« first day (4294 days earlier)      last day (19 days later) » 

00:22
REFRESH! There are 5086 unanswered questions (93.4378 answered)
01:17
Paras, there is a code review Stackexchange site which may be helpful. I think a web search will find it. — Robert Dodier 2 mins ago
01:44
@RobertDodier Code Review is for only for code that works as intended. — pacmaninbw 57 secs ago
02:44
 
5 hours later…
07:26
0
Q: Depth-first ListIterator over JTree

SergeyI wrote a depth-first ListIterator for JTrees. Considerations: I wanted to avoid writing any loops, stay high-level and instead delegate as much as I can. Time complexity is more important for me than memory consumption. Drawbacks: (the most important one) It absolutely doesn't suit huge lazy ...

 
4 hours later…
11:26
What is your question? What did you expect? What happens instead? Please edit and tell us. If your code works, it's not a candidate for this site but could be asked on our sibling site Code Review, instead. — Friedrich 56 secs ago
12:10
0
Q: Trying Out DDD: How to enforce data integrity and immutability

koussay issaouiI've been transitioning from type-safe programming languages like Dart and Java to Python, and I'm trying to enforce Domain-Driven Design (DDD) principles in a language that naturally leans towards flexibility. The challenge is that Python's typing system is gradual—meaning it allows many potenti...

 
2 hours later…
14:29
Generic optimization questions tend to be off-topic here. Consider posting it to our sister site Code Review after reading their Help Center. — Anerdw just now
15:13
I voted to close this question: You asked for help with one issue: It hangs in isExecutorsAvailable(). The reason for that hang should be immediately obvious to anybody who reads the code, but besides that, I count five other reasons why this example cannot work at all, and four reasons why it might cause problems in a program that uses it, and nine other reasons why it should not pass even a casual code review. This is just not something that any other beginner needs to see, even if their problem somewhat matches the question that you asked. — Solomon Slow 45 secs ago
I voted to close this question: You asked for help with one issue: It hangs in isExecutorsAvailable(). The reason for that hang should be immediately obvious to anybody who reads the code (see the "hint" in my previous comment.) But besides that, I count five other reasons why this example cannot work at all, and four reasons why it might cause problems in a program that uses it, and nine other reasons why it should not pass code review. This just is not something that any other beginner needs to see, not even if they face a problem that somewhat matches the question that you asked. — Solomon Slow 21 secs ago
If the code works, but you want to improve the time complexity, it may be a candidate for Code Review. Be sure to look at their requirements and standards before posting there. — Old Dog Programmer 20 secs ago
15:52
@Duga Oh a seemingly good recommendation
16:36
Monking
17:15
Monking
17:45
@CaptainObvious TIL:
15
A: The [java-8] tag, here to stay?

rolfljava-8 should not be a full tag, but a synonym to java. Reasons: People tagging with java-8 will also need to tag with java anyway. Questions with Java8 will always need some text 'disclaimer' anyway: I wrote the following code with help of some Java 8 Maybe I've gotten a bit over e...

That takes me back.
18:47
Back when I was really active
Oh yes I even posted an answer on a meta post, means I was really really active
Actually.. am I the creator of that tag? I don't remember
apparently rolfl created java-8, Jamal creaetd java-9 and Michael K created the java tag
Java 8... oh, such a dream. Code has to be written to Java 6 specs (regardless of what JDK version we are using). At least it's not Java 1.4... Oh, and our project lead dislikes Joda. — Jason Feb 26, 2015 at 16:11
19:48
I remember when Python 3 was new enough to warrant a tag.
Python 2 took forever to die.
It's almost entirely completely dead now though.
If you're still stuck on it, I'll help you get upgraded.
20:35
@Mast I haven't been following Python at all, but that's good to hear!
I've been glancing over at C++20 modules but seems to be way too new
21:08
@Mast Have you migrated now? I recall you being one of the last

« first day (4294 days earlier)      last day (19 days later) »