somebody"

tchrist“Reach out” is just so much mindless business twaddle. There are lots of web pages excoriating its promulgators. For example, John Smurf’s MBA Jargon Watch defines it as follows: reach out (v.) To call or email. For this one, we can blame those old AT&T ads that encouraged folks to...

tsk, tsk. this is peeving disguised as an answer.
2
 
Teehee.
 
i shan't deny any man the right to peeve here in chat, but c'mon. give the poor pineapple his answer
 
@JSBձոգչ It explains what it means. I provide four citations documenting its meaning.
You, in contrast, fail to mention the opprobrium the term garners, leading readers into temptation but never delivering them from evil.
 
3:45 PM
@tchrist you edited it. the initial revision had no such explanation.
nonetheless, i shall rescind your downvote
 
Thanks. It was the 1st Post thing.
How odd! When I tag it , it gets rewritten to . Perhaps would work better.
@StoneyB has coined twaddleity, which sounds unsettlingly close to twat laity in the mouths of most North Americans.
 
4:19 PM
i would like to meet the twat clergy
 
You’ll have to go Canada for that.
Specifically, to Nunavut.
 
4:40 PM
What is an “absolute phrase”, anyway? The ESLlers keep using it, but I have never heard it before.
 
I am going to absolutely commute.
C absolutely U.
 
It sounds like they're describing apposition?
Well, no. . .
 
@Jez This Pharyngula post is somewhat timely considering our conversation about religion the other day
 
The chompchomp site description makes no sense to me: "Rather than modifying a specific word, an absolute phrase will describe the whole clause"
The phrase does modify a specific thing.
 
4:47 PM
@Zairja Yeah I read that page 3 times and felt a bit dumber each time.
 
I’ve heard of an “absolute superlative” before.
 
Jez
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 i don't see how that particularly pertains to the discussion
 
For the better of two items, you use the comparative. For the best of three or more items, you use the superlative. But — and I may have this wrong — when you are saying that something is #1 max of the entire universe of such items — you use the absolute superlative.
 
@Jez Wasn't there some discussion about fairness and how it's unfair, but Jesus dies for your sins to it's all cool, or something? Maybe I just read that while clicking through on christianity.se which I should really avoid.
 
Maybe. That’s just a model of my own (mis?)understanding. I haven’t read it anywhere.
Hm, the Wikipedia page opposes a comparative superlative to an absolute superlative. That may be what I was thinking, poorly.
In grammar, the superlative is the form of an adjective (or adverb) that indicates that the person or thing (or action) modified has the quality of the adjective (or adverb) to a degree greater than that of anything it is being compared to in a given context. English superlatives are typically formed with the suffix -est (e.g. healthiest, weakest) or the word most (most recent, most interesting). In English :Example of superlative: "she is [the] most beautiful [of all the women here tonight]" Simply put; the word 'superlative' is defined as *(a noun) an exaggerated mode of expression ...
> Superlatives with absolutes Some grammarians object to the use of the superlative or comparative with words such as full, complete, unique, or empty, which by definition already denote either a totality, an absence, or an absolute.
> In contrast to English, in the grammars of most romance languages the elative and the superlative are joined into the same degree (the superlative), which can be of two kinds: comparative (e.g. "the most beautiful") and absolute (e.g. "very beautiful").
“Elative”?
Must be relative.
But relative superlative sounds as bizarre as comparative superlative does.
> There is a difference between comparative superlative and absolute superlative: Ella es la más bella → (she is the most beautiful); Ella es bellísima → (she is extremely beautiful).
So she’s the smartest vs she’s super-smart. I guess.
> The absolute phrase is a sentence modifier, adding particular description. It's like a close-up shot in a movie that follows an establishing shot.
Where do they get these things?
> Usually (but not always, as we shall see), an absolute phrase (also called a nominative absolute) is a group of words consisting of a noun or pronoun and a participle as well as any related modifiers. Absolute phrases do not directly connect to or modify any specific word in the rest of the sentence; instead, they modify the entire sentence, adding information.
Their reputation as winners secured by victory, the New York Liberty charged into the semifinals.
The season nearly finished, Rebecca Lobo and Sophie Witherspoon emerged as true leaders.
The two superstars signed autographs into the night, their faces beaming happily.
The season [being] over, they were mobbed by fans in Times Square.
[Having been] Stars all their adult lives, they seemed used to the attention.
The old firefighter stood over the smoking ruins, his senses alert to any sign of another flare-up.
His subordinates, their faces sweat-streaked and smudged with ash, leaned heavily against the firetruck.
They knew all too well how all their hard work could be undone — in an instant.
Wait, these have other names:
Your best friends, where are they now, when you need them?
And then there was my best friend Sally — the dear girl — who has certainly fallen on hard times.
The first is a topicalizer.
The second is surely an appositive, isn’t it?
The Queen of Hearts She made some tarts, All on a summer's day;
The Knave of Hearts He stole those tarts, And took them clean away.
The King of Hearts Called for the tarts, And beat the knave full sore;
The Knave of Hearts Brought back the tarts, And vowed he'd steal no more.
Sounds like a sticky card game.
Did you know we have 18 dinosaur questions?
Well, or answers.
Dinosaurs are always popular.
After all, they won Herbert Hoover the 1928 US Presidential election.
1
Q: Punctuation outside of quotes

tylerharmsHere is what I have written: Is it too late to say, "Don't go. I'm sorry"? Here is my question: If I add a period after sorry, within the quotes, is it absolutely incorrect. I don't know why, but the above looks wrong.

Give us the day our daily dupe.
 
5:23 PM
> 1606 Shaks. Ant. & Cl. iv. ix. 30 ― The hand of death hath raught him.
Not What hath God wrought? after all.
This one is more like wrenched than reached:
> 1863 W. Lancaster Praeterita 51 ― Old confusions, which··Raught from my helm the garland of its praise.
Did they posthumously rename Tweedle-Dee to Twaddle-Did?
 
@tchrist Think ablative absolute.
In English, there is the absolute construction.
You could call it the nominative absolute, but it is normally called absolute construction.
@Zairja But it does not modify another constituent.
It functions as an adverbial constituent itself.
A satellite/adjunct, normally.
[image deleted by mod because of virus warning]
Venice flooded (again).
New moving dikes will be operational in 2014.
 
5:56 PM
Santorum on Mitt Romney
@Cerberus I don't know that I'd be sitting out in floodwash.
 
@MετάEd How else would you get an espresso at that time of day? sheesh, think, man!
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I'd make one in my abode on high ground.
@tchrist Did I see you argue that The Hobbit can't be a prequel?
 

« first day (732 days earlier)      last day (4200 days later) »