I guess the rest of the boolean functions from apl would be nice haha

@NerdRage which ones?

Not less than, not greater than, not equals, nand and nor jsoftware.com/papers/eem/caret.htm would need unicode for all of that and not sure if that's gonna happen in k given recent conversations in the google group. Would only save a character here or there which explains why they're not in k in the first place. More of a vitamin vs a pill kind of thing.

If we were to extend your question to adverbs I wonder if an adverb that rotates the arguments of a function would be useful. Let's suppose that character is ¡ for now then {(x;y;z)}¡[1;2;3] would return 2 3 1 and {(x;y;z)}¡¡[1;2;3] returns 3 1 2

Might be better just to rotate the args however necessary as a list and use . though

@NerdRage there was a bit of discussion about rotate in the google group

Not necessarily answering my own question as I haven’t much experience, but it would be nice to have something that applies x to f as f[x;x]

So say a square: assuming ^ is used, *^4 ~ 16

^ now being ‘sort asc’ is surprising to me, would have thought grade was enough + the asc/dsc builtins

...maybe that could still be added given sort should only work on lists?

It’s back: github.com/kelas/kcc

@ThomasLackner ugh - i found the prose pretty entertaining, reminded me of 'learn you a haskell' :p

@Adám have asked about this, it bothers me too groups.google.com/d/msg/shaktidb/ttIdJiWx9xI/GFFI6e7oBAAJ

@chrispsn I do not have permission to access this content. (#418)

@Adám you need to be logged into your google account

@chrispsn I am.

i don't think they restrict access based on membership, but they do ask that you be logged in

hmm

@Adám can you see the messages in groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/shaktidb ?

@chrispsn No, same thing.

weird! @AlexanderBelopolsky was there a change of policy?

@chrispsn I have not heard of any.

@chrispsn please ask Fintan - [email protected]

Does /[+;(1,2,3)] do anything?

@AlexanderBelopolsky is it ok also for me to request membership? (i remember getting denied from the k7 mailing list a bit back, not sure what the criteria is)

@dogstar sure - send me your e-mail address

@AlexanderBelopolsky Can I also have access to the Google group? (I don't have your email address, but you can email me: adam@ you know who right? .com)

I had to request access. They "let me in", not sure on what grounds though

@H.PWiz How did you request?

There was a button, when I did it

@Adám sorry, I am slow in the morning. My handle here @gmail.com should work

@Adám I sent a test e-mail to my best guess. If you respond I'll add you to the group.

@H.PWiz from my perspective anyone active here qualifies for the shaktidb group (I don't work for shakti, but I am a volunteer moderator for the group)

@ngn Well, you could have a k bot with some way to specify non-shakti flavour, e.g. \n 2+2 for "ngn/k" or \o for "oK" or \k for "Kona" reserving plain \ for (hopefully) shakti one day…

@chrispsn there was

@ngn but Adám was logged in

@chrispsn he wasn't a member

@Adám that would be nice, but implementing the bot and setting aside a pc to run it 24-7 seems more bother than it's worth

@ngn Implementation is done. As for the machinery, maybe we can just configure ours so run Ks here.

@Adám "ours" = the orchard bot?

@Adám btw, teaching and promoting k is none of my business, i'm more interested in reimplementing it :)

@ngn Dyalog's. It isn't tied to any one or a single room. And it is obviously idle most of the time.

@Adám well, if you wanna do it, go ahead

@chrispsn Why isn't that a comment?

@Adám No space after the /

@Adám I'm sorry the k7contrib docs were misleading on this when you first saw them - they're now updated

huh, after testing:

 / [+][1 2 3]
/ [+][1 2 3]
  ^
parse error

oh right. needs the space before the /. duh.

@chrispsn comments start with /. When used inline, prepend at least one space implied when not used inline, no preceding space is necessary.

@Adám that's true for scripts, but not for the REPL

@chrispsn ugh