@90intuition If you think you'd do a good job, then by all means nominate yourself. However, you may find that your low rep counts against you. For example, see this meta thread: meta.math.stackexchange.com/questions/9507/…
@90intuition In my opinion a moderator must know a lot of maths. A mod needs to be able to understand poorly posed questions on a vast, vast range of topics, needs to know enough maths to deal with wether or not to migrate certain questions which might be borderline mathematics/other subject, etc.
And I don't know nearly enough maths for that. Plus the community has a special hate for me because I'm so funny ^_^
And I wouldn't be impartial, to be honest. (Not that that would be bad, but people seem to want impartiality in a mod).
@J.M. Thank you for stating my view in this thread.
@Kasper Thank you for your support! (I've been getting that a lot; I'm certainly not dismissing a moderator position in the future at this point. Who knows?)
I vote for you if you know the answer of this puzzle: http://meta.math.stackexchange.com/questions/9408/2013-moderator-election-qa-question-collection/9512#9512
@90intuition Sorry, but this election is about as serious as this site gets. If you want to joke around, try the main chat; if you don't understand the significance of this election, please read up.