« first day (155 days earlier)      last day (4766 days later) » 
00:00 - 17:0017:00 - 00:00

5:05 PM
@MrHen It is also a duplicate.
 
@kiamlaluno I was just gonna say that.
 
I am sure there is a question about "the route," but I cannot find it, right now.
 
Oh, wait, no it isn't: this is an old question.
There's a related question, but not a duplicate.
1
A: Differences between American dialects?

MarthaI can't tell apart the various accents, either, other than to know that I'm hearing one. My one story about dialect differences came shortly after I moved to the Philly area, and happened to mention the 202. The person I was speaking to got inexplicably amused, and brought her friend over and ha...

 
Oh, right. The duplicate I was talking of is the question itself.
I thought it was an older question.
Is it possible to close a question because it's a duplicate of itself? ;-)
 
Haha, someone downvoted an answer of mine with "ass" in it. I wonder if it had to do with the swearing...
1
Q: Is there a literary term for the circular nature of a story?

imineiIs there a literary term for the circular nature of a story, starting in place a, going on to b and c before returning to complete at a again?

This should probably be moved to Writers.SE
See the comments in response to my answer.
 
5:16 PM
So, going back to thwacking: a rolled-up newspaper is indeed a good thwacking tool for halfhearted or inadvertent puns. It's also a good reinforcement device for trainees who have learned the error of their ways, and just need the occasional reminder. Unfortunately, nobody on EL&U has yet reached this stage.
 
It is vaguely on topic here but Writers would probably have a more appropriate set of experts
@Martha See, where you thwack I fling chalk and 3x5s.
Or just walk over and punch them, depending.
 
@MrHen Since it's asking for the name of the technique, I'd say it's on-topic. Could use better tagging, though.
 
@Martha Yeah, but it would have been a much better question for the Writers. It isn't a question about a technical term for English; it is asking about a technical term for literature.
It is a minor point and I don't mind one way or the other.
But I don't mind throwing Writers a few bones.
 
@MrHen Which answer is it?
 
1
A: Is there a literary term for the circular nature of a story?

MrHenYour question is a tad broad but you may be thinking of the "Hero's Journey" or "monomyth". The steps of the journey are: Departure Initiation Return The Wikipedia article has plenty of details for each step. For instance, the subgroups for Departure are: The Call to Adventure Refusal of th...

"sorry mr hen but im looking for the word for the linguistic device of ending a story in the same place it started – iminei 21 mins ago

almost like the first and last scene of the film Scandal...where John Hurt was surveying the same street scene, (albeit with subtle differences) – iminei 20 mins ago"
 
5:21 PM
@MrHen: I think @kiamlaluno is wondering which ass -containing answer of yours was downvoted.
 
@Martha oh
one sec
2
A: Is there a pejorative alternative to "improvise"?

MrHenThe most common phrase I hear for this is "pulling something out of your ass." There are variations and the phrase is pretty flexible: Did you just pull that out of your ass? Stopping pulling things out of your ass. Tom likes to pull things out of his ass.

 
Yeah, what @Martha said.
 
@Martha Holy wow, you can reply to a future comment.
2
You just have to do it before the edit timer is up.
 
Grat, grat.
 
Heh, cool.
 
5:25 PM
:D
 
Does that count as time machine?
 
Dunno, but it's definitely star-worthy.
 
I wonder if I can get it to reply to itself...
 
@MrHen You cannot.
 
@MrHen Testing recursion in three... two... one...
Well, okay.
That looks about right...
 
5:28 PM
@kiamlaluno Can I?
Ahah!
 
@MrHen — That's as good an explanation as any.
@Cerberus: What makes you think @Martha keeps me in check?
 
@MrHen: Hover the mouse over your question, and take note of the number you see; then write a new post with a colon followed by that number.
 
@kiamlaluno Yeah, I got the recursion reply to work too.
 
@Robusto Ooh, does that mean I keep you in terror? 'Cause terror is better than check.
 
@Martha — Actually he said you keep me under control. Which is obviously false, because I have never been under control, not even from myself, so what chance do you have?
 
5:33 PM
Hello. Does anybody possibly know what this grammatical structure is called: “Those who don't read books, they usually don't have a wide vocabulary” (as opposed to “Those who don't read books usually don't have a wide vocabulary”)? I want to read about it in a reference grammar but don't know where to start.
 
Ok, so terror is better than control. Check.
 
Also, I suspect I have seen a question like that somewhere on English.StackExchange, but I have no clue how to find it.
 
