« first day (1864 days earlier)      last day (1765 days later) » 

vzn
vzn
02:54
The dangerous disregard for fat tails in quantitative finance / SRSV
@JarekDuda VERY BIG news for emergent QM! curious what you think!
in The h Bar, Aug 1 at 1:57, by vzn
@bolbteppa it appears something like those measurements have already/ recently been made by vinante et al wrt Adler theory which you still seem to have no comment on https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.110401 https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23931860-100-is-this-our-first-clue-to-a-‌​world-beyond-quantum-theory/ https://www.nature.com/articles/srep07664 http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/361/1/012002
@ThomasKlimpel ↑ hey still into QM or not? just math these days? :'( :P
 
2 hours later…
Jarek Duda
Jarek Duda
05:33
Regarding fat tails, we can recreate any real probability (also joint) from the sample using polynomial fitting of density as I have mentioned some time ago ... economics.stackexchange.com/questions/23967/…
 
5 hours later…
Thomas Klimpel
Thomas Klimpel
10:35
@vzn More QM and physics than ever before. Still not sure whether I like it. But a certain math part is currently even more critical, after a commercial 3rdParty package for a critical subtask failed to meet speed and parallel scaling expectations.
You linked to those articles before, even on reddit. Did anybody at "The h Bar" provided interesting feedback? I remember that your reddit link did not generate any feedback. My own impression of your linked article is positive, but I didn't spend much time on it.
 
4 hours later…
vzn
vzn
15:09
@ThomasKlimpel hi not aware you have been following some of the highlights here, thats great, hard to tell unless there are replies. there were upvotes on reddit & was some discussion in Physics. the big breakthru is actual subquantum experimental results, anomalous wrt standard QM, otherwise there are a lot of skeptics re falsifiability issues etc., lack of pushback/ silence from the hardcore skeptics is notable...
 
4 hours later…
Thomas Klimpel
Thomas Klimpel
18:52
@vzn a discussion on Physics.SE and lack of pushback from the hardcore skeptics is not bad...
 
3 hours later…
vzn
vzn
21:23
@ThomasKlimpel its a small plant growing in a crack, think it will get bigger in months/ years ahead, think it is breakthru, lines up closely with many avenues previously pursued/ outlined, plan to blog on it soon. :)

« first day (1864 days earlier)      last day (1765 days later) »