@rak1507 i think getting the implementation right first is more important. implementation leads, documentation follows. for popular software like shakti, they don't even have to lift a finger - some fan will eventually write the docs. there already are a few competing attempts.
True, but if they actually wanted to make it easy like they claim, they would be doing more to try and document things rather than relying solely on community provided material imo
@ngn what's worked for me is to attempt to golf things. I almost feel like a (relatively) straightforward "throw an arg of each type at each builtin, including all flavors of empty lists and nulls" would cover a bunch of the low hanging stuff
throw in a few inplace amends, and all the flavors of reduces/scans
one of those "combine X characters" as a fuzz test would be interesting