@Vitaly, I'm vaguely remembering something, too, but I couldn't find it.
 
@Vitaly Yeah. It's a construction you see a lot. "Me, I don't care what you do." or, from Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness, "Mistah Kurz, he dead." Some kind of noun-pronoun repetition subject repetition.
 
I also see something similar in the form of a question: "Those guys? I don't know them."
 
5:41 PM
@Robusto we linguists call that a topic-comment structure
some languages have that as their dominant clause structure (eg. Japanese)
 
@JSBangs — I don't think that's quite the same thing. The Japanese wouldn't say Kamakura-san wa, kare wa takai. (Kamakura-san as-for, he as-for tall [is]). They'd just say Kamakura-san wa takai.
 
Thanks! The topic-comment structure concept seems a good launchpad for searching for the relevant sections in a grammar book.
 
right, because you would never mark the topic twice. you have two wa's
however, unless i'm mistaken you can use both a wa and the subject marker
that being ga
eg. ima wa kuruma ga atarashii desu.
 
Yeah, "now as for car new is" ...
But the ga is usually used to imply more than a topical relationship. More of an operative relationship, or ownership relationship.
If I want to say "I like sushi" I would say Sushi ga suki or Sushi ga suki desu
 
correct: the topical focalization is given by wa, while ga gives the syntactic subject, if the topic and subject are not the same
the difference is that english requires that the topic be repeated with a pronoun subject if the topic is also the subject
 
5:54 PM
I would not say Sushi wa suki desu
 
because english is not a pro-drop language
are you native japanese?
 
No.
 
i don't speak japanese at all, so i'm in no position to correct you. i merely repeat what i've learned in linguistics classes, where japanese is frequently trotted out as the example of topic-comment structure
 
I think topic-comment may not be the same as topic repetition then. Or maybe it just means something different when applied by linguistics majors to the different languages.
 
my point is that the english and japanese topic-comment structures are not that different, though the syntactic details differ
 
5:57 PM
In your sentence Ima wa kuruma ga atarashii desu there is no repetition of the topic.
 
@MrHen Nice one
 
namely: english requires you to have an explicit subject, even if the subject is the same as the topic. japanese does not require an explicit subject if the subject and topic are the same. that is all.
english always requires an explicit subject
 
In fact, Japanese doesn't even require a subject. :)
 
How does the French phenomenon compare? Ma mère, elle aime les oiseaux.
 
If the subject is understood, they omit it.
 
5:58 PM
Though that just makes me wonder... what happens if I try the following?
 
exactly
 
17 secs ago, by psmears
(placeholder)
 
@Cerberus the french example is also a topic-comment construct
 
Haha @PSM...
 
Lol, I said admit when I meant omit.
 
5:59 PM
bah, infinite recursion fail
 
@psmears did you just make a message quote itself?
 
@psmears — Only @Kosmonaut can do infinite recursion in here.
 
@JSB: And Dutch, Anne, die komt ook niet.
 
@JSBangs Well, I tried to...
... I suppose it is quoting itself, but the result is not as spectacular as one might have hoped :)
 
The funny thing is that, in Dutch, we use the demonstartive pronoun "die", which would normally not be used as topical subject (hij or zij/ze, rather).
 
6:01 PM
most languages have some degree of topic-comment structure to them. some languages, however, make that the primary sentence structure, while others don't. most european languages treat the examples we've been giving as non-standard in writing
 
Not in writing, exactly.
I have always wondered what the function of this kind of construction is. To mark the topic? But why is that necessary: the subject as first constituent is by default taken as topic, I should think?
Or is the construction used in sentences where it would be unclear what the topic would be? I doubt it...
 
@psmears Hmm...
 
@Cerberus good question! it's true that the subject and the topic are often the same.
in subject-oriented languages (like most IE languages) there is a very strong preference to make subject and topic the same
 
Exactly.
 
this is why we have a passive voice: a special transformation that takes what would naturally be the object and promote it to subject in the cases in which it is the topic
 
6:05 PM
I can imagine this might be less clear if the subject is not in first position...
Exactly.
 
But i can do the same thing w/o passive in a topic-oriented structure:
> Pickles, I hate em!
 
True.
But then, is pickles topical?
Is it the hate or the pickles that has focus?
 
in my examples, i'd say that pickles is the topic. english can't topicalize verbs. there are hardcore topic-oriented languages, though, which can topicalize verbs
(though i can't remember one right off)
 
1 min ago, by MrHen
http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/838260#838260
 
6:08 PM
We can use stress.
 
