« first day (11 days earlier)      last day (17 days later) » 

08:44
@Baskakov_Dmitriy Yes, sure. In the same order, creatures will have: 85 (DR10/cold iron), 144, 68, 58, 82, 85 (DR10/adamantine or good), 46, 149 (DR5/magic), 84, 57, 45, 30, 12 (huh? In tier 7-8?), 35, 31, 31, 78, 136, 67, 156, 84.
So three creatures with DR out of more than 20. Just leave creatures with DR to spellcasters or barbarian with a greataxe.
Don't forget that your eidolon is limited by number of attacks per round, and it's still only 4 by level 7.
Can probably get another pair of limbs to allow them to hold a wand along with four swords, but that's it.
 
5 hours later…
13:27
@Draco-S That's actually why Greatswords might be better. Because then you need to compare 4 Shortswords to 4 Greatswords.
 
7 hours later…
20:06
@Baskakov_Dmitriy That's actually a good point. 4x Greatsword attacks at +9 (2d6+7) yield 33.6 DPR before increases. AND they're 17.5 DPH (per hit), so will go better through DR.
 
2 hours later…
21:56
Also saves us Double Slice
@Draco-S This build is actually very feat-agnostic.
You still need Double Slice to get full damage bonus for secondary attacks
@Baskakov_Dmitriy You will still consume all three feats at level 7 - Multiattack, Weapon Focus and Double Slice are all a must.
23:03
@Draco-S Since there is no case for TWF while actually holding a weapon with two hands, I'd assume that one can normally wield a GS with two off-hands for 1.5x STR damage. So you don't need Double Slice.
Also, saves some money on weapon enhancements. Someday you'll want +1 on your weapons.

« first day (11 days earlier)      last day (17 days later) »