3:24 PM
search posts Posts with \ulam: data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/972953/1381674/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1094683/1381675/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066861/1318473/…
There was an answer by François G. Dorais which used this macro (defined in the question) - I have edited it: math.stackexchange.com/posts/171287/revisions
search comments No comments with \ulam: data.stackexchange.com/math/query/556789/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1094685/1351465/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066862/1318474/…
search comments Nothing in the two newer queries, either: data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066863/1318475/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066865/1318477/…
search posts Posts with \ul: data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/972953/1381674/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1094683/1381675/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066861/1318473/…
search posts \ul is a prefix of \ulcorner - this problem is solved by the query with regex or by this query: data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1071496/1323755/…
And also two posts which contain \uline - however without definition of this macro anywhere on the page: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1925670/… math.stackexchange.com/questions/674971/…
search comments Comments with \ul: data.stackexchange.com/math/query/556789/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1094685/1351465/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066862/1318474/…
search comments No comments with \ul but not \ulcorner: data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1071502/1323761/…
search comments Nothing in the two newer queries, either: data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066863/1318475/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066865/1318477/…
search posts No posts with \ol: data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/972953/1381674/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1094683/1381675/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066861/1318473/…
search comments Comments with \ol: data.stackexchange.com/math/query/556789/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1094685/1351465/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066862/1318474/…
The first query found one comment which contains \old - probably just a typo, I do not see the definition of the macro \old on the page.
they wrote $\mathbb{E} (\ln p(X,Z |\theta)$ which agree with your expresssion, note that expectation depends on the distribution that you consider, in this case the distribution is $P(Z|X, \theta^{\old})$. — Siong Thye Goh Jul 21 '17 at 18:06
search comments Nothing in the two newer queries, either: data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066863/1318475/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066865/1318477/…
search posts No posts with \totald: data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/972953/1381674/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1094683/1381675/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066861/1318473/…
search comments No comments with \totald: data.stackexchange.com/math/query/556789/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1094685/1351465/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066862/1318474/…
search comments Nothing in the two newer queries, either: data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066863/1318475/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066865/1318477/…
« first day (263 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (1484 days later) »