Yeah, it has recursion protection.
 
I don't hate you, I hate her!
Well it is mostly the opposition that takes away focus from the repeated element, not so much anything in the verb itself or the stress.
 
English, why doesn't it topicalise verbs?
 
@MrHen I think it just saves the state of the link at the time the comment is posted (or just before)...
 
@JSBangs How about "Eat is what I do." What do I call that?
 
6:10 PM
That is, the stress and the opposing words are naturally linked.
@MrHen: I rather think "eat" would have focus there.
 
@psmears The quoted bit is just that; no editing
I don't know enough about the quote linking to try tricking it further than I did.
 
We could easily topicalise verbs if we turn them into gerunds, I should think.
 
@MrHen ungrammatical for me. you could say eating is what i do, but there you've nouned your verb
 
@Cerberus Does it? Or does "I"?
 
Jinx!
 
6:11 PM
I should have said verb phrases, I think
 
@JSBangs Sure. It was the best I could do. :)
 
It sounds poetic or archaic, but not ungrammatical to me.
But I agree it is not a regular tool available in daily speech.
 
"Sleep is what I did."
 
Same.
 
"What did you do?" "Sleep."
 
6:13 PM
Yes.
Then it has focus again, I'd say.
 
Except the more proper way to say it is, "Slept."
As in, "I slept."
 
@MrHen Sleep is a noun there.
 
A noun? I call foul play!
 
@JSBangs Mmk. Than it seems "Eat is what I do" would make "Eat" a noun?
 
I'd call that an infinitive.... or do you call that a noun too?
 
6:14 PM
(I don't know terms well.)
 
I think modern linguists call infinitives nouns.
 
@MrHen, but sleep is a noun in general: I need some sleep. I got four hours of sleep. Sleep doesn't come easy to me.
 
@JSBangs Oh
Sure.
 
eat is not a noun in general, which is why i thought it was ungrammatical
 
"What did you do?" "Eat."
"Eat is what I did."
Or any verb
 
6:15 PM
Those are infinitives.
 
I still think eat is what i did is ungrammatical
 
I call infinitives both verbs and nouns.
 
@JSBangs I think I agree. It does sound funny.
"Jump is what I did."
 
at least we all agree that it's unusual in a way that most of the others aren't
 
"Attack is what I did."
 
6:15 PM
@JSB: Agreed.
 
"What did you do?" "Jump."
 
@MrHen I don't know... I think "Sleep" is a valid response ("What did you do? / Sleep! / Did you? / Yes, I did sleep!")
 
IMO, it doesn't work.
 
Are we also agreed that those infinitives are not at all topical?
 
@psmears Hmm... good point.
 
6:17 PM
@JSBangs I might parse it as: "Eat" is what I did
 
@PSM: Agreed, as an answer it is quite current still.
 
Anyhoo, you guys figure it out. I am going to drink coffee.
 
Bye Mr!
> Oh, to dwell on my old home, how sad it makes me!
Eat that!
 
46 secs ago, by Cerberus
Eat that!
I'd say "eat" was the topic of that?
 
@PSM: Then "that" would have focus... I'm not sure: can we separate finite verb and pronoun-object like that for purposes of assigning topic and focus? Perhaps.
 
6:21 PM
Fun fact: topicalization in Irish English is more prominent than in British English. Still reading about it. Also, thanks again, @JSBangs, for bringing that term up.
 
@Cerberus I'm by no means sure either, hence the question mark!
 
@psmears OK that's what I thought!
 
@JSBangs — Word.
 
@JSBangs: Would you say "What he does is eat", or "What he does is eats"?
 
"Eats" would definitely be wrong to my ears.
Only infinitives can be subject complements.
 
6:25 PM
@Cerberus And to mine (I think... this discussion is rapidly degrading my ability to tell...)
 
You are suffering from semantic ehhh... something with an s....
Satiation.
 
All I do is try to cope.
 
With life?
 
I gtg... catch you all later!
 
on-topic poll:
0
Q: What is the definition and origin of "imba"?

MrHenI often hear the phrase, "That is imba" in the video gaming community. It seems to refer to something powerful or unskillful: Hunters are so imba. Grenade launchers are imba! But I have also noticed that it is often used tongue-in-cheek or sarcastically to mock people complaining about...

 
6:26 PM
Adios!
 
Obviously I think it is on-topic since I asked the question
But it is another fringe case.
 
