« first day (539 days earlier)      last day (2864 days later) » 

12:43 AM
What do you guys think about near-rings? Endomorphism near-rings of non-abelian groups? Whoa.
 
 
4 hours later…
5:00 AM
Here's a (probably) basic commutative algebra question: Suppose I have two regular local rings (A,I) and (B,J) of the same dimension along with a homomorphism $\phi:A \to B$. Suppose $I = (x_0,\ldots,x_{n-1})$ and $J = (y_0,\ldots,y_{n-1})$. What conditions do I need on $\phi$ and/or $B$ (as an $A$-module) to ensure that $x_i^{-1}A/(x_0,\ldots,x_{i-1}) \otimes_A B = y_i^{-1} B/(y_0,\ldots,y_{i-1})$?
 
5:35 AM
I should add, I want this to be true for $i=1,\ldots,n-1$
 
6:20 AM
hi sean
:)
 
 
8 hours later…
2:24 PM
Hey y'all, so, is it true that the completion tower for a ring at an ideal is really the tot tower of a cosimplicial ring?
And in general, this is is why, in topology, we define "completions" cosimplicially?
 
 
2 hours later…
4:11 PM
@user101036 I think grothendieck wanted an abelian category as a target for his universal cohomology theory and people still don't have a good t-structure on the triangulated category of mixed motives (not even sure if people currently think one should exist)
hmm okay out of curiosity
what is the best model for K-homology
also what's up with this MSO-orientation for L-theory -- when we say L-theory in this context, is it just the cohomology theory represented by L of a point ? like, one side of the assembly map ?
 
4:39 PM
@ArnavTripathy graeme segal has a lovely one in "K-homology theory and algebraic K-theory"
it's similar to the theorem "homology is homotopy groups of the infinite symmetric product"
the infinite symmetric product has points are formal sums of points with coefficients in N (mod the basepoint)
segal's model, though it's phrased in terms of C^*-algebras, is a space whose points are formal combinations of points of X labeled by subspaces of C^\infty, where the subspaces associated to two distinct points must be orthogonal
if two labelled points collide, then you "add" these perpendicular subspaces together by taking their common span
unfortunately that only gets you connective K-homology, so you've got to formally impose Bott periodicity if you want the periodic one
 
 
4 hours later…
9:11 PM
+1 graeme segal, that's great
 
 
2 hours later…
10:59 PM
@Jon: completions are cosimplicial because they're limits (e.g. think of the limit defining I-adic completion) and totalizing cosimplicial objects computes limits. dually, realizing simplicial objects computes colimits
 

« first day (539 days earlier)      last day (2864 days later) »