@chrispsn I guess it would make all "n-times" loops be interpreted as "while", no? if that can be avoided it would also be useful for making constant amends cleaner, i.e. @[v;i;x]
@Traws i don't think there's a problem with n-times vs while - numbers can still be numbers but only act as self-returning functions when they are applied. for instance, this is similar to `json - it's a symbol (not function), but when you apply it, it serializes the argument to json.
@ngn I see.. I was thinking in terms of "atoms are constant functions" but it's actually "applied atoms are constant functions". I like it, seems consistent and useful.