(@JSBangs: just clarifying before I go: would you say that "What he does is eat" is to "Eat is what he does" as "What he eats is food" is to "Food is what he eats"?)
 
@PSM: I'd say, yes, that is the same.
@MrHen: You got two answers within 5 minutes. You must be popular!
 
@Cerberus :P
 
“‘Conuay’, the wise it call!” (Shakespeare Merry Wives of Windsor I.iii) — what is topicalised here?
the… object?
 
7:00 PM
@Vitaly: I don't think that is being topicalised; focalised, rather. But topicality and focality are often impossible to make out without context.
 
Ok, thanks. @Cerberus
 
And that is the object complement being placed in first position.
 
Another fun fact: phonemic diversity in human languages fits a serial founder–effect model of expansion from inferred origin in Africa, just like human genetic and phenotypic diversity declines with distance from Africa (Science 332, 15 April 2011)
 
Interesting! Does that mean that the indigenous languages of South America are/were the least diverse?
 
Actually, that's what the data is saying: the smallest phoneme inventories are in South America and Oceania
 
7:06 PM
@Vitaly: Hmm that theory would seem to have something of a hard time explaining the huge number of wildly differing languages on New Guinea...
Their existing in countless small communities isolated by geographical features might explain it.
 
it's about phonemes, i.e. the diversity of sounds found in a language
vowels, consonants, tones, etc
 
Yeah ok... so the different language families on N.G. should be quite close as regards phonemes?
Usually different language families develop different phonemes, I should expect?
 
Seems so, but I have no idea what they actually are like
 
For the original Science paper, you'd need an AAAS subscription, unfortunately
 
7:12 PM
Interesting!
It mentions S-E Asia as another place with great phonemic variety.
 
Makes sense, at least to me (I am used to thinking that humans migrated in waves, and one of those waves had settled in that area 10,000-something years before the next one)
I could be wrong, though.
 
True.
@Vitaly: Do you want the article?
 
I have read it.
 
Ah ok.
 
But thanks.
 
7:19 PM
You said "unfortunately" hehe...
 
Information wants to be free. XP
 
I should have divined that you were commiserating what you perceived as my misfortune of lacking access to this treasure.
 
 
2 hours later…
8:50 PM
@Vitaly, that article was just up at Language Log, who had a pretty negative review of it
i have to say that i agree with their complaints: the authors make a whole bunch of unfounded assumptions about phonetics and language change in their analysis
(correction: i should have said Language Hat not Language Log)
 
9:20 PM
@JSBangs Actually the article is at Richard Sproat's website. Language Hat just links to that.
 
@Kosmonaut true
 
Sproat is a smart guy, and very skeptical.
 
Did I miss anything?
Wow... I get messages about flagged posts.
 
That is strange.
 
I mean chat posts.
@Kosmonaut Didn't you see any blue badges, to the left of where you write your posts?
 
9:29 PM
I did.
But I'm a mod, so I would expect it :)
 
@Kosmonaut So am I.
That is why my username is shown in blue.
Moderators in a SE site are moderators in all the chat rooms.
 
Ahhhhh!
Got it!
 
:-)
Actually, I saw the blue badge also before becoming moderator, but when I clicked on that badge nothing happened.
Sigh! Nobody else understood my "wait, I will scratch my armpit." That means I will not go to Zelig. Sigh!
 
*before becoming
(I thought you said you wanted to pointed out infinitive-gerund problems: but if you've had enough just say so and I will stop commenting.)
 
10:02 PM
@Cerberus Where? When? Why? ;-)
 
Okay, okay, I'll stop...
 
@Cerberus It will be enough when I stop making such mistakes.
 
Haha...
You see what you are doing there?
I assume that was on purpose (...)
 
As they say on LIRR trains: "See something? Say something."
 
*stop making
Arg I did it again.
If you "stop to do x", you stop doing something, in order to start doing x.
Ding!
 
10:05 PM
Eheh!
Well, basing on what I am doing, I can say I stop to do such mistakes. :-)
 
Hehe. Fair enough.
 
Is saying "LIRR trains" as saying "ATM machine"?
 
Eh that depends on what you are referring to. Probably not, unless it contains a word close enough to "train" in meaning.
 
LIRR is "Long Island Rail Road."
I hate when the computer gets so slow that I cannot see what I am writing.
 
Hah, you have that too? I thought I was alone.
 
10:12 PM
Add that to the "attention syndrome" I have, and you get a good picture.
 
I don't have it so much on this PC, only a little bit; but it is unworkable on my 2GHz single-core Windows 7 PC.
Meh I wish there were a way to disable some advanced (and CPU-consuming, no doubt) features of this website.
 
