@MoreAnonymous Schrodinger's equation is nothing but the energy conservation thing, which is not complete enough to get state function to get complete description of a system.
In general relativity, the Hamilton–Jacobi–Einstein equation (HJEE) or Einstein–Hamilton–Jacobi equation (EHJE) is an equation in the Hamiltonian formulation of geometrodynamics in superspace, cast in the "geometrodynamics era" around the 1960s, by Asher Peres in 1962 and others. It is an attempt to reformulate general relativity in such a way that it resembles quantum theory within a semiclassical approximation, much like the correspondence between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics.
It is named for Albert Einstein, Carl Gustav Jacob Jacobi, and William Rowan Hamilton. The EHJE contains...
Hmm ... Well it's okay I guess. Here's my advice. I had a philosopher friend in uni. We'd often debate in 1st year about things (for fun). However, in fourth year I noticed none of initial depositions (1st year ideas of things) had changed whereas mine had vastly changed. When I asked him this. He conceded it was true. I asked if he thought a university degree was worthwhile. He said for him it was a mistake.
If your worldview isn't changed by your university experience. Then something has gone wrong.
But if you have any interesting references that back your view lemme know?
My understanding is that the circular paths are caused by the action of the Lorentz force on the electrons and positrons.
However, I'm not sure why the circular paths are going inward. I have two ideas in mind. The first is that this could be caused by drag forces from the atmosphere of the b...
tl,dr: This is really just a verbous synthesis of what has already been said by alanf and CuriousOne with a more basic experiment and theory explanation approach and a smattering of my own limited knowledge.
The upshot is the same: trajectories make little sense in nonrelativistic QM and if you...
tl,dr: This is really just a verbous synthesis of what has already been said by alanf and CuriousOne with a more basic experiment and theory explanation approach and a smattering of my own limited knowledge.
The upshot is the same: trajectories make little sense in nonrelativistic QM and if you...
@MoreAnonymous Now, interference experiement shows that, electrons move in certain way depending on $\lambda$ factor on the previous electrons in order to form wave like pattern
@AbhasKumarSinha let's say I fire a 1000 electrons there is a non-zero chance that a wave pattern will not form. In the sense they all can also hit the same point
And the quanta link says: "Oil droplets guided by “pilot waves” have failed to reproduce the results of the quantum double-slit experiment, crushing a century-old dream that there exists a single, concrete reality. "
@MoreAnonymous yes, found article earlier this year. think the latest supposed conclusions are problematic verging on erroneous and am very disappointed in the findings/ results, and somewhat the efforts. am delighted its getting a 2nd (or 3rd?) look but expect much better of world class scientists. have been meaning to contact some mentioned in the article, thanks for the reminder on that. would like to discuss it all sometime at length with you and/ or others if/ when youre available.
Simulated reality is the hypothesis that reality could be simulated—for example by quantum computer simulation—to a degree indistinguishable from "true" reality. It could contain conscious minds which may or may not be fully aware that they are living inside a simulation. This is quite different from the current, technologically achievable concept of virtual reality. Virtual reality is easily distinguished from the experience of actuality; participants are never in doubt about the nature of what they experience. Simulated reality, by contrast, would be hard or impossible to separate from "true...