« first day (2616 days earlier)      last day (787 days later) » 

02:05
I feel like someone once referred me to a result in Lurie's SAG specifically about the slice topos over an n-truncated object in an ∞-topos (maybe something like such a topos is n-localic, or something like that). Does anyone know what result I'm thinking of?
Ah maybe this is Lemma 1.4.7.7
 
9 hours later…
10:58
@AndrewSenger Amazing. Thanks!
 
10 hours later…
21:20
Does anyone know of a book or lecture notes which includes an explanation of the results in Thom's paper "Quelques propriétés globales des variétés différentiables"? I am interested in understanding Thom's results on representing homology classes of a manifold by submanifolds.
@TimCampion Could there be an ∞-operad O such that O-monoidal ∞-categories (in the sense of HA.2.1.2.13) are lax monoidal ∞-categories?
22:00
@Michael I'm sure the answer is yes. If you read French, the paper itself is not bad, although I remember when I looked at it my emphasis was on other parts.
@AlexanderCampbell sounds plausible. I guess I'm thinking that classically you might need a Cat-enriched operad. Does that translate into needing something a little fancier $\infty$-categorically?
@DylanWilson That makes more sense now. Thanks a lot!
@TimCampion Yeah, I have the same suspicion, which makes me think the answer to my original question is no. I was hoping we could use Lurie's version of the Day reflection theorem (HA.2.2.1.9).
(for reference, the context is Emily's very interesting question today)
It's interesting that Lurie states the theorem in the O-monoidal context. Does he really rely on O-monoidality, or does the heart of the proof extend to more general operads?
wait maybe I'm confused and that question doesn't make sense
An O-monoidal category is a cocartesian fibration over O / a colax O-monoidal category is a locally cocartesian fibration over O. So the question seems to be whether in HA 2.2.1.9, we can get away with locally cocartesian rather than cocartesian. Which I think boils down to the same question about HA 2.2.1.11...
Actually wait -- I think this is over-optimistic. Lurie's results about localization are about reflective localizations, but the localization from a model category to its presented $\infty$-category is decidedly not of this form.
not reflective, I mean.
22:47
@TimCampion Ha, of course. D'oh.
23:22
Just catching up on the really valuable discussion @AaronMazel-Gee initiated a few days ago, I just want to say that it renews my hope in the MO community to see us talk about these things in such a heartfelt way. For my part, I find many of these challenges to be hard enough normally without a pandemic to exacerbate them!
3
@JonathanBeardsley I hope that having such conversations openly can be a step towards the goal Jon expresses that we should always be striving to be a more welcoming space for more people. Are there other things we can be doing in this direction?
Personally, I was already in a mathematical funk at the beginning of last semester. Then I had the amazing experience of being at MSRI with so many amazing people -- some of them in this room now -- and it was really rejuvenating. Then COVID cut things short and I've felt myself regressing for awhile since.

« first day (2616 days earlier)      last day (787 days later) »