I have that problem all times when Safari starts, or when Time Machine starts backing up files.
When Safari starts, Firefox still has problems when I quit Safari.
Actually, I had more problems when I installed Mac Os X Lion.
Since then, I have to reset my Mac once per day.
(This time the gerund/present participle is not necessary.)
 
Correct!
 
(This shows mine is mainly an attention problem.)
 
Possibly so.
 
10:19 PM
I notice that; I cannot keep doing something for too long, or I lose interest.
 
trying to resist the urge to bash Apple... must not bash Apple...
 
bash> ls Apple
 
I make mistakes in chat all the time that I have actually condemned in some of my Answers. That's just the way the world works, no problem.
 
-1
Q: Word that is a "negative" version of in, but not "out"

jaredonlineSo, I'm a programmer, and I have a function that has the name of "in?". It basically asks the question, "Is A in the set of A, B, C". I would like a function that can be expressed as one word, that is the opposite of that. For various reasons, "not_in" won't suite that purpose. Does anyone have...

 
Well, at least you know it's an error.
 
10:20 PM
It is probably time to start dealing with this question
The OP needs something far too specific
 
I think it would better suit programmers.stackexchange.com.
If it would be there, I would reply with !in().
 
@kiamlaluno Yeah; this sort of very narrowly specific question really isn't going to help anyone else in the future with regards to English
And he just rejects all of the answers as "nah, this was thrown out"
And all seems reminiscent of
 
@MrHen Don't you hate when they do so?
 
3
Q: The opposite of "contains"

NickI was just wondering if anyone could think of a single word meaning the opposite of contains. E.g. This bottle of beer contains alcohol whereas this one doesn't. This bottle of beer doesn't contain alcohol whereas this one does. Basically, I'm looking for a single word which means doesn't c...

@kiamlaluno I don't mind it when an answer doesn't work but rejecting a perfectly fine answer for a non-English reason seems to flag the question as suspect
 
First they ask a question, then they comment with "it's not what I meant." They should write the question better, then.
 
10:25 PM
"What is this?" "This." "Nah, that doesn't work well in programming."
 
@MrHen I agree.
 
@kiamlaluno Agreed.
 
Sometimes I am tempted to reply "OK, tell me what you want to read, and I will write an answer with that."
 
@kiamlaluno Haha, brilliant.
 
As alternative, I could reply "I am sorry: my crystal ball is being repaired." ;-)
 
10:28 PM
Nice.
 
It's nicer if they say "I didn't ask about a crystal ball; what is a crystal ball?" :-)
 
Do upvotes on questions get pruned by the rep cap?
 
For who gets the up votes, they are.
 
Mmk. That's what I thought.
 
The only way to get over the rep cap is having accepted answers, or accepting answers.
 
10:31 PM
And bounties
 
I have never had the lucky to get a bounty. ;-)
 
Are questions about symbolism on-topic?
As in, "Why is black considered an evil color?"
(Not that it still is; just the first example I thought of)
 
It is not about English; therefore, it's off-topic.
 
@kiamlaluno It is about literature, then?
What is the subject?
 
@MrHen It's symbolism. :-)
 
10:38 PM
@kiamlaluno :P Symbolism in what?
Obviously not "math"
Not "English"
 
It is like asking why somebody thinks that putting salt close to a door keeps the daemons away.
 
@kiamlaluno Not really.
 
It's symbolism, as in to attribute a meaning to objects or facts.
 
There is certainly a broader application of symbolism that effects literature
There scores of idioms birthed from symbolism
 
*like asking
 
10:42 PM
@kiamlaluno Hmm... maybe I am using the wrong word
 
There is surely literature about symbolism, but not all literature is about symbolism.
 
I'd say it was on topic. But I suck at voting to close or not.
 
("Looks around, and checks if somebody noted that.")
 
@kiamlaluno Bah. That isn't what I am aiming for, though.
Anyhoo, I am off
Good weekend to everyone. :)
 
@MrHen Have a good one.
 
11:13 PM
0
Q: "when spring arrives"

language hacker I often told you we'd go there when spring arrives. That sentence seems funny to me. It means that in the past the speaker would often promise the listener that when spring arrives they would go to a certain place together. Is it grammatically correct? What about these alternatives? I...

The answer from C_P seems a little confused.
 
00:00 - 17:0017:00 - 00:00

« first day (155 days earlier)      last day (4766 days later) »