MathOverflow

« first day (2240 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (1727 days later) »

Martin Sleziak

9:44 AM

[so], [math.se], [mathoverflow.se] gives Stack Overflow, Mathematics, MathOverflow

I learned about this from: Magic link for MathOverflow in chat and comments.

Martin Sleziak

10:09 AM

Jan 14 at 11:00, by Martin Sleziak

According to the statistics from 2018: a year in spam: 0.7136% posts on MathOverflow (and 0.7792% posts on Mathematics) were spam posts.

spam I see that I misunderstood the information from that post. The 0.7136% means that of all spam posts in the network, 0.7136% were posted on MO. (Not that 0.7136% of all MO posts were spam posts.)

1 hour later…

Martin Sleziak

11:14 AM

Some discussion about the recent issues with joke thread in another chatroom (around the time when the first question about this on meta was posted): chat.meta.stackexchange.com/rooms/89/conversation/…

Jokes on MathOverflow

Aug 2 at 4:11, 2 hours 10 minutes total – 48 messages, 6 users, 0 stars

Bookmarked 58 mins ago by Martin

4 hours later…

Martin Sleziak

3:03 PM

-4

Q: Area 51 community peer review

Since some time there has been discussions about having a place for community reviews; see for example Community Peer-Review in Mathoverflow Such a system already working at PhysicsOverflow with considerable success. My attempt to start something similar in MO was quickly rejected for reasons ...

So now there is a proposal on area51: Mathematics Open Community Reviews

Mathematics Open Community Reviews

Proposed Q&A site for professional mathematicians

Currently in definition.

I have created the proposal....let's see what happens! meta.mathoverflow.net/q/4321/40644 — Thanasis Stylianou 3 mins ago

3 hours later…

Martin Sleziak

5:45 PM

And it is already closed.

A: Area 51 Mathematics Open Community Reviews

Questions appropriate for a Stack Exchange-style Q&A are on topic for Mathematics SE and MathOverflow. If you would like to experiment with this type of content on MathOverflow, great; but unfortunately, we are not currently accepting proposals for new sites whose core premise is to solicit criti...